Sabrosky's limited focus of only Israel concerning 9/11 lacks overall analysis

[citizenx]

Actually, I think 3.3 trillion might have been funneled to Israel by Dov Zakheim and his crew.

But, what about the 23-27 trillion that is being funneled as we speak to the global elite (Gentile and Jewish) in the form of bailouts to the banks and other companies?

Anybody that think that America's enemies are Jewish only or predominantly Jewish is completely wrong.

Zionist-extremists are part of the problem, indeed, but only part of the problem.

Rio, you so aptly represent the "Jews only" or "It's mainly the Jews" that the forum really needs you -- it needs exactly one of you.

[rio]

Actually, I think 3.3 trillion might have been funneled to Israel by Dov Zakheim and his crew.

But, what about the 23-27 trillion that is being funneled as we speak to the global elite (Gentile and Jewish) in the form of bailouts to the banks and other companies?

Anybody that think that America's enemies are Jewish only or predominantly Jewish is completely wrong.

Zionist-extremists are part of the problem, indeed, but only part of the problem.

Rio, you so aptly represent the "Jews only" or "It's mainly the Jews" that the forum really needs you -- it needs exactly one of you.

World Bank, IMF, Goldman Sachs, Federal Reserve, they all share a common bond. Guess what it is?

[citizenx]

I don't really have time for guessing games.  OK, dramatic drum roll.

What is it?

[Dig]

World Bank, IMF, Goldman Sachs, Federal Reserve, they all share a common bond. Guess what it is?

Houses of Rothschild, Windsor, Orange-Nassau

[rio]

I don't really have time for guessing games.  OK, dramatic drum roll.

What is it?

Zios at the top. Just like the Pentagon had on 9/11.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=163726.msg1106330#msg1106330

[citizenx]

Apparently being Zionist alone is bad in your book.  IMO, if you believe in Israel's right to exist on some level, you are a Zionist whether you admit it or not.  In those terms, I am a Zionist.

Now, if you mean that Zio=Jew=Zionist=Zionist extremist, I would have to say that:

A.  You are wrong.

B.  Though it is true that the leaders of some of these insitutions are Jewish, it is not clear that they would be supporters of the militarists or hard right-wingers in Israel.  For instance, Bernanke is Jewish, but I am not aware of links between him and the hard-liners.  Frankly, I am more concerned about the results of his action which are beneficial to the extremely wealthy at the expense of the common man, "Kike" and "Goy" alike.

[pac522]

Anyone that belongs to a secret societies and especially those that practice degrees of initiation.The Order of the Quest, the JASON Society, the Roshaniya, the Qabbalah, the Knights Templar, the Knights of Malta, the Knights of Columbus, the Jesuits, the Masons, the Ancient and Mystical Order of Rosae Crucis, the Illuminati, the Nazi Party, the Communist Party, the Executive Members of the Council on Foreign Relations, The Group, the Brotherhood of the Dragon, the Rosicrucians, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the Open Friendly Secret Society (the Vatican), the Russell Trust, the Skull & Bones, the Scroll & Key, the Order or to put it simple, The New World Order.

[rio]

Apparently being Zionist alone is bad in your book.  IMO, if you believe in Israel's right to exist on some level, you are a Zionist whether you admit it or not.  In those terms, I am a Zionist.

Now, if you mean that Zio=Jew=Zionist=Zionist extremist, I would have to say that:

A.  You are wrong.

B.  Though it is true that the leaders of some of these insitutions are Jewish, it is not clear that they would be supporters of the militarists or hard right-wingers in Israel.  For instance, Bernanke is Jewish, but I am not aware of links between him and the hard-liners.  Frankly, I am more concerned about the results of his action which are beneficial to the extremely wealthy at the expense of the common man, "Kike" and "Goyim" alike.

No country has the "right to exist" at the expense of another. Some would even argue whether a country even has a "right" to exist at all,and who gives that "right"? It's certainly not a God given right. That's what Zionism is in it's essence and no I am not a Zionist. Bernake is working on behalf of World Zionism, just like the heads of the World Bank, IMF, Bilderbergers ect. It's all for World Zionism it's been proven over and over whether you want to admit it or not.

[citizenx]

Does America have a right to exist, then, in your book?

How's that for a dramatic question, eh?

[rio]

Does America have a right to exist, then, in your book?

How's that for a dramatic question, eh?

No we don't because we are a cowardly nation who won't address its problems and we deserve our fate. A nation has to fight to exist, it doesn't automatically have the right to exist. The only reason Israel exists is because it relies on the US and Germany for it's sustenance, I don't believe it automatically has the "right to exist."

[fradus]

Worldcom and Enron benefitted by WTC7 going ar$e up...yeah?

[citizenx]

Rio,

Both nations have a right to exist as self-determining republics.  There is no gray area here for me.  This is really black-and-white as far as I am concerned.

And both nations have fought for their right to exist.  Many of us here are fighting so that what is left of the "real America" can continue to exist and so constitutional government can be restored.

To the extent that the U.S. is financially dependent on other coutries (China, Japan, Saudi Arabia etc.) to finance its debts, does that mean it doesn't have a right to exist?

[citizenx]

Robert Zoellick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Robert Bruce Zoellick

11th President of the World Bank Group
Incumbent
Assumed office
July 1, 2007
Nominated by George W. Bush
Preceded by Paul Wolfowitz


14th United States Deputy Secretary of State
In office
February 22, 2005 – July 7, 2006
President George W. Bush
Preceded by Richard Armitage
Succeeded by John Negroponte


13th United States Trade Representative
In office
January 20, 2001 – February 22, 2005
President George W. Bush
Preceded by Charlene Barshefsky
Succeeded by Rob Portman


3rd Under Secretary of State for Economic and Agricultural Affairs
In office
May 20, 1991 – August 23, 1992
President George H.W. Bush
Preceded by Richard T. McCormack
Succeeded by Joan E. Spero

 
Born July 25, 1953 (1953-07-25) (age 57)
Naperville, Illinois, U.S.
Nationality American
Spouse(s) Sherry Zoellick
Children None
Residence Chevy Chase, Maryland, U.S.
Religion Lutheran[1]
Website www.worldbankgroup.org

Robert Bruce Zoellick (/tsœlɪk/ in German, but usually pronounced /ˈzʌlɪk/; born July 25, 1953) is the eleventh president of the World Bank, a position he has held since July 1, 2007.[2] He was previously a managing director of Goldman Sachs,[3] United States Deputy Secretary of State (resigning on July 7, 2006) and U.S. Trade Representative, from February 7, 2001 until February 22, 2005.

President George W. Bush nominated Zoellick on May 30, 2007 to replace Paul Wolfowitz as President of the World Bank.[4] On June 25, 2007, Zoellick was approved by the World Bank's executive board.[2][5]
 

[edit] Background
Zoellick was born in Naperville, Illinois, to a family of German origin.[6] He was raised Lutheran[1] and graduated in 1971 from Naperville Central High School. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa in 1975 from Swarthmore College as a history major and received his J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School and a Master of Public Policy degree from Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government in 1981.[7][8][9] In 1992, he received the Knight Commander's Cross of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany for his eminent achievements in the course of German reunification.

In 2002, Zoellick was awarded an honorary Doctor of Humane Letters from Saint Joseph's College in Rensselaer, Indiana. On May 30, 2007, President George W. Bush nominated Zoellick to become president of the World Bank, with Paul Wolfowitz formally stepping down on June 30.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rio, you didn't do your homework on this one.

What's a matter, he's not Aryan enough for you?

How is he Jewish, or a Zionist even?

[rio]

Both nations have a right to exist as self-determining republics.  There is no gray area here for me.  This is really black-and-white as far as I am concerned.

And both nations have fought for their right to exist.  Many of us here are fighting so that what is left of the "real America" can continue to exist and so constitutional government can be restored.

To the extent that the U.S. is financially dependent on other coutries (China, Japan, Saudi Arabia etc.) to finance its debts, does that mean it doesn't have a right to exist?

America is a conquered nation, conquered by Zionists whether you want to admit it or not. We have the right to try and take it back from them, but as long as we are under occupation, we're living under their rules and they state "might makes right" and govern by the golden rule; "he who has the gold makes the rules."

We don't see eye to eye on this right to exist thing and that's fine, we can still fight together. I'm not a Zionist and Israel stole that land from people who were already there and now they want others to fund their existence. It's wrong on its face, and while the Israeli people have a right to survive, I don't believe that their nation state automatically has the right to exist.

Yeah and as far as Zoelick is concerned I don't care which god he prays to he's a put his signature on this letter to Clinton and that makes him a Zionist. He may be Jewish, he may not be Jewish, but he holds positions in NGO's that in recent years have been held by Zionist Jews.

Robert Zoellick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rio, you didn't do your homework on this one.

What's a matter, he's not Aryan enough for you?

How is he Jewish, or a Zionist even?

The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President:

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War.  In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat.  We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world.  That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power.  We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.

The policy of “containment” of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months.  As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections.  Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished.  Even if full inspections were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if not impossible to monitor Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons production.  The lengthy period during which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam’s secrets.  As a result, in the not-too-distant future we will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess such weapons.

Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East.  It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard.  As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle this threat.

Given the magnitude of the threat, the current policy, which depends for its success upon the steadfastness of our coalition partners and upon the cooperation of Saddam Hussein, is dangerously inadequate. The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.

We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy, we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council.

We urge you to act decisively. If you act now to end the threat of weapons of mass destruction against the U.S. or its allies, you will be acting in the most fundamental national security interests of the country. If we accept a course of weakness and drift, we put our interests and our future at risk.

Sincerely,

Elliott Abrams    Richard L. Armitage    William J. Bennett

Jeffrey Bergner    John Bolton    Paula Dobriansky

Francis Fukuyama    Robert Kagan    Zalmay Khalilzad

William Kristol    Richard Perle    Peter W. Rodman

Donald Rumsfeld    William Schneider, Jr.    Vin Weber

Paul Wolfowitz    R. James Woolsey    Robert B. Zoellick

[citizenx]

You guys are like Doritos.

"We'll make more."

You just come crawling out of the woodwork.

Yahshuah ministries?

What do you guys have against Yahshuah's relatives anyways?

(you probably wouldn't like the Palestininans either -- the other half of the family tree.)

[citizenx]

And America wasn't built on "stolen" land?  What about the Native Americans? 

Again, does that mean the America in 2010 doesn't have the right to exist?

But, oh yeah, you don't believe any country has the right to exist?

Why don't you go back and read the Declaration of Independence one more time?

Maybe, just maybe, it will sink in this time.

[citizenx]

America is a conquered nation, conquered by Zionists whether you want to admit it or not. We have the right to try and take it back from them, but as long as we are under occupation, we're living under their rules and they state "might makes right" and govern by the golden rule; "he who has the gold makes the rules."

America is unduly influenced by Israel and its supporters -- that is true. If it has been "conquered" by anyone, it has been "conquered" by the global elite/globalists in their push for world government.

We don't see eye to eye on this right to exist thing and that's fine, we can still fight together. I'm not a Zionist and Israel stole that land from people who were already there and now they want others to fund their existence. It's wrong on its face, and while the Israeli people have a right to survive, I don't believe that their nation state automatically has the right to exist.

Again, see my last post on the right of self-determination of peoples.

Yeah and as far as Zoelick is concerned I don't care which god he prays to he's a put his signature on this letter to Clinton and that makes him a Zionist. He may be Jewish, he may not be Jewish, but he holds positions in NGO's that in recent years have been held by Zionist Jews.

He is not Jewish at all.  His family is of German origin.  As for the letter, it is not obviously about Israel at all, but Iraq.  The elite had their own reasons to want their hands on Iraq -- chiefly oil.

[rio]

Qui bono? Bibi is not too shy to tell you who...

As for the letter, it is not obviously about Israel at all, but Iraq.  The elite had their own reasons to want their hands on Iraq -- chiefly oil.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=163726.msg1106330#msg1106330

"... At the same time, the administration should reject the siren song that an Iraqi intervention should be preceded by a solution of the Palestine issue. It is not true that the road to Baghdad leads through Jerusalem. Much more likely, the road to Jerusalem will lead through Baghdad." Heinz Kissinger (Zionist)

[rio]

America is unduly influenced by Israel and its supporters -- that is true. If it has been "conquered" by anyone, it has been "conquered" by the global elite/globalists in their push for world government.

Who came first, the globalists or the Zionists? 

http://wp.me/pny8b-PH

[EvadingGrid]

These globalists are not true members of any race religion or nationality, because they are infiltrators.

[citizenx]

Rio,

And America wasn't built on "stolen" land?  What about the Native Americans?  

Again, does that mean the America in 2010 doesn't have the right to exist?

But, oh yeah, you don't believe any country has the right to exist.

Why don't you go back and read the Declaration of Independence one more time?

Maybe, just maybe, it will sink in this time.

You answer my questions first.  I'm tired of riddles.

I'm beginning to sense fail.

I'm disappointed.

[Time2WakeUpSlaves]

Mossad was definitely a key player in 9/11, whoever consistently denies this FACT is highly suspect. 

Deniers of Mossad involvement of 9/11 are an Inside Job!

Thanks for the information rio, keep it up, great posts.

Whoever changed the topic name of this thread- who are you working for, what is your problem with people investigating Israeli involvement on 9/11?

[rio]

Rio,You answer my questions first.  I'm tired of riddles.

I'And America wasn't built on "stolen" land?  What about the Native Americans? 

Again, does that mean the America in 2010 doesn't have the right to exist?

But, oh yeah, you don't believe any country has the right to exist.

Why don't you go back and read the Declaration of Independence one more time?

Maybe, just maybe, it will sink in this time.

You seem to be referring to the people, whereas I am referring to the concept of a nation-state, or in other words, the government.

From Wikipedia

The right to exist is said to be an attribute of the sovereign state, although the concept is virtually nonexistent in international law. An essay on nationalism by nineteenth century French philosopher Ernest Renan helped popularize the phrase.[1] Contemporary international relations scholarship has paid very little attention to the "right to exist" as a theoretical concept and the idea itself is underdeveloped. It has featured prominently in the Arab-Israeli dispute since 1967. The right to exist of a de facto state may be balanced against another state's right to territorial integrity.[2] Proponents of the right to exist trace it back to the "right of existence," said to be a fundamental right of states recognized by writers on international law for hundreds of years.[3]

"Governments are instituted ... to secure ... certain unalienable rights, [including] life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

Thomas Jefferson's text asserts that "Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it."

[citizenx]

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them...

...We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,[72] that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security...

...That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent ...

...and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rio,

I get the feeling you and I are not reading the same document.

Moreover, as far as this passage is concerned:

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security..."

I think anybody that reads history with a objective eyes will see that the Jews in Europe and the Middle East did indeed suffer such a "long train of abuses and usurpations" as to justify their creation of a self-determining state somewhere in this world.  Palestine was chosen.  It was but one choice out of many, including our own country and even South Africa.  The people who made those decisions are dead and gone. Right now there are Jewish and Palestinian people living in the former Palestine/Israel.  A way must be found for both people to have the right of self-government, and there are many working toward that end.  You would have us believe that neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians have the right to such a thing.

I say you are wrong.

You are wrong about Israel, the U.S., and what may one day be the future Palestinian state.

[citizenx]

Mossad was definitely a key player in 9/11, whoever consistently denies this FACT is highly suspect. 

Who said they weren't a "key player"?  Who is "suspect"?

Deniers of Mossad involvement of 9/11 are an Inside Job!

Advocates of the "Israelis-only" theories are the PR men for the inside-job (CIA).

[rio]

I think anybody that reads history with a objective eyes will see that the Jews in Europe and the Middle East did indeed suffer such a "long train of abuses and usurpations" as to justify their creation of a self-determining state somewhere in this world. 

Why Eternal victim meme being presented here on PP again?

[Dig]

Mossad was definitely a key player in 9/11, whoever consistently denies this FACT is highly suspect.  

Deniers of Mossad involvement of 9/11 are an Inside Job!

Thanks for the information rio, keep it up, great posts.

Whoever changed the topic name of this thread- who are you working for, what is your problem with people investigating Israeli involvement on 9/11?

who has a problem investigating israeli involvement?

the two films which expose their involvement better than any other are fabled enemies and core of corruption which are prominantly displayed on this forum. What are you trying to hide with your inability to expose these agents for the new world order? who are you working for? why are you trying to allow the terrorists whether they be israeli or whatever to escape under the cloak of an entire nation, religion, or race? why are you protecting these terrorists?

[Dig]

Who came first, the globalists or the Zionists? 

http://wp.me/pny8b-PH

The globalists are over 6,000 years old, how old are the zionists?

[citizenx]

Why Eternal victim meme being presented here on PP again?

And that is the only thing I wrote you are responding to?

Why don't you believe the Palestinians have the right of self-determination?

What's the matter?  Have you intellectually painted yourself in a corner?

It's simple.  Change your mind.

As for the Jews being the "Eternal victims" -- no one is a victim forever, certainly not the Jews.  And they are hadrly the only people in history that have gotten a raw deal.  (Personally, half of my family is Irish.  I'm pretty sure the Irish got a pretty raw deal for a long time.)

I'm not saying that they had it worse than anybody, but it is certainly possible they had it  worse than even the American colonists before the Revolution.  (Yes, that is an understatement.)

[Dig]

You seem to be referring to the people, whereas I am referring to the concept of a nation-state, or in other words, the government.

From Wikipedia
 

Yup, the British Crown convinced many morons in the US to forward your ideal which of course led to the unnecessary "rich man's war" as the average Southerer called the Civil War. And then the British Crown did the same so that a short clown British agent was pushed into the spotlight in Germany. You could actually read some historical documents and realize what the crowns and the banksters are attempting to do here too...

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."
~Abraham Lincoln


"The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States if they remained as one block would attain economic and financial independence which would upset their financial domination over the world."
~Otto von Bismark, Chancellor of Germany

[citizenx]

Precisely.  Good response, Dig.

Rightful government belongs to the people.  Our Congress and Presidents are meant to be but public servants. 

This is forgotten in our age where the President has become an emperor or king in his own right, and the Congress but his "parlement" -- at times a pack of fawning spaniels, at other times a pack of baying hounds.

[Dig]

Qui bono? Bibi is not too shy to tell you who...

"... At the same time, the administration should reject the siren song that an Iraqi intervention should be preceded by a solution of the Palestine issue. It is not true that the road to Baghdad leads through Jerusalem. Much more likely, the road to Jerusalem will lead through Baghdad." Heinz Kissinger (Zionist)

Out of over 1,000,000 articles for the last 10 years dealing with 9/11 and Iraq and this is your argument? Two quotes from globalist pig psychopaths who do not give a flying crap about national sovereignty?

Sir Henry Kissinger (Knight Commander to the British Empire who took a solemn oath to obey the Queen Bitch above all else) the biggest war criminal since Mao and the confirmed CFR member who would sell out his own country for a plate just under the globalist CFR/Bilderberg capstone.

Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, deeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr



http://plaintruthmagazine.blogspot.com/2009/07/benjamin-netanyahu-cfr-member.html

Friday, July 3, 2009
Benjamin Netanyahu: CFR Member

Not new but increasingly relevant information, a blast from the past:

Who Owns the National Bank of Israel? [who gets the NIS seigniorage?] - Barry Chamish, February 21, 2006

[Note: Up to now, each Israelite was stolen of about 800,000 US dollars-equivalent of seigniorage]

Where CFR sell each other's profits. [Barry Chamish continues with information from a reliable source]

I told you a couple of days ago that a CFR member, (Edgar Bronfman's son Matthew who purchased it for the family), purchased 6% of Israel Discount Bank, with option to buy another 25% the controlling interest, listen to this:

November 14, 2005, there was a press release from the Israel Finance Ministry, with EHUD OLMERT as finance minister, to the effect that 9.99% of Bank Leumi's shares had been sold to the "Barnea Investment Group" ( a Jewish enough sounding name, don't you think?), in parenthesis the Cerberus-Gabriel group, with option to buy another 10%, which would make it the controlling interest in the bank, in this particular case.

Prof. Amir Barnea is the founding Dean of the Arison School of business, teaches at the Recanati School of Business, TAUGHT AT TAU, SPECIALIZES IN CORPORATE FINANCE AND IS A VISITING PROFESSOR IN THE US, IN PARTICULAR IN HOUSTON, AT RICE UNIVERSITY, and is a partner in the Singer Barnea investment firm.

What the press release failed to mentioned, and what the Knesset official release in January of 2006 - complete with picture of beaming Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, Stanley Fischer, and Jewish representative of the Barnea group - "failed to mention", and what the Israeli Press the world over failed to mention, is that the Barnea group is a front for the Cerberus hedge fund, (the Cerberus-Gabriel group, according to my research, only appears on the internet in connection with this single transaction of Ben-Leumi; with other words, it doesn't exist!). Who REALLY bought 9.99% of Bank Leumi, and who, by their own words, definitely plans to exercise their option to buy the rest, thereby making them the controlling interest of the "National Bank of Israel"? Well, the CERBERUS HEDGE FUND, WITH AT ITS HEAD NONE OTHER THAN DAN QUAYLE, BILDERBERG GROUP MEMBER, FORMER US VICE PRESIDENT, WHO FAILED TO OBTAIN THE LAST REPUBLICAN NOMINATION, WHO STILL HAS PRESIDENTIAL ASPIRATIONS, WHO REGULARLY VISITS THE WHITE HOUSE AND HELPS THEM WHENEVER HE CAN, WHOSE WIFE BELONGS TO A HOUSTON-BASED CHURCH.

More details: The Cerberus group was competing against six other bidders, and BID AS A STRATEGIC INVESTOR vs. FINANCIAL INVESTORS . With other words, Dan Quayle's purpose is not to make a lot of money, but to be able to do whatever he wants and actively control the bank. Not only that, but he paid so much more for the deal than what it is worth that the whole financial and banking community was in shock!!

WHY WOULD THE FORMER VP OF THE U.S. PAY SO MUCH FOR THIS ISRAELI BANK UNLESS THE US, IN PARTICULAR THE BUSH FAMILY (DON'T FORGET THAT HE WAS THE VP OF GEORGE BUSH SENIOR) WANTS TO CONTROL THE FLOW OF FUNDS HERE IN ISRAEL?

EHUD OLMERT, THEN FINANCE MINISTER, AND STANLEY FISCHER, DIRECTOR OF THE BANK OF ISRAEL, SOLD A STRATEGIC FINANCIAL ASSET OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL TO THE ENEMY! THE CFR IS THE ENEMY! THE BILDERBERG GROUP IS THE ENEMY!

And [the reliable source] found the source for the donations. They were both American members of the CFR;

Council on Foreign Relations Membership List (L-R)
2893. OLIVER COVEY T,CFR '84, 1988 annual rpt ,,
2894. OLMERT EHUD,CFR '92,,,
2895. OLMSTEAD CECIL J,CFR '92,,,
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/roundtable/CFRL-Rlist.html#N

2803. NEMAN RICHARD A,, 1988 annual rpt
2804. NETANYAHU BENJAMIN,, 1988 annual rpt
2805. NEUMAN STEPHANIE G,CFR '92,
end

December 13, 2005
Cerberus-Gabriel hedge fund buys stake in Leumi Bank
http://www.fundstreet.org/2005/12/cerberusgabriel.html

Israel is on its way to privatization. The banking sector is amongst the first ones to take a step in this direction. Bank Leumi was in the market recently and attracted bids from several players. Bidder names include strategic investors like Lev Leviev, IDB and Bill Davidson and also financial contenders like UBS, Deutsche Bank and Citibank. However the winner was an American Hedge fund, Cerberus-Gabriel.

Cerberus-Gabriel has purchased 9.9% of the shares of the bank. The purchase of this stake was for approximately $500 million. The fund also has the option of buying an additional 10.01% in the bank. This will bring the total shares quantum to 20% and is roughly valued at $1 billion. This option of additional purchase has to be utilized with in the next one and a half years.

Ehud Olmert, Finance Minister of Israel, is reportedly quite satisfied with the outcome. He feels that this is a positive development and will help the over all Israeli economy. He is amongst the top promoters of privatization move. In his statement he also mentioned that the purchase will ensure healthy competition between the banks and will definitely contribute a lot to the local market.

Another person quite happy with the development is Yaron Zelekha, the treasury's accountant-general, who led the tender. He sees it as fulfillment of the promise made to the people of Israel about privatization of the entire banking system in 2005. Ynetnews reports:

“Cerberus-Gabriel offered NIS 2.474 billion (about USD 500 million) for 9.99 percent of the bank's shares, and has the option to purchase another 10.01 percent of the shares held by the State within a year and a half, and to reach a total holding of 20 percent of the bank's shares.”


Barry Chamish too controversial?

What about other sources?

Like the CFR themselves:

http://www.cfr.org/publication/22616/conversation_with_benjamin_netanyahu.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuRoE8IV9gs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0mbSFlI-oM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKvC5sD7bkA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jbjXjecgVk&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flMbzFaqYnY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bESlJJkfxQs&feature=related

What do Bibi and Achmadinajad have in common? Both are british empire agents in the CFR....derrrrrrrr

and achmadinijad also might come from jewish ancestors, they love messing with everyone

[jimd3100]

The 9-11 “Whodunit” of 9-11 SOLVED!!
By Michael Treis

IT IS ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CERTAIN that 9-11 was a Mossad operation- period.

Well, then that's it. Since it's "one hundred percent certain" that should pretty well settle it.  This proves "9-11 was an inside job." Or rather, an outside job done by Mossad which kind of makes it an inside job sorta. But don't be surprised if some folks think you should "expand your horizons" and realize there is more to 9-11 than the buildings that went down at the WTC.

The 9-11 “Whodunit” of 9-11 SOLVED!!
 The Twin Towers were demolished after Silverstein had been DENIED permits to demolish them.

Is this a fact? I'd like to see the evidence for this statement.

[rio]

Time2WakeUpSlaves you're talking to brick walls here. Israel only had a tiny little part in 9/11, not matter if it was Israelis who were caught actually filming the attacks and who were trying to bomb the George Washington Bridge, it was the "globalists" New World Order who carried out the attacks.

[Freeski]

The globalists are over 6,000 years old, how old are the zionists?

Do you know?

[simpletruths19]

Mossad 9-11 Connection Alan Sabrosky Danny Jowenko

“Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former director of studies at the US Army War College said that the military brass now knows that Israel and those traitors within our nation committed the 911 attack.”  In his interview he makes reference to a Dutch television interview with Danny Jowenko that he said he showed to military brass.  In it it talks about World Trade Center 7 being a controlled demolition.  Danny Jowenko states that it was a controlled demolition.

   Source
   Interview with Alan Sabrosky
   Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXCa6S09Ycs&feature=related
   Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBc0MVUiKAo&feature=related
   Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bq1H0CmFbU&feature=related
   Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5bIljdpHKQ&feature=related
   

   Interview with Danny Jowenko
   Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3DRhwRN06I
   Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sep-HDZoEBM&feature=related
   Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boNzLZInbjU&feature=related

[blissentia]

The CFR is subservient to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, controlled by the Rothschilds.

The Trilateral Commission is subservient to the Bilderberg Group, controlled by the Rothschilds.

The Queen is subservient to the City of London, controlled by the Rothschilds.

[blissentia]

the following should end the debate for anyone clueless enough to ignore the fact that 9/11 enabled Globalist AND Zionist interests, and that these interests are in many ways fused (though I see the US military as being more important than the UN, ever since the UN has stopped supporting Israel 100%): http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5367&start=0

The Talmudic ideology of Jewish World domination is at the heart of Globalism. See "The Controversy of Zion" by Douglas Reed.

These Globalists are totally subservient to Rothschild interests.

here is Alex Jones admitting that Zionism is more relevant than Globalism, but we shouldn't talk about it because "it doesn't do any good": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQxuvBUdhrE

Alex Jones' linked to the Bronfmans (evidence somewhat circumstantial, but still damning): http://www.alexjonesmachine.com/round2.htm

[Ruth]

World Bank, IMF, Goldman Sachs, Federal Reserve, they all share a common bond. Guess what it is?

Oh, I thought it was money!  And money is a source of power, the love of which can bring about all kinds of problems.

[citizenx]

...here is Alex Jones admitting that Zionism is more relevant than Globalism, but we shouldn't talk about it because "it doesn't do any good": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQxuvBUdhrE

That could be read two ways.  You are choosing to read it one way.  A word to the wise is sufficient.

Alex Jones' linked to the Bronfmans (evidence somewhat circumstantial, but still damning): http://www.alexjonesmachine.com/round2.htm

Circumstantial evidence, by definition, is not very damning.  (Yes, I DO respond to weak arguments -- to point out their weakness.)