Matt and Trey Make a Statement [Update: Another future FF patsy EXPOSED!]

[endof]

http://www.collider.com/2010/04/22/statement-from-south-park-creators-about-last-nights-censored-episode/

In the 14 years we’ve been doing South Park we have never done a show that we couldn’t stand behind. We delivered our version of the show to Comedy Central and they made a determination to alter the episode. It wasn’t some meta-joke on our part. Comedy Central added the bleeps. In fact, Kyle’s customary final speech was about intimidation and fear. It didn’t mention Muhammad at all but it got bleeped too. We’ll be back next week with a whole new show about something completely different and we’ll see what happens to it.

The south park studios forum was also taken down earlier today after fan anger on the boards, many posts and threads were deleted before the takedown.

As of right now, the forums are still down.

[Dig]

http://www.collider.com/2010/04/22/statement-from-south-park-creators-about-last-nights-censored-episode/

The south park studios forum was also taken down earlier today after fan anger on the boards, many posts and threads were deleted before the takedown.

As of right now, the forums are still down.

holy crap, they bleeped a speech about keeping to your principals in the face of intimidation? 

You Basterds!

[Monkeypox]

Unbelievable.   You can't even SAY the name "Muhammad"?

[ImmortalTRUTH]

Yes you can.. But not according to Comedy Central apparently.

If this is not a publicity stunt.. 

[endof]

During one scene, a mechanized Barbara Streisand robot is seen stomping through the town on a path of destruction. One voice is heard to say, "they've destroyed La Casa Bonita!"

"La Casa Bonita" is the name of Parker and Stone's production facility.

http://www.lompocrecord.com/news/state-and-regional/article_07c38f67-e32f-5fdb-a35c-c46c884cacf7.html


the end of south park?

If this is not a publicity stunt.

dont look like it...


Also it seems its been pulled from airing in the UK and will never re air in states again...

[Monkeypox]

During one scene, a mechanized Barbara Streisand robot is seen stomping through the town on a path of destruction. One voice is heard to say, "they've destroyed La Casa Bonita!"

"La Casa Bonita" is the name of Parker and Stone's production facility.

http://www.lompocrecord.com/news/state-and-regional/article_07c38f67-e32f-5fdb-a35c-c46c884cacf7.html


the end of south park?

dont look like it...


Also it seems its been pulled from airing in the UK and will never re air in states again...

Never re-air?  Where did you read that?

Well, it's all over the internet and I just pulled my downloaded copy out of the recycle bin to save for posterity.

When will TPTB learn that censorship just doesn't work?

[able]

well mr smoking monkey... post the torrent when your done uploading

[endof]

well mr smoking monkey... post the torrent when your done uploading

http://eztv.it/ep/19997/south-park-s14e06-201-hdtv-xvid-fqm/

there isnt a version im aware of without the censorship...

Never re-air?  Where did you read that?

well the re airs there were supposed to be have been pulled and onthe UK version of the site, where it used to say 'new episode 201, friday' it now says...nothing.

[Monkeypox]

well mr smoking monkey... post the torrent when your done uploading

It's all over the place on the interwebs.  That's how I got it.

if you're talking about the uncensored version, it was never aired.

[Monkeypox]

Why don't Matt and Trey release the text of the speech?  If it doesn't even mention Muhammad, then what's the big deal?

 

[happyJoy]

During one scene, a mechanized Barbara Streisand robot is seen stomping through the town on a path of destruction. One voice is heard to say, "they've destroyed La Casa Bonita!"

"La Casa Bonita" is the name of Parker and Stone's production facility.

the end of south park?

dont look like it...

Also it seems its been pulled from airing in the UK and will never re air in states again...

La Casa Bonita is a faux Mexican theme restaurant in the vein of Chucky Cheese in Lakewood. CO.
A little Denver area trivia.

Still, since they chose that name for their Prod. Co., who knows?

[RabidSheep]

Matt and Trey practicing free speech since 1997. I do not know about you guys, but I will be boycotting Comedy Central with the exception of the New South Park Episodes.

[endof]

Matt and Trey practicing free speech since 1997. I do not know about you guys, but I will be boycotting Comedy Central with the exception of the New South Park Episodes.

Just download them or watch them on south park studios. boycott censorship central!

That is...if there is a south park after this...

i got the distinct impression in 200 they were saying give us our free speech or we are out.
Considering its now clear CC took 201 and Censored the absolute shit out of it..i really dont know.

I honestly think this could be the end of south park, after next weeks ep there may well be no more.

[endof]

The Official forum btw is totally gone.

Its apparently been gone for over 10 hours, it seems CC have completely removed the entire database because of a fan backlash earlier today.

http://www.kylefanclub.com/forum/showthread.php?t=815

http://forums.southparkstudios.com/forum/

[Monkeypox]

WTF, I guess CC are a bunch of anti-free speech goons now.

Like The Clash said, you have the right to Free Speech, as long as you're not dumb enough to actually try it.

[L2Design]

This is horrible 

[Dig]

comedy central is owned by viacom which is owned by globalist pig sumner redstone.

LOOK AT WHAT DOES NOT GET CENSORED BY SUMNER REDSTONE:


Lady Gaga, The Illuminati Puppet
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=123040.0

[Yes MTV = Masonic TV...Duh!]



"No one will enter the New World Order...
unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer.
No one will enter the New Age
unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation."
-David Spangler
Director of Planetary Initiative
United Nations

-------------------------------------
SUMNER REDSTONE'S MTV AWARD SHOW
&
UNITED NATIONS LUCIFERIAN INITIATION


http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=135033.0
-------------------------------------

The cure for the conditioning...

[endof]

edit...never mind

[Dig]

Viacom loves to keep an eye on things

[endof]

Viacom loves to keep an eye on things

litterly what..2 mins after i posted that link to the video it was taken down by viacom..

[H0llyw00d]

whats a Gaga???...that hideous woman??

[Dig]

VIacom cannot let South Park liberate the American people from their intimidation agenda:


VIACOM: NCIS Los Angeles : Homegrown Terrorist show

this week, "homegrown" terrorists

http://www.cbs.com/primetime/ncis_los_angeles/video/?pid=V1Y5RvghKLoFVDVLexqXuV5lVe5Pi9FE&nrd=1

VIACOM: Sensationalizing DHS/NORTHCOM HOMEGROWN TERROR PSYOPS "HACKING" UAV'S

Here is the TV line up this season:

NBC (General Electric builds the concentration camps with Halliburton and owns the Deathcare Eugenics Legislation)...

CBS (Viacom/National Amusement owned by illuminati globalist Sumner Redstone)...

ABC (Disney conditioning kids to accept illuminati agendas for decades)...

NONSTOP CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATIONS, EMERGENCY DISASTER PROGRAMMING, HOSPITAL DAY TO DAY ACTIVITIES DEALING WITH MANUFACTURED PANDEMICS, SHEEP ALL DOING EXACTLY AS THEIR TOLD, AND ANYONE WHO STEPS OUT OF LINE GETS TASERED/TAGGED/BAGGED/RIDICULED/TORTURED/EXECUTED FOR THE GOOD OF NATIONAL SECURITY!

WHO CAN DENY THIS? IT IS RIGHT ON TV 24/7!

[Dig]

litterly what..2 mins after i posted that link to the video it was taken down by viacom..

Yup, Sumner loves playing whack-a-mole...

[Dig]

And what happens when this forum exposes Viacom's agenda of conitioning false flags and blaming them on patsy homegrowners?

Concept and text by Sane

Hey Sumner and Brzezinski's manufactured war on freedom...

F*ck you Dorrrrphin, F*ck you Whaaaaarrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Dig]

more fun from these globalist pigs...

ACTA treaty aims to deputize ISPs on copyrights
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20003005-38.html
by Declan McCullagh April 21, 2010 1:59 AM PDT

Internet service providers could become copyright cops encouraged to block access to suspected pirate Web sites, according to a previously secret draft treaty made public on Wednesday.

One section of the proposed digital copyright treaty says that immunity from lawsuits would be granted to Internet providers "disabling access" to pirated material and adopting a policy dealing with unauthorized "transmission of materials protected by copyright." If the ISPs choose not to do so, they could face legal liability.

Both the Obama administration and the Bush administration had rejected requests from civil libertarians and technologists for copies of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, or ACTA. Last year, the White House went so far as to invoke an executive order saying disclosure would do "damage to the national security."

But after the European Parliament voted last month by a 633-to-13 margin to demand the release of ACTA's text, keeping it secret became too politically problematic for the countries represented in the closed-door negotiations. Besides the United States, the European Commission, Australia, Canada, Japan, and New Zealand are among the nations participating. They've been egged on by copyright lobby groups.

Much of the language in ACTA has been anonymously proposed by one nation or another but is not final, and it's not clear whether the "disabling access" section will remain. Another nearby paragraph does say, in a nod to privacy concerns, that governments should not "impose a general monitoring requirement" on broadband providers. The language does appear to go further than U.S. laws governing broadband providers and copyright.

The wording is slightly different from an earlier draft, which talked about yanking the accounts of "repeat infringers" and was leaked last month by a French digital rights group.

The European Union published the draft text of ACTA on its Web site on Wednesday, along with a statement from EU Trade Commissioner Karel de Gucht saying concerns about the document's sweep were "unfounded."

De Gucht noted, for instance, that suspected language such as a "three strikes" rule for broadband customers and a "gradual response" for suspected infringement was not in the ACTA draft.

In general, ACTA's proposals seek to export controversial chunks of U.S. copyright law to the rest of the world. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act's "anti-circumvention" section, which makes it illegal to bypass copy protection even to back up a Blu-Ray disc, is in there. So is the No Electronic Theft Act's concept of making it a crime to copy a sufficient quantity of software, music, or videos -- even if no money changes hands.

While the public draft version of ACTA wouldn't prohibit border guards from searching travelers' gadgetry for infringing files, nor would it appear to require that action. That has been one of the concerns of groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge, which have criticized the draft treaty.

The U.S. Trade Representative said in a statement last week that recent ACTA negotiations in New Zealand were "constructive." The next meeting is in Switzerland in June.

Update late Wednesday: By now, there has been a flurry of responses to the release of the ACTA draft, including the Motion Picture Association of America saying it is an "important step forward" and deserves to be adopted. The Copyright Alliance likes it too. Public Knowledge, on the other hand, remains concerned that ACTA attempts "to export a regulatory regime that favors big media companies at the expense of consumers and innovators." The Computer and Communications Industry, which has often cast a skeptical eye toward laws expanding copyright, says the release confirms "fears that the agreement will unreasonably increase the legal exposure of U.S. technology and Internet businesses operating abroad."

[Dig]

And now a word from our solicitor general and possible supreme court nominee on freedom of speech:


Solicitor-general nominee: impressive First Amendment resume
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/analysis.aspx?id=21093

Kagan's articles include:

“The Changing Faces of First Amendment Neutrality: R.A.V. v St. Paul, Rust v Sullivan, and the Problem of Content-Based Underinclusion,” in The Supreme Court Review, 1992.

“Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V.,” University of Chicago Law Review, 1993.

“When a Speech Code is a Speech Code: The Stanford Policy and the Theory of Incidental Restraints,” U.C. Davis Law Review, 1996.

“Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine,” University of Chicago Law Review, 1996.

In her 1993 University of Chicago Law Review piece, she wrote that proposed regulations on hate speech and pornography failed to adhere to the fundamental First Amendment principle of viewpoint neutrality — that the government cannot favor certain private speakers or viewpoints over others.

Her 1996 article on government motive in First Amendment cases has been cited more than 115 times — an enviably high number for a secondary source. In that article she declares that “the application of First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting.”

[Ryujin]

And what happens when this forum exposes Viacom's agenda of conitioning false flags and blaming them on patsy homegrowners?

Hey Sumner and Brzezinski's manufactured war on freedom...

F*ck you Dorrrrphin, F*ck you Whaaaaarrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dude, you just made my night. While we might not agree on everything I think we can agree on the fact so long as we can make fun of those bastards victory is inevitable

[superfender]

During one scene, a mechanized Barbara Streisand robot is seen stomping through the town on a path of destruction. One voice is heard to say, "they've destroyed La Casa Bonita!"

"La Casa Bonita" is the name of Parker and Stone's production facility.

No, actually there was an older episode, in which cartmen was obsessed with going to his favorite, chucky-cheese-type restaurant, Casa Bonita:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYKyRM-oxL4

[FFeg626]

WOW. what a show. if you guys don't think this is a publicity stunt you don't give these guys enough credit. For instance when was the last time the PP forums had what 3 topics on a tv show on the first page. and we are talking 200!!! episodes.
        When this show first hit the air there where news story's of the same liking about whether or not it "crossed the line" and here we are 200 episodes later and they are yet again getting front news press. Trey and Matt a brilliant at realizing what offends people making fun of it and in turn making mad money off it. It is as simple as that.

      On the note of free speech. this as nothing to do with what our constitution says. It protects us form government infringing on ones speech. Not a corporation with which one HAS A CONTRACT WITH THAT ALLOWS THEM TOO CENSOR there OWN material. If the south park creators really wanted to get there uncensored material out they would have broken their contract a long time ago and gone to someone else or just released it on there own.


OH ya!  There are TWO wars going on in our name  and the banks are turning us into slaves!.... Man i just played right into there game of distraction... now i feel cheated... Im gonna sleep.

[Dig]

WOW. what a show. if you guys don't think this is a publicity stunt you don't give these guys enough credit. For instance when was the last time the PP forums had what 3 topics on a tv show on the first page. and we are talking 200!!! episodes.
        When this show first hit the air there where news story's of the same liking about whether or not it "crossed the line" and here we are 200 episodes later and they are yet again getting front news press. Trey and Matt a brilliant at realizing what offends people making fun of it and in turn making mad money off it. It is as simple as that.

      On the note of free speech. this as nothing to do with what our constitution says. It protects us form government infringing on ones speech. Not a corporation with which one HAS A CONTRACT WITH THAT ALLOWS THEM TOO CENSOR there OWN material. If the south park creators really wanted to get there uncensored material out they would have broken their contract a long time ago and gone to someone else or just released it on there own.


OH ya!  There are TWO wars going on in our name  and the banks are turning us into slaves!.... Man i just played right into there game of distraction... now i feel cheated... Im gonna sleep.

you do realize that the need to continue the fake al-CIA-duh lies is the reason for this right? before brzezinski's frankenstein project went full monty, this was a non-issue.

the episode is not available and in 200 episodes this is the only time they were ever censored like this.

and yes it is a first amendment issue when only 5 bilderberg controlled maniacs control 99% of what we see, hear, and read it is not just a simple contract, it is a corporatist oligopoly that can shut down free speech at will.

Here are the details of supposed al-CIA-duh threat:

The New York-based Revolution Muslim group on Wednesday issued a "call to protest," after long-running cable television show "South Park" portrayed the Prophet wearing a bear costume, CNN reported. The website was largely unavailable Wednesday but a CNN report said the statement was posted alongside a graphic photo of slain Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, who was murdered by a Muslim extremist in Amsterdam in 2004. The statement posted the address of "South Park" creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker's Los Angeles production offices, CNN reported. "We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo van Gogh for airing this show," the group said. "This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality that will likely happen to them." A spokesman for the group denied the statement was an incitement to violence. "Revolution Muslim only wants those offended to be able to voice their opposition by letters to the show's creators," a spokesman told CNN. http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0422/south-park-episode-censored-muslim-groups-warning/

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE RANDOM DEATH THREATS AS A SUPPOSED TERRORIST ORGANIZATION OPERATING OUT OF NEW YORK CITY AND NOT GET INVESTIGATED?

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE WHEN ANY CITIZEN GETS IMMEDIATELY INVESTIGATED FOR SAYING "I AM NOT SURE I COMPLETELY LOVE EVERY WORD OF THE HEALTHCARE BILL".

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE IF IT IS NOT A CIA/MI6/MOSSAD FRONT GROUP?

READ THE RELEVANT PARTS AGAIN:

The New York-based Revolution Muslim group on Wednesday issued a "call to protest"

the statement was posted alongside a graphic photo of slain Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh,

who was murdered by a Muslim extremist in Amsterdam in 2004.

The statement posted the address of "South Park" creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker's Los Angeles production offices,

"We have to warn Matt and Trey that what they are doing is stupid and they will probably wind up like Theo van Gogh for airing this show,"

"This is not a threat, but a warning of the reality that will likely happen to them."

HOW IS THAT NOT A HAL TURNER/FEDERAL AGENCY?

[ImmortalTRUTH]

We need to wait and see.. 

[Viper]

So it turns out the giant bleep at the end wasn't Matt and Trey sayin' f you to comedy central, it was the other way around.
Loco de Coco fo sho!

[ImmortalTRUTH]

Yes i agree, Sane.. All groups or individuals who is allowed to make death threats without being arrested is usually Feds\Provocateurs.

[Monkeypox]

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE RANDOM DEATH THREATS AS A SUPPOSED TERRORIST ORGANIZATION OPERATING OUT OF NEW YORK CITY AND NOT GET INVESTIGATED?

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE WHEN ANY CITIZEN GETS IMMEDIATELY INVESTIGATED FOR SAYING "I AM NOT SURE I COMPLETELY LOVE EVERY WORD OF THE HEALTHCARE BILL".

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE IF IT IS NOT A CIA/MI6/MOSSAD FRONT GROUP?

Absolutely Sane.

The ironic thing is, Muhammad wasn't even in the bear costume, LOL

[DanishD00D]

Any avid South Park fan will know that these guys truly don't discriminate. They'll poke fun at everybody.

As for the 200th episode... It was annoying to watch. For a fan the whole gingers/Scott Tenorman/Cartmans dad/Super Best Friends/Whiny celebrities/Mega-Streisand brought so many favorite moments and characters back. And the Tom Cruise bashing was a particular delight.

And if nothing good comes of this, most likely this episode will reach the net in an uncensored version I'm sure. Just like the Simpsons Halloween special from a few years back where the unedited version arrived first blasting the Iraq war decision showing the people as mindless pigs the instant they got scared, in a War of the Worlds storyline, and the crappy FOX censored and ruined one later after network air.

May South Park continue for another 14 seasons+

[endof]

I hope everyone does realise what this represents, what this is.

There is an outright war on free speech and with the censorship of south park, a major battle has been lost.

[chrisfromchi]

what i don't understand is how a Ny based muslim group that issued this threat isn't closed down and everyone arrested and on TV cause they death threated americans?

They go after people for forums posts right?!? i mean seriously is this ny muslim group a controlled fed one that put it out to cause it all?

I say its a ny based group cause jon stewart said so.

[Dig]

I hope everyone does realise what this represents, what this is.

There is an outright war on free speech and with the censorship of south park, a major battle has been lost.

I completely disagree. This is like what happened to Tommy Chong, Dave Chappelle, Dylan Ratigan, Wyclef Jean, and James Traficant. Such a complete perverse and manipulative abuse of power that cannot possibly by rationalize, justified, or in any way logically understood causes a mass awakening to the New World Order control grid. Trey and Matt and millions of SP fans can see this bullshit from a mile away.

These creative geniuses might completely revolutionalize comedic communications from this.

Bottom line is that this was not a new strain on free speech IMO. It is a wake up call to millions who can now see how draconian the MSM is in their obsession with depriving the population of basic entertainment.

I mean this is beyond surreal. Once every 2-3 weeks after hard labor of carrying stones up the illuminati pyramid, we slaves get the gift of 30 minutes of fine entertainment. Now the pharaoh has declared..."F U slaves, no more chocolate rations!"

[Dig]

what i don't understand is how a Ny based muslim group that issued this threat isn't closed down and everyone arrested and on TV cause they death threated americans?

They go after people for forums posts right?!? i mean seriously is this ny muslim group a controlled fed one that put it out to cause it all?

I say its a ny based group cause jon stewart said so.

HOW CAN THERE BE ANY DOUBT?

I mean this is like 0 = 0. It does not even begin to require algebraic evaluation, it is an absolute  truth, a null set.

[endof]

I completely disagree. This is like what happened to Tommy Chong, Dave Chappelle, Dylan Ratigan, Wyclef Jean, and James Traficant. Such a complete perverse and manipulative abuse of power that cannot possibly by rationalize, justified, or in any way logically understood causes a mass awakening to the New World Order control grid. Trey and Matt and millions of SP fans can see this bullshit from a mile away.

These creative geniuses might completely revolutionalize comedic communications from this.

Bottom line is that this was not a new strain on free speech IMO. It is a wake up call to millions who can now see how draconian the MSM is in their obsession with depriving the population of basic entertainment.

I mean this is beyond surreal. Once every 2-3 weeks after hard labor of carrying stones up the illuminati pyramid, we slaves get the gift of 30 minutes of fine entertainment. Now the pharaoh has declared..."F U slaves, no more chocolate rations!"

What Matt and Trey did, was effecitvely to challange the status quo, opening a salvo agaisnt it.
The fact they have been slapped down like this and censored to high heaven, should wake people the hell up and rally people to their support.
Anything can be censored now, if they the establishment can come up with a reason, it will be censored.

I just wonder if the majority will yet again just accept things and am concerned the needed counter attack will not materialize.
People here have an alaraming tendancy to accept things, in fact several people i have spoken to have agreed with the censorship..