AE911Truth Engineer Does for Free what NIST Couldn’t for Millions

[Scootle]

AE911Truth Engineer Does for Free what NIST Couldn’t for Millions
http://www.ae911truth.org/news/41-articles/321-ae911truth-engineer-does-for-free-what-nist-couldnt-for-millions.html



One of several burning questions surrounding the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 was: “Where did the sulfur come from that melted some of the structural steel members from the building so much that they looked more like 'Swiss cheese'?”

Some government officials have attempted to explain the issue away by alleging that the sulfur came from normal building materials like gypsum wallboard.

Scientists and engineers have urged the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to perform experiments to determine the source of the sulfur. But despite spending over $20,000,000 NIST failed to do any experiments or provide a working theory.

Enter Jonathan Cole, P.E., Civil Engineer, who has three keys to success: a desire to know the truth, a lot of determination, and a big back yard.  He wanted to know if normal building materials, including wallboard, diesel fuel, and aluminum, could release the sulfur needed to attack the steel. View the dramatic video of this creative no-holds-barred backyard experiment that proves, for free, what NIST could not, or would not, for $20 million.

9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw

[vlamingi]

I saw that too, and it was a great story.

I got into a debate the other day with a guy about 911 but I couldn't answer one of his questions......That was this;

How do you explain all the people on the planes and the telephone calls and all that stuff?

How can I debunk that?

[Scootle]

Ignore it. The phone call stuff is a controversial issue and just distracts from the hard science and documentation. Stick to the best evidence. Debunkers love it when you get into speculation.

[simpleblend]

Ignore it. The phone call stuff is a controversial issue and just distracts from the hard science and documentation. Stick to the best evidence. Debunkers love it when you get into speculation.

Exactly. Speculation is  beyond the point.

A common object I get from people is "Well, what's the motive?" "How would the government be that efficient?!" "How did they pull off all the logistics?!"

Calmly tell them that the people who protest the validity of the official story do not claim to know the answers to these questions. Furthermore, these questions are answered to the best of human ability in a formal Judicial court of law.

The point is, is we need to get the crime into an investigated court of law.

[jeremystalked1]

I saw that too, and it was a great story.

I got into a debate the other day with a guy about 911 but I couldn't answer one of his questions......That was this;

How do you explain all the people on the planes and the telephone calls and all that stuff?

Why bother explaining that?  There's no question that two planes crashed into those buildings.  Whether some or all of the people on those planes' passenger lists were actually not on those planes is unknowable, and a distraction.

The questions surrounding 9-11 (for starters!) should be, how did two planes take out three buildings; and how did those two buildings actually hit by the planes fall perfectly to the ground, as if rigged by a demolition crew?  If you can't get your audience to acknowledge the official story doesn't explain these things, why bother going any further?

[chris jones]

I saw that too, and it was a great story.

I got into a debate the other day with a guy about 911 but I couldn't answer one of his questions......That was this;

How do you explain all the people on the planes and the telephone calls and all that stuff?

How can I debunk that?

He switched channells on you.  The topic was the demoltion of the building and proof, you have it, tons of it, this story is but one-there are hundreds of back up- Check out the backlogs PP.
If that doesnt do it then this guy doesn't want the truth, there are plenty of this type running loose.