Dynamic Network Analysis: Total Tyrannical Control Over Your Social Networks

This ties in to a post made by Anti_Illluminati a year ago:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=109559.msg673491#msg673491

Once again, from the same workshop, 'Behavioral Influences Analysis Center (BIAC) Workshop', held in March 2008 at Air University.

This presentation was made by the Carnegie Mellon University group, CASOS.

I'll just let the images do the talking:

Inferring Adversary Intent & Estimating Behavior
http://www.au.af.mil/bia/events/conf-mar08/agenda08mar.htm

From Raw Source Data to Simulation
http://www.au.af.mil/bia/events/conf-mar08/frantz2_mar_08.pdf

Dynamic Network Analysis: Automap/ORA/Dynet
Annual Tools/Computational Approaches/Methods Conference

March 19, 2008
US Air Force Behavioral Influences Analysis (BIA) Center

Terrill L. Frantz
Carnegie Mellon University
terril@cs.cmu.edu

Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems

www.casos.cs.cmu.edu

BTW: I want to emphasize this here - there was a reason why they made Al-Qaeda (this CIA Arab Legion masquerading as a bunch of ragtag fundamentalist terrorists) the enemy of the 21st century - one reason:

Al-Qaeda is ASYMMETRICAL.

Previously, wars were symmetrical - wars were between nationstates or two opposing superpowers. SYMMETRY means - you know what to expect - your adversaries will be soldiers of a given country, and you pretty much know the rules and what to expect.

Now that you have supposed 'terrorists' and 'sleeper cells' - all of a sudden the enemy is de-centralized - there's no Al-Qaeda HQ so to speak - they can be anywhere. And they form independent social networks and they can use 'ideas'/'memes' to 'influence' others to join their ranks. And because the military's entire infrastructure was based on fighting a symmetrical threat, this 'enemy' all of a sudden justified the need for upgrading all systems so that they could meet 'asymmetrical warfare'.

See how they have perfectly mapped this Al-Qaeda archetype onto the general public? People in the 'mass' are 'asymmetrical' - they only form a bond through ideas, and social networks. So they need to regulate all that all under the pretense that there is a global enemy out there that operates by the same guidelines.

This should be pointed out more - because this explains in a nutshell why this entire War on Terror is really a War on the Public.

This above all illustrates how nuts these guys are - in Holland (in many respects the most docile police state in the world - it's Brave New World-land here), they're rolling out these programs where the government will inspect adolescents' personal sex life - how many partners he has, whom he dates, whether he practices 'safe sex', and so on.

This is what the FBI's COINTELPRO used to do when they went after the Black Panther Party - take out the top influence agents in the organization. They've perfected this to a fine art by now.

This is what they understand by a 'semantic web'.

'We can also look where you are at' - Google Waves anyone? Google Latitude anyone?

http://wave.google.com/

http://www.google.com/latitude