PrisonPlanet Forum
June 19, 2013, 08:06:02 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: . Census workers get ready for door-to-door count  (Read 2241 times)
carlee
Guest
« on: May 01, 2010, 08:35:48 AM »

By DEEPTI HAJELA, Associated Press Writer Deepti Hajela, Associated Press Writer – Sat May 1, 7:24 am ET
NEW YORK – It sounds simple enough. Knock on some doors, ask some questions, get some answers.

But for the more than 600,000 people going door-to-door to reach those who haven't mailed in their census forms, it's not.

When census enumerators set out this Saturday, they could encounter a range of responses at the 48 million addresses they need to check. People who never seem to be home. People who don't speak English. People who say they're too busy. People who swear they mailed in their responses. People who want to know what business is it of the government how many people live in their house, anyway. People who question what will happen to the information that gets collected.

Census workers around the country have spent most the last week getting trained in all the things they need to know to get the job done, from how to deal with people who are reluctant to answer to what to do at homes with guard dogs.

They've been taught the big things: All the information is kept confidential. (That means they can't talk about anything they've seen with anyone, either.) That it's important to answer because census information is needed for many things, such as Congressional representation and federal funding for programs. If someone says they're too busy at that moment, ask for a specific time to come back.

They've also been taught the smaller things: Wear comfortable shoes. Make sure your pencils are nice and sharp to fill out the forms (and yes, they have to be No. 2 pencils). If there's a dog, ask if the householder would mind moving the animal away. Don't ask to enter someone's home. Smile and be confident.

"We did a lot of practice role-playing all week," said Lesley Rubinger, 61, a Manhattanite who will be leading a crew of census workers in her first door-to-door count. "What to do if somebody gets hostile, or they refuse to answer your questions."

The Census Bureau tries to encourage as many people as possible to mail in their responses — this year's response rate was 72 percent, the same as in 2000. That's because door-to-door canvassing is the most expensive part of the count, as well as the most vulnerable to mistakes.

The more than 600,000 workers who will canvass residents around the country earn between $10 and $25 an hour, working until mid-July.

Enumerators have very specific rules about how they're supposed to work, to ensure consistency, said Tim Olson, assistant division chief in the Census Bureau's Field Division.

That means the same rules for everyone, from the number of contact attempts per address (up to six) to how to properly canvas a block (start at one place, then move clockwise.)

Olson said for the most part, census workers don't meet with extremely negative responses to their visits.

"What our enumerators will encounter, by and large, are households that simply have forgotten or misplaced their forms or just were too busy," he said.

"People want to part be of the census," he said.

Of course, there are some differences in what gets emphasized in training sessions around the country. At a New York City training, it didn't make sense to discuss the section on evaluating mobile homes and trailer parks in depth, Rubinger said.

"The manual is very much written for the whole country," she said. "So they talk about mobile homes and RVs and knocking on doors. Our big problem is doormen and brownstones, so it's a whole other little piece.

"That's what we've been emphasizing all week, what to do when someone says 'No, you can't come in this building.'"

The door-to-door count has its challenges — in some immigrant communities, limited English proficiency could hamper responses and in some rural communities, people are spread out and hard to reach.

The stakes are high. The results of the decennial census are used to apportion seats in the House of Representatives. Census officials this week said New York, California, Texas, Arizona and Florida were in danger of losing Congressional seats because of poor participation.

Observers said the Census Bureau had made strides in getting ready for this year's count, and that includes efforts for the door-to-door canvassing.

The agency has reached out to community groups, to help spread the message that people should fill out their questionnaires and shouldn't be wary of census workers knocking on their doors, as well as to help recruit people who speak other languages for those householders who don't speak English.

Some immigrant advocates still expressed their concerns about whether the census would be able to effectively deal with language barriers.

Seema Agnani, executive director of Chhaya Community Development Corporation, said her group had gone out to some Queens neighborhoods to talk to people about the census and had dealt firsthand with the language challenges some enumerators will face.

Even though her members speak a number of languages, it still wasn't enough to talk to all the people they met.

"I can't imagine that the census enumerators will have more languages available than we do," she said.

But still, she praised the agency for the steps it has taken since last decade.

"It's so much better than it was 10 years ago," she said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100501/ap_on_re_us/us_census_door_to_door
Logged
reddog801
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 537


MOLON LABE!


WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2010, 08:55:05 AM »

I sent mine in, granted I ONLY answered question #1 they better just stay away from my house. I have no time for the unconstitutionally motivated questions that they need to have answered for the government. I did my part for the survey, I answered it. I just did not answer all the other crap that I believe to be unconstitutional.....
Logged

Eric
Proud member of OATHKEEPERS!


We must be free not because we claim freedom, but because we practice it.  ~William Faulkner

SKYPE: Reddog801  Twitter: REDDOG801.
Exposing America Forums - http://exposingamerica.info/forums
Dig
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 63,103



WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2010, 09:07:24 AM »

They are planning false flags with census workers, video taping is always helpful.
Logged

All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
votewritein
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 210



« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2010, 09:09:02 AM »

I haven't sent mine in, but if they come by my place, I'm going to give them the form with just the "how many people live here?" question filled out, along with this Ron Paul article:

Quote
Taken from: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=675

Last week Congress voted to encourage participation in the 2010 census. I voted "No" on this resolution for the simple, obvious reason that the census- like so many government programs- has grown far beyond what the framers of our Constitution intended. The invasive nature of the current census raises serious questions about how and why government will use the collected information. It also demonstrates how the federal bureaucracy consistently encourages citizens to think of themselves in terms of groups, rather than as individual Americans. The not so subtle implication is that each group, whether ethnic, religious, social, or geographic, should speak up and demand its "fair share" of federal largesse.

Article I, section 2 of the Constitution calls for an enumeration of citizens every ten years, for the purpose of apportioning congressional seats among the various states. In other words, the census should be nothing more than a headcount. It was never intended to serve as a vehicle for gathering personal information on citizens.

But our voracious federal government thrives on collecting information. In fact, to prepare for the 2010 census state employees recorded GPS coordinates for every front door in the United States so they could locate individuals with greater accuracy! Once duly located, individuals are asked detailed questions concerning their name, address, race, home ownership, and whether they periodically spend time in prison or a nursing home - just to name a few examples.

From a constitutional perspective, of course, the answer to each of these questions is: "None of your business." But the bigger question is -- why government is so intent on compiling this information in the first place?

The Census Bureau claims that collected information is not shared with any federal agency; but rather is kept under lock and key for 72 years. It also claims that no information provided to census takers can be used against you by the government.

However, these promises can and have been abused in the past. Census data has been used to locate men who had not registered for the draft. Census data also was used to find Japanese-Americans for internment camps during World War II. Furthermore, the IRS has applied census information to detect alleged tax evaders. Some local governments even have used census data to check for compliance with zoning regulations.

It is not hard to imagine that information compiled by the census could be used against people in the future, despite claims to the contrary and the best intentions of those currently in charge of the Census Bureau. The government can and does change its mind about these things, and people have a right to be skeptical about government promises.

Yet there are consequences for not submitting to the census and its intrusive questions. If the form is not mailed back in time, households will experience the "pleasure" of a visit by a government worker asking the questions in person. If the government still does not get the information it wants, it can issue a fine of up to $5000.

If the federal government really wants to increase compliance with the census, it should abide by the Constitution and limit its inquiry to one simple question: How many people live here?

I may end up reading the article to their face, then giving them my census form.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!