PrisonPlanet Forum
May 18, 2013, 10:51:30 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Yes!!!! Rand Paul cancels General Electric's Dog and Pony Show!  (Read 11986 times)
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #40 on: May 21, 2010, 07:21:40 PM »

Felons on the Air
Does GE's Ownership of NBC Violate the Law?

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1254
November/December 1994
By Sam Husseini

General Electric's ownership of the NBC TV network has been in the news in recent months. As Extra! went to press, companies like Time Warner, Disney, ITT and Turner Broadcasting have reportedly been negotiating to either buy NBC outright or enter into some kind of partnership with GE. But a little-noted aspect of communications law raises questions about GE's ownership of NBC's broadcast licenses -- and its ability to sell those licenses to another company.

Shady Characters

The Federal Communications Act of 1934 created the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the airwaves, which are considered public property. The act states that the FCC should assess the "character...of the applicant to operate the station," and ensure that the "public interest...would be served by the granting" of a license.

Despite a general decline in the FCC's enforcement of the public interest aspect of this law, there is at least one factor that the FCC still considers before granting a license: whether the applicant has committed a felony.

In 1989, Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, complained of FCC laxness in examining felons (Broadcasting, 1/1/90); his office said the policy "represents one of the excesses of the last eight years." This apparently led the FCC to issue a statement saying it would "consider all felony convictions," as well as "misdemeanors in certain circumstances," as factors in granting or renewing broadcast licenses. This announcement toughened a policy that had been weakened in 1985.

Shortly thereafter, the FCC revoked the broadcast license of WFXL-TV in Georgia because the license-holder was an individual convicted of laundering drug money. The FCC also denied the licensee's appeals to be able to sell the station, forcing him to forfeit his investment (Broadcasting, 8/12/91).

Not all felons have been treated so harshly. Alan Gottlieb, an anti-environmental, pro-gun activist who helped raise money for the 1988 Bush/Quayle campaign, was convicted of tax evasion in the mid-'80s. Though he was denied a gun permit for a time, he was granted the license for KBNP in Portland, Ore. in 1989.

Gottlieb, who also owns a chunk of the Talk America radio network, told Extra! that he disclosed his felony conviction to the FCC, but they still allowed him to purchase the station; apparently he convinced the FCC that his felony was due to a record-keeping mistake. To Gottlieb's knowledge, no one has contested his license.

A corporation, like an individual, can also lose its license on character grounds. "If you're going to permit corporate licenses in the first place -- which is questionable -- you've got to apply the same standard" to corporations and individuals, former FCC commissioner Nicholas Johnson told Extra!.

Broadcasting reported in 1991 (3/25/91) that "the FCC was considering holding license revocation hearings" for WNCN-FM in New York after its parent company, GAF, was convicted of securities fraud. The FCC dropped the matter after the conviction was overturned on appeal.

Even without a felony conviction, a corporate entity can lose its license because of character questions. In a prolonged case, the FCC decided not to renew the licenses of 14 of the TV and radio stations owned by RKO General, a subsidiary of General Tire (now GenCorp). "The FCC decision was not based on the quality of broadcast service...but on the question of RKO's corporate integrity," Fortune noted (4/21/80). "General Tire was maintaining slush funds for such uses as improper overseas payments and questionable campaign contributions," Time later reported (8/24/87), and "allegedly filed false and misleading financial statements." Of particular concern was RKO's lack of candor in reporting these wrongdoings to the FCC.

RKO was stripped of one station (Boston's WNAC-TV) without compensation,and was forced to sell other stations for less than full market value, resulting in major financial losses.

Citizen GE

These cases would pale in significance if the FCC applied the "character question" to NBC's parent. As the owner of the network, GE controls the licenses for NBC's six owned-and-operated TV affiliates. These stations,located in key markets, are worth an estimated $2.5 billion.

But these assets could be threatened if the FCC ruled that GE's criminal record -- including a host of fraud, environmental, financial and employment violations -- made the corporation unfit to hold broadcasting licenses. (See Extra!, 6/92.) As William Greider writes (Rolling Stone, 4/16/92), "Citizen GE practices its everyday politics unhindered by its status as a convicted felon."

When GE acquired NBC's licenses, the rules were somewhat looser. On Dec. 10, 1985, the FCC relaxed the policy on character qualifications, declaring that a large corporation could be held responsible for felonies only if the heads of the corporation or those directly involved in the broadcasting aspect were the wrongdoers. The very next day, GE announced it would buy NBC's parent, RCA, for $6.2 billion. (The timing, of course, was completely coincidental -- as was the fact that GE chair Jack Welch was an old friend of then-President Ronald Reagan, who had gotten his start in politics largely thanks to GE.)

GE was a direct beneficiary of the new FCC policy, as an AP report noted the following year (6/5/86):

Acting for the first time under a new policy on judging the "character" of broadcast licensees, the commission determined there was no reason to deny the license transfers because GE had rehabilitated itself [since pleading guilty to fraud charges in 1985] and convinced the government it had taken steps to insure that similar violations would not happen again.


GE's Rap Sheet

But despite the FCC's faith in GE's redemption, the corporation has returned to its criminal ways repeatedly since it took over NBC. A partial sampling of its rap sheet since then:

In 1990, GE was "convicted of defrauding the Defense Department by overcharging the Army for a battlefield computer system." (Fortune, 9/5/94) GE paid $30 million in criminal and civil fines.

In 1992, GE "pleaded guilty to charges of fraud, money laundering and corrupt business practices in connection with its sale of military jet engines to Israel," the Washington Post reported (7/23/92). "Bob Pettit, general counsel to the FCC, said today that such convictions are 'relevant' for the commission to consider, but do not result in automatic loss of license," the paper noted.

GE currently faces anti-trust charges "of a scheme by GE executives to rig prices with DeBeers Consolidated Mines, the secretive South African cartel that controls much of the world's diamond production." (Fairfield County Business Journal, 5/25/92)

Most recently have come revelations of illegal reporting at Kidder Peabody, GE's investment subsidiary, which resulted in the dismissal of Kidder CEO Michael Carpenter -- who was brought in from another GE division by Welch in 1989 to put Kidder in order. "Like it or not, the scandals at Kidder Peabody were brought on by GE's management," Fortune asserted (9/5/94).

A February 1994 report of the Project on Government Oversight found that GE had 16 instances of fraudulent activity against the government since 1990 -- the most of any company listed (Daily Citizen, 3/14/94). Such revelations led Russell Mokhiber, editor of Corporate Crime Reporter, to note, "If the law were 15 strikes and you're out, GE would be banned."

The FCC is particularly concerned with questionable activity before other government agencies, since this might indicate a willingness to deceive the FCC. Despite GE's unsavory record, formal challenges have rarely been made to its ownership of the NBC licenses. Such cases were to be raised in a hearing against NBC by National Capital Communications Inc., which was filing a competing application for WRC-TV, NBC's D.C. affiliate. But NBC and NCCI made a deal whereby NBC would pay $295,000 (ostensibly for legal costs) to NCCI, in return for NCCI dropping its challenge Television Digest, 5/24/93).

"The Price They Ought to Pay"

In the past, the FCC has ruled that non-broadcast legal cases against GE "raise no substantial and material question" as to NBC's qualifications to own its licenses. (See Communications Daily, 3/5/92). But this was under an FCC with a more conservative cast, and preceded the somewhat toughened 1990 character policy. As things stand, "the FCC's rules on the subject are vague about what impact wrongdoing by one corporate subsidiary has on another," Electronic Media reports (7/27/92).

Any sale of NBC's licenses has to be approved by the FCC. This may give the agency (and anyone seeking to challenge NBC's licenses) an additional opportunity to review GE's fitness to own the outlets in the first place. Any action by the FCC against GE would likely result in a prolonged court battle, but could prove disastrous for GE should it lose.

GE maintains that it should not be held responsible for the actions of rogue employees. But Greider, in his book Who Will Tell the People, writes that this argument is disingenuous, given GE's "high-pressure management culture":

GE first turns up the heat on its line managers by creating a climate of purposeful insecurity -- everyone's job is at risk if his or her division's profit performance lags. Then, when division managers in the field are caught in false billings and other forms of profiteering, GE piously disavows them as "miscreant employees."


The Washington Post (7/23/92) noted that

some disaffected former employees contended that GE's relentless competitive drive to dominate markets and increase profits fostered a climate in which some managers decided to cut corners to preserve their careers.


Says retired FCC commissioner Nicholas Johnson of the culpability of parent corporations like GE for illegal activity by subsidiaries: "If you're going to allow conglomerate licenses -- something that was prevented in the case of ITT [which tried to buy ABC] in 1967 -- this ought to be part of the price these guys ought to pay."

"Bozos and Thieves"

GE/NBC's potential vulnerability on this question has apparently been used for less than principled reasons. In 1989, Broadcasting Magazine (4/3/89) announced that "NBC will soon have a competitor for Ted Turner's CNN with CNBC," a cable channel that was originally conceived as carrying round-the-clock news. Shortly thereafter, Ted Turner attacked GE as "the most corrupt corporation in America," It was run by "bozos" and "thieves" who have been "indicted and admitted to stealing from the Pentagon" (Electronic Media, 4/13/89). Turner declared: "These crooks, these convicted felons, should be behind bars."

After hearing this implicit threat -- and after getting a cold shoulder from TCI, the nation's largest cable systems operator, which owns part of CNN -- GE decided that CNBC would become merely a financial and talk outlet rather than an all-news channel, thus preserving CNN's monopoly.

Curiously, one of the few outlets to have noted what it called GE's "Litany of Sins" was Fortune, which ran a cover story (9/5/94) about trading scandals at GE's Kidder Peabody division. This issue was on the newsstands when information that Time Warner (which owns Fortune) was considering buying NBC was first reported.

The complicated politics of broadcast ownership make it questionable whether Time Warner was trying to leverage GE in the Ted Turner fashion. Time Warner has reportedly proposed that GE would keep a majority stake in NBC's affiliates in any deal, since the FCC would (for now) frown on Time Warner, a major cable operator, acquiring broadcast outlets.

Still, it's odd to see Time Warner's Fortune complaining about corporate synergy: "When the Kidder scandal came to a head in June, GE went on CNBC, which it owns, to respond," the September 5 cover story noted.

Vulnerable Media

GE is not the only media company vulnerable to the "character" issue. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. has been charged by the FCC with "either carelessness or recklessness" for failing to disclose a fraud settlement. (See sidebar.)

Turner ally TCI, which benefited from GE's backing down on CNBC, faces similar license problems; although its cable systems are not licensed by the FCC, TCI relies on FCC-regulated licenses to maintain its national system. A TCI anti-trust conviction led to a license challenge from the non-profit Media Access Project; TCI managed to hold on to its broadcast licenses, but had to pay the Media Access Project $50,000 in attorneys' fees (Multichannel News, 6/10/91).

And after the Wall Street Journal (1/27/92) ran an article headlined "Cable Cabal," which tracked a series of insider stock transactions by TCI Chair Robert Magness and CEO John Malone, Broadcasting (2/24/92) noted that

If TCI were ever convicted of a wrongdoing, its microwave licenses (and its current attempts to get a DBS [Direct Broadcast Satellite] license) could be jeopardized. Any conviction could disqualify TCI under the FCC's character-qualification policy, which is primarily concerned with felony convictions that suggest a willingness to deceive a federal agency or the public.


In the past, the government's potential to abuse the FCC's power to strip the licenses of felons has chilled news media. In 1971, the Washington Post was concerned that if it was ruled to have violated the law when it published information from the "Pentagon Papers" -- classified documents about the Vietnam War -- the Post's broadcast holdings might be jeopardized. Publisher Katharine Graham "was really risking the television stations, all of them," by its reporting, editor Ben Bradlee noted (AP, 5/13/91).

What's needed are clear, tough and consistent FCC standards regarding the character of licensees. This would better ensure that the airwaves are used in the public interest in a vibrant manner without fear of political manipulation.

Sam Husseini is FAIR's activist coordinator.

Sidebar: NBC Brings Good Things to GE

While a licensee's deception of any government agency is always problematic, the FCC is particularly concerned when the commission is itself lied to. The FCC allowed GE to take over NBC in part because it accepted "GE's assurance that NBC News will operate autonomously, without interference by the new bosses." (Advertising Age, 6/16/86) But there is considerable evidence this has not been the case.

"Don't bend over backwards to go after us just because we own you," former NBC News president Lawrence Grossman said GE chair Jack Welch told him. The GE boss was worried, Grossman reported, "that in the news division, we might be off the reservation and might want to demonstrate our independence."

Grossman also reported that Welch gave him specific criticism, like telling him that "NBC's reporters should stay away from using depressing phrases like 'Black Monday'" to refer to the 1987 stock market crash. Welch even insisted that Today show weather forecaster Willard Scott continue to mention GE light bulbs on the air. "It was one of the perks of owning a network," Grossman said. "You get your light bulbs mentioned on the air.... People want to please the owners."

Grossman, who was fired in 1988, says he also got pressure from NBC head Robert Wright (who had come from GE Financial Services) when NBC News aired reports critical of MCA/Universal, whose TV arm supplied fare to NBC. "The vibrations or message that was being communicated [by Wright] was 'We're losing money and you guys are risking even more when you put on these reports,'" Grossman told Electronic Media (11/11/91).

Grossman's revelations were shrugged off by the FCC. William Johnson,deputy chief of the Mass Media Bureau, said (Electronic Media, 11/11/91): "If the owner has an opinion, he's entitled to say that to his employees. It's hard for me to see what's wrong with that."

NBC News has also edited out or excluded negative reporting on GE, from GE's use of defective bolts in airplane engines to references to the INFACT-led boycott against GE. NBC News has also plugged subjects dear to its corporate parent's heart, as with a 14-minute series on a GE-manufactured breast cancer detector. (See Extra!, 1-2/91.)
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
cjrocks
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 232


"The f**k you all lookin at"


« Reply #41 on: May 21, 2010, 07:42:41 PM »

"General Electric is not a news organization"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric#Acquisitions
Logged

"As the imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map." - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
"I would be willing to use nuclear weapons against Iran if it were to launch a nuclear attack on Israel" - Hillary Rodham Clinton
InfoArsenal
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 429


« Reply #42 on: May 21, 2010, 08:10:48 PM »

The topic seems a bit misleading. Was searching for the Rand part somewhere.

I guess it's just general FCC/GE background?
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #43 on: May 21, 2010, 08:54:04 PM »

The topic seems a bit misleading. Was searching for the Rand part somewhere.

I guess it's just general FCC/GE background?
he was scheduled to be on Meet the Press and canceled because they were planning a character assassination for Bilderberg wizards.

This is huge and would be the first time a bona fide senate candidate blows off the project mockingbird MSM.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #44 on: May 21, 2010, 08:55:36 PM »


Hitler recounts in Mein Kampf  "I understood the infamous spiritual terror which this movement exerts, particularly on the bourgeoisie, which is neither morally nor mentally equal to such attacks; at a given sign it unleashes a veritable barrage of lies and slanders against whatever adversary seems most dangerous, until the nerves of the attacked persons break down . . . This is a tactic based on precise calculations of all human weaknesses, and its result will lead to success with almost mathematical certainty . . ." The Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich pg. 22
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
rustygunn
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 863


« Reply #45 on: May 21, 2010, 09:06:10 PM »

Well, since I started this thread and Sane hijacked it....

Southern Indiana 65 miles from KY. Family house on the Ohio on the KY side. If you know the Indiana you understand what I am talking about. Southern Indiana and Kentucky are one and the same.

A very large percentage of my friends live in Louisville. I am reporting what they are saying.

They feel like they had been "had" by him since they voted him in to run.

A shill? FU idiot. I have been at this Game much longer than most, if not all, of you.

There is something coming - July....

Have fun with your "win" - I hope he can vindicate himself. But, I 99% doubt it.

Kentuckians want to elect a racist, right....

Were do you get that he is a racist?
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #46 on: May 21, 2010, 09:11:02 PM »

Were do you get that he is a racist?

GE/MSNBC were saying it with 5 person pannels, it was a complete psyops shake down and they got caught because everyone is awake.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
rustygunn
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 863


« Reply #47 on: May 21, 2010, 09:16:49 PM »

GE/MSNBC were saying it with 5 person pannels, it was a complete psyops shake down and they got caught because everyone is awake.
Ya, I did catch parts of this character assassination attempt the last day or so.  I guess I should have asked "PT" if he believed MSM on this, or if he had another source.  I find it ironic for somebody who is supposed to be "in the know" would fall for this type of character assassination.   
Logged
jofortruth
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,125



WWW
« Reply #48 on: May 21, 2010, 11:22:22 PM »

Good for Rand! Serves them right!

Check this video out! Spread it around! The MSM tried to do the same thing to his father (RACE CARD)
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=172059.0
Logged

Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

The Great Deception - Forum/Library - My Research
http://z4.invisionfree.com/The_Great_Deception/index.php?showforum=110
worcesteradam
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,867


Knight Commander of the Old Republic


WWW
« Reply #49 on: May 22, 2010, 01:32:17 AM »

Its good he turned it down
He never needed msm, except for Fox. Left wing msm will never be his friend

The civil rights issue will constantly come up though, its the strongest card they can play against him, along with the civil war.
If i was him id focus on the important issues of today, like elected representatives being allowed to see the law before being told to vote on it, and just agree with civil rights and civil war to keep things simpler.
Logged

"Outlaws have their uses." - Earl of Newark
chris jones
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,383


« Reply #50 on: May 22, 2010, 05:43:54 AM »

How about Rand goes on Meet the Press after Queen Elizabeth goes on the AJ show

bwaaaaahahahahahaa
S......good one!!!!!!!!
Logged
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #51 on: May 22, 2010, 06:01:58 AM »

It's great that he snubbed them, but now that he's made the point, he should re-accept the invite with the caveat that they are on notice. It's just too big of an audience to pass up such an opportunity to spread the word.
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #52 on: May 22, 2010, 06:12:19 AM »

It's great that he snubbed them, but now that he's made the point, he should re-accept the invite with the caveat that they are on notice. It's just too big of an audience to pass up such an opportunity to spread the word.

It is not his target audience at all.

Meet the Press was a great program before Russert was assassinated for exposing the fact that Bush/Kerry were S&B bros.

Now it is just used by other bobble heads to repeat the "gotcha" moments over and over again until the campaign pays off the MSM.

It is a huge extortion racket, it is not a program with any journalistic integrity whatsoever.

NBC's parent company GE makes its money off of killing brown people, poisoning people's water, and building race based weaponry.

Why should anyone give this apocalyptic demigod of a company credibility?
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #53 on: May 22, 2010, 06:18:01 AM »

Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.
-Benito Mussolini (father of fascism)



General Electric
http://www.warprofiteers.com/article.php?list=type&type=16

Run until 2001 by “Neutron” Jack Welch, who made it a matter of principle to lay off 10% of his workers per year, the world’s biggest company churns out plastics, aircraft engines and nuclear reactors and media spin through NBC, CNBC, Telemundo, and msnbc.com.

CEO: Jeffrey R. Immelt
Military contracts 2005: $2.2 billion
Defense-related contributions in the 2004 election cycle: $220,950*

The world’s largest company by market share, General Electric’s revenues in 2003 totaled $134.2 billion. GE was run until 2001 by “Neutron” Jack Welch, who made it a matter of principle to lay off 10% of his workers per year.

General Electric makes household appliances, plastics, water treatment systems, lighting, medical equipment, and commercial financial services. It also makes aircraft engines and nuclear reactors, and keeps criticism at bay with its ownership of media giants NBC, CNBC, Telemundo, Bravo, and, in partnership with Microsoft, msnbc.com. GE’s recent partnership with Vivendi added Universal Studios, USA, Trio and Sci-fi cable channels to its $43 billion media empire.



General Electric is one of the world’s top three producers of jet engines, supplying Boeing, Lockheed Martin and other military aircraft makers for the powering of airplanes and helicopters. The “war on terrorism” has seen GE’s military contracts rise substantially. But the company’s “defense” side has been doing well for a while. GE and other military contractors got a big boost under the Clinton administration from Presidential Directive 41 which stated that it was the job of US diplomats to promote arms sales abroad in order to safeguard American jobs; this directive tied the promotions of diplomats to how effectively they hocked US armaments.


GE has designed 91 nuclear power plants in 11 countries, yet its nuclear reactors around the world have a fatal flaw. In the event of a nuclear meltdown, there is a 90 percent chance that radiation from GE-designed reactors would be discharged directly into the atmosphere. While the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is aware of the problem, it continues to license GE nuclear reactors. GE’s history with nuclear power is an ugly one.



In the 1940s-1960s the company ran experiments on humans with radiation, including irradiating the reproductive organs of prison inmates in Walla Walla, Washington, without warning them of the risk of cancer. Other tests were run on the elderly and hospital patients. General Electric intentionally released large amounts of radiation into the air from the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Richland, in order to see the distance it would travel. These atrocities were revealed in hearings in 1986 held by Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts.

The company has also been accused of knowingly poisoning its workers at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in Schenectady, New York with radiation and asbestos.




General Electric is currently attempting to overturn the US Superfund Law of 1980, which allows the government to hold polluters responsible for cleaning up their toxic chemicals. GE argues that it is “unconstitutional” for the Environmental Protection Agency to force the company to pay $500 million for the cleanup of the Hudson River, where GE dumped carcinogenic PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls, over three decades. In March 2004, a federal appeals court has revived GE’s lawsuit. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that GE is trying to change the Superfund Law: the company is responsible for 78 Superfund sites around the US. It’s clearly not safe to be a worker for GE either. The US government’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, has cited the company for 858 workplace safety violations from 1990-2001.



General Electric has been involved in so many cases of fraud that in the 1990s the Pentagon's Defense Contract Management Agency created a special investigations office specifically for the company, which indicted GE on 22 criminal counts and recovered $221.7 million. In one case, in 1992, GE entered a guilty plea to criminal and civil charges for defrauding the Pentagon in a case where money was funneled to the Israeli military. GE was fined $69 million for violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.



GE’s financial division has been another area ripe for fraud. GE was fined $100 million for trying to get bankrupt creditors to pay without informing the bankruptcy courts, in effect paying debts that they no longer legally owed. Not surprisingly, General Electric is the financial backer of WorldCom, the telecom company whose massive fraud and creative accounting led to the largest bankruptcy in US history.The company has been involved in countless scandals, but strangely enough, they don’t seem to affect General Electric’s ability to win government contracts – but then, this is typical of all military contractors. According to a survey by the Center for Public Integrity, from 1990-2002, 30 of the US government’s top contractors were found guilty of fraud in 400 cases, leading to settlements and fines amounting to at least $3.4 billion. General Electric paid $982.9 million for 63 cases in this period.

Such repeated behavior and continued contracts wouldn’t be possible without friends in high places, of which General Electric. GE spent more than $31 million in 2001 and 2002 lobbying lawmakers; in 2000 it spent $16 million. Reigning CEO Jack Welch had enormous influence and was consistently ranked CEO of the Year by the slavish business press; he was major Republican donor as well. GE director Sam Nunn was senator for Georgia for 27 years, and also sits on the boards of ChevronTexaco. GE’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Secretary, Benjamin W. Heineman, used to work for the US government’s Department of Health, Education and Welfare. General Electric's defense sector gave $221,200 to political campaigns in the 2004 election cycle, with 50 percent going to Democrats and 50 percent to Republicans. *Source: opensecrets.org

General Electric
Fair Finance Watch
United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE)
GE Workers United
EnviroHealthAction

US: Energy Group Plans to Build Nuclear Plants in Gulf States
by Matthew L. Wald, The New York Times
September 23rd, 2005
A consortium of eight companies said on Thursday that it would spend about $100 million to prepare applications to build two nuclear reactors, in Mississippi and Alabama, a step that seems to move the industry closer to its first new reactor order since the 1970's.

US: Court Revives GE Challenge of Superfund Law
by Devlin Barrett, Associated Press
March 4th, 2004
A federal appeals court has revived a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the 1980 Superfund law that allows the government to assess polluters for cleaning up toxic waste sites.

US: Big Media Gets Bigger
by Bill Moyers, NOW with Bill Moyers on PBS
October 10th, 2003
Big media companies keep getting bigger – with more and more power over our lives. This week's deal between General Electric (GE) and Vivendi means that GE'S NBC, which helped elect Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor of California, has just picked up not only Universal Studios, but the USA, Trio and Sci-fi cable channels, to go with CNBC and MSNBC, all now part of a $43 billion dollar empire.

US: The Case Against General Electric
Multinational Monitor
August 1st, 2001
General Electric has a lengthy record of criminal, civil, political and ethical transgressions, some of them shocking in disregard for the integrity of human beings. This article will list a few examples.

World: General Electric's Global Assault
by Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman, Mother Jones
May 26th, 2000
While the 20-reign of General Electric's CEO has been a golden era for shareholders - the company's stock value has risen three time more than the Dow Jones average, leading Forbes magazine to name Welch the "Most Admired CEO of the Century" - it has been a disaster for employees.

US: General Electric Expose Garners an Oscar
by Megan Rosenfeld, Washington Post
April 23rd, 1992
Chasnoff's film indicts the multi-billion-dollar corporation on two counts: failing to clean up the site of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state, and knowingly poisoning workers with asbestos and radiation at the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory in Schenectady, N.Y. Scenes of Hanford area residents who have had or know of birth defects and cancer are juxtaposed with the familiar jingle: "GE: We bring good things to life."


General Electric Makes it to the top war profiteers list:
Top Military Contractors/War Profiteers
 
The following companies are the top 10 recipients of U.S. military dollars.

David J. Lesar, CEO, Kellogg, Brown & Root (subsidiary of Halliburton )
2003 military contracts revenue: $3.9 billion
Runs US military bases in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Djibouti, Georgia, Jordan, Kuwait, Turkey and Uzbekistan, built Guantanamo Bay, Cuba prisons, South Vietnam & Diego Garcia military bases
 
Vance D. Coffman, CEO, Lockheed Martin of Bethesda, Maryland.
2002 Salary: $25.3 million
Campaign Contributions in 2002: $9.7 million, Military Contracts 2000-2003: $69.1 billion,
Products: F-16, F/A-22 jet fighters, C-130J air transport, Hellfire, Javelin missiles

Philip M. Condit, CEO, Boeing of Chicago, Illinois
2002 Salary: $4.1 million
Campaign Contributions in 2002: $1.6 million, Military Contracts 2000-2003: $60 billion
Products: F-15 fighter, C-17 air transport, Apache Helicopter, JDAM "smart" bombs

William H. Swanson, CEO, Raytheon of Lexington, Massachusetts.
2002 Salary: $8.9 million, Military contracts 2000-2002: $27.5 billion
Products: Patriot & Tomahawk missiles, "Bunker Buster" bomb

Ronald Sugar, CEO, Northrop Grumman of Los Angeles, CA
2002 Salary: $1.5 million, military contracts 2000-2002: $34.6 billion (including TRW)
Products: B-2 stealth bomber, amphibious assault ships

Nicholas D Chabraja, CEO, General Dynamics of Fall Church, Virginia
2002 Salary: $15.2 million
Campaign Contributions in 2002: $1.64 million, Military Contracts 2000-2002: $25 billion
Products: Abrams M1 tanks, Trident submarines

George David, CEO, United Technologies of Hartford, Connecticut
2002 Salary: $9.7 million, Military contracts 2000-2002: $9.8 billion
Products: Black Hawk, Sea Hawk, Comanche helicopters

John F. Welch, Jr., CEO, General Electric of Fairfield. Connecticut
2002 Salary: $15.1 million
Campaign Contributions in 2002: $221,350,
Military Contracts 2000-2003: $7.7 billion

Products: Aircraft engines, nuclear reactors, NBC news, msnbc.com

 
Paul V. Lombardi, CEO, DynCorp
Owned by Computer Sciences Corporation of El Segundo, California
Campaign Contributions in 2002: $221,350, Military Contracts 2000-2003: $5.5 billion
Products: Rent-a-cops in Afghanistan, Bosnia & Iraq, US-Mexico border, defoliation missions in Colombia.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #54 on: May 22, 2010, 06:19:33 AM »

General Electric's Nuclear-Powered Returns
http://www.forbes.com/2001/05/18/0518ge.html
Tara Murphy, 05.18.2001, 2:30 PM ET


NEW YORK - President Bush's energy plan sounds like a renaissance for nuclear energy, proposing to increase reactors at U.S. licensed plants. The plan is a vision covered in red tape, but won't likely impact investors' wallets in the near term.

Most experts don't see a new nuclear plant being built for decades due to the onerous licensing process and environmental issues, such as storing radioactive waste. But Bush wants to add reactors to current plants and that may clear the bureaucracy faster. U.S. companies haven't been building plants here, but they've been active in more nuke-friendly countries and are ready to reap the benefits in the U.S. when the time comes.

"If the U.S starts building nuclear plants in significant numbers, that would have to be looked at, but we're pretty active," says John Redding, manager of marketing and public affairs of GE Nuclear Energy, a unit of General Electric (nyse: GE - news - people ).

GE, which supplied many of the reactors when U.S. plants were being built in the 1970s and 1980s, is building two plants in Taiwan and constructed two nuclear plants for Tokyo Electric Power, which have been running for four years.

The company doesn't expect any major changes in U.S. nuclear operations in the next one to two years. However, if Bush's nuke plan comes to fruition, GE is ready with its licensed Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) nuclear plant design, which was completed in May 1997, says Redding.

GE Nuclear Energy is a segment of GE Power Systems, which raked in $15 billion in revenue for the company in fiscal 2000. The parent company's sales were $129.8 billion in 2000.

GE is an energy heavyweight even without nuclear energy, says Lawrence Horan, analyst at Parker/Hunter, tagging their natural gas energy turbine generators as a breadwinner after capturing a 70% market share in the U.S.

"GE is sold out for two years, and probably about 85% sold out for the third year, referring to 2003," says Horan, who considers GE's nuclear prospects a "small, long-term positive," given the public opposition that it faces.

Nuclear options could buffer GE's balance sheet from future weakness, says Bear Stearns analyst John Inch, who agrees that the resurgence of nuclear energy is a long-term process.

"By the time some of these plans and actual revenue come[ s] into the build cycle, this might be a very nice offset to some of GE's other power businesses," says Inch, postulating if GE's strong turbine shipments ever begin to wane.

By building at current sites, Bush's plan avoids many complex issues associated with building new plants. Since several of the plants could operate four to six reactors but only have two or three, it's feasible.

Also, obtaining a design license and then operating and construction licenses from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission might be easier, says Jennifer Weeks, director of a research project at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government. However, the need for energy environmental issues, including nuclear waste disposal, would still be addressed, she says.

Exelon (nyse: EXC - news - people ), the largest nuclear operator in the U.S., stands to get a leg up from a nuclear comeback. The holding company, which was formed through the merger of Unicom and PECO Energy, is co-developing a design for a Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) in South Africa and says it will apply for a design license in the U.S. in 2001, if it passes feasibility testing.

On May 3, Corbin MacNeil, Exelon's chairman and chief executive, testified in front of a senate committee that the PBMR, which has been used in Germany, is safe and economical, costing $125 million to $150 million for a 125-megwatt plant and $1,100 per kilowatt to construct.

The last generation of reactors cost $3,500 per kilowatt, according to Daniele Sietz, analyst at Salomon Smith Barney.

Due to its small size, the PBMR can also be constructed in 18 to 36 months, whereas large reactors take four to six years.

Exelon hopes to score an operating and construction license for the PBMR by 2003. But those projections might be jumping the gun. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's licensing process is typically two to three years, says Harvard's Weeks.

Here's the bottom line: Nuclear solutions must be able to be price competitive with other forms of energy, says Weeks. "Until the industry can make new plants absolutely competitive, the capital of cost building a new nuclear power plant competitive with the capital cost of building combine gas turbine plants, the issue of building new plants isn't going to come up." Weeks doesn't see that happening for about 20 years.

Bush says he sees nuclear energy as a viable energy source, but the Texas oilman is proposing cutting research and development funds in 2002. According to Weeks, Bush's budget proposal slices the Department of Energy's Nuclear Energy Research Initiative's slim $35 million budget by 48%, and radioactive waste management by 30%.

"The Bush Administration has said they want to rely on the science for a lot of their environmental decision, but they don't have very much science appointees and they're cutting science research essentially across the board, except for defense and health," says Weeks.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
chris jones
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,383


« Reply #55 on: May 22, 2010, 06:43:35 AM »

It is not his target audience at all.

Meet the Press was a great program before Russert was assassinated for exposing the fact that Bush/Kerry were S&B bros.

Now it is just used by other bobble heads to repeat the "gotcha" moments over and over again until the campaign pays off the MSM.

It is a huge extortion racket, it is not a program with any journalistic integrity whatsoever.

NBC's parent company GE makes its money off of killing brown people, poisoning people's water, and building race based weaponry.

Why should anyone give this apocalyptic demigod of a company credibility?
S.. I agree, meet the press is a controlled 100%>>Gotcha, but the average guy doesn't know that, they may interperet this as RP is on the run. Joe Cit doesn't have any idea whats going on, they are surface dwellers, headline artists, talking head loyalists.
I get the feeling Rand doesnt want to get into it with these freaks, they are scumsukers with a battle plan, a shiite fight to discredit rand. Rand knows this, they will play the race issue to the FK hilt, the tea party, the whole bit to discredit him. Rand has the truth, he most likely is not with the capacity to mince words, to play the game, to pizz on his beleifs, to apease the masses. No grey areas to play with.
his dad could had a comeback, a gentelemns rebuttal.  Now AJ would castrate these guys, he gets pizzed and has an immediate comeback. I don't thin Rand has this yet. In time he will.
JFK loved to fence with the media, he had that controll and imediate recouse of thought without loosing his cool.

I know I ramble to make my point, sorry, a guy who has the truth and knows it, is honest and can not manipulate as these freaks do, is in a very difficult position. On one side of the coin he is correct, the other side is the general uniformed public bubblefks will not see this.
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #56 on: May 22, 2010, 06:57:58 AM »

S.. I agree, meet the press is a controlled 100%>>Gotcha, but the average guy doesn't know that, they may interperet this as RP is on the run. Joe Cit doesn't have any idea whats going on, they are surface dwellers, headline artists, talking head loyalists.
I get the feeling Rand doesnt want to get into it with these freaks, they are scumsukers with a battle plan, a shiite fight to discredit rand. Rand knows this, they will play the race issue to the FK hilt, the tea party, the whole bit to discredit him. Rand has the truth, he most likely is not with the capacity to mince words, to play the game, to pizz on his beleifs, to apease the masses. No grey areas to play with.
his dad could had a comeback, a gentelemns rebuttal.  Now AJ would castrate these guys, he gets pizzed and has an immediate comeback. I don't thin Rand has this yet. In time he will.
JFK loved to fence with the media, he had that controll and imediate recouse of thought without loosing his cool.

I know I ramble to make my point, sorry, a guy who has the truth and knows it, is honest and can not manipulate as these freaks do, is in a very difficult position. On one side of the coin he is correct, the other side is the general uniformed public bubblefks will not see this.

It is not a presidential race, it is a state senate race. Only the people of KY will vote. He has over a 25% lead on the challenger and instead of going on controlled hit piece shows with Bilderberg mockingbirds attacking 24/7, he can focus on real issues for the people of Kentucky. The people of Kentcky are getting ridiculed by the media as well, I think they will appreciate that a politician is willing to draw a line in the sand and say: "enough!"

But, the controversy gives us a great opportunity to expose General Electric's crimes against humanity.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
chris jones
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,383


« Reply #57 on: May 22, 2010, 07:21:29 AM »

S-
Yes, that brings it down for me , where it belongs.
Logged
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #58 on: May 22, 2010, 07:49:07 AM »

It is not a presidential race, it is a state senate race. Only the people of KY will vote. He has over a 25% lead on the challenger and instead of going on controlled hit piece shows with Bilderberg mockingbirds attacking 24/7, he can focus on real issues for the people of Kentucky. The people of Kentcky are getting ridiculed by the media as well, I think they will appreciate that a politician is willing to draw a line in the sand and say: "enough!"

But, the controversy gives us a great opportunity to expose General Electric's crimes against humanity.

Good point Sane.
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
chrisfromchi
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,181



« Reply #59 on: May 22, 2010, 07:53:46 AM »

bill maher was his classy self last night btw....
Logged
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #60 on: May 22, 2010, 07:56:00 AM »

General Electric promotes war with Iran and then does business with them.






Is American Technology (General Electric) Killing Our Military People in Iraq and Afghanistan?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,539128,00.html
Wednesday, August 12, 2009  
By Bill O'Reilly

Roadside bombs, known as improvised explosive devices (IEDs), are the most deadly weapons the terrorists have on the battlefield.

In Iraq, more than 2,000 Americans have been killed by IEDs, more than 21,000 injured, many maimed for life. In Afghanistan, 252 have been killed by roadside bombs, more than 1,600 wounded.

It is heartbreaking to visit soldiers and Marines rehabbing their injuries, brave young Americans struggling to put their bodies and lives back together. This is the price of protecting Americans from those who would harm us. This is the result of terrorists who use technology to kill and maim.

Sources tell "The Factor" that there is a federal investigation underway to find out if any American company sold components for roadside bombs to nefarious people. In May of 2008, and again in October '08, coalition forces discovered unexploded roadside bombs in Iraq and handed them over to the FBI bureau in Baghdad. The FBI discovered that radio frequency modules inside the bombs were part of a shipment made by a U.S. company to Corezing International, a business in Singapore with direct ties to Iran. The bombs, designed to penetrate armor, contained Maxstream XT09-SINA 900 MHz radio frequency modules, which can be used to explode the bombs by remote control.

According to authorities, these modules are still being used today to kill Americans. The FBI will not comment, and "The Factor" believes the investigation may be classified, because information is very hard to come by.

The former chairman of Maxstream, Brad Walters, told "The Factor" the modules are excellent bomb material and that his company legally sold more than a million of them to other companies for a variety of uses. "The Factor" has been told, but cannot confirm, that the General Electric corporation is under suspicion in the case.

You may recall that GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt denied doing business with Iran to "Factor" producer Jesse Watters but a few weeks later admitted GE's dealings with the mullahs to Michael Eisner on a CNBC program. GE's official position is that they stopped taking orders from Iran in 2005, but any American company could ship stuff to a middleman, like Corezing International.




GE, Halliburtan and their business with Iran
http://captaincapitalist.blogspot.com/2008/01/ge-halliburtan-and-their-business-with.html
Thursday, January 10, 2008

Despite US sanctions against doing business with Iran, GE, Halliburton and other companies have continued to do business with that country and others such as Syria and Libya.

While they don't do it directly, they go through foreign subsidiaries and have defended the practice by stating that they are in compliance with current US law.

That may be the case, but how do you morally and ethically justify doing business with a regime that we know is supplying weapons that are being used to kill Americans in Iraq and Afganistan? The companies believe they are looking after the best interests of their shareholders. I would submit that supporting state sponsors of terrorism against US citizens is a bigger concern to their shareholders than an extra couple of cents in their dividend payment.

Capitalism at its best is not all about cash. It's about improving your quality of life by finding ways to improve the quality of other people's lives. It's about creating value. Providing support and stability for regimes that want to kill us is not providing value.

Claiming a legal responsibility to honor existing contracts is complete BS. The minute the Iranians and others decided to sponsor the killing of Americans they voided any legal rights they may have had. No legitimate court in the world would hold GE or Haliburton to those contracts if they terminated them tomorrow, which is what they ought to do. Even if it did mean taking a hit in court, how about sucking it up and taking one for the team? Suppose a company like GE got involved in a highly publicized case in which they refused to honor contracts with Iran because of their involvement in the killing of US service members. What do you think would be worth more? The less than 1% of revenues that GE makes on Iranian business, the penalties or fines they might have to pay, or the PR?

I would highly recommend that US citizens refrain from patronizing any company or its subsidiaries that continues to do business with our enemies, regardless of existing contracts.



GE is still selling goods to Iran.
http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977226327
January 10, 2008 08:53 PM EST


Some very disturbing news is reported publicly once again. A member of NBC press corps writes that NBC, owned by GE has stopped its newscasters from reporting about the very close relationship between GE and the Bin Laden family, or the fact that GE is still selling goods to Iran. A Canadian subsidiary of GE has supplied hydroelectric generators to Iran, while an Italian subsidiary has supplied pipeline and gas turbines to Iran. Even with the fact that Iran is listed by the State Department as one of seven state sponsoring terrorists. These nations included Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, North Korea, and Cuba. Iraq is no longer on this list.

General Electric told the State Department, as well as the State of New York, "It is none of your business. GE is within the guidelines of the law, and will do what is best for its investors." GE told the government to go "pound sand" in more or less terms. GE utilizes offshore subsidiaries, as well as Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries to go around the law. Yet people continue to support GE by purchasing their products and singing praises of the company.

Many think of Haliburton, as the only culprit of doing business with foreign countries that are questionable, but it seems that as deep, if not deeper in the sand and oil fields you will find Imelt, and General Electric. NBC actually knew shortly after 9-11 that General Electric was friendly with the Bin Laden Family, and that Imelt had a personal relationship with them, and did not report this fact, while screaming of the Halliburton issue.

As one digs deeper into the history, and investigations of NBC, and GE, one can find several devious and under handed achievements. While Americans call for more open dialog of government, they should first demand what are these multi-billion dollar companies are doing. This is just the tip of the iceberg, and I am offering several other articles that support this information, and give much more in-depth information concerning GE, and its terrible dealings.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/22/60minutes/main595214.shtml
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4476494 http://www.democracynow.org/2003/7/16/trading_with_the_enemy_halliburton_ge http://money.cnn.com/2003/05/29/news/iran_sanctions/
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117495743693749812-siqnI8qlULM9hbMuAlzn4v7_q7s_20070425.html
http://www.forbes.com/2005/02/02/0202autofacescan07.html
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
PeaceAndFreedom
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 508



« Reply #61 on: May 22, 2010, 08:07:27 AM »

It is not a presidential race, it is a state senate race. Only the people of KY will vote. He has over a 25% lead on the challenger and instead of going on controlled hit piece shows with Bilderberg mockingbirds attacking 24/7, he can focus on real issues for the people of Kentucky. The people of Kentcky are getting ridiculed by the media as well, I think they will appreciate that a politician is willing to draw a line in the sand and say: "enough!"
 

Excellent development! After the launching of Rand as a national figure last week the rational way to interview him (if the media was balanced) would have been to do introductory conversations where a variety of his views on current issues would get explored. Instead the NBC hacks like Rachel Maddow went on full scale attack mode, focusing on such urgent matters as the Civil Rights Act of 1964!

The point for the MSM, clearly, isn't to be relevant. Pinging on race issues is a technique designed exactly to fill up an entire interview with a repetitive exchange over a touchy matter, rather than the stuff Rand wanted to talk about. Any issue they hang a candidate up with for over 15 minutes, thereby shuts down that candidate from talking about their issues.

The Maddow interview was an example that this could be done with any issue they want to focus on (race, 9-11, etc.)---and it has nothing to do with the substance. Rand is wise to blow them off and stay away from them. And what can they reply if he does? Isn't this is the same media that, without even commenting on it, allowed Hillary Clinton to avoid any major media interviews during her 2000 Senate run? It's a safe seat, Rand, with a big lead---sit on it and coast to victory.
Logged

"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered!... I am not a number, I am a free man!"
worcesteradam
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,867


Knight Commander of the Old Republic


WWW
« Reply #62 on: May 22, 2010, 02:55:03 PM »

Will peoples rights defender MSNBC be covering this?

In Maryland, it is a felony to record thuggish cops as they push around skateboarding teenagers, beat sports patrons, and pull guns on motorists for speeding.
“Several Marylanders face felony charges for recording their arrests on camera, and others have been intimidated to shut their cameras off,” reports WJZ 23 in Baltimore.
Maryland cops are using a Maryland law that states conversations in private cannot be recorded without the consent of both people involved in order to go about their business of harassing, intimidating, and assaulting citizens.
http://www.infowars.com/maryland-citizens-face-felony-charges-for-recording-cops/
Logged

"Outlaws have their uses." - Earl of Newark
Freeski
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20,744


« Reply #63 on: May 22, 2010, 10:23:42 PM »

Will peoples rights defender MSNBC be covering this?

In Maryland, it is a felony to record thuggish cops as they push around skateboarding teenagers, beat sports patrons, and pull guns on motorists for speeding.
“Several Marylanders face felony charges for recording their arrests on camera, and others have been intimidated to shut their cameras off,” reports WJZ 23 in Baltimore.
Maryland cops are using a Maryland law that states conversations in private cannot be recorded without the consent of both people involved in order to go about their business of harassing, intimidating, and assaulting citizens.
http://www.infowars.com/maryland-citizens-face-felony-charges-for-recording-cops/

Truth never fears light.
Logged

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." Martin Luther King, Jr.
Overcast
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,120



« Reply #64 on: May 24, 2010, 10:15:58 AM »

Will peoples rights defender MSNBC be covering this?

In Maryland, it is a felony to record thuggish cops as they push around skateboarding teenagers, beat sports patrons, and pull guns on motorists for speeding.
“Several Marylanders face felony charges for recording their arrests on camera, and others have been intimidated to shut their cameras off,” reports WJZ 23 in Baltimore.
Maryland cops are using a Maryland law that states conversations in private cannot be recorded without the consent of both people involved in order to go about their business of harassing, intimidating, and assaulting citizens.
http://www.infowars.com/maryland-citizens-face-felony-charges-for-recording-cops/

Will muting the audio make a difference then?
Logged

It is when a people forget God, that tyrants forge their chains. ~ Patrick Henry

Our founding fathers, if they met the current politicians in office; would either kick their asses good or just shoot them dead. ~Me
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!