PrisonPlanet Forum
May 22, 2013, 08:18:22 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: US is a corporation (again for the 100th time)  (Read 2857 times)
adissenter2
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,044


Revolt Time


« on: March 09, 2010, 05:10:30 AM »

where o where were you folks on this?

 Huh

THE ULTIMATE FRAUD/ILLUSION THAT WE HAVE ALL BEEN LIVING UNDER
--> http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/US_Citizen_Examined.php <--
...
....
...


so what happens to Cinderella at midnight?  





Logged

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ! Molon Labe! Come and take them!
agentbluescreen
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,510


« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2010, 06:12:14 AM »

Bork (as usual) is totally wrong, the US Constitution is a constitution (of nationhood) not a "charter" (of "incorporation") it is a declaration of the republican rights of individual citizens (not their states) as monarchs (divine right of citizens as opposed to kings or nobles) over their states and their national government thus "constituted".

His main secessionist premise that the federal constituent assemblies and courts is merely an "incorporation" of "the states" is false, thus all that flows from the flawed theory thereafter is irrelevant.  The United States is not a confederation of independent states it is a unification of citizens who's "subjects" are their governments under the absolute authority of the paper monarch of their Constitution(s), as ratified by all citizens.

Under Republican Liberty the government is always the "subject" of the governed. Bork's top-down theories are a relic of imperial monarchy.

The founding fathers did not get together and say "let's start a provisional company". They came together to anoint a paper monarch upon which all could and would permanently thereafter agree. This "constitution" is the only document "thus anointed" - by the citizens.

Borks paper is yet another mound of nullificationist droppings.
Logged
TheCaliKid
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,574


What can we do about it, really?


« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2010, 06:24:16 AM »

Cliff notes please?
Logged

Better to beg for forgiveness, than to ask for permission
JT Coyoté
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,024


"REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"


« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2010, 11:22:21 AM »

The prison Planet forum has been on top of this TRUTH since the beginning of these pages... if you want to read the dialogue and the proof that the DC government is a Foreign Corporate Government that has supplanted our lawful Constitutional federal government... Go here!

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=63062.0

JTCoyoté

"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous
than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be
paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity
on a large scale."

~Thomas Jefferson
Logged

adissenter2
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,044


Revolt Time


« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2010, 01:48:34 PM »

a triple hats off to you for blowing my post off, changing the title and distracting from the meat of the argument...

yes a corporation blah blah blah..then what? Huh ?? ?


Quote
the United States was always considered a corporation and
the incorporators were all the state governments in the Union. The style or name of the
corporation—which is The United States of America—was established under the Articles
of Confederation12 and was carried on through to the Constitution.

With that set forth, we are now able to ascertain what the United States is in relation to
international law. Unknown to most people it should be noted that the United States of
America is not a nation nor is it a country;13 this corporate entity is only loosely referred

to as such. As a matter of international law, the United States—when referenced to in the
internal and collective sense—is a confederation of countries or nations.

To further expand on the term “citizen of the United States”, in the California case that is
known   as   Ex   Parte-Frank   Knowles—California   Supreme   Court,   July   term   1855—the
court   stated   that   there   was   really   no   such  thing   as   a   “citizen   of   the   United   States”   in  relation   to   a   state,   there   were   only   state   citizens;   such   citizens   being   separate political members of the several states in the Union. However, another issue that was not covered  in this instant case was: if a person that—in example—was a governor of one of the U.S.
government's territories (i.e., territories or lands that were either acquired by purchase or
conquest by the United States), what national status or citizenship did such person have
that lived in these territories or lands? Was he considered a “citizen and national of the
United States? This is just one conflict that is caused by the federation under the United
States Constitution. There are several more. For this instant query, as earlier stated, when
one was naturalized, he became a citizen of the United States, or a citizen of one of the
several states. Again, it appears that the citizen of the United States status was developed
under the original constitutional system even though it may have been unspoken.

And—in a final note—there have been several myths that the capital  ‘C’ as used in the
original Constitution for the United States has some specific meaning. This is a myth that
has little or no merit.14 However, there is a legal premise behind the myth;15 the issues

are more involved than most people understand. The main issue is purely that of common
law and political, of which were somewhat aforementioned herein above.16

11   AMENDMENT XIII - Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a
     punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the
     United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. [note: notice the usage of their instead
     of ITS in the authority. The De facto United States refers to itself as IT in most acts of law.]
12   Article I: The Stile of this Confederacy shall be "The United States of America".
13   COUNTRY. By country is meant the state of which one is a member. Every man’s country is in
     general the state in which he happens to have been born. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
14   There are many words that had started with an uppercase letter in the drafted Constitution.
     This discounts any specific meaning to the capital ‘C’ citizen premise.
15   The premise is purely political. The ones that refer to themselves as a “Citizen” are lacking
     the knowledge that the political system changed under the Fourteenth Amendment.
16   Additionally, there are some “theories” that say citizen is a pronoun as used in the 14th
     Amendment of the United States Constitution; however if you would take time to reference
     any dictionary, the term or word carries no such grammatical attachment; the term or word is
     strictly a noun, not a pronoun. Such premise is surely a stretch of the imagination.
      Moreover, it should be noted that the United States government regards “citizen of the United
     States” and “American citizen” as being synonymous, e.g. reference: Code of Federal
     Regulations (1949), Title 8, Part 176, Section 176.101(w), Definitions.



Quote
With the aforementioned “citizen of the United States” set forth, we can now go over the
new paradigm that encompasses the term “citizen of the United States” created after the
so-called Civil War.17 This is what we refer to as the convenient conversion.

After the so-called Civil War an amendment to the United States Constitution was added.
The language of the Fourteenth Amendment, section 1, is as follows:

             • “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
                  subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
                  States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Accordingly, the infamous amendment has caused the term “citizen of the United States”
to take on a whole different meaning. . . there is now a so-called dual citizenship:

     • dual citizenship. Citizenship in two different countries. Status of "citizens of
         United States" who reside within a state, i.e. persons who are born or naturalized
         in the United States are “citizen of the United States” and the state wherein they
         reside, see Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution.18

To further illustrate this term, let us look at what a state citizen is considered to be under
the 14th Amendment, as defined by Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 3rd edition:

     • citizen of a state. A citizen of the United States residing in any state of the
         Union; Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
     • subject. A citizen. An inhabitant. See subject to.
     • subject to. Words of qualification.

American Heritage Dictionary simply defines the word “qualification” as: A quality, an
accomplishment that makes a person suitable for a particular position. All people living
in a particular country are not actually qualified to be a “citizen”, per se; but if one is
qualified to be a citizen and states that he is a citizen, or does anything that would deem
him a citizen by operation of law, would qualify him to be “subject to” a government.

With the aforesaid set forth, contrary to popular belief, there is no such thing as a state
citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment governmental/political system. Why is this? No
one   can   participate   in   the   political   system   under   the   Fourteenth   Amendment   without
being a “citizen of the United States”.19 If you remember, the definition of citizenship

above stated that the main issue of such status maintains the right to participate in the
political process. If one participates in the system under the Fourteenth Amendment he is
ipso facto a citizen of the United States by an operation of law. Accordingly, generally,
everyone is presumed to be a citizen and subject; or as found in the basic language of the
Fourteenth Amendment: “subject to the jurisdiction thereof (or of IT)”.

17  As the United States is a confederation, the so-called Civil War was an international war.
18  Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition Deluxe
19  Two examples of such qualifications: IDAHO. 34-402. Qualifications Of Electors. Every male
    or female citizen of the United States, eighteen (18) years old. . .; MAINE. 21A § 111.
     General qualifications. A person who meets the following requirements may vote in any
    election in a  municipality. 1. Citizenship. He must be a citizen of the United States.

                                             Page 5 of 14

Quote
THE SO-CALLED STRAW MAN PREMISE

There are some people that believe that the corporation entitled the “United States” has
established and controls some fictional character which is referred to as a “straw man”.
Such entity resembles the name of a man or woman and is generally noted or spelled in
all uppercase letters. People that subscribe to this theory believe that government created
it, and they—the real flesh and blood man—are not responsible for it; although some of
these people think they can use this entity without recourse—a silly notion.

With   that   established   we   can   now   explain  where   people   have   developed   the   infamous
straw man premise. Remember, the United States of America is not an actual country nor
is it a nation, but it is a corporation. Now the following is evidenced:

Firstly, again, the United States is not a nation; now, the difference is as follows:

     • BODY POLITIC, government, corporations. When applied
         to the government this phrase signifies the state.
         2. As to the persons who compose the body politic, they take
         collectively the name, of people, or nation; and individually they are
         citizens, when considered in relation to their political rights, and
         subjects as being submitted to the laws of the state.
         3. When it refers to corporations, the term body politic means that the
         members of such corporations shall be considered as an artificial person.

Note that the primary difference between a  body politic government and a  body politic
corporate is that members of a corporation are persons or legal entities. When you couple
this   with   the   United   States   one   can presume   that   a   U.S.   citizen   is   an  entity   of   law;
however, this is only partially true. The real flesh and blood man is the one that is openly
participating in the body politic under the 14th Amendment. Moreover, the government
looks at ones who are considered “citizens of the United States” as living persons:

     • TITLE 20—EMPLOYEES’ BENEFITS
         CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
         PART 401—PRIVACY & DISCLOSURE OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND INFO
         Subpart A—General
         Section 401.25. Terms defined. Individual when used in connection
         with the Privacy Act or for disclosure of nonprogram records, means a
         living person who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully
         admitted for permanent residence.

So you see, the straw man premise is a dangerous thing to implement in any particular
instance. A man or woman is acting in the capacity as such a person under the Law of
Persons, i.e. Roman Civil Law. The simple fact is: Americans are just regarded as U.S.
persons—e.g. see Title 26 USC § 7701(a)(30)—of  which government has control over
under the general premise of nationality/citizenship20 as one being a member of a nation:

thefalse nation  that the United States has created under the Fourteenth Amendment.

20  Title 8 USC § 1101(a)(22). As used in this chapter [chapter 12 of Title 8]. The term
     “national of the United States” means a citizen of the United States.

                                         Page 6 of 14

Quote
Therefore, the factual premise is that of a legal fiction,21 which is a man or woman being

of the de facto status of a “citizen of the United States”. Such status is actually grounded
in established facts, mainly examining the actions of any specific individual.

In an expanded sense the straw man premise has some validity, but pursuing the “straw
man   premise”   is   an   act   of   futility   and   is   truly   tomfoolery.   Moreover,   in   law,   the   term
noted as straw man is actually a real person that is another party.22 The simple fact is you

are the “straw man” for acting in the capacity as a new “citizen of the United States”.

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

Now, to explain the aspect of the so-called dual-citizenship:

There is none—It is a FRAUD!

One must understand that the “United States” did not have the authority to create its own
political system; therefore, to cover-up this fact there has been a plethora of fraudulent
acts committed by the insurgent courts and other insurgent officers of this system.23

Just as a man was a citizen of a ‘state’ and a ‘county’ or ‘city’ in the original form of the
constitutional   system—i.e.  a   man   could   participate   in   any   or   all   of   the   aforementioned
levels   of   government—under   the   operations   of  the   Fourteenth   Amendment   a   man   is   a
citizen of the United States and may participate—in levels—in all forms of government
under the new political system created under the Fourteenth Amendment.

In further explanation: Again, the United States of America is not a country nor is it a
nation;   it   is   only   considered   such   in   relation   to   certain   matters   which   are   found   in   the
Constitution. Thepolitical control of the several states was transferred over to the United
States; hence, the states in the Union under the Fourteenth Amendment political system
are now to be regarded as political subdivisions (quasi-political subdivisions) of the new
United States; they are the counties of the United States (of sorts), they are not sovereign
states with a clipped sovereignty as they were prior to said amendment.24

Under the Fourteenth Amendment, NOW the United States of America is considered a
nation internally. As a matter of law, one is either a member of one nation (a state/nation)
or the other—not both. To cover-up this fraud, the courts have made bogus rulings that
one may be a citizen of a state without being a citizen of the United States;25 but common

21   FICTION OF LAW. The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or
     thing, a quality which is not natural to it, and establishes, consequently, a certain disposition,
     which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth.  It is an order of things
     which does not exist, but which the law prescribe; or authorizes it differs from presumption,
     because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the
     proof of something true. Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition Deluxe
22   STRAW MAN. An irresponsible bondsman or surety. One made to appear as the owner of
     record who in fact holds title for another. Ballentine’s Law Dictionary
23   See The Red Amendment, an in law Exposé on the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.
24   See the article Treason by Design, by LB Bork
25   Crosse v. Board of Supervisors of Elections, 221 A.2d 431 (07/21/1966) (State has right to
     extend qualifications for state office to its citizens, even though they are not citizens of the
     United States." "Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution
     it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a
     citizen of his state. United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549 (1875); Slaughter-House

                                                 Page 7 of 14

Quote
sense   dictates   that   this   is   a   non-possibility.26  All  de   facto  state   officers   are   elected   by

citizens of the United States (see footnote 19  in regard to who may vote). Therefore, one
could only surmise that such officers are also citizens of the United States due to such
fact, not to mention all other operations of law that tie them into such status.

A NIFTY TRICK AND CON

Again,   the  so-called   dual   citizenship   was   instituted   to   cover-up   the   legal   fraud   of   the
system forced under the 14th Amendment; in somewhat of a retraction, the system is not
forced, it is set-up so one volunteers.23 This allows both the United States and any given
state to pick and choose what system of law one is subject to.27

In example: Depending on the circumstances of a case in question, a judge might say to
himself:  “Well now. . . Am I going to take notice that this guy is a person under this new
political   system   or   am   I   going   to   look   at this   matter   as   if   he   were   a   person   under   the
original constitutional system?” If he knows that you voted to put him in office—which
means you agree to the new citizenship, and accordingly you agree to the laws of both the
federal and state governments—one is then subject to his jurisdiction. This is just ONE of
the   factors   that   incorporates   the   phrase   found   in   the   14th   Amendment,   section   one,
wherein it is set forth:  “. . .and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. . .”

You ask: How can this be? How can there be two systems of law? We simply ask you?
Was anything formally repealed in the original Constitution? Answer: NO.

It is truly a nifty game that has been instituted: it keeps people confused and continually
sucks money out of them via the attorneys that argue both sides of the “CONstitution”.

A STEALTHY TOOL OF ILLUSION

To further reiterate that there is a new political system, as many believe, the so-called
Civil War—which was really a national or international war as a matter of law—was over
the freedom of the slaves of the Southern States in the Union. The Fifteenth Amendment
of   the   new   United   States   Constitution   gave  such   people   the   right  to   vote.   But   wait   a
minute. . . such people (ex-slaves) are deemed citizens of the United States, which gave
them the right according to the premise of the term. Why the amendment? If you look at
the language in the Fifteenth it is not creating the citizenship, just stating they can vote.

     Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 73-74, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873); and see Short v. State, 80 Md.
     392, 401-402, 31 A. 322 (1895). See also Spear, State Citizenship 16 Albany L.J. 24 (1877).
26   See the legal term Conflict of Laws: PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW. A name used
     by some writers to indicate that branch of law which is now more commonly called
     “Conflict of Laws”. CONFLICT OF LAWS. Inconsistency or difference between the
     laws of different states or countries, arising in the case of persons who have acquired
     rights, incurred obligation, injuries or damages, or made contracts, within the territory
     of two or more jurisdictions. Black’s Law, sixth edition
27   This is the nature of federal citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment as stated by the
     Supreme Court of the United States: “It is the natural consequence of a citizenship [92 U.S.
     542, 551] which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The
     citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of
     government. He owes allegiance to the two departments, so to speak, and within their
     respective spheres must pay the penalties which each exacts for disobedience to its laws.”
     U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) http://laws.findlaw.com/us/92/542.html

                                                     Page 8 of 14



Logged

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ! Molon Labe! Come and take them!
adissenter2
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,044


Revolt Time


« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2010, 02:03:01 PM »

continued..

Quote
The question is: Are there two political systems under the Fourteenth Amendment? One
that the original citizens participated in and one that the ex-slaves to participated in?

The answer is simply: NO, there is only ONE political system.

Simply   put:   The   Fourteenth   Amendment   installed   a different   political   system  under   an
alternate constitutional system; and anyone that chooses to participate in this new system
is a “citizen of the United States” ipso facto. It is unambiguous that under the Fourteenth
Amendment there is no longer a de jure “state citizenship.” The main question is: Does
one really have to “participate” to be deemed a citizen of the United States?

The answer: NO. Anyone that is born in the any one of the >U<nited States of America is
assumed to be a “citizen of the United States” or “United States citizen”.28

Why   you   ask?   Because   any   such   person   did   not   formally   establish   he   was   not   such   a
person (see Title 8 USC § 1481); moreover, at one time in the life of any such person he
may have done something that was in the benefit of the private/special law that has been
established   by   these new  governments  (see   footnote   19   &   ‘straw  man   premise’   for   an
example). Furthermore, under international doctrine, a child carries the citizenship of his
father. As only a citizen of the United States can vote, did his father vote?

In conclusion: If it looks like a Duck and quacks like a Duck. . . It must be a Duck.

THE NEW LAW GOVERNING PEOPLES

So what kind of citizen is the new citizen of the United States? That is to say, what kind
of law system is such a person really under? To help answer this query, below is a
summation from the famous landmark court case Roe v Wade:

        In this country, the law in effect in all but a few States until mid-l9th century was
          the pre-existing English common law... It was not until after the War Between
               the States that legislation began generally to replace the common law.
                                          Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113

In this landmark case the United States allowed women in America to kill their babies by
abortion. And under the original system of common law abortion is murder:

         Qui in utero est, pro jam nato habetur quoties de ejus commodo quaeritur. He
         who is in the womb, is considered as born, whenever it is for his benefit.

Simply put: Every child that is conceived has the right to live as it is a child of God.

Before the  War Between the States—the correct way to depict this war—America was
under a law system that was grounded in Scripture, i.e. the Law of God. However, after
such war a new system of law that governed societies was introduced; that system of law

28   There are many people that like to think that they are not “subject to the jurisdiction
     thereof”, but there are too many fictions of law that may apply; moreover, this is what the
     Supreme Court stated about said clause: Statement by Justice Fuller in U.S. v Wong Kim
     Ark: “Mr. Justice Miller, indeed, while discussing the causes which led to the adoption of
     the fourteenth amendment, made this remark: “The phrase ‘subject to its jurisdiction’ was
     intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or
     subjects of foreign states, born within the United States.” 16 Wall. 73. ( In other words,
     everyone in the several states is deemed a “citizen of the United States” at birth. )

                                              Page 9 of 14

Quote
is the Roman Civil Law. As stated by the Roe court, before the war the law that governed
the several societies throughout the Union was the common law. Such society law was
diverse in each country in the Union because it was based on the customs and usages of
each society. Accordingly, as America was founded by God fearing people, they lived in
reverence of God; hence the common law mirrored the guidance of Scripture.

With that established, below are two definitions taken from Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th
edition. Such definitions will evidence the difference between the two systems:

     • common law. As distinguished from statutory law created government, the
         common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action,
         relating to the government and security of persons and property, which
         derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial
         antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing,
         affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs. It consists of those
         principles, usage and rules of action applicable to government and security
         of persons and property which do not rest for their authority upon any
         express and positive declaration of the will of the legislature.

     • constitutional liberty or freedom. The aggregate of those personal, civil, and
         political rights of the individual which are guaranteed by the Constitution and
         secured against invasion by government or any of its agencies.

By looking at these two definitions one can see that:

         1) The legislature is not to govern the people; and

         2) That all agencies of government are to totally stay out of one’s life. That is,
         there has to be constitutional authority for any intrusion.

As most know and understand, they are commonly governed by statutory law; hence the
above definitions provide prima facie evidence—which is evidence on the face of what is
presented—that   America   is   generally   under   a   system  of Roman   Civil   Law.29        Such   law

replaced   the   original   societal  law   for   the   several   states,   the  Common   Law.   Under   the
original system of societal law, a case like Roe v. Wade would have never made it to the
Supreme Court to stand as precedence. The “people” of each society in the Union decide
what is right under their Scriptural practice, not the government acting as a god.

Accordingly, here is the definition of a person of Rome:
                                         • civis. (Roman law.) A citizen.30

The point of this is: the Roman Empire had conquered many countries and extended its
civil law system into areas that it did not belong. The “United States” has done the exact
same thing with its citizen of the United States status. Accordingly, with the United States
acting in place of God and people excepting this de facto31 status, do people that act in

defiance of the Word of God really believe that He will bless America?

29  See the piece: http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/sup/Civil_Law_v_Common_Law.php
30  Ballentine's Law Dictionary, 3rd edition
31   DE FACTO. In fact, as distinguished from “de jure,” by right. Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.

                                                  Page 10 of 14


is THE REVIVED ROMAN EMPIRE being exposed? 

Quote
When in Rome, or should we say—in the United States. . .

          Do you really want to do what the Romans do?


POLITICAL MATTERS INVOLVED

Now to delve into political issues of the Fourteenth Amendment:

So what is this new citizenship all about, besides Roman Civil Law?

Answer: COMMUNISM.

You may be asking: What is the true definition for communism?

Well, it is not what you have heard in school or on the television that pegs Cuba, China
and the Ex-Soviet Union as being such. These were/are just “bogeymen” to cover-up the
world scheme that is being implemented right under your nose: The New World Order.
This New World Order is fundamentally a scheme of the world elite.

The schools and the media—who are the crux of the problem—have everyone thinking
that communism is based on dictatorship, not a democracy; however, this is not true. The
true litmus test for communism is the Communist Manifesto. This political manifesto was
written in 1848 just prior to the so-called Civil War. The primary drafter—who was Karl
Marx—had a list in the document named Planks. These Planks are a true litmus test to
establish whether or not a people is communist; if most or all the Planks are implemented
in any given country or political arena—A PEOPLE IS COMMUNIST!

Below is a list of the main elements of communism which are set forth by the Communist
Manifesto. However, before reading them one should note that Marx stated:
     “These measures will, of course, be different in different countries. Nevertheless, in
        most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.”

In other words: All the Planks will be installed by any means possible or they will do the
best they can to apply them through law. Below are the 10 Planks; the American parallels
are portrayed in the copy below the plank; such descriptions establish the applications in
America through acts of the insurgent Congress and the new President:

    1) ABOLITION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY AND APPLICATION OF ALL
    RENT TO PUBLIC PURPOSE. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S.
    Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes, so-called
    national parks, lands, etc. Also the Bureau of Land Management.

    2) A HEAVY PROGRESSIVE OR GRADUATED INCOME TAX.
    Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913 as it is taxing
    wages, not income; The Social Security Act of 1936; Joint House Resolution 192 of
    1933; Federal Income Tax and various State Income Taxes. We have been
    conditioned to call it “paying your fair share.”

    3) ABOLITION OF RIGHT TO INHERITANCE. We call it Federal & State
    estate Taxes (1916), via the Federal Internal Revenue Code; or reformed Probate
    Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance income tax statutes
    implemented by the foreign State: the United States.

                                        Page 11 of 14


   
Quote
4) CONFISCATION OF PROPERTY OF ALL EMIGRANTS AND REBELS.
    We call it government seizures, tax liens, Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive
    Order 11490, sections 1205 and 2002 which gives private land to the Department of
    Urban Development. Punishment for participating in the new political system as
    orchestrated through the operations of law set forth by the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Read The RED Amendment, by LB Bork, to understand this one better.

    5) CENTRALIZATION OF CREDIT IN THE HANDS OF THE STATE, BY
    MEANS OF A NATIONAL BANK WITH STATE CAPITAL AND AN
    EXCLUSIVE MONOPOLY. We call it the Federal Reserve which is a
    credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All
    local banks are members of the Fed System, and are regulated by the Federal
    Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

    6) CENTRALIZATION OF THE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION AND
    TRANSPORTATION IN THE HANDS OF THE STATE. We call it the
    Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Department of
    Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions
    Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The
    Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and
    Executive Orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver’s licenses and
    Department of Transportation regulations. Also the most blatant one, Amtrak:
    Strangely established May 1st-May Day, i.e. World Socialist Day.

    7) EXTENSION OF FACTORIES AND INSTRUMENTS OF PRODUCTION
    OWNED BY THE STATE, THE BRINGING INTO CULTIVATION OF
    WASTE LANDS, AND THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE SOIL GENERALLY
    IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMMON PLAN. We call it corporate capacity,
    The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department
    of Commerce and Labor (OSHA), Department of Interior, the Environmental
    Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of
    Mines, National Park Service, and the Internal Revenue Service control of business
    through corporate—i.e. creature of the state—regulations. Government involvement
    in the Stock Market which portrays the old definition of a fascist state.

    Cool EQUAL LIABILITY OF ALL TO LABOR. ESTABLISHMENT OF
    INDUSTRIAL ARMIES, ESPECIALLY FOR AGRICULTURE. We call it the
    Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The so-called national
    debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two
    “income” family of which both “individual” “entities” are paying Income Tax.
    Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s due to mind control, the 19th Amendment
    of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions,
    affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive Order
    11000. Mass movement of Americans from family farmlands to cities in the creation
    of corporate farms under control of the U.S. government no less.

                                    Page 12 of 14


   
Quote
9) COMBINATION OF AGRICULTURE WITH MANUFACTURING
    INDUSTRIES; GRADUAL ABOLITION OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
    TOWN AND COUNTRY BY A MORE EQUABLE DISTRIBUTION OF THE
    POPULATION OVER THE COUNTRY. We Americans call it the Planning
    Reorganization act of 1949, zoning (Title 17 USC 1910-1990), as well as Executive
    Orders 11647 and 11731 (ten regions) and Public “Law” 89-136; the main plank for
    reduction of town and country; the Fourteenth Amendment accomplished this. Non-
    city land is now subject to Property Tax.

    10) FREE EDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
    ABOLITION OF CHILDREN’S FACTORY LABOR IN ITS PRESENT
    FORM. COMBINATION OF EDUCATION WITH INDUSTRIAL
    PRODUCTION, ETC. People are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’
    schools, which train the young to work for the perpetual communal debt system that
    enriches the World Bank (IMF). Also, we call it the Department of Education of
    which controls all states, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education.”

In   review,   the   main   driving   force   behind  communism  is:   A   Central   Bank.   What   is   the
name of the implemented central bank in the United States: The Federal Reserve Bank,
which is owned by private investors. The second factor is the elimination of countries and
nationalities, or the unification of many  into one (see E Pluribus Unum). Accordingly,
this is further stated in the Communist Manifesto in its applied dogma:

                              “The Communists are further reproached with desiring to
                                           abolish countries and nationality.”

An intelligent person would say—in applying the principles of the law of nations—the
Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution—under its various operations
of law— fundamentally does away with fifty countries and nationalities. The matters that
have been brought to your attention herein are just measures to deal with the plot.

In short: To get away with this plot on a large scale, all Americans had to be pulled into
the jurisdiction of the “United States” to be controlled by its laws to establish this. You
ask, what is THIS, ultimately? The below definition will explain this question:
    • fascism.... any system of government in which property is privately owned, but
         all industry and business is regulated by a strong national government.32

It should be understood that the United States Constitution always mandated the control
of commerce under the United States… In other words, it is a very progressive plot. All
these elements exposed herein are part and parcel of the end result desired.

In essence, the system as established gives corporations protections and allows the larger
corporations to control the legislatures which destroys smaller businesses. Furthermore,
larger corporations enjoy the benefits of not having to take care of their employees via

32  Thorndike Century Senior Dictionary, 1941. The new definition: fascism.... A system of
    government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic
    controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy
    of belligerent nationalism and racism. American Heritage Dictionary

                                         Page 13 of 14

Quote
insurances that are shifted to the masses which in turn expands their profits: that is to say,
corporations do not have to be concerned about their workers; they are taken care of via
pooled monies that come from all businesses. Moreover, the system as established allows
the   government—i.e.,   Federal   Reserve—to   create   false   accounts   in   a   pyramid   scheme
that   is  actually  stealing  Americans    labor; this   perpetuates   the  “Public   Debt”   which
benefits the owners of the Federal Reserve.

SYLLABUS

IN SUMMARY: One might say the so-called Civil War (1861-1865) was a fight against
fascism; but at the time people of America just did not understand it, nor do they today.
Any person that claims to be a U.S. citizen—i.e. a citizen of the United States—which
includes not formally establishing that he is not, is fundamentally a COMMUNIST.

And in a final note, below is an example of propaganda from the year 1906. The copy
that is illustrated is from a book that was widely distributed in America; the book was
entitled simply: Citizenship.33 Its estimated purpose was to condition all Americans to be

goodpatriotic citizens under the new governmental system:

    “. . .the spirit in the citizen that, originating in love of country, results in obedience to
  its laws, the support and defense. . . . such a citizen is called a patriot. . . it is the citizen
     who yields the legitimate share of his property, as well as the proper services of his
     person, to the lawful demands of his country for support, who is the real patriot.”
Excuse me! A patriot is defined as one who gives his property to the state? 34 The truth of

the matter is the controllers have incorporated several methods to con all Americans into
supporting this governmental system under the Fourteenth Amendment. Accordingly, as
you can see, there are a lot of factors to consider in the matter of the New America.

         “Those people who are not governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.” –William Penn

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Authored by LB Bork of the People’s Awareness Coalition

POB 313 – Kieler, Wisconsin www.pacinlaw.org

LB may be reached via email at: lb@pacinlaw.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                              For a complete understanding of the issues discussed in this
paper you may want to acquire a copy of The Red Amendment. For information on how
to receive a personal copy, go to the website at : http://www.redamendment.net

33  STUDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, A Treatise On American Citizenship By
    John S. Wise, Edward Thompson Company Northport, Long Island, N.Y. (1906)
34  Senate Document # 43; SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 62 (Page 9, Paragraph 2) April 17,
    1933. “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called “ownership”
    is only by virtue of government, i.e. law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in
    accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.”

                                           Page 14 of 14



Logged

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ! Molon Labe! Come and take them!
maim
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 574



WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2010, 02:06:50 PM »

when u got a ssn/sin, u became an employee of the corporation, u waived all constitutional rights afforded to you by the organic constitution.  the corporation has its own charter, which it calls a constitution for appearances sake, but those are privileges from the corporation, not rights.  trying going to court and invoking your 'rights', the judge will laugh at you.  the courts are a department of the corporation.
Logged

JT Coyoté
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,024


"REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"


« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2010, 04:42:43 PM »

Communism=Slavery, socialism=Slavery... hell Catholicism= slavery. Beware of isms, they = slavery. Any blanket political, religious, or economic "System" will produce slavery in time or a well hidden or accepted under class...

Liberty and a totally free market with adherence to it's precepts is the only posture that will keep this to a minimum, and can bring people together to accomplish great things. The shysters fall away as "caveat emptor" evolves within individuals who educate themselves and each other against the elitists... the Constitution and it's original supporting law is THE way...

JTCoyoté

"It [the Market Crash of 1929] was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence....
The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they
might emerge as rulers of us all."
~ Rep. Lewis T. McFadden (R-PA)
Chairman of the House banking and finance committee (1920-31)
Logged

maim
Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 574



WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2010, 05:11:20 PM »

Communism=Slavery, socialism=Slavery... hell Catholicism= slavery. Beware of isms, they = slavery. Any blanket political, religious, or economic "System" will produce slavery in time or a well hidden or accepted under class...

Liberty and a totally free market with adherence to it's precepts is the only posture that will keep this to a minimum, and can bring people together to accomplish great things. The shysters fall away as "caveat emptor" evolves within individuals who educate themselves and each other against the elitists... the Constitution and it's original supporting law is THE way...

JTCoyoté

"It [the Market Crash of 1929] was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence....
The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they
might emerge as rulers of us all."
~ Rep. Lewis T. McFadden (R-PA)
Chairman of the House banking and finance committee (1920-31)

the most important 'ism' which u didnt include is capitalism.  that is the cause of all slavery
Logged

adissenter2
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,044


Revolt Time


« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2010, 11:24:30 AM »


The "Holy Roman" 14th Amendment American Empire inc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4E8NNljC_mE
Logged

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ! Molon Labe! Come and take them!
adissenter2
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,044


Revolt Time


« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2010, 08:55:47 AM »


THIS IS THE SYSTEM YOU ARE ENSLAVED TO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqamRFr0Lj0



Come out of her My people!
Logged

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ! Molon Labe! Come and take them!
JT Coyoté
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,024


"REMEMBER THE ALAMO!"


« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2010, 10:45:45 PM »

the most important 'ism' which u didnt include is capitalism.  that is the cause of all slavery

Why should I reiterate the "ism" you already stated.  Get out of that Communism Capitalism dichotomy buddy... they are merely the two "divide and conquer" wings of the great enslaver... TotalitarianISM... TYRANNY!!

Redistribution of wealth by law is "legal plunder"... charity is sharing abundance by individual initiative...

"To suppose that any form of government will secure
liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people,
is a chimerical idea."

~James Madison

Google... Fredrick Bastiat The Law G. Edward Griffin youtube ... and listen... then read the book, "The Law" by Fredrick Bastiat...

JTCoyoté

"There are people who think that plunder loses
all its immorality as soon as it becomes legal.
Personally, I cannot imagine a more alarming
situation."
~Frederic Bastiat


Did I just hear the sound of a head popping out of a sphincter...Grin
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!