Seth Macfarlane and 9/11

[tripper]

It's admitted that Seth Macfarlane was suppose to be on flight 11, one of the flights that flew into the world trade center, but he was running late and accidentally missed the flight. Makes me wonder if there was someone on the inside who was a Family Guy fan and decided to intervene and save his life. Also worth mentioning 3 or so  years later his show American Dad comes out about a dad who works for the CIA. HMMmmmm....... Makes you think...

[kingp43]

Many people were warned to not fly that day.  Mayor Willie Brown was warned for sure.

[tripper]

Mark Wahlberg also supposedly "missed" his flight.

[Scootle]

To be honest if you're in charge of a highly popular FOX TV psy-op show, you're probably part of it to a extent. Many people suspect Matt Groening of the Simpsons, and even the voice actors (Harry Shearer), as being part of it.

[bodygaurd]

He also could have just been late.

[riley martin]

Explains why Fox will put on anything he is involved in.  The Cleveland Show?  Are you kidding me?  That is the biggest pile of shit I have ever seen.

[RickT]

Maybe since he works for Rupert Murdoch he was tipped off.

There's something very odd with that whole Fox situation.  Murdoch pays to have Macfarlane make fun of Republicans and Christians and then pays O'Reilly, Hannity et al to get upset and call it the "attack from the left".  Doesn't make any sense... unless Seth is just the modern day court jester.  A steam valve, so to speak.  I put Colbert & Stewart up there too.

[RickT]

Explains why Fox will put on anything he is involved in.  The Cleveland Show?  Are you kidding me?  That is the biggest pile of shit I have ever seen.

Ever see the Thanksgiving episode?  Some of the worst TV I've ever seen.

[matrixcutter]

Flight 11 didn't fly into the WTC.

[Scootle]

Flight 11 didn't fly into the WTC.

yes it did.

[riley martin]

Ever see the Thanksgiving episode?  Some of the worst TV I've ever seen.

Terrible.  They even aired some special of all the voice actors doing Family Guy live in some performance hall.  I will admit that I am a fan of Family Guy but the rest of his resume is awful.

[Viper]

yes it did.

How do you explain the pods underneath seen in "9/11 in plane sight", and the two flashes?

[Scootle]

In Plane Site is a disinfo film. The pod theories were debunked by truthers before even the Popular Mechanics article came out... and when Pop Mech did their debunking, Alex actually agreed with them with regards to the pod stuff!

See 911research.wtc7.net and 911Review.com (the best 9/11 research sites in my oppinion)

"ERROR: 'A Pod Was Attached to the South Tower Plane'"
http://911review.com/errors/phantom/st_plane.html

[37]

I love Family Guy, but Seth is a leftist.  He has drank of the liberal kool aid and likes it.  There is at least one episode where Brian(the dog) insinuates the world would be better if we didn't allow people to have guns. 

[matrixcutter]

yes it did.

Are you sure?

Have you been sure about things before and been wrong?  I know I have.

[37]

Are you sure?

Have you been sure about things before and been wrong?  I know I have.

Can you prove it didn't?

[matrixcutter]

I love Family Guy, but Seth is a leftist.  He has drank of the liberal kool aid and likes it.  There is at least one episode where Brian(the dog) insinuates the world would be better if we didn't allow people to have guns. 

There is an episode in which Stewie gets vaccinated, and Brian explains that he was already fine, so what was the purpose in being vaccinated?

And then Stewie asks him something and he says that he's already said too much, and walks off.

So there's bits of truth in there, and it is funny, in my opinion.  But it is also part of the agenda to promote beastiality and paedophilia, and it's not the only comedy show to do so.

[matrixcutter]

Can you prove it didn't?

I can't give you 100% proof here on this forum, but there is already enough information out there to suggest that the "NPT", combined with Dr Judy Wood's work, is worthy of attention.  Unfortunately, it has been ridiculed so much that many people have drawn conclusions without actually looking at the evidence first.

The arguments put forward against the "NPT" have tended, in my experience, to be very similar to the arguments put forward by people who believe that 19 Arabs were responsible for 9/11, and that any alternative view is just insane, no matter what.

-----

Video - 9/11, The Hutchison Effect & Hurricane Erin

[hal 9000]

I also do not believe that AA 11 hit the north tower. Same thing for UA 93 hitting the south tower. Everything was in place that morning. There is no way the plotters would have depended on actual hijacked airliners hitting the towers. Too many things could have gone wrong, not the least of which is the hijackers missing the targets. Every single detail was carefully planned and executed, and I have not seen a persuasive explanation for the "pod" beneath the starboard wing of flight 93. And - dare I say it - I do not entirely rule out the possibility of same kind of visual fakery having been employed in the deception.  

[matrixcutter]

I also do not believe that AA 11 hit the north tower. Same thing for UA 93 hitting the south tower.

Same thing for the other two incidents as well.

Everything was in place that morning.

Definitely. This was probably planned before the Twin Towers were even built.

There is no way the plotters would have depended on actual hijacked airliners hitting the towers. Too many things could have gone wrong, not the least of which is the hijackers missing the targets.

This is true, but this on its own does not prove no planes (not that you're suggesting that it does).  However, it does suggest that Flight 11 didn't hit the tower.

Every single detail was carefully planned and executed, and I have not seen a persuasive explanation for the "pod" beneath the starboard wing of flight 93. And - dare I say it - I do not entirely rule out the possibility of same kind of visual fakery having been employed in the deception.

At times like this, it is well worth remembering this very important quote:

"The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies."

This definitely applies to 9/11, as everyone who rejects the official, "authorized conspiracy theory" will recognise.  But it could apply equally to what "unauthorized conspiracy theorists" were led to believe.

The truth is, most of the matter that made up the Twin Towers turned to dust.

[hal 9000]

One error: I wrote that UA 93 hit the south tower, but it was actually UA 175 that hit the south tower. UA 93 supposedly crashed in Shanksville. I made that post as I was rushing out the door to work.