*MSM BLACKOUT: Elena Kagan has been a paid advisor for Goldman Sachs for years!

Author Topic: *MSM BLACKOUT: Elena Kagan has been a paid advisor for Goldman Sachs for years!  (Read 44188 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RabidSheep

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,082
W T F ?

nice comments!

Everything about this nomination is insane. It is worse than Harriett Myers. Every time she accidently opened her mouth a bunch of unconstitutional nonsense flowed out of it.

I still think they are prepping for a bait and switch with Cass Sunstein.

This is who I always suspected anywho.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
NEW YORK NEWS CONFERENCE THURSDAY: Andy Martin slams Goldman Sachs-Elena Kagan connection
http://www.pr-inside.com/new-york-news-conference-thursday-andy-r1888385.htm

2010-05-13 09:07:23 - Internet Powerhouse Andy Martin says Elena Kagan would be Goldman Sachs “Golden Girl” on the U. S. Supreme Court. Martin says Goldman Sachs paid Kagan $10,000 a day for her “advice,” to purchase potential influence peddling. “If she was for sale once,” Martin charges, “She will be for sale again. Kagan is Goldman’s Golden Girl on the U. S. Supreme Court. Goldman Sachs has been raping America using our own tax dollars. Now the U. S. Senate is going to put a Goldman agent of influence on our Supreme Court? This is insanity.”


Internet powerhouse Andy Martin says Goldman Sachs purchased Elena Kagan’s seat on the U. S. Supreme Court

Martin says Goldman probably hopes Kagan will provide “juice” as Goldman’s controversial appeals percolate up to the Supreme Court

ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin
Executive Editor

“Factually Correct, Not Politically Correct”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

ATTENTION DAYBOOK/ASSIGNMENT EDITORS

ANNOUNCEMENT OF NEW YORK NEWS CONFERENCE THURSDAY

ANDY MARTIN SAYS ELENA KAGAN WOULD

BE GOLDMAN SACHS’ “GOLDEN GIRL” ON THE U.S. SUPREME COURT

MARTIN LINKS GOLDMAN’S $1 MILLION CASH DONATION TO BARACK OBAMA AS THE PRICE GOLDMAN PAID TO PLACE KAGAN ON THE HIGH COURT

(NEW YORK)(May 13, 2010) ContrarianCommentary.com’s Executive Editor, Andy Martin, will hold a New York City news conference Thursday, May 13th in front of the Goldman Sachs headquarters at 200 West Street to call on Americans to tell the U. S. Senate not to confirm former Goldman “adviser” Elena Kagan to the U. S. Supreme Court.

“After Goldman Sachs has raped every American and sucked the blood out of our economy, to pay massive ‘bonuses’ to its greedy and arrogant employees over the past five years, why would senators vote to give Goldman Sachs a seat on the U. S. Supreme Court through Elena Kagan?

“Leftist media have tried to minimize or ignore the fact that Kagan was paid $10,000 per day for her ‘advice No one is asking why Kagan accepted an obviously disproportionate payment--$10,000 per day—for her ‘services’ over the past several years, until she became a federal employee in 2009.

“Kagan was obviously not being paid for her advice. She was being paid to be on call as part of the corrupt network of potential influence peddlers that Goldman kept at the ready to work its evil will throughout the government. One columnist has said Kagan ‘knows everyone She was obviously being paid and kept on retainer as a potential influence operative. Kagan was accepting grossly disproportionate compensation, $10,000 per day, precisely because she was available to be an enormously influential influence peddler through her network of contacts in the legal and business community. Kagan was for sale at $10,000 a pop. The Dean of Harvard Law School was for sale for $10,000 a day. Didn’t Harvard pay enough? Was Kagan greedy and arrogant too? For shame.

“Have Americans learned nothing? Why are we placing a corporate servant on the Supreme Court at a time when corporate America has disgraced and embarrassed our nation and ravaged our economy?

“Ironically, Goldman Sachs purchased influence with Barack Obama by giving him $1 million in campaign cash. Obama has now named a Goldman ‘adviser’ as a judge to sit in judgment on the contentious cases that are going to arise as America seeks to recover from the corporate rape of the century. But why would any senator vote to reward the rapist by placing the rapist's influence peddler on the Supreme Court? There is something wrong with our society when someone who took $10,000 a day from Goldman Sachs is rewarded with a seat on the Supreme Court, where she can continue to do Goldman's bidding.

“But, maybe not. Maybe the system is operating the way it is supposed to. We have the finest congress money can buy. Pretty soon we may have the finest Supreme Court Goldman Sachs can buy Martin will charge.

Martin is leading popular opposition to Elena Kagan, but focusing primarily on her closeted lesbian lifestyle and her links to Goldman Sachs. Friday Martin will hold a New York news conference to announce a new 24-hour hotline to counter Barack Obama’s pro-Kagan hotline in the White House. “We must defeat this nomination Martin says. “Goldman Sachs should not be allowed to continuously crucify America by purchasing a seat on the U. S. Supreme Court

NEWS CONFERENCE DETAILS:

WHO:

ContrarianCommentary.com Executive Editor Andy Martin

WHAT:

Internet powerhouse Andy Martin says that Goldman Sachs purchased Elena Kagan’s seat on the U. S. Supreme Court

WHERE:

Entrance to [anonymous] Goldman Sachs headquarters, 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282

WHEN:

Thursday, May 13, 2010; 2:00 P. M.

MEDIA CONTACT:

CELL (917) 664-9329; General: (866) 706-2639

-
ABOUT ANDY: Andy Martin is the Executive Editor and publisher of www.ContrarianCommentary.com. Andy is a legendary New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of radio and television background. He is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC) and holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law. Martin comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of experience.

UPDATES:
www.Twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline rio

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,708

It is a fairly decent article, but the author seems to be exposing a bit of a religious slant on a topic that has no room for religion.

I don't see too many people here or complaining of the articles by Jews proclaiming Kagan's strong Jewish identity.

On Kagan's strong Jewish identity...

Quote

Years later, after her mother died in 2008, Kagan -- who is replacing the only Protestant on the court -- spoke movingly at the funeral and conveyed a "very strong sense of Jewish identity, a strong commitment to her history and her people and her background," said Rabbi Yael Ridberg of the Reconstructionist West End Synagogue, where Kagan's parents were active. "The family really valued education and the ability to make meaning out of the world and to understand it."





Actually, religion has nothing to do with being a judge, as justice is suppose to be blind, in theory.



If this were true, then why are there no antheists on the supreme court.

Also, if your assertions were true, then why do members of the US Supreme Court have such a close working relationship with the fringe, but powerful Jewish cult, the Chabad Lubbavitch? Are you familiar with their poisonous, racist doctrines and proclaimations about non-Jews? If not, then you should take a few moments and familiarize yourself with them. Notice, I didn't say all Jews believe this, just the fringe wackos who are working closely with the US Supreme Court.




And just in case somebody missed it earlier...

There is NO WAY that this Kagan person should even be considered for even a district court judge, let alone SCOTUS. She has never even served as a judge, ever, in any court. Not even in traffic court.


You mean that setting up a free tampon and coffee service aren't relevant job skills for the Supreme Court  ;D

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
I don't see too many people here or complaining of the articles by Jews proclaiming Kagan's strong Jewish identity.

On Kagan's strong Jewish identity...


If this were true, then why are there no antheists on the supreme court.

Also, if your assertions were true, then why do members of the US Supreme Court have such a close working relationship with the fringe, but powerful Jewish cult, the Chabad Lubbavitch? Are you familiar with their poisonous, racist doctrines and proclaimations about non-Jews? If not, then you should take a few moments and familiarize yourself with them. Notice, I didn't say all Jews believe this, just the fringe wackos who are working closely with the US Supreme Court.


You mean that setting up a free tampon and coffee service aren't relevant job skills for the Supreme Court  ;D

This is definitely what Goldman Sachs had in mind IMO with this choice. Instead of the most obvious issue which is that she is a corporate shill just like Obama. She will ensure Goldman or and of the international bankers ever see justice. They definitely want the conversation to go into a religion/sexism dialectic. I agree that the makeup of the court should definitely be more representative of constitutionalists.  She most certainly is not as she believes the constitution has not taken into effect the superior role of the corporation over the rights of man.

And by the way, that wake up from your slumber zionazi stuff is 100% disinfo. The Zionists hate orthodox jews with a passion, that is why they executed the Rabbi and wife in Mumbai and why, documented since Herzl, they have been on a mission to exterminate all remnants of religious monotheism on the planet.

But whatever, guess LeftyLeo started with the whole "religion has nothing to do with it" stuff. Even Buchanan (not known to hold his toungue on such fun filled rhetoric) has a cherry of a story on that issue: http://www.creators.com/conservative/pat-buchanan.html
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dok

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,269
    • end times and current events
Kagan was member of pro-abortion group
Contributed to organization seeking to block attempts to limit female 'reproductive rights'

NEW YORK Elena Kagan, President Obama's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court, contributed financially to and was a listed member of an organization whose stated goal is to promote access to abortion services and blocks attempts to limit female "reproductive rights."

Kagan's listed herself as a member in the National Partnership for Women and Families, or NPWF, which seeks "to increase women's access to ... reproductive health services and block attempts to limit reproductive rights ... and to give every woman access to ... abortion services."

Kagan admitted to her membership in a 1999 questionnaire she filled out as part of judicial nomination hearings that year.

Americans United For Life, a pro-life organization, notes NPWF senior advisor Judith Lichtman wrote a letter "wholeheartedly" supporting Kagan's 2009 solicitor general nomination. In the letter, Lichtman describes Kagan as a "friend and colleague."

"Americans' lives are shaped and changed by the law, but a Supreme Court justice's role is not to impact people's lives by shaping or changing the law according to her own beliefs," an Americans United for Life news release stated.

Kagan has no judicial record to point to her beliefs on key issues, but in 1991 she criticized a Supreme Court decision allowing the government to ban the use federal money for abortion.

Kagan termed the ban "government hostility toward some ideas."

WND reported last week how Kagan argued government funds must not be granted to any religious organizations seeking to prevent teen pregnancies, since such groups may "inject" religious teaching.

However, WND has learned that when questioned during Senate hearings earlier this year about her argument made in a 1987 legal brief Kagan reversed course and called her own memo "the dumbest thing I ever read."

"It would be difficult for any religious organization to participate in such projects without injecting some kind of religious teaching," wrote Kagan in the brief.

She continued: "The government is of course right that religious organizations are different and that these differences are sometimes relevant for the purposes of government funding. ... But when the government funding is to be used for projects so close to the central concerns of religion, all religious organizations should be off limits."

Sign the online petition to oppose Kagan's confirmation

Kagan authored the memo while clerking for Justice Thurgood Marshall. The case was filed in response to a Supreme Court decision that reversed a lower court ruling allowing religious groups that help prevent teen pregnancies to receive government funds through the Adolescent Family Life Act.

The case centered on a religiously affiliated group that provided pregnancy testing, adoption counseling, educational services and child care.

The Supreme Court had ruled the act did not require grantees be affiliated with religious groups, "although the act clearly does not rule out grants to religious organizations."

Kagan, however, took issue with the Supreme Court to argue religious groups should never receive government funds under the act.

Her memo could have been a surefire point of controversy for her nomination to the Supreme Court.

However, asked about her memo in February 2009 Senate confirmation hearings for her nomination as solicitor general, she called her 1987 argument "the dumbest thing I ever read."

Continued Kagan in Senate testimony reviewed by WND: "I indeed believe that my 22-year-old analysis, written for Justice Marshall, was deeply mistaken. It seems now utterly wrong to me to say that religious organizations generally should be precluded from receiving funds for providing the kinds of services contemplated by the Adolescent Family Life Act."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=154805
HOW TO BE SAVED
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Ye Must Be Born Again!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Basics/ye_must_be_born_again.htm

True Salvation & the TRUE Gospel/Good News!
http://www.contendingfortruth.com/?p=1060

how to avoid censorship ;)

Offline rio

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,708

This is definitely what Goldman Sachs had in mind IMO with this choice. Instead of the most obvious issue which is that she is a corporate shill just like Obama. She will ensure Goldman or and of the international bankers ever see justice. They definitely want the conversation to go into a religion/sexism dialectic.



No, the point is not to have a serious religious/racial debate with the Kagan nomination, unless it is a narrowly framed by the mainstream media ie: hatred of minorities. That inflammatory debate will be allowed by "Goldman Sachs" and  international bankers.

The Goldman Sachs issue is obviously of importance, but also of importance is the issue of possible ethnic networking and the over-representation of Jews, Catholics (and possibly lesbians) on the Supreme Court, their connections to a fringe, racist Jewish cult, and what that might mean for the Americans.

From a recent Paul Watson article.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/senator-kagan-argued-government-could-ban-books.html

Quote from:

Obama’s Supreme Court nominee also thinks certain expressions of free speech should be ‘disappeared’ if the government deems them to be offensive. On the surface that’s any opinion on racial, sexuality or gender issues, but since criticizing Obama is now deemed racist, where will it all end?

In a 1993 University of Chicago Law review article, Kagan wrote, “I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation.” (emphasis mine).



And by the way, that wake up from your slumber zionazi stuff is 100% disinfo.


When you say zionazi 100% disinfo stuff it seems means that you disagree with it personally,and that other members should not go there and look at the information. It's the same tactic that mainstream forums use when someone posts a like to Prison Planet/Infowars.

 What the forum members should do when you claim somthing is "100% zionazi disinfo" is to immediately go to the source, read the information and decide for themselves. WUFYS is nothing more than a cut and paste news aggregator, where users post stories from mainstream and alternative news sources.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
No, the point is not to have a serious religious/racial debate with the Kagan nomination, unless it is a narrowly framed by the mainstream media ie: hatred of minorities. That inflammatory debate will be allowed by "Goldman Sachs" and  international bankers.

The Goldman Sachs issue is obviously of importance, but also of importance is the issue of possible ethnic networking and the over-representation of Jews, Catholics (and possibly lesbians) on the Supreme Court, their connections to a fringe, racist Jewish cult, and what that might mean for the Americans.

From a recent Paul Watson article.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/senator-kagan-argued-government-could-ban-books.html

Exactly, Goldman Sachs has been the number one connection that is completely sidelined by the MSM. And many compromised sites seen as Hal Turner type provocateurs are diverting attention to focusing on race/religion/nationality/sexism/sexual orientation. This is overtly obvious by the likes of iamthewitness, ziopedia,and wakeupfromyourslumber (your reference) to name but a few. As Paul has exposed another important issue is the opinion of hers to infring on free speech. She of course uses the very sites that you promote and their rhetoric to support her argument. Almost like peas in a pod. And although the article does not in any way support your collapsing of issues, you seem to post a portion of it as if it does. Kind of odd, oh well it has been done before so I guess I should not be surproised.

Quote
When you say zionazi 100% disinfo stuff it seems means that you disagree with it personally,and that other members should not go there and look at the information. It's the same tactic that mainstream forums use when someone posts a like to Prison Planet/Infowars.

Actually, the attacks on the orthodox jews that oppose zionism is well known. This is why a few were assassinated by zonazi Dope Inc. elements during the Mumbai false flag, why those that support Iran's summits questioning the official version of holocaust events are shunned, and why Herzl and Ben Gurien declared a war on orthodox jewish beliefs to exterminate their kind from the globe. If you wish to personally call these confirmed and documented facts personal, that is of course your perogative.  I am simply pointing out that this seems to be something you disagree with personally and do not seem to have much evidence backing it up.

Quote
What the forum members should do when you claim somthing is "100% zionazi disinfo" is to immediately go to the source, read the information and decide for themselves.

Absolutely and definitely look around such websites to get a full understanding of the content and any possible agendas.

Quote
WUFYS is nothing more than a cut and paste news aggregator, where users post stories from mainstream and alternative news sources.

Yup, I am certain that the audience can assess for themselves via the consistency and propensity of the agreggate reposts central themes and any comments therein what any possible agenda may be.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,090
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Elena Kagan - Nominee to be an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court - Committee Questionnaire
http://judiciary.senate.gov/nominations/SupremeCourt/KaganQuestionnaire.cfm
On May 13, 2010, the Committee released the questions included in the bipartisan Committee questionnaire.  The responses were received on May 18, 2010.

Committee Questionnaire
Question 12A - Publications - Books, Articles, Reports, Letters to the Editor, Editorial Pieces, Other Published Materials
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Attachment 7
Attachment 8
Attachment 9
Attachment 10
Attachment 11
Attachment 12
Attachment 13
Attachment 14
Attachment 15
Attachment 16
Attachment 17
Attachment 18
Attachment 19
Attachment 20
Attachment 21
Attachment 22
Attachment 23
Attachment 24
Attachment 25
Attachment 26
Attachment 27
Attachment 28
Attachment 29
Attachment 30
Attachment 31
Attachment 32
Attachment 33
Attachment 34
Attachment 35
Attachment 36
Attachment 37
Attachment 38
Attachment 39
Attachment 40
Attachment 41
Attachment 42
Attachment 43
Attachment 44
Attachment 45
Attachment 46
Attachment 47
Attachment 48
Attachment 49
Attachment 50
Attachment 51
Attachment 52
Attachment 53
Attachment 54
Attachment 55
Attachment 56
Attachment 57
Attachment 58
Attachment 59
Attachment 60
Question 12B - Reports, Memoranda, Policy Statements, Minutes, Agendas, Other Materials
Combined Attachment
Question 12C - Testimony, Official Statements, Other Communications
Question 12D - Speeches, Remarks, Lectures, Panel Discussions, Conferences, Political Speeches, Symposia, Panels, Continuing Legal Education Events, Question and Answer Sessions
Question 12E - Outlines and Notes from Speeches
Question 12F - Interviews
Question 12G - Reports, Memoranda, Policy Statements from Public Office
Question 12H - Community-Wide Letters, Emails and Other Communications
Question 12I - Letters, Pamphlets, Website Content, Articles, Other Materials
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately