some of them are

[chili]

Did you know that a lot of radio and news stations spy on U.S.citizens.They not only can hear you they can see you any where you're at even in your homes.It's called see thru wall radar.You might have heard about satelites being able to read license plate numbers back in the 70's.They have come along way sense then.They also practice what is called "mind control"I don't mean trying to pursway a person to buy something I mean control your emotions,behavior,body funtion,body part movements your sense of smell and taste,evrything.

  Here's one write up about the matter, some people write about the   different mehtods they use to direct these energy waves like micro waves,plasma waves and so on but also notice at the end of the article one way is just plain radio waves.Like as in your radio and T.V. stations type waves. One person wrote how that some of this is just plain radio frequency waves.
 
 



Background Information. A Serious International Issue According to the Experts.

 

Electromagnetic weapons are as important as the atomic bomb, according to many experts. Here are examples of just a few. Gorbachev stated in 1986 "new non-nuclear weapons [such as] ...radio wave, infrasonic... which, in terms of their destructive potential, could be no less dangerous than already existing weapons of mass destruction." (BBC,1986,A1.) Dr. Stefan Possony was a Hoover Institute fellow and was called "the intellectual father of 'Star Wars' and "one of the most influential civilian strategic planners in the Pentagon"(Guardian,1995,17). Dr. Possony wrote about " messaging directly into a target mind" with low frequency waves. (Possony,1983,34). The article was entitled "Scientific Advances Hold Dramatic Prospects for Psy-Strat". A "Harvard molecular geneticist and biological/chemical warfare specialist, Matthew S. Meselson warned: 'We're going to learn how to manipulate every life process, genetic ones, mental ones, the emotional ones, ...If our inevitably increasing knowledge of life process is also harnessed to hostile purposes, that will completely change the nature of the expression of human hostility.' (Mann,1996, 58). It is logical to conclude that some of the top strategists and academic experts may know of the classified technology and cannot openly discuss it.

There are several unclassified sources to document a forty year history of the international arms race to develop electromagnetic weapons. From 1975 to 1998, the UN Committee on Disarmament has discussed the Russian proposals to ban "new types of weapons of mass destruction." One of these weapons was described by the Soviet government in 1979 as "Infrasonic 'acoustic radiation' weapons. They would utilize harmful effects of infrasonic oscillations on biocurrents of the brain and nervous system;" (United Nations Department for Disarmament Affairs,1985,115). But neither side has admitted to having electromagnetic weapons. "Russia's Federal Counterintelligence Service emphasized that there is no psychotronic weapons on the territory of Russia, and never has been."(Tass,1994). Psychotronic is the Russian name for electromagnetic mind control weapons. And the Pentagon has stated that "Radiofrequency weapons are too sensitive to discuss." ("CNN Reports", 1985).Alot of them are sports stations also.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTSZR0GgHjI  [just copy and past in your browser]
Mayoral Candidate Alleges Government Surveillance,                                                     http://www.wfpl.org/2010/04/16/marshall-holds-press-conference-on-electromagnetic-attacks/                                                                                                                           http://emhdf.com/mich-law.htm       

[jeremystalked1]

Did you know that a lot of radio and news stations spy on U.S.citizens.They not only can hear you they can see you any where you're at even in your homes.It's called see thru wall radar.You might have heard about satelites being able to read license plate numbers back in the 70's.They have come along way sense then.They also practice what is called "mind control"I don't mean trying to pursway a person to buy something I mean control your emotions,behavior,body funtion,body part movements your sense of smell and taste,evrything.

  Here's one write up about the matter, some people write about the   different mehtods they use to direct these energy waves like micro waves,plasma waves and so on but also notice at the end of the article one way is just plain radio waves.Like as in your radio and T.V. stations type waves. One person wrote how that some of this is just plain radio frequency waves.

"Through the wall" surveillance is a misnomer.  It's millimeter-wave radar with very low resolution.  It can be blocked with a thin layer of metal (e.g. iron filings in your paint).

http://areyoutargeted.com/orientation/electronic-harassment/

(See "misconceptions" in the above link)

The advanced surveillance technologies (the ones the military/DHS don't boast about) are much harder to block.

[chili]

I meant to add this...I watched a special on t.v about the cia and how it operates a little.The thing that struck me was when they said the easiest way to hide things some times is to have it right in plain sight.Thats how these radio and t.v stations operate.Who would ever guess.Think of how they can reach any where any time.How they operate 24/7.                                                                 

I don't know the technology behind it.I just know they can see you in your home or in any building.They'll tell me to pick up a piece of paper or some other object off the floor just to condition me to think they have control over me.

[jeremystalked1]

If you want to believe TV and radio broadcast towers are responsible, go ahead, but it's not credible.  They aren't directional.

[Deca]

If you read "Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weaponry" then V2K(voice to skull) microwave hearing effect is done via modified RADAR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect

Is there a RADAR in use in urban areas? you bet a passive one called CELLDAR

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2002/oct/13/humanrights.mobilephones

How mobile phones let spies see our every move

Government's secret Celldar project will allow surveillance of anyone, at any time and anywhere there is a phone signal

Secret radar technology research that will allow the biggest-ever extension of 'Big Brother'-style surveillance in the UK is being funded by the Government.

The radical new system, which has outraged civil liberties groups, uses mobile phone masts to allow security authorities to watch vehicles and individuals 'in real time' almost anywhere in Britain.

The technology 'sees' the shapes made when radio waves emitted by mobile phone masts meet an obstruction. Signals bounced back by immobile objects, such as walls or trees, are filtered out by the receiver. This allows anything moving, such as cars or people, to be tracked. Previously, radar needed massive fixed equipment to work and transmissions from mobile phone masts were thought too weak to be useful.

The system works wherever a mobile phone can pick up a signal. By using receivers attached to mobile phone masts, users of the new technology could focus in on areas hundreds of miles away and bring up a display showing any moving vehicles and people.

An individual with one type of receiver, a portable unit little bigger than a laptop computer, could even use it as a 'personal radar' covering the area around the user. Researchers are working to give the new equipment 'X-ray vision' - the capability to 'see' through walls and look into people's homes.

Ministry of Defence officials are hoping to introduce the system as soon as resources allow. Police and security services are known to be interested in a variety of possible surveillance applications. The researchers themselves say the system, known as Celldar, is aimed at anti-terrorism defence, security and road traffic management.

However civil liberties groups have been swift to condemn the plan.

'It's an appalling idea,' said Simon Davies, director of Privacy International. 'The Government is just capitalising on current public fears over security to intoduce new systems that are neither desirable nor necessary.'

The system, used alongside technology which allows individuals to be identified by their mobile phone handsets, will mewan that individuals can be located and their movements watched on a screen from hundreds of miles away.

Prototypes have been effective over 50 to 100 metres but the developers are confident that range can be extended.

After a series of meetings with Roke Manor, a private research company in Romsey, Hants, MoD officials have started funding the multi-million pound project. Reports of the meetings are 'classified'.

Whitehall officials involved in radar confirmed that the MoD was 'very interested' last week. 'It's all about resources now,' said one.

Private security specialists have also welcomed the new technology.

'It will be enormously useful,' the director of one private security firm said. 'Instead of setting up expensive and cumbersome surveillance equipment, police or the security services could start work quickly and easily almost anywhere.

'For tracking a suspect, preventing a potential crime or a terrorist strike or simply locating people [the system] has enormous advantages.'

It is likely that the technology would be used at first to protect sensitive installations such as ports and airfields.

The perimeter of a nuclear power station or an RAF base could be watched without having a bank of CCTV screens and dozens of expensive cameras.

If the radar picked up movement then a single camera could be focused on a specific area.

Celldar could also monitor roads when poor visibility due to bad weather rendered cameras useless.

'The equipment could pick up traffic flows towards an accident site and the details of a crash; who is where and so on,' said Peter Lloyd of Roke Manor.

Lloyd also outlined a number of military applications for the technology. Individual armoured vehicles or even soldiers could carry the detectors which could tell them where enemy troops were.

Security specialists point out how useful personal radars would be in siege situations. However there are significant concerns that the technology might be abused by authorities or fall into the wrong hands.

'Like all instrusive surveillance, we need to be sure that it is properly regulated, preferably by the judiciary,' said Roger Bingham of Liberty.

Bingham expressed concerns that the new equipment, which would be virtually undetectable, could be used by private detectives or others for personal or commercial gain.

Modern technology has brought massive opportunities for wider surveillance. Since the 11 September terrorist attacks on Washington and New York, the government has been pushing through a package of anti-terrorism legislation which targets electronic communications.

Senior police officers are now allowed to access mobile telephone and email records without judicial or executive assent. Within two years, all mobile phones are expected to have satellite-locating devices built into them.

the US has a passive one to called Silent Sentry
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/silent-sentry/index.html

Silent Sentry’s Passive Coherent Location (PCL) technology provides precise, real-time, all-weather detection and tracking ideal for air surveillance, missile tracking and homeland security applications. Silent Sentry’s innovative approach is totally passive, allowing targets to be tracked without generating any RF energy by using existing broadcast signals from FM radio and TV (analog and digital) transmitters across the globe. This virtually undetectable surveillance system has no safety or environmental impact. With no moving parts and a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) approach, Silent Sentry is less expensive to acquire, operate and maintain than traditional radar systems.

http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc64d9q2_0fc6mf8g8

Possible Influence on Subject(s)


Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message

transmission it may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of

the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be

psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard" voices within one's head."


Technological Status of Generator/Aiming Device


This technology requires no extrapolation of estimate its usefulness Microwave energy

can be applied at a distance,and the appropriate technology can be adapted from existing

radar units. Aiming devices likewise are available but for special circumstances which

require extreme specificity, there may be a need for additional development Extreme

directional specificity would be required to transmit a message to a single hostage

surrounded by his captors. Signals can be transmitted long distance(hundred of meters)

using current technology Longer distances and mores sophisticated signal types will

require more bulky equipment but it seems possible to transmit some type of signals at

closer ranges using man-potable equipment.


Range


The effective range could be hundreds of meters.

[chili]

Not only can radio and t.v signals be used they are one of them that help with this mind control.I've been dealing with these people for 14 years.I've talked with other TIs that know what I'm saying is true.They'll even talk to you in an indirect way while you're listening to them.They'll say something about what's going on in your personal life in an indirect way to let you know they are referring to you.

[jeremystalked1]

Spyware on cell phones has nothing to do with mind control, voice to skull, or mind reading.  Cell phone towers have nothing to do with any of this stuff.  Please read the "misconceptions" section in my page about the technology.

http://areyoutargeted.com/orientation/electronic-harassment/#techpart70

[jeremystalked1]

I just wrote a little article about CELLDAR and Lockheed-Martin's silent sentry system.

http://areyoutargeted.com/2010/05/01/passive-surveillance-infrastructure/

Basically, this isn't how they're watching targeted individuals, and even if it were, it's easy to shield against, and it's easy to test the integrity of your shielding.  (No bars on your cellphone?  CELLDAR can't be used against you!)

[Deca]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091012084217.htm

Radio Waves 'See' Through Walls


Through Wall Tracking With Wireless Networks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSF_CnDQsYg

outside


inside

ScienceDaily: Your source for the latest research news and science breakthroughs -- updated daily

Radio Waves 'See' Through Walls

ScienceDaily (Oct. 12, 2009) — University of Utah engineers showed that a wireless network of radio transmitters can track people moving behind solid walls. The system could help police, firefighters and others nab intruders, and rescue hostages, fire victims and elderly people who fall in their homes. It also might help retail marketing and border control.


"By showing the locations of people within a building during hostage situations, fires or other emergencies, radio tomography can help law enforcement and emergency responders to know where they should focus their attention," Joey Wilson and Neal Patwari wrote in one of two new studies of the method.

Both researchers are in the university's Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering – Patwari as an assistant professor and Wilson as a doctoral student.

Their method uses radio tomographic imaging (RTI), which can "see," locate and track moving people or objects in an area surrounded by inexpensive radio transceivers that send and receive signals. People don't need to wear radio-transmitting ID tags.

One of the studies – which outlines the method and tests it in an indoor atrium and a grassy area with trees – is awaiting publication soon in IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, a journal of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

The study involved placing a wireless network of 28 inexpensive radio transceivers – called nodes – around a square-shaped portion of the atrium and a similar part of the lawn. In the atrium, each side of the square was almost 14 feet long and had eight nodes spaced 2 feet apart. On the lawn, the square was about 21 feet on each side and nodes were 3 feet apart. The transceivers were placed on 4-foot-tall stands made of plastic pipe so they would make measurements at human torso level.

Radio signal strengths between all nodes were measured as a person walked in each area. Processed radio signal strength data were displayed on a computer screen, producing a bird's-eye-view, blob-like image of the person.

A second study detailed a test of an improved method that allows "tracking through walls." That study has been placed on arXiv.org, an online archive for preprints of scientific papers. The study details how variations in radio signal strength within a wireless network of 34 nodes allowed tracking of moving people behind a brick wall.

The method was tested around an addition to Patwari's Salt Lake City home. Variations in radio waves were measured as Wilson walked around inside. The system successfully tracked Wilson's location to within 3 feet.

The wireless system used in the experiments was not a Wi-Fi network like those that link home computers, printers and other devices. Patwari says the system is known as a Zigbee network – the kind of network often used by wireless home thermostats and other home or factory automation.

Wilson demonstrated radio tomographic imaging during a mobile communication conference last year, and won the MobiCom 2008 Student Research Demo Competition. The researchers now have a patent pending on the method.

"I have aspirations to commercialize this," says Wilson, who has founded a spinoff company named Xandem Technology LLC in Salt Lake City.

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

How It Works

Radio tomographic imaging (RTI) is different and much less expensive than radar, in which radar or radio signals are bounced off targets and the returning echoes or reflections provide the target's location and speed. RTI instead measures "shadows" in radio waves created when they pass through a moving person or object.

RTI measures radio signal strengths on numerous paths as the radio waves pass through a person or other target. In that sense, it is quite similar to medical CT (computerized tomographic) scanning, which uses X-rays to make pictures of the human body, and seismic imaging, in which waves from earthquakes or explosions are used to look for oil, minerals and rock structures underground. In each method, measurements of the radio waves, X-rays or seismic waves are made along many different paths through the target, and those measurements are used to construct a computer image.

In their indoor, outdoor and through-the-wall experiments, Wilson and Patwari obtained radio signal strength measurements from all the transceivers – first when the rectangle was empty and then when a person walked through it. They developed math formulas and used them in a computer program to convert weaker or "attenuated" signals – which occur when someone creates "shadows" by walking through the radio signals – into a blob-like, bird's-eye-view image of that person walking.

RTI has advantages. "RF [radio frequency] signals can travel through obstructions such as walls, trees and smoke, while optical and infrared imaging systems cannot," the engineers wrote. "RF imaging will also work in the dark, where video cameras will fail."

Even "where video cameras could work, privacy concerns may prevent their deployment," Wilson and Patwari wrote. "An RTI system provides current images of the location of people and their movements, but cannot be used to identify a person."

Would bombardment by radio waves pose a hazard? Wilson says the devices "transmit radio waves at powers 500 times less than a typical cell phone."

"And you don't hold it against your head," Patwari adds.

Radio 'Eyes' to the Rescue

Patwari says the system still needs improvements, "but the plan is that when there is a hostage situation, for example, or some kind of event that makes it dangerous for police or firefighters to enter a building, then instead of entering the building first, they would throw dozens of these radios around the building and immediately they would be able to see a computer image showing where people are moving inside the building."

"They are reusable and you can pick them up afterwards," he says.

The technique cannot distinguish good guys from bad guys, but at least will tell emergency personnel where people are located, he adds.

Patwari says radio tomography probably can be improved to detect people in a burning building, but also would "see" moving flames. "You may be able to look at the image and say this is a spreading fire and these are people," says Patwari.

Wilson believes radio imaging also could be used in "a smarter alarm system. … What if you put radios in your home [built into walls or plugged into outlets] and used tomography to locate people in your home. Not only would your security system be triggered by an intrusion, but you could track the intruder online or over your phone."

Radio tomography even might be used to study where people spend time in stores.

"Does a certain marketing display get people to stop or does it not?" Wilson asks. "I'm thinking of retail stores or grocery stores. They spend a lot of money to determine, 'Where should we put the cereal, where should we put the milk, where should we put the bread?' If I can offer that information using radio tomographic imaging, it's a big deal."

Radio image tracking might help some elderly people live at home. "The elderly want to stay in their homes but don't want a camera in their face all day," Wilson says. "With radio tomographic imaging, you could track where they are in their home, did they get up at the right time, did they go to the medicine cabinet, have they not moved today?"

Wilson says a computer monitoring the radio images might detect an elderly person falling down the stairs based on the unusually fast movement.

He says radio tracking also might be a relatively inexpensive method of border security, and would work in dark and fog unlike cameras.

Another possible use: automatic control of lighting, heating and air conditioning in buildings, says Wilson. Radio tracking might even control sound systems so that the best sound is aimed where people are located, as well as noise cancellation systems which could be aimed automatically at noise sources, Patwari says.

[jeremystalked1]

Same deal - not applicable to targeted individuals because it's very low resolution.  It's also easy to shield against.  There are lots of good reasons, and more all the time, to shield your living quarters from harmful emissions and to prevent unintended emissions.

[Deca]

I am not saying its the precise technology used against TI`s but it does demonstrate that what we claim is not so far fetched.

If you look at "Radio Waves 'See' Through Walls" , They are just using off the self bog stranded wi fi transmitters and clever software looks like a student project rather than what the military complex has at its disposal ...and it proves individuals can be tracked via RF and these tiny transmitters kick out 500 times less than mobile phone mast do.

Also celldar can track cars and there's some suspicious that individuals can be track with it too, a company involved removed the claim it could track humans from its website as soon as people questioned it.

Obviously once you have the ability to locate/track something then the next thing is to intercept it and what better way than a microwave based weapon ether audio effects or pain ray or all the other non lethal s they can do.

you seem quick to want to dismis this information, I think when non TI`s read/see this it makes them realise that its even more pluasable that TI`s are being targted

[Deca]

Joey Wilson and Neal Patwari of the University of Utah describe and demonstrate their through-wall wireless network tracking system. Joey enters a home surrounded by simple radio devices. He does not carry any kind of electronic device on his body, nor are any devices deployed inside the home, and the system is able to estimate his location.

he explians this a bit more in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifQkbMJ_sXM&feature=related

[jeremystalked1]

you seem quick to want to dismis this information, I think when non TI`s read/see this it makes them realise that its even more pluasable that TI`s are being targted

I'm dismissing CELLDAR et al as technologies that are used against targets, but obviously it's a talking point that you can use when talking to non-TI's.

My approach is to tell the public, "there's a group of people who are intensely interested in shielding against RF/microwave weapons & surveillance and you would do well to take notes, because the Evil is coming for you".  Part of the reason the public claims to be uninterested in this stuff is that they feel they are defenseless against it.  Once defenses are constructed people will be much more willing to fight back.

The unwillingness of most Americans to resist comes from their fear of the authorities, or their fear that they'll lose whatever benefits owed them by the System if they make noise.  As TI's sharing shielding information, we can address at least one of those fears.

[OctoberCat]

If you want to believe TV and radio broadcast towers are responsible, go ahead, but it's not credible.  They aren't directional.

+1

[Deca]

http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc64d9q2_0fc6mf8g8

Microwave Hearing


A recently declassified US Army report on the biological effects of non-lethal weapons reveals outlandish plans for "ray gun" devices, which would cause artificial fevers or beam voices into people's heads.

The report titled "Bioeffects Of Selected Nonlethal Weapons" was released under the US Freedom of Information Act and is available on this website (pdf). The DoD has confirmed to New Scientist that it released the documents, which detail five different "maturing non-lethal technologies" using microwaves, lasers and sound.

 
This is the part about Microwave hearing from the "Bioeffects Of Selected Nonlethal Weapons" PDF 

Possible Influence on Subject(s)


Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message

transmission it may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of

the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be

psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard" voices within one's head."


Technological Status of Generator/Aiming Device


This technology requires no extrapolation of estimate its usefulness Microwave energy

can be applied at a distance,and the appropriate technology can be adapted from existing

radar units. Aiming devices likewise are available but for special circumstances which

require extreme specificity, there may be a need for additional development Extreme

directional specificity would be required to transmit a message to a single hostage

surrounded by his captors. Signals can be transmitted long distance(hundred of meters)

using current technology Longer distances and mores sophisticated signal types will

require more bulky equipment but it seems possible to transmit some type of signals at

closer ranges using man-potable equipment.

microwave hearing was discovered by people walking in front of radars, it can be transmitted via RADAR....is there a RADAR unit in urban Areas ? yes CELLDAR.....can in track people? there is plenty speculation it can!!!

DO the people that are partners in making/devloping CELLDAR also run HARRP yes they do !!!!!
Do the same militray complex also have there own satilite network as well

I don't know what they have at there end!!!!!! I just reverses engineering the information that's out there and admitted.

When people learn about CELLDAR (weather is the technology used or not) it certinly makes our cliams more pluasable

[Deca]

the tech more like this, but people non TI`s just don`t believe its possible or as advanced as it is....they think its some type of near field line of sight type weopon

BRAIN AND SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE, ASSAULT AND TORTURE

ELECTRONIC BRAIN LINK & REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING (EBL & RNM) - Hopefully these excerpts will make it clearer- (especially please see the highlighted parts)
from http://www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/akwei.html

Also see the links below
sincerely, john finch

John St. Clair Akwei vs NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA
Evidence for the Lawsuit filed at the US courthouse in Washington, D.C. (Civil Action 92-0449)

Detecting EMF Fields in Humans for Surveillance.

A subject's bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment NSA cryptologists can remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can be decoded into a person's brain-states and thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the Signals lntelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA's computers will then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out and track anyone in the U.S.

NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation

NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MKUltra program of the early 1950's, which included neurological research into "radiation" (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security Archives as "Radiation Intelligence," defined as "information from unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not including radioactivity or nuclear detonation."
Signals Intelligence implemented and kept this technology secret in the same manner as other electronic warfare programs of the U.S. government. The NSA monitors available information about this technology and withholds scientific research from the public. There are also international intelligence agency agreements to keep this technology secret.

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can continuously monitor all the electrical activity in die brain continuously. The NSA records and decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link. (In military fighter aircraft, for example.)

For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject's verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain's auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject's brain and show images from the subject's brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject's eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex. bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject's brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain- programming purposes.

Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM

There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the 1940's. The NSA, Ft. Meade has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech and 3D sound, and subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject's brain (bypassing the ears) and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM can alter a subject's perceptions, moods, and motor control.

Speech cortex/auditory cortex link has become the ultimate communications system for the intelligence community. RNM allows for a complete audio-visual brain-to-brain link or brain-to-computer link.

National Security Agency Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link Technology

NSA SigInt can remotely detect, identify and monitor a person's bioelectric fields.

The NSA's Signals Intelligence has the proprietary ability to remotely and non-invasively monitor information in the human brain by digitally decoding the evoked potentials in the 30-50 hz,.5 milliwatt electro-magnetic emissions from the brain.

Neuronal activity in the brain creates a shifting electrical pattern that has a shifting magnetic flux. This magnetic flux puts out a constant 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt electromagnetic (EMF) wave. Contained in the electromagnetic emission from the brain are spikes and patterns called "evoked potentials."

Every thought, reaction, motor command, auditory event, and visual image in the brain has a corresponding "evoked potential" or set of "evoked potentials." The EMF emission from the brain can be decoded into the current thoughts, images and sounds in the subject's brain.

NSA SigInt uses EMF-transmitted Brain Stimulation as a communications system to transmit information (as well as nervous system messages) to intelligence agents and also to transmit to the brains of covert operations subjects (on a non-perceptible level).

EMF Brain Stimulation works by sending a complexly coded and pulsed electromagnetic signal to trigger evoked potentials (events) in the brain, thereby forming sound and visual images in the brain's neural circuits. EMF Brain Stimulation can also change a person's brain-states and affect motor control.
Two-way Electronic Brain-Link is done by remotely monitoring neural audio-visual information while transmitting sound to the auditory cortex (bypassing the ears) and transmitting faint images to the visual cortex (bypassing the optic nerves and eyes, the images appear as floating 2-D screens in the brain).

Two-Way Electronic Brain Link has become the ultimate communications system for CIA/NSA personnel. Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM, remotely monitoring bioelectric information in the human brain) has become the ultimate surveillance system. It is used by a limited number of agents in the U.S. Intelligence Community.

RNM requires decoding the resonance frequency of each specific brain area. That frequency is then modulated in order to impose information in That specific brain area. The frequency to which the various brain areas respond varies from 3 Hz to 50 Hz. Only NSA Signals Intelligence modulates signals in this frequency band.

An example of EMF Brain Stimulation:

Brain Area
   

Bioelectric
Resonance
Frequency
   

Information Induced
Through Modulation

Motor Control Cortex
   

10 HZ
   

Motor Impulse Co-ordination

Auditory Cortex
   

15 HZ
   

Sound which bypasses the ears

Visual Cortex
   

25 HZ
   

Images in the brain, bypassing the eyes

Somatosensory Cortex
   

09 HZ
   

Phantom Touch Sense

Thought Center
   

20 HZ
   

Imposed Subconscious Thoughts


This modulated information can be put into the brain at varying intensities from subliminal to perceptible.

Each person's brain has a unique set of bioelectric resonance/entrainment frequencies. Sending audio information to a person's brain at the frequency of another person's auditory cortex would result in that audio information not being perceived.

The Plaintiff learned of RNM by being in two-way RNM contact with the Kinnecome group at the NSA, Ft. Meade. They used RNM 3D sound direct to the brain to harass the Plaintiff from 10/90 to 5/91. As of 5/91 they have had two-way RNM communications with the Plaintiff and have used RNM to attempt to incapacitate the Plaintiff and hinder the Plaintiff from going to authorities about their activities against the Plaintiff in the last twelve years.

The Kinnecome group has about 100 persons working 24-hours-a-day at Ft Meade. They have also brain-tapped persons the Plaintiff is in contact with to keep the Plaintiff isolated. This is the first time ever that a private citizen has been harassed with RNM and has been able to bring a lawsuit against NSA personnel misusing this intelligence operations method.

[Georgiacopguy]

Jeremy, I think I owe you an apology. as you've been posting here, I've noted that you are far more rational than I initially thought. I'm not saying I beleive what you have to say mind you, but you are by far, more rational than some "TIs" who pop up here from time to time. Anyhow, you are a pretty decent guy to have around here, and I'm sorry for giving you a hard time.

[chili]

 some news and radio stations are part of this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTSZR0GgHjI  [just copy and past in your browser]
Mayoral Candidate Alleges Government Surveillance

[OctoberCat]

some news and radio stations are part of this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTSZR0GgHjI  [just copy and past in your browser]
Mayoral Candidate Alleges Government Surveillance

Part of what? Specifics please.

[ShadowBroker]

I have come to the conclusion that I have to be implanted with some kind of a microchip.
The microchip have the ability to monitor and manipulate my central nervous system. Decoding the nervous system is a whole lot easier than decoding the mind. Professor Kevin Warwick demonstrated how easy this can be done with his cyborg 2.0 project.
I also wonder why there are so many professionally made video's about alien implants. I think these video's are pentagon funded.
I think many other TIs are implanted too. I think this explains undocumented effects by electromagnetic radiation, satellite tracking etc.

[Deca]

I have come to the conclusion that I have to be implanted with some kind of a microchip.
The microchip have the ability to monitor and manipulate my central nervous system. Decoding the nervous system is a whole lot easier than decoding the mind. Professor Kevin Warwick demonstrated how easy this can be done with his cyborg 2.0 project.
I also wonder why there are so many professionally made video's about alien implants. I think these video's are pentagon funded.
I think many other TIs are implanted too. I think this explains undocumented effects by electromagnetic radiation, satellite tracking etc.

I am not doubting they have "implants" or that they have used them but I just don`t think with modern technology the advancements they have made (plus they make every 6months) that the use "implants" are practical or really what they use on TI`s.....think about it we live in a wireless real time world "big brother" having to go to the bother of covertly inserting an implant in to an intended "target" is a major time/risk hassle .....far easy to use microwave/RF ....again think the idea of "implants" is misdirection and damge limitation ......think about it...."only implanted people can be effected" also people may think they don`t need to worry because they can avoid being implanted or remove/disable  them if the do

[amazon]

BOOKMARK