MONARCH: The New Phoenix Program - by Marshall Thomas

[matrixcutter]

http://www.monarchnewphoenix.com/



Marshall Thomas's explosive Monarch book trilogy and video series exposes the New Phoenix Program currently being carried out on political activists and dissident civilians. The Phoenix Program, assassinating suspected VC sympathizers in a systematic manner, worked well during the Vietnam War and is the blueprint for the current black op targeting thousands of loyal Americans using state of the art microwave (MW) and radio frequency radiation (RFR) weapons. The motivation to suppress domestic dissidents and to assassinate loyal American opposition stems from the perception of dissent against the war as treason. This philosophy is stated very clearly in the MindWar paper written by NSA General Aquino. The DOD has a huge stake in futuristic technology that kills by ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, leaving little or no trace. The indiscriminant killing of the Phoenix Program continues on American soil. The terms soft kill, slow kill and silent kill refer to the new way of killing the enemy in conflicts short of war and the small wars of the future.

The counterinsurgency doctrine has now been applied to the home front, so that the perceived betrayal of the military in Vietnam will not be repeated. The generation of CIA and military intelligence led by Shackley, Helms, Casey, Abrams, Singlaub, Secord, John B. Alexander, Michael Aquino, Paul Vallely, and others have built the perfect beast, using selective assassination that leaves no trace. The ability to cull the human herd with Silent Kill technology allows a few personalities to remake the entire society in their own image.

The victims of this new program of harassment and abuse need YOUR help! Please read the books and watch the videos today, send the links to your friends, and tell as many people as you can about this website. Then please make a donation using our Paypal button to help us spread the word and stop the victimization!

NEW: Visit the Monarch store to buy shirts and more! Download Marshall Thomas's new music here.


Read the books:

Monarch: Book One
The New Phoenix Program
PDF     DOC

Monarch: Book Two
Victims
PDF     DOC

Monarch: Book Three
The Long Way Home
PDF     DOC

Videos:

Youtube account and playlists
133 videos at the time of writing + 5 Google Videos below.

The New Phoenix Program (2hrs 15mins)
The film about war crimes using microwave weapons to neutralize and kill political activists and whistleblowers. The author has interviewed 200 targets who have been turned into human guinea pigs to perfect electromagnetic weapons and the science of behavior modification.

The New Phoenix Program II (1hr 20mins)
The second film about microwave weapons war crimes and crimes against humanity. The victims tell their story of being tortured mercilessly with state of the art anti-personnel weapons.

Monarch three (45mins)
Victims of electromagnetic harassment and organized stalking speak of their torture.

War Crimes Speech (6mins 52s)
Brief description of four main facts proving war crimes.

Seven Minute Speech
War crimes and information about how to reform.

-----

All of this information can be downloaded for free.  Then you can make a donation using the Paypal button on Marshall Thomas' website .

Getting all these links together took a while, so please give generously (to Marshall Thomas, not to me).

[Mr Grinch]

This is disturbing when a person considers that they have GPSd everyones front door (including mine, I saw the silly girl as she hopped off my porch) and this new DTV system implementation.

Ive become convinced DTV along with wifi and the pulsed microwave digital cellphone signals are probably capable of being tuned remotely into directional arrays perhaps capable of "helping" a person into a box underground.

[matrixcutter]

A: MONARCH: The New Phoenix Program 2hrs (22 Videos)

[Infoninja]

Wow.

This was really great and really informative about stuff I didn't know too much about.

Just when you think you've seen it all.

That's some seriously strange stuff. Michael Aquino is obviously a serious freak. He very likely still has lots of power in the government/intelligence communities if he's on the same level as Hayden.

Unbelievable.

Must see.

[Mr Grinch]

Wow.

This was really great and really informative about stuff I didn't know too much about.

Just when you think you've seen it all.

That's some seriously strange stuff. Michael Aquino is obviously a serious freak. He very likely still has lots of power in the government/intelligence communities if he's on the same level as Hayden.

Unbelievable.

Must see.

Isnt he the same guy who Kelley O'Brien accused of vaginally mutilating her and of being a Satanic priest?

{"Traceformation of America" My copy is unreferenced so I cant search easily}

[Mike Philbin]

if this is REALLY the case, if such weapons are being used on the populace, we need to start coming up with Independent Autopsy tests/observations that'll confirm cause of death from these systems.

what are the symptoms of such weapons?

Mike
 

[ShadowBroker]

This site list some effects

http://www.stopeg.com/electronicharassment.html

Basic restrictions
Different scientific bases were used in the development
of basic exposure restrictions for various frequency
ranges:
c Between 1 Hz and 10 MHz, basic restrictions are
provided on current density to prevent effects on
nervous system functions;
c Between 100 kHz and 10 GHz, basic restrictions
on SAR are provided to prevent whole-body heat
stress and excessive localized tissue heating; in
the 100 kHz–10 MHz range, restrictions are
provided on both current density and SAR; and
c Between 10 and 300 GHz, basic restrictions are
provided on power density to prevent excessive
heating in tissue at or near the body surface.

This is taken from this document

http://www.icnirp.org/documents/emfgdl.pdf

The “microwave hearing”
effect is a well known example of this (Frey 1961; Frey
and Messenger 1973; Lin 1978): people with normal
hearing can perceive pulse-modulated fields with frequencies
between about 200 MHz and 6.5 GHz. The
auditory sensation has been variously described as a
buzzing, clicking, or popping sound, depending on the
modulation characteristics of the field. The microwave
hearing effects have been attributed to a thermoelastic
interaction in the auditory cortex of the brain, with a
threshold for perception of about 100–400 mJ m22 for
pulses of duration less than 30 ms at 2.45 GHz (corresponding
to an SA of 4–16 mJ kg21). Repeated or
prolonged exposure to microwave auditory effects may
be stressful and potentially harmful.

From the same document.

Finally, at extremely high current densities,
exceeding 1 A m22, severe and potentially lifethreatening
effects such as cardiac extrasystoles, ventricular
fibrillation, muscular tetanus, and respiratory failure
may occur. The severity and the probability of irreversibility
of tissue effects becomes greater with chronic
exposure to induced current densities above the level
10 to 100 mA m22. It therefore seems appropriate to
limit human exposure to fields that induce current densities
no greater than 10 mA m22 in the head, neck, and
trunk at frequencies of a few hertz up to 1 kHz.

Also from the same document.

That electromagnetic fields only dangers are excessive heating is a myth.

[ramallamamama]

Aquino = Vampire.

[raven1]

While the crime of organized stalking and electronic harassment, of which "mind control" is one part, is very important, visitors to this thread need to know that neither "MONARCH" nor a program called the "New Phoenix" have any connection to the OS/EH crimes.

"MONARCH" was allegedly, never proven, a program of torturing physically captive children to produce split personalities.  "Phoenix" was a military black operation in Southeast Asia.

For years, Mr. Thomas has been informed that it is misleading to try to associate such irrelevant program names with the crime of OS/EH, but he has steadfastly refused to correct this error.

Eleanor White

[jeremystalked1]

Confirming what Eleanor White has to say, there is no program run by the government called Monarch (so far as we know).  The survivors of the program call it that, apparently because images of Monarch butterflies figure prominently in the programming, but as mentioned in John W. DeCamp's exposé of ritual abuse (The Franklin Cover-Up), that's not what the official name is.  I call it Monarch, while adding the disclaimer that it's what the survivors' name for the program is.

And furthermore, Monarch is a trauma-based mind control program.  This is a very important issue, but it doesn't have anything to do with organized stalking/electronic harassment (OS/EH) except insofar as some Monarch Project survivors get targeted with OS/EH to keep them quiet.

Many MKULTRA/Monarch survivors refuse to even acknowledge targeting because they feel it discredits them.  I feel the same way about certain incredible stories coming from mind control survivors (e.g. the shape-shifting lizards), which I believe are the product of brainwashing.  NAFF is with me on this.

http://naffoundation.org/Illuminati%20Survivors.htm#lizard%20alien%20screen%20memories

[gangstalking]

Has anyone in the other Gang Stalking camps done any research into the violent persons registry? Here is a comment I left over at a Ken 5 news investigation article on the subject.



gangstalking said on March 4, 2010 at 11:19 AM

I think it was very nice to see a news story on this topic. I am a little concerned that the focus for this is being shifted away from local community policing groups and the fact that they have joined forces with other organizations. Please do some research on the Violent Persons Registry and the Jane Clift story. It's possible to have a Violent Registry Marker issued against your name, without you knowing it, and this can also coincide with being followed around, and flagged pretty much where you do. Also if a marker coincides with a community investigation, you will likely be followed around by citizen informants. No satalights needed. You can have this designation against you for years. If Targets are on such lists, the Gang Stalking portion comes in because these lists are being used illegally to target specific people. Marking them as violent, crazy, pedophiles, drug dealers, etc.

 
Please do an investigation into Violent Person Designation or Violent Persons Registry, but do the research for America. These terms that I just used are for the UK. Under Health and Safety programs workplaces, educational facilities, must report incidents, and we have the same flagging system, which could get someone I guess you call it blacklisted, but flagged is the term. Where they go, making it hard to get jobs, rent, and live their lives. That would be bad enough, but if an investigation is opened, everyone is contacted, told not to say anything and you could be followed around by the vast networks of citizen informants that each community now has. Most people are not aware of the citizen informant networks, they are already in place thus why dozens of people can follow one person. Limited guidelines means they can and do get away with gaslighting and harassing us. I think legal action would be good. Individual or a class action if we can.

[gangstalking]

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/03/the-list/

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2009/10/defamation-and-anti-social-behaviour/

various authors / CC BY-NC 2.0

Defamation and anti-social behaviour
Published by Francis Davey
14 July 2009

Clift v Slough Borough Council [2009] EWHC 1550 considers the extent to which a local authority has an interest or duty to pass on allegations about anti-social behaviour to its employees and contractors for the purposes of the defence of qualified to a claim for defamation. It is also an example of the all too common situation of a victim being targeted as a perpetrator.

Background

On the morning of 11 August 2005 Mrs Clift witnessed a group of five people in the public park drinking. A child of about 3 years of age was pulling plants up from a flower bed and damaging other plants. Ms Clift protested at this behaviour and was herself threatened by one of the men. In addition he himself trampled the flower bed in response to her intervention.

Mrs Clift called the police and the parks department. She was referred to the council who she telephoned. The conversation “went badly” with the council officer threatening to terminate the call, although it was in fact ended by Mrs Clift. She wrote a letter of complaint explaining how upset she was about the handling matter. In the letter she said (referring the the council officer):

“…I felt so affronted and filled with anger that I am certain that I would have physically attacked her if she had been anywhere near me. I truly am not of that nature and so, surely, this should act as a wake up call to the Borough as to the capacity she has for offending people….”

Rather than trying to address the underlying problem (the anti-social behaviour directed against C and her unhappiness that it had not been properly addressed) the council’s Head of Public Protection (Mr Kelleher) investigated the incident itself and decided to enter Mrs Clift’s name in the “Violent Person Register”. She was rated as medium risk, her name to remain on the register for 18 months. The reason being noted as “threatening behaviour on several occasions” together with some inaccurate particulars of the incident.

By way of comparison, another entry on the register of medium risk referred to someone who had prevented a council representative from leaving premises for a period of 2 hours.

Mr Kelleher had circulated an email to 54 individuals stating:

“I have requested that Jane Clift’s name be added to the register of violent persons following repeated threats of violence towards a member of staff.

Whilst we will continue to provide her with our normal range of services, I would ask that any officer making a site visit, or conducting a face to face interview with Ms Clift does so in the presence of an accompanying officer. Equally, any member of staff receiving a telephone call from Ms Clift should make a full note of that conversation including Ms Clift’s manner”.

A hard copy was also sent to 12 council community wardens. The Register itself was circulated – though precisely how and to whom was unclear to the court. Evidence from Slough suggested that there would not have been more than 150 recipients of the Register but the exact number was not an issue left to the jury.

Mrs Clift was, unsurprisingly, unhappy about this and eventually brought proceedings under the Data Protection Act in the county court and a further claim for libel. The DPA claim was stayed pending the determination of the libel action.

Mrs Clift alleged that the register entry meant that she was a violent person who had engaged in threatening behaviour on a number of occasions. Slough defended on two grounds: (1) justification, that is that Mrs Clift was a violent person etc; and (2) qualified privilege. Mrs Clift replied by alleging malice on behalf of Mr Kelleher.

The jury found in favour of Mrs Clift, awarding her £12,000 in damages, but found that there was no malice.
Qualified Privilege

You can be put on these lists in the U.K. and countries such as America, Canada, and others have the same reporting standards.

[gangstalking]

http://www.1brickcourt.com/files/cases/140CLIFT_58136.pdf

This case is great. She was placed on a list. She used the Data Protection Act and Human Rights Act to sue and win her case.

   

6# The words complained of contain personal information relating to Ms Clift. That is data which is subject to the Data Protection Act 1998 (”DPA”). This Act implemented in English law some of the rights recognised by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (”the Convention”). Later those rights were more fully incorporated into English law by the Human Rights Act 1998 (”HRA”). The Council is a public authority. HRA s.6 (1) provides:

    “It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention Right”.

Physical Contact. This is an area that some targets might be able to build a case on, in regards to who was given access to their data.

Data Protection Act. Human Rights Act. These are the two acts that she was able to use to file her case.

 

    8# The question in this case is whether, and if so how, the Council must demonstrate that it has complied with its public law duties under HRA (and incidentally DPA) if it is to be able to assert that it has the interest or duty required at common law for there to be a defence of qualified privilege.

This is what the case came down to. The same would likely be true for the Acts in other countries.

 

    EVENTS LEADING TO THIS ACTION

    9# As a responsible employer the Council has a policy to protect its employees from violence at work. The policy is set out in a document headed “Safe System of Work (Codes of Practice) H&NS/COP/1.14 Version 1.0 date issued 11/3/03 Violence at Work (Inc Potentially Violent Persons)” (”the Policy”).

This also fell under Violence at Work

   

  15# Mr Kelleher then conducted a number of other interviews. One was with Mr Gulfraz, a friend of Ms Clift. She was accustomed to helping him in making telephone calls and filling out official forms. She was at the time also helping him in a complaint he was making against the Council on a housing matter. He was present at the time Ms Clift made her call to Ms Rashid on 11 August. He heard the whole conversation over the speaker phone. Other witnesses were fellow employees of Ms Rashid. Ms Rashid did not have the phone on loud speaker but her colleagues sitting near her heard her side of the conversation. It was sufficiently unusual to attract their attention.

Witness close to Jane Clift were interviewed. Just like witnesses, family, friends, would be interviewed.

She basically used the Data Protection Act and The Human Rights Act to win her case. Targets might try to duplicate this effort with a lawyer in toe.

[wfy9621]

He has his own YouTube channel. Lots of his "talking head" commentaries and interviews with targeted individuals. Full of info.

http://www.youtube.com/user/marsboy683#g/u

[TRY]

Phoenix program

http://www.uaff.info/marshall_thomas_monarch_the_new_phoenix_program_2009.pdf

[Djævlen]

I really enjoy Marshall's series on MK Ultra. Thanks for posting!