Continue exposing the Rockefeller False Flag cyber attack plans

[endof]

Simple as the title says, this should be the main term we focus on for a while, if we can keep this one up in the trends for a 1 week, 2 weeks, maybe even a month, just think how much damage it could do. They plan for a an attack to justify much greater control of the web? well lets keep exposing it.

Ive tracked many news stories that have been picking up on this, just from one day.

http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/tech-gadget/false-flag-cyber-attack-could-take-down-internet
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6360742-false-flag-cyber-attack-threatens-worldwide-internet
http://www.thenewsone.com/false-flag-cyber-attack/
http://supertrender.com/9862-false-flag-cyber-attack
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978384801
http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/07/21/false-flag-cyber-attack-risks/

theres quite a few more...not any msm's to name as of yet.

this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgvldEG-tLs
has some extracts from the CNN cyber shockwave shitpeice they did, some of the more worrying stuff like "lets get regular troops out, in the cities, in the infrastructure, nationalise the guard if governers wont go along with it" all casually discussed. Along with several more youtube videos, it seems this term has set a fire out there.

[creat3d]

Just so you know, most of these are automated news aggregators... some make sense, others are keyword-generated pages that exist probably for the sole reason to generate ad revenue off popular search terms...

[endof]

Just so you know, most of these are automated news aggregators... some make sense, others are keyword-generated pages that exist probably for the sole reason to generate ad revenue off popular search terms...

Exactly.

Im also seeing alot tech blogs and news pick it up, many news agencys use these when looking for stories, if we can keep the term up in the trends...

http://tech.spreadit.org/false-flag-cyber-attack/
http://www.xomba.com/false_flag_cyber_attack
http://habledash.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=794:rumors-looming-of-false-flag-cyber-attack-and-qdigital-pearl-harbor


but hell if you want to just give up, go for it. be defeatist.

[ericsnow]

Exactly.

Im also seeing alot tech blogs and news pick it up, many news agencys use these when looking for stories, if we can keep the term up in the trends...

http://tech.spreadit.org/false-flag-cyber-attack/
http://www.xomba.com/false_flag_cyber_attack
http://habledash.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=794:rumors-looming-of-false-flag-cyber-attack-and-qdigital-pearl-harbor


but hell if you want to just give up, go for it. be defeatist.

I'm pretty sure the term "false flag cyber" was blacklisted. So even if we get it back to volcanic level it wont appear in the top 20. Maybe we can go with "cyber false flag" and it will get through? Anywaywe really need to get motivated and focused and come together on this board. Like I said in another thread all it will take is 40 or 50 of us using the reload every 5 or 10 second add on feature in 2 or 3 tabs, and we could get 50,000+ searches per hour. I'm pretty sure that would crack the top 20 wouldn't it? I mean if we really work as a team we could literally take over google trends.

[creat3d]

but hell if you want to just give up, go for it. be defeatist.

What are you talking about? I'm not saying we should stop, I'm saying you linked to bogus automated websites and could've picked real ones instead.

I'm pretty sure the term "false flag cyber" was blacklisted. So even if we get it back to volcanic level it wont appear in the top 20. Maybe we can go with "cyber false flag" and it will get through? Anywaywe really need to get motivated and focused and come together on this board. Like I said in another thread all it will take is 40 or 50 of us using the reload every 5 or 10 second add on feature in 2 or 3 tabs, and we could get 50,000+ searches per hour. I'm pretty sure that would crack the top 20 wouldn't it? I mean if we really work as a team we could literally take over google trends.

While I agree we should take on it ourselves and choose the search terms on our own, even if all the active members of this board (which there are a lot but not enough) committed to it, it still would have no where near the effect of all of Alex's listeners doing it at the same time.

Remember we're competing with insane amounts of pointless, MSM-influenced, entertainment industry-dominated web searches here.