BLOWBACK: MSM's attempt to alienate Medina backfires, millions more wake up to 9/11 truth

[7footer]

If I can agree with her and EVERY single issue except 9/11 then I can rest easy voting for her. 

That's absolutely your right and your decision...

And, I agree there are MANY other positives about what she "allegedly" stands for, beyond just this one issue.

However, if she will about face on this issue, what makes you believe she can be trusted about anything else?

[Optimus]

Guys, Guys..... We must worship Madina.

Remember if you slander our goddess Madina, you are a Sustien Troll.  If you don't like Madina saying we are "dispicable", then you are just creating infighting and you are a Sustein Troll.

Aint that right Sane?


Ron Paul is cool because he does tip his hat to us often, but this Madina bitch just threw up a big middle finger to everyone in this forum.....

Now that I have had a chance to calmed down, I can't help but notice you have a dual motive with this thread. You obviously didn't start it to show righteous anger for what Medina did, but used this as an opportunity to attack another member of this forum.

[Jackson Holly]

In my opinion it is WAY PAST TIME
that Ron Paul get of the f'in fence too!

Do we despicable truthers REALLY want to
VOTE for ANYBODY who denies
NINE ELEVEN WAS AN INSIDE JOB?

IF THEY ARE NOT TRUTHERS
THEY ARE DAMN LIERS!

[jofortruth]

I blame her for calling those who question the official story "despicable"!

Didn't the commentator say that himself? He said a lot and she said "She agreed" in general with his comments. She didn't say the word herself. Is that right or not?


Let's not use this as another DIVIDE and CONQUER scenario! It could easily turn into such!

[7footer]

I'm surprised at the rather mild reaction to this, honestly.

[madworld21]

Why do people trust politicians? In general, normal people don't gravitate towards politics. If they do, they generally don't get far. Psychopaths love positions of power.

The whole political system is corrupt. As Quigley said, ALL top members of the main parties are owned and controlled by the CFR.

[jofortruth]

We need to look into this, and stop the knee jerk overreacting. She is still better than Perry and Hutchison, can we at least agree on that?

 

[7footer]

Didn't the commentator say that himself? He said a lot and she said "She agreed" in general with his comments. She didn't say the word herself. Is that right or not?


Let's not use this as another DIVIDE and CONQUER scenario! It could easily turn into such!

Yes, and Yes...

It's one in the same in my opinion.

If you call the constitution a "worthless piece of paper" and I agree with you, am I any better for not mouthing the actual words?

[Viper]

"A republic, if you can keep it."

Some say it was nevers yours to begin with.

[jofortruth]

Yes, and Yes...

It's one in the same in my opinion.

If you call the constitution a "worthless piece of paper" and I agree with you, am I any better for not mouthing the actual words?

You are fairly new here! Have you been listening to AJ for a while? Just wondering!

[Neco]

If this is true then it just goes to show that you can't trust politicians, they play the game and use people like us and Alex. I am starting to think that we should try to get people who aren't career politicians elected. you know, like normal peopel like us.

She isn't a career politician.  That is why I like her. 

And like I said, if I can agree with her on EVERY issue except 9/11, well I can rest easy voting for her. 

I, like many of you, refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils because you are still voting for evil.  But I have seen her and the woman I saw is not a George W. or a Rick Perry.  She is genuine.

Let's look at it in her shoes for a moment. 

If you had been working for 13 months prior to this Glenn Beck controversy and 9/11 had not come up once and all of the sudden when your campaign is showing REAL promise and has a real chance to bring freedom back to Texas, and a single issue threatens to derail everything, what would you do?

Embrace it and go down in flames and let those other clowns enter office again?

Unless you are Ghandi or Jesus, I am pretty sure all of you would do the same thing because in the end WAAAAYYYY more good will come out of your decision then bad.

Am I disappointed?  Sure.  Am I going to go off and refuse to vote or vote for one of these other globalists?  CERTAINLY not.

[jofortruth]

Now that I have had a chance to calmed down, I can't help but notice you have a dual motive with this thread. You obviously didn't start it to show righteous anger for what Medina did, but used this as an opportunity to attack another member of this forum.

And I am thinking the same thing. I smell a DIVIDE AND CONQUER strategy playing out here. I won't bite.


I will take some time and look into this for myself, and not have a knee jerk reaction to something that is not clear!

[7footer]

You are fairly new here! Have you been listening to AJ for a while? Just wondering!

Long time listener and lurker...but a relatively new participant.

This topic really ruffled my feathers though...I am extremely disappointed and don't take well to backstabbing.

[Joe(WI)]

She has committed political suicide.

My take-someone pulled a "Ross Perot". I think someone made a threat, this doesn't sound right. Something compromised her.

My jury is still out, first to call her scum however, will be me.

[jofortruth]

Long time listener and lurker...but a relatively new participant.

This topic really ruffled my feathers though...I am extremely disappointed and don't take well to backstabbing.

Nor do we take well to people coming in on one topic and exploiting it for a possible other agenda. Get the message?

I see your comments as very overdone which makes them suspect!

[Viper]

Nor do we take well to people coming in on one topic and exploiting it for a possible other agenda. Get the message?

7ft wsn't attacking another member that was another guy.

[jofortruth]

7ft wsn't attacking another member that was another guy.

I wasn't referring to that. I just find it interesting that a newbie decides to pop into the forum on this particular note and be adamant about it. It smells of someone just waiting to smear Debra Medina.

Things are not always as they seem. If we have learned anything from the elite, it should be that.

We need to take time and find the truth on this, if we can!

[7footer]

She isn't a career politician.  That is why I like her. 

And like I said, if I can agree with her on EVERY issue except 9/11, well I can rest easy voting for her. 

I, like many of you, refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils because you are still voting for evil.  But I have seen her and the woman I saw is not a George W. or a Rick Perry.  She is genuine.

Let's look at it in her shoes for a moment. 

If you had been working for 13 months prior to this Glenn Beck controversy and 9/11 had not come up once and all of the sudden when your campaign is showing REAL promise and has a real chance to bring freedom back to Texas, and a single issue threatens to derail everything, what would you do?

Embrace it and go down in flames and let those other clowns enter office again?

Unless you are Ghandi or Jesus, I am pretty sure all of you would do the same thing because in the end WAAAAYYYY more good will come out of your decision then bad.

Am I disappointed?  Sure.  Am I going to go off and refuse to vote or vote for one of these other globalists?  CERTAINLY not.

Hey Neco,

I respect what you are saying, I do.

However, I absolutely would NOT have done what she did.  My integrity is too important to compromise.

Besides, she already lost the support of the Neo-cons...Does she honestly think she will gain their support by turning on us?

All she did is show that she is willing to sacrifice her morals for political gain...Something we have all seen time and time again from 99% of the politicians currently in office.

I used to think she was genuine also, but she has now shown me otherwise.

[GoingEtheric]

Now that I have had a chance to calmed down, I can't help but notice you have a dual motive with this thread. You obviously didn't start it to show righteous anger for what Medina did, but used this as an opportunity to attack another member of this forum.

agreed

In my opinion it is WAY PAST TIME
that Ron Paul get of the f'in fence too!

IF THEY ARE NOT TRUTHERS
THEY ARE DAMN LIERS!

agreed

I ignore politicians. There's no way someone who believes in the global model that we do (openly) has a snowball's chance in hell of making it to a major position of power. If the ignorant public doesn't stop that person's progress, agents of the nwo will. Grassroots is all we really have; abandon hope in waffling, pandering politicians.

"I'm a politician, which means I'm a cheat and a liar. And when I'm not kissing babies, I'm stealing their lolly-pops. But it also means I keep my options open" - The Hunt for Red October

[EchelonMonitor]

She isn't a career politician.  That is why I like her. 

And like I said, if I can agree with her on EVERY issue except 9/11, well I can rest easy voting for her. 

I, like many of you, refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils because you are still voting for evil.  But I have seen her and the woman I saw is not a George W. or a Rick Perry.  She is genuine.

Let's look at it in her shoes for a moment. 

If you had been working for 13 months prior to this Glenn Beck controversy and 9/11 had not come up once and all of the sudden when your campaign is showing REAL promise and has a real chance to bring freedom back to Texas, and a single issue threatens to derail everything, what would you do?

Embrace it and go down in flames and let those other clowns enter office again?

Unless you are Ghandi or Jesus, I am pretty sure all of you would do the same thing because in the end WAAAAYYYY more good will come out of your decision then bad.

Am I disappointed?  Sure.  Am I going to go off and refuse to vote or vote for one of these other globalists?  CERTAINLY not.

This is not that we disagree with her on the issue of 9/11.  We disagree with Ron Paul on that but he still has our support.

She directly called most of her supporters despicable.

She has proven that she can't be trusted.  

She's finished, and not worth discussing further.

[Jackson Holly]

Neco:

And like I said, if I can agree with her on EVERY issue except 9/11, well I can rest easy voting for her. 

To be or not to be (for truth) ... this is the question!

[jofortruth]

Besides, she already lost the support of the Neo-cons.

Well, I would say that's a good thing. The neocons are part of the troublemakers and if they were supporting Medina, I wouldn't do so.

[7footer]

Nor do we take well to people coming in on one topic and exploiting it for a possible other agenda. Get the message?

I see your comments as very overdone which makes them suspect!

Whoah there Charlie!!!

Before you attack or question my motives, you should probably come with some sort of evidence!

I am a patriot and a supporter of truth...I support Paul (both), Kokesh, Schiff, and all REAL defenders of freedom.  I didn't create this mess...Debra did!

She betrayed me and all of us who believe in the same...And you now attack and accuse me?

[Neco]

This is not that we disagree with her on the issue of 9/11.  We disagree with Ron Paul on that but he still has our support.

She directly called most of her supporters despicable.

She has proven that she can't be trusted.  

She's finished, and not worth discussing further.

Well what else are we going to do here in Texas?

Sit around typing on the internet with out thumbs up our asses like usual?

I'm voting for her because she can bring actual change on a lot of fronts that the other globalists can't, like property tax.  

At the same time, I'll go and protest her for not realizing the truth for 9/11.

We are running out of options here.

[7footer]

Well, I would say that's a good thing. The neocons are part of the troublemakers and if they were supporting Medina, I wouldn't do so.

That was my point...

She already lost THEIR support...and now she is losing OURS (speaking for myself and others who are equally outraged).

[EvadingGrid]

Did you hear what Alex is saying on the radio ?

[7footer]

Did you hear what Alex is saying on the radio ?

Yeah...and thank GOD he's telling it like it is.

People deserve to know!

[Viper]

I'm gonna catch the re-stream,
but as AJ has ripped her a new ass, AI calls her a terrorissy, and most members here are pissed,
the thing's kinda setteld for me, though admittedly i'm thousands of miles away on the Island of Ingsoc.

[Libertarian Perspective]

"She isn't a career politician.  That is why I like her.  "

Well I hope she won't be making the same mistake trying to pander to everybody and in the end losing all of her support. Irrespective of what she thinks or how she might be like, she has started on the wrong foot.

[Optimus]

Well what else are we going to do here in Texas?

Sit around typing on the internet with out thumbs up our asses like usual?

I'm voting for her because she can bring actual change on a lot of fronts that the other globalists can't, like property tax.  

At the same time, I'll go and protest her for not realizing the truth for 9/11.

We are running out of options here.

She chose to flip-flop on the 9/11 issue. It is safe to assume that she is also capable of flip-flopping on other issues as well. She blew it and damaged her own reputation and integrity by blowing off the major base of her supporters as being "despicable".

[7footer]

I'm gonna catch the re-stream,
but AJ has ripped her a new ass, AI calls her a terrorissy, and most members here are pissed,
the thing's kinda setteld for me, though admittedly i'm thousands of miles away on the Island of Ingsoc.

Yeah, I have no impact on it either being from a different state.  I'm just really disappointed that this happened...There was NO reason for her to agree with what that snake said.  All she had to say was something like , "I may or may not agree with some of the theories, but it is the people's right to ask questions, and we must ensure they ALWAYS have the freedom to do so!".

See, that was easy...She should have hired me as her adviser instead

[Neco]

Davis: "...it would have been over in a day, if after the Beck thing, you'd have said boy, I'm sorry, I messed up. I should've identified this 9/11 truther movement as the despicable paranoid cult that they are, what a horrible hateful belief to have in your head that 9/11 was an inside job. Why didnt you do that?

Medina: "Yeah I um, I agree with ya Mark, I laughed it off whenever he said I was a truther cause I thought it was so absurd and i should have just said NO, absolutely I'm not a truther. I think it's abundantly clear I'm not a truther;  um ya know those things happen to us and we pick up say should've done that better, move on, and that's what we've done."

[Blowback]

Now that I have had a chance to calmed down, I can't help but notice you have a dual motive with this thread. You obviously didn't start it to show righteous anger for what Medina did, but used this as an opportunity to attack another member of this forum.

I'm just trying to make a point.  

If you say you don't like how Madina disses 911 truth, then automatically you are a Sustein troll.

I'm sick of that shit.

Enough with the praise of these f**king politicians.  

[Damascus]

Well will we focus on the slow and steady method of getting the lower local offices back? These huge coup d'états almost never work out. If you don't like career politicians then lets focus on the basics once again. Placing all our bets on presidents and govnators isn't working so well, so lets try something new.

[adissenter2]

WTF !!!!!

Shit last week it was finding out Dr. Bill Deagle was a turncoat, now Medina, who's next?

link to this info on Deagle?

.......

wondering if Medina is using the Machiavelli deception technique on them??

not that I approve just curious to what the heck is going on, if anything -this is a good thing to find out a persons true colors earlier rather than later

[jofortruth]

I need to hear this for myself, as this is the first place I've heard anyone talking about this. I won't jump to a conclusion until I investigate it.

Enough said!

[Neco]

I need to hear this for myself, as this is the first place I've heard anyone talking about this. I won't jump to a conclusion until I investigate it.

Enough said!

I quoted it at the top of the page.

[jofortruth]

I quoted it at the top of the page.

Thx Neco!

[7footer]

I need to hear this for myself, as this is the first place I've heard anyone talking about this. I won't jump to a conclusion until I investigate it.

Enough said!

Wait a minute...

You haven't even heard this for yourself yet, but you chose to attack/accuse me in the previous page for voicing my disappointment?

How strange...

[SUPREMEMASTER]

Oh yeah Sane.  Your girl is still throwing us under the bus. 
I'll go back to my Sustein Trolling....

Guys, Guys..... We must worship Madina.

Remember if you slander our goddess Madina, you are a Sustien Troll.  If you don't like Madina saying we are "dispicable", then you are just creating infighting and you are a Sustein Troll.

Aint that right Sane?

I'm just trying to make a point.  

If you say you don't like how Madina disses 911 truth, then automatically you are a Sustein troll.

I'm sick of that shit.

Enough with the praise of these f**king politicians.  

3. Personal attacks will not be tolerated. You may attack a person's theory BUT you may not attack the person presenting the theory.