PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD

Author Topic: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD  (Read 16798 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kregener

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,728
PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« on: December 07, 2007, 05:15:54 pm »
PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD

by Alan Stang
December 7, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

Here we are again at the “day that will live in infamy.” I have a modest thought I have seen nowhere else. Let’s look at the horror again, through the eyes of Robert B. Stinnett, who spent seventeen years going through more than 200,000 documents and interviews about it. His book is Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor, New York, Touchstone (S & S), 2001.

It is crucially important to establish who Robert Stinnett is. In the early years after the devastating attack on Pearl Harbor, through one utterly phony “investigation” after another, Roosevelt’s Socialist idolaters swore up and down that he had known absolutely nothing about it. The possibilities that he knew it was coming and did nothing, or, even worse, that he conspired to arrange it, were labeled psychotic fantasies only a psychiatrist could call serious.

All these years later, however, so much slime has oozed forth that Roosevelt worshippers now stand up to their eyeballs in it. They can’t deny it. So, now they take a totally different position, a diametrically different position. Now they say, yes, Roosevelt knew about it, he even arranged it, because the American people at the time were too dumb to know they needed to be in the war – they needed a big enough shock to trick them into it – so Roosevelt arranged it for our own good.

And it is important to establish that Robert Stinnett is one of these people. He is not a “Roosevelt hater.” He idolizes Roosevelt. He is a decorated veteran of World War II and therefore, like other veterans of that nightmare, has considerable emotion invested in it. Here’s the way he puts it in the preface:

“As a veteran of the Pacific War, I felt a sense of outrage as I uncovered secrets that had been hidden from Americans for more than fifty years. But I understood the agonizing dilemma faced by President Roosevelt. He was forced to find circuitous means to persuade an isolationist America to join in a fight for freedom. He knew this would cost lives. How many, he could not have known.

“The country was disillusioned by the failure of America’s idealistic commitment to make ‘the world safe for democracy’ in World War I. Many Americans had chosen isolationism to shelter their young from the horrors of another war, and believed that Roosevelt would ‘not send their sons to fight in foreign wars.’ Roosevelt believed that his countrymen would rally only to oppose an overt act of war on the United States. The decision he made, in concert with his advisors, was to provoke Japan through a series of actions into an overt act: the Pearl Harbor attack.”

So the Stinnett book is what the criminal lawyers (even some lawyers who are not criminals) call an “admission against interest.” Notice that Stinnett even uses the telltale terminology of the world government crowd. He calls America’s wholesome, fervent desire to mind its own business “isolationism.”

But Stinnett, like your Intrepid Correspondent, is a news man. And like a Dalmatian in a fire house, he apparently could not help but respond to the bell. His book proves beyond even the remotest question – with an endless Niagara of evidence from the government itself – that Roosevelt conspired to arrange the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

A word should be said about Franklin Roosevelt. In World War I, he was Assistant Secretary of the Navy in the administration of Woodrow Wilson, who conspired with First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill to arrange for a German submarine to sink HMS Lusitania, a Royal Navy warship posing as a passenger liner.

Despite strenuous German warnings to passengers – even including newspaper ads – the conspirators continued the pretense, and used the ensuing outrage as a cause célèbre to trick the United States into the world government war. Roosevelt held that job for seven years. It is important to understand that he was a real expert on the U.S. Navy.

In 1932, he ran for President. He won by accusing Republican Herbert Hoover of perverting our system by creating big government, by inflicting scores of Socialist bureaucracies on the people, a charge that was true. The people elected Roosevelt because he promised to dismantle Hoover’s big government. Don’t take my word for that. Look at his campaign speeches. If I told you that some Ron Paul forerunner wrote them, you would believe me.

Roosevelt lied, of course. He never had any intention of doing what he said. His New Deal was simply more and bigger Herbert Hoover. Indeed, whenever the economy tried to revive, Roosevelt intervened with more and bigger warmed over Hoover – more programs, more agencies, more handouts, etc. – and it collapsed again. When war erupted, the U.S. economy was just about as bad as it was on Black Friday, 1929. See the unemployment numbers. One of Roosevelt’s “solutions” was to steal the people’s gold.

Now, let’s browse through the Stinnett book. Not only did FDR know about the Japanese attack, not only did he help arrange it, but he also had an eight-step plan to implement it. Throughout the book we learn, according to horse’s mouth Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, that Roosevelt said, “The United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act.”

In a weird replay of World War I, Churchill was again First Lord of the Admiralty, early in the war. By the fall of 1940, he was PM, and T. North Whitehead of the British Foreign Office, sent him a message from the United States: “America is not in the bag. However, the President is engaged in carefully calculated steps to give us full assistance.” (Preface)

One step in FDR’s treason plan kept our Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor, not on the West Coast. Vice Admiral James O. Richardson, commander in chief of that fleet, a true hero, strenuously disagreed, because at Pearl his men and the fleet would be in jeopardy. He was fired.

Page 17: “. . . A Gallup poll taken in early September showed that 88 percent of Americans agreed with the views of an isolationist bloc . . . that advocated staying away from Europe’s wars. . . .” So in 1940 a staggering 88 percent of the American people wanted no part of the war. Remember that in his reelection speeches that year, FDR swore up and down that he hated war, his wife hated war, even his dog, Fala, hated war, and he would not send American boys to fight in the war then raging in Europe.

Page 30-31: On January 26, 1941, Max W. Bishop, third secretary at the U.S. embassy, Tokyo, cables the State Department: Many sources say that “the Japanese military forces planned in the event of trouble with the United States, to attempt a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor using all of their military facilities. . . .” Remember, this is more than 10 months before the attack.

Page 31-32: Lt. Cdr. Arthur McCollum, author of Roosevelt’s eight point plan, head, Far East desk, Navy intelligence, sends as follows to Adm. Husband E. Kimmel, Richardson’s successor as new commander of the pacific fleet, on 2/1/41: “The Division of Naval Intelligence places no credence in these rumors. . . . . no move against Pearl Harbor appears imminent or planned for in the foreseeable future.”

Admiral Kimmel kept trying to get intelligence, but gradually became aware that Washington was withholding it. Of course, he could not have imagined why. Stinnett reports that by late July, 1941, he was cut off from intelligence completely.

One of the enduring Roosevelt Pearl Harbor myths says that Japanese naval forces never broke radio silence, so there was no way to know they were on their way to attack Pearl. Stinnett utterly buries that myth under a mountain of U.S. government documents. Admiral Yamamoto and other Japanese commanders broke radio silence again and again, even giving their route and location.

Roosevelt knew this because Navy intelligence had broken the Japanese code, but Washington withheld that fact from Kimmel. The U.S. Army commander at Pearl was General Walter Short. He intercepted Japanese messages but couldn’t decode them and sent them to Washington. Despite his pleas, Washington would not tell him what they said. Washington intercepted bomb plots at Pearl but did not tell Short.

Kimmel and Short did not learn until later that they were being set up as fall guys who would take the rap for the treason in progress. All of this was concealed in the phony post-war “investigations.” Key witnesses were not called. The conspirators falsified documents. They re-dated documents. Some documents that could not be falsified or re-dated simply disappeared.

Page 158: On 11/15/41, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall says in a secret press conference that we’ll be at war with the Japanese during the first ten days of December, 1941. But Marshall doesn’t bother telling this to Kimmel and Short! Washington told Short again and again to watch for sabotage, not for attack. Sabotage requires an entirely different kind of planning. Washington told our Pearl Harbor commanders the Japanese would attack the Philippines.

Page 186-87: Author Stinnett writes as follows: “None of the nine Pearl Harbor investigations examined the TESTM dispatches or questioned why their crucial data were cut from Kimmel’s intelligence loop. Since he was never told, the admiral could not raise the question in his own defense. . . . In April 1995, Congress . . . directed that the Department of Defense conduct an investigation. But the TESTM documents were not produced by the DOD, even though they had been released by the FOIA. Captain Duane Whitlock—one of America’s most honored and heroic code-breakers—was available to explain and identify the dispatches in both 1945 and 1995. He was never asked to testify.”

Page 203: Lt. Cdr. Joseph J. Rochfort, who commanded Station HYPO, Pearl Harbor, said later of our losses: “It was a pretty cheap price to pay for unifying the country.” I admit I do not understand this. As I read it and re-read it, my mouth falls open. The only way I can keep it in my head is to recognize that I am looking at an utterly different kind of mentality. Rochfort is a U.S. Navy officer. The price he says was pretty cheap was the mass murder of about 3,000 fellow Americans, many of them fellow U.S. Navy sailors.

As I write, I can see in mind’s eye the sailors trapped in the hull of a capsized battleship. It is dark, not just dark, but so dark they can’t see their fingers in front of their own nose. The water is rising. The air is running out. They tap on the hull. Some were rescued. Hundreds were not. The rescuers couldn’t get to them.

The tapping apparently continued for a couple of weeks. That’s right; it took two weeks for those sailors to die in the dark. Today they are entombed, still at Pearl. The movies have immortalized Rochfort as a hero. I would have hanged him. Of course, remember, I do not understand.

Loc.cit: “Seven Japanese naval broadcasts intercepted between November 28 and December 6 confirmed that Japan intended to start the war and that it would begin at Pearl Harbor. The evidence that poured into American intelligence stations is overpowering. All the broadcasts have one common denominator: none ever reached Admiral Kimmel. . . .”

P. 204: “There is not the slightest reason to believe that JN-25 or any other navy system contained anything that would have forecast the attack.” So says Lt. Cdr. Thos. Dyer, second in command to Rochfort as chief cryptographer at HYPO, in a letter to the author dated 6/4/83. But Station H Japanese radio intercepts make him a liar.

Page 208: Washington sent mutilated summaries to Kimmel in late November and early December. Yes, that is correct. We are talking about physical mutilation. More than 65 summaries were “crudely cut” to omit the information Admiral Kimmel needed. Page 226: On December 5, Tokyo sends two messages that war with U.S. would start on December 7. The messages were decoded immediately but not sent to Pearl.

Page 227-28: Tokyo sends a four part message starting on December 6 to Ambassador Kichisaburo Nomura in Washington, severing relations and instructing him to deliver it at 1 pm Sunday, the next day, December 7, which was 7:30 am in Pearl. U.S. intelligence intercepted, decoded and translated the message even before Nomura got it. So FDR, Marshall & Co. knew that at 7:30 am, Japan would take some hostile action. What would you do if you were Army Chief of Staff?

Page 228: Here is what Marshall did, says Robert Stinnett: “Instead of picking up his scrambler telephone and tipping off General Short to the 1:00 P.M. deadline, Marshall sent the warning to Hawaii using a combination of Western Union and RCA, a slower method. . . . It includes a later attempt to distance Pearl Harbor investigators from Marshall and the 1:00 P.M. deadline and involves coercion of a U.S. Army colonel to alter his testimony. It even reaches to post-surrender Germany in 1945 when that colonel, Rufus Bratton, was flagged down on the Berlin Autobahn and persuaded to ‘modify’ evidence against Marshall.”

FDR read all this Saturday night and said: “This means war.” Meanwhile, early Sunday morning, Colonel Bratton, who knew the attack was coming, but didn’t know the fix was in, desperately tried to find his boss, Marshall, who conveniently was out horseback riding. Bratton finally convinced Marshall he needed to go to his office, a ten minute trip. Marshall showed up an hour and fifteen minutes later.

Page 255: The Roberts Commission, named for Supreme Court Associate Justice Owen Roberts, conducted an “investigation.” Remember that the purpose of a federal investigation is to conceal and confuse the subject it is “investigating.” Sure enough, the commission was not allowed to see any evidence. Its report, issued on December 24, 1942, was not the Christmas present Short and Kimmel expected.

It absolved Marshall, another traitor President Stang would have hanged, and blamed Admiral Kimmel and General Short. Admiral James Richardson said: “It is the most unfair, unjust, and deceptively dishonest document ever printed by the Government Printing Office. I cannot conceive of honorable men serving on the commission without greatest regret and deepest feeling of shame.”

Stinnett says that four days after the attack, on December 11, Rear Adm. Leigh Noyes, U.S.N. director of communications, told his subordinates: “Destroy all notes or anything in writing.” Page 256: In 1945, Congress was denied access to those Japanese intercepts that would have proved Roosevelt knew. Admiral Ernest King threatened all Navy personnel who knew anything that, if they talked, they would lose all benefits and be imprisoned.

Page 302: From Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto: on November 25, 1941, To First Air Fleet (Pearl Harbor Attack Force) “The task force, keeping its movement strictly secret and maintaining close guard against submarines and aircraft, shall advance into Hawaiian waters, and upon the very opening of hostilities shall attack the main force of the United States fleet in Hawaii and deal it a mortal blow. . . .” That was just one of the intercepts.

So what do we have? Franklin Roosevelt was a liar, a swindler, a robber, a traitor and a mass murderer. Notice that after doing everything he could for a couple of years to provoke the Japanese to attack us, he could at least have warned Admiral Kimmel and General Short, who would have acted immediately to save American lives.

He didn’t because he wanted as many killed as possible to overcome the almost unanimous American desire to stay out of the war. Had “not enough” been killed, had not enough damage been done, the attack on Pearl Harbor would not have been sufficiently convincing to qualify as a casus belli; it would have remained what the diplomats call an “incident,” like the Chinese Communist attack on that U.S. Navy plane early in 2001. Again, it is hard for the normal man to understand the Roosevelt mentality. He was obviously a satanic monster who should have been hanged beside Marshall.

The subtitle of this piece says Pearl Harbor proves that Nine Eleven is a fraud. How can something that happened sixty years before Nine Eleven prove it? What elements do they share, other than the odd fact that both enemy attacks killed about the same number of people?

One of the official elements of Nine Eleven says federal collusion in that enemy attack is unthinkable, because to think it would logically enmesh many of the highest officials in our government. Well paid Washington mouthpieces have used that fact to ridicule any hint of collusion. Treason on such a scale is inconceivable, we are told.

But at Pearl Harbor we have the incontrovertible, undeniable fact, even applauded by their supporters, that top government officials – from the President of the United States on down – conspired to attack the United States. When you know that, it becomes perfectly thinkable that a future President could have participated in another such attack. Rather than a reason for derision, it becomes a speculation worth considering if the facts lead in that direction.

Secondly, one of the arguments designed to discredit any speculation about government collusion says that it couldn’t be possible because so many people would need to be involved and someone eventually would talk. There would be too many people in the plot to keep the secret, according to this argument.

But look at all the people we know for sure were involved in the Pearl Harbor conspiracy. On page 318 of the Stinnett book, there is a list of 36 Americans cleared to read all Japanese intercepts in 1941. Many more people were aware of or involved in elements of the conspiracy. No one talked.

Remember, the Navy threatened everyone who could have talked with loss of benefits, even prison. If someone had, who would have listened? Even today, all these years later, even after Robert Stinnett’s vacuum cleaner research, a host of documents are still sequestered. Maybe as many people kept the secret of Pearl as so far have kept the secret of Nine Eleven.

Here is an example you will recall that proves why premises are so important. There was a time when the four-minute mile was physically “impossible.” A man just couldn’t run that fast. But in the year after medical student Roger Bannister broke the four-minute mile, thirty seven other runners did so.

Can the excuses! Peel off the slime! Let’s nail the traitors who perpetrated Nine Eleven, whoever they are.

© 2007 - Alan Stang - All Rights Reserved

Going to church does not make you a Christian any more than going to a hospital makes you a doctor.

Stop thinking in terms of left and right and start thinking in terms of right and wrong

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR Stand-down order?
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2009, 02:41:08 am »
Thank you for a very thorough write-up on Pearl Harbor

Recently I found

 Lee, L. E., (Ed.) (1998).  World War II in Asia and the Pacific and the War's aftermath, with general themes: A handbook of literature and research, Greenwood Press. [Preview available at http://books.google.com]

pages 45-55 Chapter 3: The Japanese attack on Pearl Habor by Eugen L. Rasor
[Was there a stand down order? Was the CFR involved?]

page 124 provides information of the Anglo-Japanese alliance in 1902

-----

In 1905 the Emperor of Japan is accepted into the Royal Order of Garter.  Is it possible that ALL Japanese-foreign interactions were and are still sanctioned by this international alliance?
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR--Okinawa Stand-down
« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2009, 02:54:45 am »
What happened at the end of WWII?

Yu-wei, K. A. and L. G. Thompson (1936-2005). Ta' Tung Shu: The one-world philosophy of K'ang Yu-wei. This book was initially written in Chinese in the late 1800’s (Started around 1885-and completed in Chinese around 1905) It was translated into English in 1936, then republished in 1958 and 2005. It outlines the division of the world into 10 regions, including The Ryukyu Kingdom as one region.

U.S. Military (1995). GHQ/SCAP top secret records II. Tokyo: Kashishabo Publishing. This series of documents states that the U.N. wanted Okinawa as a Trusteeship
(The highest government official repeatedly sanctioned the separation of Okinawa from Japan. The majority of Okinawans wanted to be part of Japan. The CIA ran the Island from 1947, and are still very active today.)

Earl Frankin Bull. Okinawa or Ryukyu : The Floating Dragon, 1958.
This book reveals intricacies of the Okinawan society and filled with important data that is not generally known to the public, including that some important individuals in society had the foreknowledge of where the safer areas would be prior to the battle of Okinawa.

-----
 
- General MacArthur stated in his memoirs that the battles fought at the end of the war were all mismanaged, resulting in high loss in human lives on both sides.
 
- Prior to the Battle of Okinawa, the Japanese moved the 9th Army from Okinawa to join the 10th Army Taiwan, late 1944, to January 1945. The 9th Army was known as one of the best fighting units. Researchers are still questioning this move.
 
- The Americans walked onto unprotected, undefended beaches on April 1, 1945. As an afterthought, the Japanese military reported that the beaches should have been protected.
 
- An airport was constructed by thousands of Okinawans just prior to the battle. The undefended airport was immediately captured and secured by the Americans.
 
- Civilians on Okinawa were divided. The elites were mostly moved off the main island to Taiwan, northern Japan, and possibly other islands. Some talented people were told to move to the north part of the Island of Okinawa. The remaining poor civilians were in the  southern battle zone. They were told to fight the Americans with sticks and commit suicide rather than surrender. Japanese soldiers murdered Okinawan civilians.
 
- The American Commander on Okinawa, General Simon Bolivar Buckner, was inept. Bought from his recruit training position in Alaska, coordinated the effort which was questioned by many of his subordinates on Okinawa. Buckner was reportedly killed by a fragment of coral, which had entered his chest after a Japanese mortar landed nearby, on June 17/18 1945.
 
- Days later two Japanese Commanders on the Island committed suicide and the Battle was “officially” over on June 21, 1945.
 
Background:
 Nations have used foreign conflicts to manage domestic issues.

 Freemasons were getting a foothold in Japanese politics in the 1930s.

There was a eugenics program in place that promoted the sterilization of genetically inferior people. The wording appears to be very similar to the League of Nations’ eugenics proposal.

 Okinawans were of very low human capital value.

 Social disorder, Diaspora, and famine were driving people out of Okinawa since the 1890s.

 The Japanese left the League of Nations in 1934, however, continued to pay membership fees until 1938.

During the Cairo Conference on November 27, 1943, the Cairo Declaration intended to separate Okinawa from Japanese Mainland, once Japan had surrendered.
 
Okinawa was made a UN Trusteeship immediately after the surrender of Japan. This is a secret to most people, however, documents are open to the public (see GHQ/SCAP Top Secret Records).
 
Could we not conclude that the Alliance wanting to make The Ryukyu Kingdom (Okinawa) a separate world region is at least partially responsible for the genocide on Okinawa?

What happened to other parts of Japan after the war?
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2009, 03:17:36 am »
Publications related to Okinawa and the creation of a World Region

Angell, N. (1932). Popular education and international affairs. International Affairs
(Royal Institute of International Affairs 1931-1939), 11(3), 321-345.

Braibanti, R. J. D. (1953). The outlook for the Ryukyus. Far Eastern Survey, 22(7), 73-78.

Brook, J. (2005). Okinawa suicides and Japan's army: Burying the truth? Retrieved
www.nytimes.com/2005/06/20/international/asia/20okinawa.html?ex=1157515200&en=fc931071de18bbc8&ei=5070

Dettmar, H. G. (1961). Okinawa: An American or Japanese island? US Army War
College, Carlisle Barracks.

Goad, H. (1933). The corporate state. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International  Affairs 1931-1939), 12(6): 775-788.

Ishihara, M. (2006). The imperial army's operation disclosed in WWII in Okinawa, 5th
International Conference on Okinawan Studies: Imagined Okinawa: Challenges from Time and Space. Venice.

Kerr, G. (1953). Ryukyu Kingdom and Province before 1945. Pacific Science Board (US),  National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council (US).

King, N. D. (1964). Okinawa as subject and object of psychological warfare (draft). Paper presented at the Psychological Warfare Seminar, John Hopkins University.

Levi, W. (1950). Fundamentals of world organization. Minneopolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.

Miyake, H. (2001). Japan's information disclosure law and the future. www.foi-asia.org/Japan/Conf_keynotespeech.html

Nakamura, J. I. (1981). Human capital accumulation in premodern rural Japan. The Journal of Economic History, 41(2), 263-281.

Snyder, L. L. (1955). The world in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

U.S. Military (1995). Top secret allocation of SCAP staff responsibilities for execution of provision of directives contained in JCS 1380/15-3 Nov 1945. In GHQ/SCAP top secret records II vol. 1. Tokyo: Kashishabo Publishing.

Office of the Chief of Naval Operations: Navy Department. (1944). Civil affairs handbook Ryukyu (Loochoo) Islands OPNAV 13-31. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Navy Department.

Office of Public Affairs. (1962). The Ryukyu Islands--a report of progress. San
Francisco: Office of Public Affairs, Office of the High Commissioner.

UN Documents 1941-1945--available for download from: www.archive.org/details/unitednationsdoc031889mbp

The Invisible Government By Dan Smoot. The book can be downloaded from: www.gutenberg.org/files/20224/20224-h/20224-h.htm


Curtis, M. (1998). The great deception: Anglo-American power and world order. London: Pluto Press.

page 14... the US 'inevitably sought only limited, top-down forms of democratic change that not risk upsetting the traditional structures [15] of power with which the United States has long been allied'. Thus US policy was to support 'the basic order of ... quite undemocratic societies' and to avoid 'populist-based change' that might upset 'established economic and political orders' and open a leftist direction'. ref 27

The Family Jewels http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB222/index.htm states similar objectives in the NATIONAL SECURITY Political, Military, and Economic Strategies in the Decade Ahead report by the Hoover Institute in 1963. See pages 00604-00609.

Also, in The Family Jewels, I found reference to how foreign service agents come into societies, acculturate, get accepted, and stay as long as they can. I witnessed precisely this in Japan, it was very clear in Okinawa as well as in other parts of Japan. These people always seem to know what’s going on without much experience. The Freemasons are part of this strategy to get people into universities covertly, then, they act as spies and sleeper cells. This appears to be supported by the Invisible Government.

Japan is a Constitutional Monarchy. We are told that the Monarchy has no official powers? So, how do they control the nation?
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2010, 10:24:50 pm »
Pilot who dismissed Pearl Harbor radar bogeys dies at 96
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20100227a4.html
Saturday, Feb. 27, 2010
SAN DIEGO (AP)

An American pilot who dismissed initial reports of what turned out to be the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor has died at age 96.

Kermit Tyler was an Army Air Force first lieutenant on temporary duty at Ft. Shafter's radar information center in Hawaii on Dec. 7, 1941, when two privates reported seeing an unusually large blip on their radar screen, indicating a large number of aircraft about 210 km away and fast approaching.

"Don't worry about it," Tyler famously replied, thinking it was a flight of U.S. B-17 bombers that was due in from the mainland.


The aircraft were the first wave of more than 180 Japanese fighters, torpedo bombers, dive bombers and horizontal bombers whose surprise attack on Pearl Harbor shortly before 8 a.m. plunged the United States into World War II.

Many questioned his decision for years, and the 1970 movie "Tora! Tora! Tora!" portrayed him in an unflattering light. Audiences watching a documentary at the Pearl Harbor Visitors Center theater still groan when they hear Tyler's response to the radar report.

Daniel Martinez, Pearl Harbor historian for the National Park Service, said Tyler's role was misunderstood and that congressional committees and military inquiries that looked into what happened at Pearl Harbor did not find him at fault.

He said a flight of B-17s flying in from Hamilton Field north of San Francisco was indeed due to land at Hickam Field.

"Kermit Tyler took the brunt of the criticism, but that was practically his first night on the job, and he was told that if music was playing on the radio all night, it meant the B-17s were coming in," Martinez said

The music played all night so the B-17 pilots could home in on the signal, and when he heard the music as he was driving to work, Tyler figured the aircraft would be coming in soon.

"I wake up at nights sometimes and think about it," Tyler said in a 2007 interview with the Star-Ledger of Newark, N.J. "But I don't feel guilty. I did all I could that morning."

Tyler, who suffered two strokes within the last two years, died Jan. 23 at his home in San Diego, said his daughter, Julie Jones.

After Pearl Harbor, Tyler flew combat missions in the Pacific.

---

Congressional Record on Pearl Harbor Prior Knowledge http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=3537.0

PEARL HARBOR: MOTHER OF ALL CONSPIRACIES http://www.prisonplanet.com/pearl_harbor_mother_of_all_conspiracies.htm

Thoughts about 9/11 on Pearl Harbor Day http://www.prisonplanet.com/thoughts-about-911-on-pearl-harbor-day.html

The McCollum Memo: The Smoking Gun of Pearl Harbor http://www.prisonplanet.com/the_mccollum_memo.htm

Webster G. Tarpley Debunks Pearl Harbor Myths (And British Spy Ring EXPOSED) http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=88303.0

Hirohito (Japan) Attacked Pearl Harbor because the Bitish Crown ORDERED HIM TO! http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=150571.0
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2010, 03:39:43 pm »
Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy
http://mises.org/store/Pearl-Harbor-The-Seeds-and-Fruits-of-Infamy-P10391.aspx

A president faced an economic depression that wouldn't go away, and a deeply disgruntled electorate. Not for the first or last time, the option of entering a war seemed politically appealing. How badly did FDR want a war and to what lengths was he willing to go to get one? The questions have vexed historians for many decades.

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy by Percy Greaves, Jr. (1906-1984), published for the first time in 2010, blows the top off a 70-year cover-up, reporting for the first time on long-suppressed interviews, documents, and corroborated evidence.

The first section (the seeds) provides a detailed history of pre-war U.S.-Japan relations, thoroughly documenting the sources of rising tension. The second section (the fruits) shows that the attack on December 7, 1941 was neither unexpected nor unprovoked. Nor was it the reason that Franklin Roosevelt declared a war that resulted in massive human slaughter. Instead, in exhaustive detail, this book establishes that Pearl Harbor was permitted as a public relations measure to rally the public, shifting the blame from the White House, where it belonged, to the men on the ground who were unprepared for the attack.

For 70 years, Greaves's documents have been the primary source of revisionist scholarship on Pearl Harbor. These documents were prepared under his leadership as main counsel for the Republican minority on the Joint Congressional Committee that investigated Pearl Harbor from 1945 to 1946.

More than any other person, he was qualified to speak on this subject. He possessed encyclopedic knowledge and had access to research available to no one else. He conducted in-person, detailed, comprehensive interviews with all the main players at Pearl Harbor and many people in the security apparatus. The contents of these interviews are further corroborated by military records.

However, for many reasons, the documents were not published. He continued to work on this book for many years before his death in 1984. At that point, his wife Bettina Bien Greaves took up the project. The result is absolutely astonishing.

Much of Greaves’s research has never appeared in print—effectively suppressed for 70 years. Even the censored minority report did not include it all. But at long last, the fullness of this report is revealed. The result is this monumental book, completed and edited by Bettina Greaves and published by the Mises Institute. Pearl Harbor is a 937-page indictment of the Roosevelt administration, one that finally and devastatingly rips the lid off a case that has been shrouded in mystery for generations.

Because of the astonishing source material and thoroughness of the argument, Robert Stinnett, the leading authority on the topic and the author of Day of Deceit, calls Greaves's book "explosive!"

Indeed, it is. The author writes in a guarded tone, carefully backing up every statement with massive evidence, provided in a level of depth never before seen. The prevailing consensus is that the fault for Pearl Harbor attack belongs to General Walter Short and Admiral Husband Kimmel, while the major political and military figures in Washington should be completely exonerated.

Greaves turns this conventional wisdom on its head. "It is now apparent also that the president himself, even before the attack, had intended to order the U.S. armed forces to make a pre-emptive strike against the Japanese in the southwest Pacific in order to assist the British in southeast Asia. But the Japanese 'jumped the gun' on him by bombing Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941."

Greaves's conclusion is dramatic: "It must be said also that the evidence revealed in the course of the several investigations leads to the conclusion that the ultimate responsibility for the catastrophe inflicted on the U.S. Fleet at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, must rest on the shoulders of President Roosevelt.... It was thanks to Roosevelt’s decisions and actions that an unwarned, ill-equipped, and poorly prepared Fleet remained stationed far from the shores of the continental United States, at a base recognized by his military advisers as indefensible and vulnerable to attack.... Thus the attack on Pearl Harbor became FDR’s excuse, not his reason, for calling for the United States’s entry into World War II."

Greaves provides comprehensive coverage here on the history of U.S. and Japanese relations, the actions of the Roosevelt administration, the attack and the response on the ground, the investigations and cover-ups that began almost immediately and continue to this day. Today the "back-door-to-the-war" theory has become mainstream historiography, even if those who admit it say that the lies were necessary for the good of the country. That is a difficult opinion to maintain in the face of the fullness of the evidence against FDR.

It is a remarkable fact that Greaves, who later became a close confidant of Mises himself throughout the 1950s and 1960s, and who is known mainly for his monetary work, has left us an amazing revelation 70 years after the fact and 26 years after his own death. It is proof that the wheels of justice can grind slowly but also very finely.

    “Percy Greaves was chief of the minority (Republican) research staff of the (1945-1946) Joint Congressional Committee to Investigate the Pearl Harbor Attack. He attended all its hearings, interviewed many Army, Navy, and Washington principals involved in the attack and in the investigations. He researched diplomatic documents, studied reports and accounts of the event published during the years that followed. This book is not about the attack itself. It is about never before presented pre-attack and post-attack events, from the Washington point of view. Without name-calling, innuendo, or slander, Greaves simply presents the pertinent, significant and relevant facts which led the Japanese to attack and the political administration to want to cover-up its involvement.” - Bettina Bien Greaves

937 pages, Hardcover, 2010, 6x9, ISBN: 978-1-933550-33-6
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline philip

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2010, 08:06:51 pm »
I've read a couple of the 'Roosevelt allowed Pearl Harbor to happen' books.  I always questioned how the trade polices came to be that basically forced Japan's options into a crisis situation.  USA aided Britain and cut-off the Japanese. 

What I need to know in order to convince me that Roosevelt desired war:
    1.)  The trade agreements did not stipulate that they were to be rendered void upon certain conditions being met and, 
     2.)  How is it that Roosevelt was sitting there knowing that JP Morgan caused the Depression with one hand and was helping to build up the Fascists with the other and couldn't envision the opportunity to kick the shit out of the people that had been causing America grief since she was started?
     
My point is that FDR knew who the FED RES was.  He knew who's interest it served and FDR hated them royal bastards, and they knew it.  I see the English/American WW II relationship sort of as that of in-laws on a camp out.  Now, Teddy Roosevelt was the fuktard athlete eugenicist bad ass cowboy president.  FDR was kool and actually whipped the globalists ass-  just like Washington.  Anyhow FDR died and Truman gave America the UN and the CIA as a victory present.  Now patriotism means war.  It used to mean the love of liberty.

I thought FDR played the war as well as possible also.  Held back our troops as long as possible to let Russia and Germany do what Socialist geniuses do best- kill their fellow man. 
Adding up the increments

Offline chrisfromchi

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,181
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2010, 08:11:07 pm »
wanna know what the big summer movie of 2001 was?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr6pVUv9cJQ

exactly.


Offline dragnet53

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2010, 02:33:18 pm »
Back in Roosevelt's time you could fool anybody. Just watch Paper Moon and see for yourself.

But yeah, I don't buy the Pearl Harbor incident especially when our Carrier's were on 'patrol' that day.

Offline TonkaTim

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2010, 03:01:23 pm »
I've read a couple of the 'Roosevelt allowed Pearl Harbor to happen' books.  I always questioned how the trade polices came to be that basically forced Japan's options into a crisis situation.  USA aided Britain and cut-off the Japanese. 

What I need to know in order to convince me that Roosevelt desired war:
    1.)  The trade agreements did not stipulate that they were to be rendered void upon certain conditions being met and, 
     2.)  How is it that Roosevelt was sitting there knowing that JP Morgan caused the Depression with one hand and was helping to build up the Fascists with the other and couldn't envision the opportunity to kick the shit out of the people that had been causing America grief since she was started?
     
My point is that FDR knew who the FED RES was.  He knew who's interest it served and FDR hated them royal bastards, and they knew it.  I see the English/American WW II relationship sort of as that of in-laws on a camp out.  Now, Teddy Roosevelt was the fuktard athlete eugenicist bad ass cowboy president.  FDR was kool and actually whipped the globalists ass-  just like Washington.  Anyhow FDR died and Truman gave America the UN and the CIA as a victory present.  Now patriotism means war.  It used to mean the love of liberty.

I thought FDR played the war as well as possible also.  Held back our troops as long as possible to let Russia and Germany do what Socialist geniuses do best- kill their fellow man. 

The Atlantic Charter is all I need to understand that FDR was a key insider.

"The Atlantic Charter was a statement agreed between Britain and the United States of America. It was intended as the blueprint for the postwar world after World War II, and turned out to be the foundation for many of the international agreements that currently shape the world. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the post-war independence of British and French possessions, and much more are derived from the Atlantic Charter."


This was drafted in June of 1941, 6 months prior to Pearl Harbor.

To me it is THE smoking gun in FDR's hand.

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR--Okinawa Stand-down
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2011, 10:42:27 pm »
- Civilians on Okinawa were divided. The elites were mostly moved off the main island to Taiwan, northern Japan, and possibly other islands. Some talented people were told to move to the north part of the Island of Okinawa. The remaining poor civilians were in the  southern battle zone. They were told to fight the Americans with sticks and commit suicide rather than surrender. Japanese soldiers murdered Okinawan civilians.

'Okinawa Notes' suit favors Oe
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110423b1.html
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Kyodo

The Supreme Court said Friday it has finalized the judgment in favor of Nobel Prize-winning novelist Kenzaburo Oe in a libel suit filed against him and his publisher for writing in a 1970 book of essays that the Japanese military forced civilians to kill themselves and others en masse during the Battle of Okinawa.
In its Thursday ruling, the court turned down an appeal from two plaintiffs who claimed in the 2005 suit that Oe's depiction disgraces two garrison commanders they represent and sought an injunction to block further printing of the book.

But the top court's five-justice First Petty Bench did not touch on whether the military issued an order for civilians to commit mass suicide, unlike lower courts that found the military was involved and thus adjudged Oe's descriptions as not defamatory.

The plaintiffs are Yutaka Umezawa, 94, the former military garrison commander on Zamami Island in Okinawa, and a younger brother of the late Yoshitsugu Akamatsu, who was the garrison commander on nearby Tokashiki Island.

Justice Yu Shiraki, who presided over the trial, said the plaintiffs discussed only factual errors and violations of the law that do not satisfy the requirements for an appeal to the Supreme Court, such as a violation of the Constitution.

The plaintiffs filed the suit against Oe, 76, and Iwanami Shoten Publishers in August 2005, seeking to halt the publication of his book of essays "Okinawa Notes," which they claim "wrongly" states that the garrison officers ordered civilians to commit mass suicide on the two islands.

Studies estimate that about 600 to 700 residents killed themselves, and others, by detonating grenades distributed by the military or clubbing each other with spades and sticks around March 25 to 28 during the Battle of Okinawa in 1945.

In "Okinawa Notes," Oe, quoting a third-party publication on the battle, states that the tragedy stemmed from military orders urging civilians to commit mass murder-suicide so as not to hamper Japanese troops fighting U.S. forces and also to ensure troops had enough food.

In March 2008, the Osaka District Court rejected the suit, ruling the Imperial army was deeply involved in the civilian killings, a decision upheld seven months later by the Osaka High Court.

The Japan Times: Saturday, April 23, 2011
(C) All rights reserved
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2011, 10:56:44 pm »
June 20, 2005
Okinawa Suicides and Japan's Army: Burying the Truth?
www.nytimes.com/2005/06/20/international/asia/20okinawa.html?_r1&ex=1157515200&en=fc931071de18bbc8&ei=5070
By JAMES BROOKE

ITOMAN, Okinawa, June 17 - Clutching a hand grenade issued by the Japanese Imperial Army and driven by tales of what American soldiers would do with a pretty young woman, Sumie Oshiro recalled recently, she fled into the forests of Okinawa during the World War II battle known here as the "typhoon of steel."

"At one place, we sat together and hit the grenade on the ground, but it did not explode," she recalled of her flight with friends after Japanese soldiers told them to kill themselves rather than be taken captive. "We tried to kill ourselves many times, trying to explode the grenade we were given from Japanese Army."

The three-month battle for Okinawa took more than 200,000 lives - 12,520 Americans, 94,136 Japanese soldiers, and 94,000 Okinawan civilians, about one-quarter of the prewar population. Lt. Gen. Robert Blackman, commander of the United States Marines in Japan, led a low-profile memorial ceremony on Friday, attended largely by American war veterans and relatives.

This Thursday, the 60th anniversary of the battle here, the last major one of World War II, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi is to attend Japan's tribute here. [On Sunday he led a memorial service in Iwo Jima, a Japanese island where fighting ended in March 1945, just as the invasion here began.]

Okinawa's trauma over what happened here after 545,000 American troops attacked this small archipelago is still deep. People here on Japan's southernmost islands want more recognition from Japanese society for their sufferings. But that wish collides with a growing nationalist effort to airbrush the past.

After winning battles to play down Japan's war-era history of forcing Asian women to work in military-run brothels and Asian men to work in Japanese factories and mines, Nobukatsu Fujioka, a nationalist educator, started campaigning two weeks ago to delete from schoolbooks statements that soldiers ordered civilians here to choose suicide over surrender. But he said there were no such orders. "I confirmed this by hearing people this time," he said. "People claimed that there was an order by Japanese Army because they wanted to get pension for the bereaved."

Okinawa's anguish over the widespread civilian suicides has been sharpened by the deep belief here that soldiers from Japan's main islands encouraged Okinawan civilians to choose suicide. In a display at the Okinawa Prefectural Peace Memorial Museum, a spotlight highlights a glinting bayonet held by a fierce looking Japanese soldier who stands over an Okinawan family huddled in a cave, the mother trying to smother her baby's cries.

"At the hands of Japanese soldiers, civilians were massacred, forced to kill themselves and each other," reads the caption. Nearby, a life-size photo shows the grisly aftermath of a family killed by a hand grenade.


Soldiers seeking refuge from the naval shelling forced civilians out of limestone caves and, during the fighting, out of the island's turtle-back shaped tombs, according to captions. About two weeks into the battle, the Japanese military commander sought to suppress spying by banning the speaking of Okinawan dialect, a version of Japanese often unintelligible to nonresidents. Armed with this order, Japanese soldiers killed about 1,000 Okinawans, according to local historians.

Two mainstream Japanese history textbooks from the 1990's that talk of Japanese soldiers "coercing" civilians to kill themselves are on display. Now, Okinawans fear that this history will be dropped from the national consciousness.

"In many cases, hand grenades, which were in extreme shortage, were distributed to residents," Masahide Ota, an Okinawan who fought here in a unit called the Blood and Iron Student Corps, said in an interview on Friday. "I heard people say they were told by the military to commit suicide using the grenades rather than becoming captives."

Mr. Ota, who surrendered four months after the fighting ended here, went on to become a leading local historian, then Okinawa's governor, from 1990 to 1998. Now, at age 80, he represents the prefecture in Japan's upper house of Parliament.

Okinawans fear that the lack of a written suicide order by Japanese commanders will prompt editors of Japanese history textbooks to drop all mention of the military indoctrination that, as a wartime slogan put it, "soldiers and civilians had to live and die together."

On Geruma Island, Takejiro Nakamura was one such civilian, a 15-year-old student when the American invasion started.

"For a long time, the Japanese Imperial Army announced that, on other islands, the women had been raped and killed, and the men were tied at the wrists and tanks were driven over them," said Mr. Nakamura, now a guide at a museum housed in a traditional dwelling that bears bullet holes from the American attack. As Japanese defenses crumbled on the island in late March 1945, 56 of the 130 residents committed suicide, he said. Fleeing with family and neighbors, he said, he passed one cave where 10 villagers had killed themselves.

"I heard my sister calling out, 'Kill me now, hurry,' " Mr. Nakamura said, recalling how his 20-year-old sister panicked at the approach of American soldiers. His mother took a rope and strangled her.

"I tried to also strangle myself with a rope," he recalled, lifting his now weather-beaten hands to his neck. "But I kept breathing. It is really tough to kill yourself."

Minutes later, the Americans took them captive.


"The U.S. soldier touched me to check if I had any weapons," he recalled. "Then he gave us candy and cigarettes. That was my first experience on coming out of the cave."

His mother lived into her 80's.

"We talked about the war," Mr. Nakamura said. "But to the end, she never once talked about killing her daughter."
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline jerryweaver

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,592
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2011, 12:27:43 am »
I met this dude while out drankin likker. He said his granddad was in pearl harbor that day and was a maintenance guy for the air force. Said they were told to pull all the guns from the planes and r&r the guns. He said they could not defend the air attack because the planes were disarmed. Anybody else hear of this?
For as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom — for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
From The Declaration of Arbroath 132

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #13 on: April 24, 2011, 12:00:46 am »
I met this dude while out drankin likker. He said his granddad was in pearl harbor that day and was a maintenance guy for the air force. Said they were told to pull all the guns from the planes and r&r the guns. He said they could not defend the air attack because the planes were disarmed. Anybody else hear of this?

Now, wouldn't that be a surprise.

Next they'll be reports of demolition teams seen rigging the boats just hours prior to the "attack".

I like to see this documented somewhere!
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4

Offline Okinawa

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,068
  • Sai On 蔡温
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2012, 07:21:26 am »
BBC: Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p1TOA99S88&feature=player_embedded

Prison Planet link
The American and British Governments Knew – Down to the Day – of the Coming Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor … And Let It Happen to Justify American Entry Into WWII
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-american-and-british-governments-knew-–-down-to-the-day-–-of-the-coming-japanese-attack-on-pearl-harbor-…-and-let-it-happen-to-justify-american-entry-into-ww
When we give up learning we have no more troubles. Lao Tzu

Sai On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sai_On

Sai On: Okinawa's Sage Reformer www.amazon.com/Saion-Okinawas-sage-reformer-introduction/dp/B0006CKRU0

Unspeakable Things www.personal.psu.edu/gjs4


Offline TahoeBlue

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,278
Re: PEARL HARBOR, PROVES 9-11 FRAUD
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2013, 11:55:04 am »
bump dec 7 2013