Norway Spiral!

[carlee]

if you guys have not seen the movie  The Pyramid Code  you need to get it. here is an interview with Carmen Boulter http://www.blogtalkradio.com/globalreality/2009/12/03/the-global-reality.mp3?localembed=download
also on coast to coast
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A13DF481DB6D3054&search_query=CARMEN+BOULTER

[Hersey]

Thank you Sir.

Second that.

[Mike Philbin]

both looking like the same source i.e. the global HAARP network - I did a (rather tongue-in-cheek) post about the bariumisation of the atmosphere and the use of such to produce global 3D images in the sky in the middle of 2008

3D sky TV for every nation
http://mikephilbin.blogspot.com/2008/07/3d-sky-tv-for-every-nation.html

what, they think we have NO MEMORY?  Here's a video of something VERY SIMILAR from Tomsk, RU, a few years back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN_y5r7vHio&feature=related

a list of HAARP-like facilities around the world will link up with this NORWAY effect and the TOMSK effect and the CHINA effect ... anyone wanna help me find this list of HAARP-research locations around the world as my feeble boolean skills just let me down for about ten minutes or so.

for me, there's definitely nothing UFOlike or MISSILE like about this 'lightshow'.

[Harconen]

It looks to me like it is being 'projected' from the mountaintop.

I think the same.

[phosphene]

AlienScientist on the Norway Spiral Part 1 of 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAiyqLl0K74

This is an excerpt taken from MIT Student Radio WMBR 88.1FM Cambridge/Boston featuring AlienScientist on suppressed technology.

An interesting take on what happened:
http://14296.vgb.no/2007/05/05/haarp-...

For a listing of the show and details visit:
http://realnewsshow.blogspot.com/
http://wmbr.mit.edu/www/sched-tue#real

For a complete .mp3 of the full 2 hour show:
http://tinyurl.com/alienMITradio

Thanks for supporting the Disclosure Movement!
If any links don't work, check the website:
http://www.AlienScientist.com

[Jackson Holly]

HAARP can make a "Bullseye" in the sky!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Artificial ionosphere creates bullseye in the sky

Auroral experiments make glowing plasma patch.

Nature News
2 October 2009 | Naomi Lubick

An experiment that fires powerful radio waves into the sky has created a patch of 'artificial ionosphere', mimicking the uppermost portion of Earth's atmosphere. The research has not only caused glowing dots to appear around these patches — it could also provide a new way to bounce radio signals around the globe.

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), near Gakona, Alaska, has spent nearly two decades using radio waves to probe Earth's magnetic field and ionosphere. One of the most obvious results of the experiments is that they can create lights in the sky that are similar to auroras, the glowing curtains of light that naturally appear in the polar skies when electrons and other charged particles pour down from Earth's protective magnetosphere into the upper atmosphere. There, at an altitude of about 250 kilometres, the charged particles collide with molecules of oxygen and nitrogen and make them emit light, similar to the process inside a fluorescent light bulb.

HAARP's high-frequency radio waves can accelerate electrons in the atmosphere, increasing the energy of their collisions and creating a glow. The technique has previously triggered speckles of light while running at a power of almost 1 megawatt1. But since the facility ramped up to 3.6 megawatts — roughly three times more than a typical broadcast radio transmitter — it has created full-scale artificial auroras that are visible to the naked eye.

Bullseye!
But in February last year, HAARP managed to induce a strange bullseye pattern in the night sky. Instead of the expected fuzzy, doughnut-....shaped blob, surprising irregular luminescent bands radiated out from the centre of the bullseye, says Todd Pedersen, a research physicist at the US Air Force Research Laboratory in Massachusetts, who leads the team that ran the experiment at HAARP.

The team modelled how the energy sent skywards from the HAARP antenna array would trigger these odd shapes. They determined that the areas of the bullseye with strange light patterns were in regions of denser, partially ionized gas in the atmosphere, as measured by ground-based high-frequency radar used to track the ionosphere2.

The scientists believe that these dense patches of plasma could be gas that was ionized by the HAARP emissions. "This is the really exciting part — we've made a little artificial piece of ionosphere," Pedersen says.

"The novelty is not seeing the aurora — it's the fact that we can actually create enough high-energy electrons to form plasma," says Mike Kosch, chair of Experimental Space Science at Lancaster University, UK, and a former co-worker of Pedersen's who was not involved in the experiment. "It shows something completely different and new that we hadn't expected. We didn't know we could do that from a radio array on the ground."

The team's results are published in Geophysical Research Letters.


"Me, Herb & Travis saw it w/ naked eye!" - Todd Pedersen records in his lab notebook their first glimpse of HAARP's illuminating effect.

Power up
HAARP's success is down to the fact that it operates at much higher power than any other array running similar experiments, such as the EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter) Scientific Association's antenna in Norway, which runs at 1.2 megawatts, explains Kosch.

"Whether it's useful or not is another story," he adds, joking that companies might one day hire physicists to use the technology to write glowing advertisements in the night sky. But the costs would be astronomical to create artificial aurora that are visible, he says — the energy costs of running HAARP at full power are more than US$4,000 an hour.


More serious applications might include creating a layer of artificial plasma that could reflect communications from a submarine, for example. The US Air Force, which co-funds HAARP with the British Air Force and others, could use the plasma to reflect radio transmissions, bouncing them farther around the globe without losing power, suggests Pederson.

"Instead of depending entirely on the natural ionosphere to redirect radio waves or short-wave broadcasts," Pedersen says, "we are now getting the capability that we can actually produce our own little ionosphere". The results of the February 2008 experiment "make these concepts seem possible".

Reprint here:
http://www.asyura2.com/09/bd57/msg/536.html

Article originally published in NATURE NEWS - Oct. 2009:
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091002/full/news.2009.975.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[iks83]

The more I look at it the more clearly its a failed rocket or missile test. Especially the one from russia that was posted. There are many vids who explain it perfectly but still there are crazy theories being made up... haarp, wormholes, bluebeam, ufos... no its a damn rocket failure. Sometimes the simplest answer is the right one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cQiUKjN2p4

low audio but nice picture of a missile failing.

Or here a simulation... naaah must be haarp bluebeam blabla.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wilTf3zPeoE

[flaming_red_pill]

I wonder if it failed or if it was a demonstration of a new rocket model's maneuvers a la Cradle of Saturn, hah.

It's a very precise spiral to have been an accident is all. But then again, things happen

[iks83]

I wonder if it failed or if it was a demonstration of a new rocket model's maneuvers a la Cradle of Saturn, hah.

It's a very precise spiral to have been an accident is all. But then again, things happen

Thats a joke right? Too precise to have been an accident? How should it have looked then? All it needs is a constant thrust and a broken steering modul or whatever... like... grab a car. Lock the steering wheel in the right or left position, put a brick on the gas and let it run in first gear.

[flaming_red_pill]

Thats a joke right? Too precise to have been an accident? How should it have looked then? All it needs is a constant thrust and a broken steering modul or whatever... like... grab a car. Lock the steering wheel in the right or left position, put a brick on the gas and let it run in first gear.

I wonder if you realize how ridiculous that argument is. Time will tell.

[One Revelator]

Connections between the spiral and the EISCAT Ramfjordmoen facility (near Tromsø, Norway) are also discussed on the ATS forum:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread527746/pg1

Whenever there are VIP’s in the area of some new military technology, there tends to be some sort of demonstration, or dog-and-pony show. Considering that the Copenhagen summit was on, this might bend the argument toward EISCAT as being the cause of this phenomenon. It’s still circumstantial evidence, though.

[37]

Thats a joke right? Too precise to have been an accident? How should it have looked then? All it needs is a constant thrust and a broken steering modul or whatever... like... grab a car. Lock the steering wheel in the right or left position, put a brick on the gas and let it run in first gear.

Then it should have been an oval...gravity.  Your car's course isn't being affected by gravity...a rocket would.

I guess you have another picture of a rocket failing in such a circular manner...without being tied to something, of course.

I don't buy into wormholes, but the ionosphere info seems fairly accurate. 

[iks83]

well there is the russian missile or rocket that misfired which made the same spiral. also if you look at the perfect spiral picture you see that the upper spiral lines are further apart than the bottom one so it seems there was gravity involved. also it wasnt a bullseye in the sky. also where is a confirmed picture of haarp doing that spiral or a similar pattern? again tons of speculation and guessing and the most obvious and simplest, logical explanation is ignored. I could whip up some rocket simulation with a physics engine but why waste my time on something that is obvious? and that other people have done already?

[37]

well there is the russian missile or rocket that misfired which made the same spiral. also if you look at the perfect spiral picture you see that the upper spiral lines are further apart than the bottom one so it seems there was gravity involved. also it wasnt a bullseye in the sky. also where is a confirmed picture of haarp doing that spiral or a similar pattern? again tons of speculation and guessing and the most obvious and simplest, logical explanation is ignored. I could whip up some rocket simulation with a physics engine but why waste my time on something that is obvious? and that other people have done already?

Ever seen a rocket tied to a horizontal bar?  It makes a spiral like that..perfectly round.  Without the string though, it only seeks to go down.  It has something to do with gravity.   

Get some links, pictures or post the results from your rocket simulator...otherwise you are just being as speculative as everyone else. 

[Jackson Holly]

In my opinion, there is much other evidence in the skies of electro~magnetic phenomena ... wheteher or not the Norway Spiral turns out to be a rocket or not. We just have to look at the universe with new
eyes to become aware of it. HAARP and the other EM 'experimental' programs are
 simply mimicking nature - for nefarious purposes it seems.

~ ~ ~  H O L E  P U N C H  C L O U D S   ~ ~ ~



~~~~



~~~~~



~~~~~



~~~~~ O O O ~~~~~

http://www.xearththeory.com/how_why_what_are_punch_hole_clouds_fallstreak_holes.html

How are Punch Hole Clouds (Fallstreak Holes) formed?

EXCERPTS:

These amazing cloud phenomenon are known as Punch Hole Clouds or Fallstreak Holes and they are strange holes in the cloud layer. Hole Punch Clouds are normally circular but can be oblong or even pentagram shaped!

How are Punch Hole Clouds formed? What process creates Fallstreak Holes? How do you get double Fallstreak Holes joined together? Punch Hole Clouds are mainly circular in shape but that does vary to include oblong cigar shapes, pentagrams and even lines of Hole Punch Clouds joined together. They start off as a clear hole in the clouds then fill up with cloud. With Punch Hole Clouds you will often find a special type of cloud forming around the edges of the circle but on the outside or surrounding the hole.

This cloud is very distinct and is seen with most Punch Hole Clouds are formed. This cloud therefore is part of the process of the creation, formation and development of Punch Hole Clouds and the Fallstreak Holes.

~~~~~

~~~~~

The special cloud formation found inside that appears to be why they are called Fallstreak Holes is not just found with Punch Hole Clouds. It can be observed with Crab Clouds and also Cloud Arc Structures. The fact that a number of physical similarities can be observed with different types of cloud holes, circles and arcs should mean that the same forces are created them all.

As the Fallstreak Hole develops cloud will appear in its center but there is normally a clear "ring" around the outside. The cloud inside the Fallstreak Hole is normally filimentary so looks like twisting braids of clouds. Sometimes these are in all directions but other times they come off a very tight white band of cloud, like they are attached or feeding from this main filiment.

How are the actual Holes physically formed and what causes them? The books and Wikipedia will say that its due to super cold water and ice etc. but that is not saying what forms them. That is still just a theory and when you look at the amazing shapes, the constant associated phenomenon it does little to explain what you can actually see happening in front of you.

Electromagnetic forces can influence water immensely. A magnetic field can increase or decrease waters physical properties. If the field is localised then water will behave very differently in that local field than water beside it. If you have a magnetic field you must have a flow of electrical current. The same as for all times you read "magenetic fields" in astronomy, for example Sunspots. But where could electrical current come from in clouds? The atmsophere is a plasma, it is a charged gas. You can see this when the Northern Lights are in action or when lightning strikes.

Sometimes they may be triggered by the contrails of a "jet engine" but what is a Jet? It is energised (charged) gas, it is a plasma. More natural events in an Electric Universe may also trigger natural Punch Hole Clouds.

~~~~~

~~~~~~

You will also see with some Punch Hole Clouds that there is a "standing wave" pattern associated beside or with the hole. It looks very much like cloud waves or corrigated clouds, showing that there is a frequency wave travelling through it. Waves are a way of transporting or showing that there is energy being transferred.

Sky Holes my also have corridors or waves of clear or thick cloud attached to them. They look like connecting cables.

~~~~~

~~~~~
The image above shows large standing waves or frequencies but notice the changes in the waves shapes in different areas and along the wave of a line.

How are Fallstreak Hole or Punch Hole Clouds formed? Are these Cloud Waves the result of the Fallstreak Hole, is the Fallstreak Hole a byproduct of the frequency waves and energy being created or are they all a side effect of something else, something EU that is creating the whole effect?

~~~~~

There is a cloud that is very much associated with electric clouds and when there is a breakdown or electrical event happening. The type of cloud can be seen clearly in the photographs above, at the top of the images. This cloud appears on the edges of fronts and events. It also can appear in the sky in patches and only last for a short time before vanishing. This is a real sign of electrical activity and shows that charge is moving between the layers in the atmosphere.

Hole Punch Clouds or Fallstreak Holes are Electric Universe events.

The force or event creating the electric breakdown clouds may spread out and weaken, dissapear or change into a wider type of cloud. This cloud, if it is related to the breakdown clouds, starts to form small Cloud Streets, much like Cloud Waves with a cloud free area between them.

~~~~>  YOU TUBES: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=hole+punch+cloud&search_type=&aq=f

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[One Revelator]

In my opinion, there is much other evidence in the skies of electro~magnetic phenomena ... wheteher or not the Norway Spiral turns out to be a rocket or not. We just have to look at the universe with new
eyes to become aware of it. HAARP and the other EM 'experimental' programs are
 simply mimicking nature - for nefarious purposes it seems.

~ ~ ~  H O L E  P U N C H  C L O U D S   ~ ~ ~

Doppler radar has shown similar anomalies since the 90’s:

[iks83]

Ever seen a rocket tied to a horizontal bar?  It makes a spiral like that..perfectly round.  Without the string though, it only seeks to go down.  It has something to do with gravity.   

Get some links, pictures or post the results from your rocket simulator...otherwise you are just being as speculative as everyone else. 

I want to see how you tie a missile to a horizontal bar... apples and oranges. Try searching on youtube there are many simulations for that spiral. I dont have the time to whip something up myself... and also no time to do the youtube search for you. You are the one who wants to believe its some magical wormhole or haarp or whatever, I know its a rocket or missile.

[Jackson Holly]

Doppler radar has shown similar anomalies since the 90’s:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Holy Cow! Check this out!




Written at 2230 Hrs (US Eastern) 15th
January 2010.

A contact in Australia just alerted me to what he describes as "very strange weather taking place over the south west of Australia".  He told me to go to the national weather satellite images if
I could not open the images he attached (See left). By the time I had discovered the e-mail and checked, the large clearly defined ring had mostly dissipated but still was just visible on a time loop which was spiraling counter clockwise (Low Pressure system).

The images above is what my contact sent which shows a wide band ring covering many
hundreds of miles across the south west of Australia with a small dot (presumably cloud)
shown just right of center.

I saved the loop of the area when I checked the site several hours later but unfortunately it was
encrypted not to permit this.  The loop is not now on the site but the satellite image taken at
16:30 UTC is also very interesting.  It shows a very large rotating over the western Australia
where the mysterious large ring appeared from which a small but brief condense trail formed
off the coastline and from the center what had been the huge ring a series of what appears to
be three mini spiraling arms are seen moving out of the area, moving north east.  This is one
of those rare occasions when I could buy weather experimentation effects or other experiments
being performed by HAARP are being observed.  It is hoped to receive an explanation from the
Australian Government Weather Bureau for these series of strange effects.

Entire Article w/MORE SATELLITE IMAGES:
http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar-Circle-Australia-2010-0116.html

Copyright Colin Andrews, C.P.R. International

[carlee]

http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=9557      Was Norway’s HAARP Facility EISCAT Responsible for the Norway Spiral?

[37]

I want to see how you tie a missile to a horizontal bar... apples and oranges. Try searching on youtube there are many simulations for that spiral. I dont have the time to whip something up myself... and also no time to do the youtube search for you. You are the one who wants to believe its some magical wormhole or haarp or whatever, I know its a rocket or missile.

Well, you certainly never have any shortage of excuses for not backing up your theories. 

BTW...you believe it is a missile or rocket but you can't seem to prove it...which means you don't know.

I'm just wondering how something with constant thrust makes a perfect spiral when gravity is pushing then pulling against it.

That's not how it looks when rockets fail...they tend to tumble end over end when the nose drops downward...or they just follow gravity straight into the ground. 


I don't think it's a wormhole or a projection on the ionosphere.  I find it far more likely that this is a media hoax.  It's certainly not a traditional missile/rocket.

[Triadtropz]

I still say there was a big projector on that hill ....

[One Revelator]

I find it far more likely that this is a media hoax.

Hadn’t thought of that one.  I wonder if anyone has examined the pics/video of the event for evidence of tampering, alteration, or artificial generation…

[37]

Plus, what kind of missile leaves a luminescent trail behind it?

The trail is constant, which is about the only aspect that would support the rocket theory...thrust being almost constant until the fuel runs out.

I still say there was a big projector on that hill ....

Projecting against what?  You have to have a screen.  If it were the ionosphere, then it should look more stretched out...or the camera would have to be pointed straight up, which it isn't.

The fact that this thing appears perfectly round and almost perpendicular to the ground, makes me suspect that it is the film which has been tampered with.  The effect is very 2 dimensional.  It just doesn't look like 3-D reality.  It looks like really good CG.

[iks83]

Plus, what kind of missile leaves a luminescent trail behind it?

But you do realize that the photo of the spiral is over exposed or used other tricks to make something more visible thats in the dark... right? With the naked eye you probably just saw the spiraling rocked and a few spirals and definately not the whole thing.

[37]

But you do realize that the photo of the spiral is over exposed or used other tricks to make something more visible thats in the dark... right? With the naked eye you probably just saw the spiraling rocked and a few spirals and definately not the whole thing.

You do realize that I don't believe a rocket is capable of making a perfect spiral? 

Regardless of how it is being filmed or how that film is developed, the rocket isn't capable.

Also, I don't recall hearing or reading this disclaimer about overexposure...not saying that you aren't correct, just pointing out that you are admitting the media hasn't been totally honest in it's representation.

[One Revelator]

Projecting against what?  You have to have a screen.  If it were the ionosphere, then it should look more stretched out...or the camera would have to be pointed straight up, which it isn't.

Here’s what’s postulated for use as a projection screen for Bluebeam holographic images.

Sodium layer refers to a layer within the Earth's mesosphere of unbound, non-ionized atoms of sodium. The altitude of this layer is usually located between 80–105 km (50–65 miles) and has a depth of about 5 km (3 miles). Atmospheric sodium below this layer is normally chemically-bound in compounds such as sodium oxide, while above the layer the atoms tend to be ionized.

Atoms of sodium in this layer are typically in an excited state, and radiate weakly at a wavelengths around 589 nm, which is in the yellow portion of the spectrum. These radiation bands are known as the sodium D lines. The resulting radiation has been termed night glow.

Astronomers have found the sodium layer to be useful for creating an artificial laser guide star in the upper atmosphere. The star is used by adaptive optics to compensate for movements in the atmosphere. As a result, optical telescopes can perform much closer to their theoretical limit of resolution.

The sodium layer was first discovered in 1929. In 1939 the British-American geophysicist Sydney Chapman proposed a reaction-cycle theory to explain the night-glow phenomenon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_layer

This is roughly equivalent to the altitude of the ionosphere @55 mi. 

Looks like there MUST be a medium to project on to when reproducing holographic images.  However, I’m still wondering how they did the Loch Ness projection in Japan last year as well as the spinning pyramid in Moscow. These images were at or just above ground level.

[iks83]

You do realize that I don't believe a rocket is capable of making a perfect spiral? 

Regardless of how it is being filmed or how that film is developed, the rocket isn't capable.

Also, I don't recall hearing or reading this disclaimer about overexposure...not saying that you aren't correct, just pointing out that you are admitting the media hasn't been totally honest in it's representation.

Why do they need to put a disclaimer up? Its obviously not a shot as seen with the naked eye. And where are you seeing a perfect spiral? Gravity is involved there as I said before look closely ffs. Also as for the illumination... as you can see in the photo the horizon looks like sunset or sunrise isnt far away. Do you have a time when the photo was taken? So basicly something high enough in the sky might still be illuminated by the sun to some extent. The center is illuminated more as if some lightsource is there... maybe a rocket engine? is that really possible? rockets making light? you are like some flat earther making up theories to explain the movements of stars and planets away that perfectly fit when you are dealing with a round planet orbiting the sun. but no the earth is flat and this cant possibly be a missile or rocket, it must be haarp, a projection, bluebeam and so on.

[flaming_red_pill]

Why does HAARP keep getting put in the lizard man category, in terms of how many people here actually believe the books about it? It's not mysticism or magic...

@...@

[iks83]

Its not about the lizard man category its about idiots pointing their finger at haarp everytime something happens that they just cant grasp although its obvious. People today are just as stupid as thousands of years ago. Back then everything strange that happened was caused by the gods... today its haarp.

[Dok]

But you do realize that the photo of the spiral is over exposed or used other tricks to make something more visible thats in the dark... right? With the naked eye you probably just saw the spiraling rocked and a few spirals and definately not the whole thing.

Just curious, was the videos also overexposed? And was the vids and pics from China of a different one altogether, were they overexposed also?

[maim]

why are you guys even arguing with this Iks83 guy?  either he's an agent or a retard if he thinks a rocket 'spiralling' out of control is going to draw a perfect, concentric spiral with a blu beam in the sky, overexposed or not.

[iks83]

the blue beam is leaking fuel from the side of the missile as simulated in a video on youtube. it matches perfectly. As for the video being overexposed... no not really... there you see only a small spiral. Have you a pic of the china one?

This is the official story http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5_8MVctp30
Of course mainstream media always deceives you and never ever even once tells you the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wilTf3zPeoE

Ok that guy thinks its space junk which is wrong too but the simulation fits.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx8i5EfmYU4

[Jackson Holly]

~ MORE CRAZINESS IN AUSTRALIAN ATMOSPHERE ~

What Now?  Seen on radar by thousands today over Australia. 
What is going on?
January 22, 2010.
Colin Andrews

ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar-Circle-Australia-2010-0122.html


Two bizarre features seen on radar over the North West and South East of Australia today ( Jan 22, 2010)


The ring over the south east appeared approximately 30 seconds before the bizarre red star over the north west.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I have received E-mails from all over Australia today reporting this rather extraordinary feature captured on the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology radar site. This follows a series of so far u-explained features seen on Australian national radars since the 15th. For a while radar from the Melbourne Airport facility was out of action ( see below).  Another strange ring appeared today over the South East of the country as seen below.

Today has been very lively surrounding this debate over what some are suggesting are weather modification experiments now under way over huge country.

SEE ARTICLE~> http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar-Circle-Australia-2010-0122.html

[phosphene]

Red Ice Radio - Freeman - Pt 1 - Space War, Norway Spiral, CARE, CERN, HAARP, EISCAT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcM3dB9mXOQ

[carlee]

Red Ice Radio - Freeman - Pt 1 - Space War, Norway Spiral, CARE, CERN, HAARP, EISCAT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcM3dB9mXOQ

                 part 2    http://www.filehosting.org/file/details/108348/RIR-100204-freemanx66-SUB.mp3     warning not for everyone

[Jackson Holly]

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/01/irans-nuclear-molemen/

Pentagon Scientists Target Iran’s Nuclear Mole Men

    * By David Hambling Email Author
    * January 12, 2010 
   
Iran’s nuclear facilities may be deeply-buried in a “maze of tunnels” — making them hard to find and even harder to destroy. But the Pentagon is working on some new technological tricks for exactly this kind of mission.

Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, apparently takes a personal and close interest in tunnels — he’s a founder member of the Iranian Tunneling Association. Many of those facilities were built as underground shelters in the aftermath of the 1987 “War of the Cities,” when Iraq and Iran exchanged bombardments of Scud missiles.

There are hundreds of miles of such tunnels, created by giant boring machines. The underground locations provide defense and concealment — there is no telling what is a nuclear facility and what is an empty storage space. And, even if the entrance is visible, the extent and layout are unknown, making targeting difficult. Even if the site is attacked, the thickness of mountain rock makes them invulnerable to ordinary bombing.

That’s why the U.S. Air Force is rushing the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (pictured) into production. The MOP can punch through 60 feet of concrete, but this is the very bluntest of instruments for the job. There is more subtle technology to seek out and destroy such facilities.

Pentagon mad science division Darpa has an array of research projects devoted to Underground Facility Detection & Characterization. According to the program’s website, the agency’s Strategic Technologies Office is:

... investing in sensor technologies that find, characterize and identify facility function, pace of activity, and activities in conjunction with their pre- and post-attack status. STO is also investigating non-nuclear earth-penetrating systems for the defeat of hard and deeply buried targets.

Seeing through solid rock might sound like a tall order, but Darpa thrives on challenge. One project is called Airborne Tomography using Active Electromagnetics, which builds on technology originally developed by the geophysical exploration industry. The ground is illuminated with electromagnetic energy — typically extremely low frequency — and the distortions on the return show the presence of underground facilities and tunnels. Some years ago, military-backed scientists at Alaska’s High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) were able to map out tunnels at depths of a hundred feet or greater. Papadopoulos, for example, says he wants to do another round of subterranean surveillance experiments. “Personally, I believe it can reach 1,000 kilometers. It [currently] can’t reach Iran, if that’s your question,” one of those researchers, Dennis Papadopoulos told Danger Room. “But if I put HAARP on a ship, or on an oil platform, who knows?”

Gravity Anomaly for Tunnel Exposure is even more sophisticated, using nothing more than variations in the local gravitational field caused by underground spaces. Extremely sensitive gravity gradiometers measure the difference in pull to map out underground voids. Darpa has already reached the stage of integrating the gravity gradiometer and signal processing payloads and mounting them in an unmanned aircraft, and have been “verifying performance in relevant geologic environments.”

Darpa is not neglecting the traditional methods of surveying underground structures, and there is a parallel Seismic and Acoustic Vibration Imaging effort. This might use untended ground sensors dropped from aircraft, or it might be something more advanced — Darpa’s website describes a mobile system using “an integrated, laser vibrometry system to detect seismic wave anomalies.” This might be another airborne sensor, though it might still need to drop something to produce shockwaves to create the seismic and acoustic vibration to be detected.

Darpa clearly believe that it is possible to locate and “characterize” underground facilities — this can mean everything from looking at what sort of vehicles come and go, to monitoring communications traffic or atmospheric sampling for traces of tell-tale nuclear material. It is hardly a surprise that Iran has complained of U.S. drone intrusions in recent years. Some observers suspect that the Air Force’s newest stealth spy drone in Afghanistan, the RQ-170 “Beast of Kandahar” may be sneaking over the border.

If detected, can such targets be attacked? The MOP may be capable of smashing through a lot of rock, but there are smarter approaches. The U.S. Air Force has developed skip-bombing techniques with bunker busters so that they arrive horizontally and can be aimed precisely at entrance doors. They may not destroy the entire facility, but if all the entrances are wrecked, then nothing can go in or out.

Thermobaric bombs like the BLU-118 “cave buster” have been specifically designed for attacking tunnel systems; the shockwave will travel far underground, going around corners and bends that would degrade normal blast waves. One test showed that it could kill human targets even when the blast had traveled through 1,100 feet of tunnels.

There are also more exotic options, like the Rocket Balls (or more correctly, “kinetic fireball incendiaries”) developed for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. A warhead would release a large number of these rubberized balls of rocket fuel; once ignited they bounce around at high speed, spreading out by going through doorways and other openings and raising the surrounding temperature to over a thousand degrees within seconds.

Attacking the Iranian nuclear program would be a massive undertaking, though but not necessarily impossible. However, it would certainly appear that the United States is the only nation with the capability to carry out such an attack. As far as we know, Israel lacks both the sensor technology and the munitions for the job.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[carlee]

http://www.enterprisemission.com/Norway-Message3.htm

[Jackson Holly]

^ ^ ^

Thanks for the post carlee ... some great new info there ... though Hoagland
can go off the deep end sometimes.

At this point I tend to believe this about the Noway Spiral:

The Russkies fired their rocket at that moment (PEACE PRIZE) to make a conventional
military statement to the USA NWO:  " ... don't mess with Moscow!". But, the EURASIANS
were ready and responded with a massive display of their SCALAR WEAPONS, taking out
the rocket tout suite, as if to say:

"Don't mess with LONDON/DC, or you may get more of our PEACE!".

[37]

Jackson's hypothesis seems very plausible, IMO.

Reminds me of the Chinese publicly blowing a satellite out of orbit a few years ago.

Saber rattling with black budget tech...

A test rocket failed, but wasn't destructed?  Was there no fail-safe?

Explosions aren't circular in appearance...they are spheres.  Rockets explode in huge clouds of fire and smoke, usually with glowing pieces raining down towards the ground.  The Russian rocket didn't explode.  If the Russians had lost control of an experimental rocket, they would have exploded it as opposed to risking it falling in a populated area...or being recovered by outsiders.

The official story doesn't fit the evidence. 

[37]

Laboratory for Advances in Consciousness and Health
http://lach.web.arizona.edu/

The painting is several years old and painted by Rhonda Ecklund, wife of Dr. Gary Schwartz...Director of the Laboratory for Advances in Consciousness and Health. 

I wonder why they don't just call it the School of Theosophy?  The painting looks a lot like a depiction of the Norway Spiral.  Interesting.