WOW! HuffPost has over 24,000 troll posts on latest Rand Paul article!

[CheneysWorstNightmare]

Amazing!  They keep falling for the race bating!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/20/rand-paul-is-kentucky-fri_n_584179.html#comments

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/20/rand-paul-blasted-by-civi_n_583640.html#comments


UPDATE: The above article has over 8,000 comments, the following is the post about the 24,000 comment article:

My gosh, the elite are FREAKING SCARED!!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/21/rand-paul-obama-sounds-un_n_584661.html

[chrisfromchi]

since 2am its been over 25,000 total over three different eariler articles.

seriously.

[CheneysWorstNightmare]

since 2am its been over 25,000 total over three different eariler articles.

seriously.

f**king amazing how race-baiting works against the Paul family.

This just ain't Rachel Maddow.  The big boys are making sure this happens.

[FormlessDisposition]

I posted this in the comments section of the race baiting article on infowars. I first put forth the disclaimer that I had to look up the section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to see if I could think of a better way Rand Paul could have handled this and based on my non-professional interpretation he could have answered yes. It's too late for him to change his answer on this issue now though.

"To be clear I’m a Rand Paul supporter; but, I think he messed this one up big. The debate they are having centers around a specific interpretation of title 3 of the 1964 civil rights act. You can read it here.

http://uspolitics.about.com/od....._act_3.htm

Specifically the debate is actually about the interpretation of the term “public facility.” No where in the law does it actually say anything about regulating private enterprise. It’s the expansion of the term “public facility” to private establishments such as restaurants and bars that allows the application of title 3 in what could be an unconstitutional regulation of private enterprise.

Thus, if Rand Paul were a senator at the time he could have voted for the 1964 civil rights act and not be granting unconstitutional powers.

I realize that technically someone voting for the *text* of the civil rights act would have to be aware of the legal context that would allow it to apply to private enterprise. However, the MSM audience is not sophisticated enough to understand these legal nuances.

Based on this interpretation Rand Paul could have, and should have answered with a concise, unequivocal YES, when asked if he would have voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act in its entirety. The liberals and neo-cons would thus be denied the sound-byte of him saying “no” or dodging the question (which he actually chose to do).

The more sophisticated supporters of Rand Paul would understand this tactic of dealing with the MSM’s attack and continued to support him and Paul would emerge from it unscathed.

That’s how I would have advised him anyways. Gosh, politics is an ugly business."

[Bash Riprock]

They have mobilized all of their forces to try and demonize him. They are scared shitless of Rand Paul.

[jeremystalked1]

http://www.randpaul2010.com/issues/a-g/abortion-2/

I can see how a lot of people will get worked up over this.

Basically, R.P. is saying he's coming into office with an agenda, to stop abortion in the United States.  We hate agendas, right?  Unless it's our agenda.

Since Dr. Paul is stating that life begins at conception, I would like to know what his position is on spontaneous abortions, which may happen in 25% of pregnancies.  Involuntary manslaughter?

I'm not pleased with mainstream political stances on this and many other issues.

[CheneysWorstNightmare]

My gosh, the elite are FREAKING SCARED!!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/21/rand-paul-obama-sounds-un_n_584661.html

[Dig]

hahahahahaha

and people think that Rand needs GE/MSNBC!

the General Electric/MSNBC/CNBC/NBC mind control is over!

We have all put on the "They Live" sunglasses and can see the truth!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/They_Live

[CheneysWorstNightmare]

MSM is OBSESSED over Rand Paul after just like 3 days!

[molarediere]

Hitler recounts in Mein Kampf  "I understood the infamous spiritual terror which this movement exerts, particularly on the bourgeoisie, which is neither morally nor mentally equal to such attacks; at a given sign it unleashes a veritable barrage of lies and slanders against whatever adversary seems most dangerous, until the nerves of the attacked persons break down . . . This is a tactic based on precise calculations of all human weaknesses, and its result will lead to success with almost mathematical certainty . . ." The Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich pg. 22

[Dig]

Hitler recounts in Mein Kampf  "I understood the infamous spiritual terror which this movement exerts, particularly on the bourgeoisie, which is neither morally nor mentally equal to such attacks; at a given sign it unleashes a veritable barrage of lies and slanders against whatever adversary seems most dangerous, until the nerves of the attacked persons break down . . . This is a tactic based on precise calculations of all human weaknesses, and its result will lead to success with almost mathematical certainty . . ." The Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich pg. 22

that is an unbelievable catch, thanks!

[usefulidiot,uselesseater]

hahahahahaha

and people think that Rand needs GE/MSNBC!

the General Electric/MSNBC/CNBC/NBC mind control is over!

We have all put on the "They Live" sunglasses and can see the truth!

When I was dumb enough to vote for Obama last election and then watched him betray every one of his solemn resolves I grew up and wised up for the better. A friend and coworker gave me an eBook copy of Eustace Mullins' The World Order: A Study In The Hegemony Of Parasitism and it made see the world in a whole new light. I no longer sleep.
And it would appear that a whole new wave of consciousness is sweeping over the masses of people. Let the mass awakening commence and shatter the shackles of NWO servitude.   

[TheProxy]

I was just checing out some of the videos from the past few days, and i've noticed alot people talking about the civil rights issue.
To me it's perfectly clear.

It's Private vs. Public. If you think of a place like walgreens as Public, Then I can bring my gun and say what i want in it. If it's Private the owner of that land has a right do with it as he/she wishes. He doesn't agree with it, but it's the law as it stands, and it's blurred.
He said he wishes he could re-debate it.

The jackhole via opts on youtube (and it's clear what they are) I've talked to someone who had 18 Subscripers. with no videoes having been uploaded. with no channel views? thats not even possible. 

I knew he was CIA after this statement "  Private Property is when a property is NOT open to the public, and owned by the Government."

Private props are owned by the Goverment? wtf

[Dig]

The state government mandated segregation in private areas...the people are the ones who repealed those Jim Crow laws. Then the feds come in after the private sector dealt with this crap and added this to the main issue which was discrimination in government. So then the feds basically outlawed groups of minorities getting together. Of course Bilderberg and Bohemian Grove have less number of blacks on average to population figures, but the MSM is owned by them so there will be no comment about it.