Copenhagen in 'disarray', leaked docs shoow IMF/World Bank, not UN will control

[Brocke]

Copenhagen conference in 'disarray'

    * From: NewsCore
    * December 09, 2009 1:55AM


Delegates preparing for the next round of talks at UN Climate Change Conference (COP15) in Copenhagen / File

    * "Leaked climate documents enrage delegates"
    * Greater power for rich countries - reports
    * Hands climate change finance to World Bank

TALKS at the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen have broken down over leaked documents indicating that wealthier nations would be given more power in future climate change negotiations.

The documents seem to allow a handful of rich countries to have larger emissions and more control over future talks within a "circle of commitment" and have enraged delegates from developing countries.

The US, UK, and Denmark are among the countries included in the so-called "Danish text."

The document also sets unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.

The secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" - understood to include the UK, US and Denmark -  has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week, The Guardian reports.

The agreement, leaked to the paper, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act.

The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol - the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks", the paper reports.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will attend the summit's second week, as will US President Barack Obama.

The Guardian has not stated whether Australia is among the countries included in the "Danish text."

http://www.news.com.au/world/copenhagen-conference-in-disarray/story-e6frfkyi-1225808437312

[TheHouseMan]

New propaganda has surfaced. According to the BBC, the Guardian and others, "leaked documents" show that poorer nations will be disadvantaged by this Copenhagen deal. But this is PROPAGANDA. These are not leaked documents. Nothing this high level could be leaked, not until years later. What we are seeing here is a PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN to make people PLEAD for richer nations to give up more money.

It is taking the disguise of "leaked documents", but this is pure propaganda.

Take note. This is key.

[Freeski]

I agree. On paper, and officially, the working agreement is a transfer of wealth from middle-class people to both the poor and the elite - so this is either a bargaining ploy (by the socialists) to get MORE, or it's just a global psyop.

[Dig]

New propaganda has surfaced. According to the BBC, the Guardian and others, "leaked documents" show that poorer nations will be disadvantaged by this Copenhagen deal. But this is PROPAGANDA. These are not leaked documents. Nothing this high level could be leaked, not until years later. What we are seeing here is a PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN to make people PLEAD for richer nations to give up more money.

It is taking the disguise of "leaked documents", but this is pure propaganda.

Take note. This is key.

hey man, what is your f**king problem?

this is now the 3rd thread that i completely agree with you on!

no more! dammit, got to re-evaluate my being an asshole towards you, dammit!!!

UPDATE: Ha I can continue being a dick to you. these docs expose that World Bank/IMF will control not the UN and the deals the 3rd world made was with the UN. There still may be some shenanigans with this, but for now it exposes more about IMF/World Bank as the money changer for this fraudulent plan.

[Freeski]

All your mindf**king are belong to us.

[deadflagblues]

or is it the real endgame? Maybe the draft released months ago was a psyop, and they were expecting the developing nations to be really happy about a deal here. But the real deal, to be disclosed at the very end is this. What are the implications of this? Well we all know about the "well being" vs "carbon emission" and "energy used" curves. This could be the real end game, such a deal would kill millions (billions?)

[SOS3]

i think its a smoke screen for climategate
Its like how a cat just buries its crap in the litter box after its done shitting
It shows me how damaging climategate really is

[oyashango]

Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak

Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol

The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.


The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.


The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.


The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.


The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".


A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:


• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;

• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";

• Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;

• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.


Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.


"It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.


Antonio Hill, climate policy adviser for Oxfam International, said: "This is only a draft but it highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurting. On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. It allows too many loopholes and does not suggest anything like the 40% cuts that science is saying is needed."

Hill continued: "It proposes a green fund to be run by a board but the big risk is that it will run by the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility [a partnership of 10 agencies including the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme] and not the UN. That would be a step backwards, and it tries to put constraints on developing countries when none were negotiated in earlier UN climate talks."


The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week. It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week.

Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders. However, it seeks to hold temperature rises to 2C and mentions the sum of $10bn a year to help poor countries adapt to climate change from 2012-15.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text/print

[Freeski]

It's a freaking PR stunt!

[Piltdown Man]

they're trying to create a faux Climategate on their own terms

[Freeski]

Wake the heck up... for the love of God!

[Piltdown Man]

Wake the heck up... for the love of God!

seriously

[deadflagblues]

.. did my post get deleted?? why?

[Dig]

.. did my post get deleted?? why?

the post saying that the thousands of emails, data models, remarks from programmers was fake but the lieele BS memo is real? probably because it is complete absurdity? why would you post such a thing in the first place?

[Brocke]

It is obviously a guilt trip/smokescreen/distraction with enough truth in the mix to give it the appearance of credibility.

I posted it for the record.

[Dig]

It is obviously a guilt trip/smokescreen/distraction with enough truth in the mix to give it the appearance of credibility.

I posted it for the record.

yup.

there is a bunch of this stuff coming out now. there are pulling out the kitchen sink on climategate, operation mockingbird is in full effect, fox is purposefully bungling numbers.

total disarray is an understatement.

[deadflagblues]

the post saying that the thousands of emails, data models, remarks from programmers was fake but the lieele BS memo is real? probably because it is complete absurdity? why would you post such a thing in the first place?

I didn't say that ffs, i said that the treaty Monckton had, promising 'climate debt' to the poor countries might be BS to get such countries interested. You might notice that i originally made the climategate thread :/

i didn't even mention climategate..

obviously you misread or someone else posted it and you deleted 2 threads or something... i don't know

[deadflagblues]

And never mind, I didn't understand what it was. The treaty is still as it was, but these documents outline how the world bank will be involved  

[Dig]

And never mind, I didn't understand what it was. The treaty is still as it was, but these documents outline how the world bank will be involved  

you were right and i was wrong. the post was restored. the document points more to the issue of the world bank/imf being the control guide whereas the 3rd world countries thought it would ne the un.

my apology

[TheHouseMan]

The leaked documents are not leaked, in my opinion. They are a way for people to get angry over a false issue, and thus, plead for UN control, or PLEAD for rich countries to give up more money to poor countries.

Documents of this high-level calibre would not be leaked this early in the game. No chance. This is a smokescreen.

[Dig]

The leaked documents are not leaked, in my opinion. They are a way for people to get angry over a false issue, and thus, plead for UN control, or PLEAD for rich countries to give up more money to poor countries.

Documents of this high-level calibre would not be leaked this early in the game. No chance. This is a smokescreen.

possibly a compartmentalization negotiation tactic, but once exposed to everyone it shows how they are now just debating what organization gets to rape us. they have obviously agreed to rape us, not they are just negotiating the particulars.

[TheHouseMan]

possibly a compartmentalization negotiation tactic, but once exposed to everyone it shows how they are now just debating what organization gets to rape us. they have obviously agreed to rape us, not they are just negotiating the particulars.

I don't think they'd really be negotiating this late in the game. This is about making people plead for richer nations to give up more money.

All to prevent a 0.5 degree increase in warming, or possible a decrease, within 100 years.

[cog]

All your mindf**king are belong to us.

I think thats whats going on here, the free debate that was occuring wasn't going the way they wanted, we had the upper hand, no amount of counter arguments were working, so now they're trying to 'strike below the belt', muddy the waters, by engaging operation mindf**k. The aim, to confuse us so much we are unable to be a strong, united oppostion.

Is this a leak? Maybe it is maybe it isn't.
Does it change anything? No.
We know that the globalists are all over this issue and are pushing for more global government, more centralisation of power, to shift large amounts of wealth around. This document, real or staged doesnt change that, nor should it change our opposition.

[Kilika]

How many times have we seen politicians put together a debate and then a bill, and then vote on said bill while the media and everybody is saying they dont want this or that in the bill, and it ends up being "renegotiated" and a new improved bill is then voted on and passed. It's like they toss out a sacrificial idea that they know won't pass, with the intent to get a "dumbed down" version passed after "bi-partisan debate and compromise", with the latter being their intent all along. Makes people think it was their own idea to get new and improved legislation passed.

So could it be that this "leak" was intended to redirect attention to their "new" plan? Who knows what insanity these people are up to, but you can be sure it won't make sense no matter how they spin it.

[Dig]

I don't think they'd really be negotiating this late in the game. This is about making people plead for richer nations to give up more money.

All to prevent a 0.5 degree increase in warming, or possible a decrease, within 100 years.

I really do not see how the leaked document does that even though obviously that is the plan:

"We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse. " -Maurice Strong


Lord Monckton has the actual updated treaty and you are precisely correct, this is a scam to take all wealth from western nations more than anything. the third world is already owned, the objective is to get at the western world. Still the leaked documents show that even though many 3rd world countries were seduced by UN power, IMF/World Bank (who they all despise) will be running the new world economic system. that is the point, not the idea that they are not getting enough money, the idea that what they thought they would have a vote in has completely arbitrary guidelines and regulation by clandestine star chamber negotiations.


The Alex Jones Show – L I V E – December 8th With Lord Monckton
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-alex-jones-show-l-i-v-e-december-8th-with-lord-monckton.html


Alex welcomes back to the show Lord Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, British politician, business consultant, policy adviser, writer, columnist, inventor and adviser to Margaret Thatcher’s policy unit in the 1980s. Monckton is a vociferous critic of the climate scam gang. He reports from the summit. Alex also talks with special guest Jesse Ventura, former Minnesota governor, retired professional wrestler and color commentator, Navy UDT veteran, actor, and former radio and television talk show host. The first episode of Jesse’s new television show, Conspiracy Theory, delivered 1.6 million viewers and was the biggest audience ever for a new series launched on truTV. Alex continues his coverage of the Copenhagen summit. He also runs down the latest news and takes your calls.

Watch the video archive and access the high quality MP3 by logging in at Prison Planet.tv and clicking on the “LIVE” page.

MEDIUM QUALITY FREE MP3 FILE: http://rss.nfowars.net/20091208_Tue_Alex.mp3

[agentbluescreen]

Just ask anyone in Russia or Eastern Europe, "one day they were "communists", the next day, they were "banksters""

[agentbluescreen]

I think we are already there....

The point is the international UN General Assembly is merely a pseudo=democratic social club for liars, warlords, tyrants and crooks and yet even it gets it right 80% of the time, whereas the all-powerful transnational Bankster's Security 'Council" is merely an Elite Cabal of elite noble puppets who always get it wrong, 100% of the time.

The thought of this latter group ruling the entire world in the way they rule Palestine and Darfoor now (still in outright defiance of the General Assembly) is sheer lunacy.

[mr anderson]

The leaked documents are not leaked, in my opinion. They are a way for people to get angry over a false issue, and thus, plead for UN control, or PLEAD for rich countries to give up more money to poor countries.

Documents of this high-level calibre would not be leaked this early in the game. No chance. This is a smokescreen.

+1

Exactly.

It's for the developing countries to cry foul they're not raping us enough and for the UN to paint a target on the our backs and show us up to be the enemy.

You stupid ignorant morons! Wake up developing countries, most with dictators!: Your being played too! Don't think by robbing us that you'll prosper or increase your living standards.

Some jerk African delegate say "$10bn won't be enough to buy all the coffins needed"

Well WTF douchebag... At what degrees do you want me bent over my sofa?! I mean I've got NO problems whatsoever with assisting developing countries move into 1st world status but taking my taxes, handing that to an unelected bureaucracy which uses most to establish global governance and the rest to dictators and mismanagers who won't pass any onto their citizens isn't the answer!  

I certainly don't buy into the left / right political paradigm, especially in Australia but the new leader of the opposition is at least showing some resistance even if it's to cool the sceptics down.

[..]http://www.news.com.au/national/copenhagen-deal-could-cost-us-400bn-says-abbott/story-e6frfkvr-1225808638674

"Just to get a five per cent reduction in emissions, Mr Rudd wants to whack a $120 billion tax on us," Mr Abbott said.

"To get a 15 per cent or 25 per cent reduction in emissions on Mr Rudd's logic, it's going to be an even bigger tax - perhaps a $300 or $400 billion tax.

"So I think that the Australian people ought to be very concerned about anything that Mr Rudd might sign us up to in Copenhagen."

He said he hated to think of the carbon footprint of the delegates travelling to Denmark for the conference.

"They are certainly making a very substantial contribution to their own emissions," he said [...]

[agentbluescreen]

This conference will hopefully be the last of it's sort, as "climate change" of any sort is a complete fraud.

Hopefully the next will be convened on the subject of environmental pollution and and making polluters pay for having  disposed of and disposing of things that really are pollution in inappropriate places for profit, and wether punishing them (Like Occidental Petroleum and it's bankers) will net enough to repair the immense damages they have caused to our planet.

[Okinawa]

Comments on the Danish Text

I cut and pasted parts of the document and highlighted what I thought was significant.

Adoption of The Copenhagen Agreement Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

I. A Shared Vision for Long-Term Cooperative Action
2. The Parties recognize the urgency of addressing the need for enhanced action on adaptation to climate change. They are equally convinced that moving to a low-emission economy is an opportunity to promote continued economic growth and sustainable development in all countries recognizing that gender equality is essential in achieving sustainable development.  In this regard, the Parties:     
- Commit to strengthen the international architecture for the provision of substantially increased finance for climate efforts in developing countries

3. Recalling the ultimate objective of the Convention, the Parties stress the urgency of action on both mitigation and adaptation and recognize the scientific view that the increase in global average temperature above pre-industrial levels ought not to exceed 2 degrees C.
- Support the goal of a peak of global emissions as soon as possible, but no later than [2020], acknowledging that developed countries collectively have peaked and that the timeframe for peaking will be longer in developing countries

II. Adaptation
4. The adverse effects of climate change are already taking place and are posing a serious threat to the social and economic development of all countries. This is particularly true in the most vulnerable developing countries, which will be disproportionally affected.

Adaptation must include action to reduce risk and vulnerability, taking into account gender equality, and build resilience in order to reduce the threats, loss and damages to livelihoods and ecosystems from disasters caused by extreme weather events and from slow-onset events caused by gradual climate change. Recognizing that the impact of climate change will differ according to regional and national circumstances, planning and implementation of adaptation actions must be considered in the context of the social, economic and environmental policies of each country.

5. In this regard, the Parties endorse the adaptation framework in decision X4/CP.15 with the objective of reducing vulnerability and building resilience to present and future effects of climate change through national action and international cooperation. This includes the provision of finance, technology and capacity building in the immediate, medium and long-term.

Support should be provided with priority for the poorest and most vulnerable countries.
In the context of this Framework institutional arrangements will be established over time to support Parties’ actions and provide technical assistance including for risk reduction and provide financial risk transfer such as insurance.

Further, this will include a system to ensure mutual accountability with monitoring, review and assessment of support and actions and share lessons learned. A share of fast-start financing comprising [$X] for 2010-12 will be provided through existing channels, including the Adaptation Fund, to implement actions identified in National Adaptation Programmes of Action and other urgent needs and to build capacity for further planning.
 

III. Mitigation
6. The shared vision limiting global average temperature rise to a maximum of 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels

Developing countries nationally appropriate mitigation actions
9. The developing country Parties, except the least developed countries which may contribute at their own discretion, commit to nationally appropriate mitigation actions, including actions supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity-building.
 
11. A Registry in the form of a database under UNFCCC is established in order to enable the international recognition of developing country mitigation action.
 
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation
12. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation is an important aspect of the necessary response to climate change. Developing countries should contribute to enhanced mitigation actions through reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, maintaining existing and enhancing carbon stocks, and enhancing removals by increasing forest cover. [I expect this to lead to starvation and depopulation.] Parties underline the importance of enhanced and sustained financial resources and positive incentives for developing countries to, through a series of phases, build capacity and undertake actions that result in measurable, reportable and verifiable greenhouse gas emission reductions and removal and changes in forest carbon stocks in relation to reference emission levels.

Bunkers
13. An effective mitigation response includes reduction of emissions from international bunker fuels.
The Parties shall work through the International Maritime Organization and the International Civil Aviation Organization to take this issue forward and secure a timely implementation of actions needed, 
 
Carbon markets
14. An effective mitigation response requires a well functioning carbon market.

National policies
15. The Parties commit to further integrate low-emission development policies into national planning.
In addition, the Parties commit to work towards adopting domestic policies aiming at payment for actual consumption of energy. Furthermore, transparency concerning consumption and cost of energy should be increased.
 
Response measures
16. Parties decide that countries must strive to implement policies and measures in such a way as to minimize adverse social, environmental and economic impacts on developing country


IV. Technology
17.
information sharing on best practices, and greater capacity-building efforts to promote the development and deployment of environmentally sustainable technologies in support of mitigation and adaptation efforts.
 
18.
Developed country parties commit to work towards doubling aggregate public investments in climate related research, development and demonstration by 2015 from current levels and quadrupling the efforts by 2020. Parties stress the need for up front finance for inter alia technology capacity building, joint research and development and demonstration projects. Parties endorse the “Technology Mechanism” set forth in decision X5/CP15, containing a technology objective, a UNFCCC technology body, the development of technology action plans, the establishment of six Climate Technology Innovation Centres in developing countries [i.e. control over technology]


V. Financial resources and investments to support actions on mitigation, adaptation, capacity-building and technology cooperation
19. Substantially scaled up financial resources will be needed to address mitigation, adaptation, technology and capacity building. It is essential to strengthen the international financial architecture for assisting the developing countries in dealing with climate change and to improve access to financial support. Resources will derive from multiple sources and flow through multiple bilateral and multilateral channels.  [aka ways to hide fraudulent activities]
 
20. The Parties share the view that the strengthened financial architecture should be able to handle gradually scaled up international public support.
 
21. The Parties confirm climate financing committed under this agreement as new and additional resources that supplement existing international public financial flows otherwise available for developing countries in support of poverty alleviation and the continued progress towards the Millennium Development Goals. In this regard:
- Developed country parties commit to deliver upfront public financing for 2010-201[2] corresponding on average to [10] billion USD annually for early action, capacity building,

22. Recalling article 4 of the Convention, Parties decide that a Climate Fund be established as an operating entity of the Financial Mechanism of the Convention, The Fund should be operated by a board with balanced representation, which will develop the operational guidelines for the Fund and decide on specific allocation to programmes and projects.  The COP will formally elect members of the Fund Board and endorse the operational guidelines and modalities for the Fund. The Fund should complement and maximise global efforts to fight climate change through up-scaled support for climate efforts in the developing countries, including mitigation, adaptation, technology and capacity-building.

23. In the context of the commitment in paragraph [14] Parties commit to global financing contributions from international aviation and international maritime transport generated through instruments developed and implemented by the ICAO and IMO respectively should be channeled through the Climate Fund
 
24. To enhance transparency and overview The Parties decide to establish an International Climate Financing Board under the UNFCCC to monitor and review international financing for climate action and in this context identify any gaps and imbalances in the international financing for mitigation and adaptation actions that may arise. The Board will consist of X representatives from developed countries and [y] representatives from developing countries.  [Z] Representatives from international institutions will participate in the Board as permanent observers.
 

VI: Measurement, Reporting and Verification and improved National Communications
26. The Parties commit to robust measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) of the commitments undertaken in this Agreement and to review global progress in addressing climate change.
 
Measurement, Reporting and Verification for developed countries
27. ... Finance, technology and capacity building for developing countries actions are subject to robust MRV. Provision of international public climate financing should be verified in conjunction with the MRV of supported action and according to international guidelines.

Measurement, Reporting and Verification for developing countries
28. In order to promote transparency and accountability the developing country Parties will report on the implementation of their individual mitigation actions and emission outcomes achieved in relation to their estimates in Attachment B.

The Registry
29. Parties decide to establish a Registry that will be managed and operated independently by a professional secretariat which shall perform its tasks to the highest standards of professionalism and objectivity. The secretariat shall further prepare and propose the accounting standards for MRV of specific mitigation action and of financing. [further tasks]

Improved National Communications
30. Noting that low-emission development is indispensable to sustainable development and recognizing that development strategies and priorities are sovereign national decisions. [Giving notice to all Parties that mechanisms to bypass national sovereignty must be available]
- That Parties are to provide their greenhouse gas inventories on an annual basis with the exception that the developing countries can provide updates on a biannual basis and the least developed country Parties on a triennial basis;
- The Parties will report, as applicable, on support received and support provided to developing countries for their actions in National Communications. A comprehensive set of statistics for climate change finance will be established enabling transparent monitoring of both provision of finance and supported climate actions. Financial flows from the international carbon market should be monitored and recognized separately.


VII: The Copenhagen Process
31. The Parties underline their commitment to immediate action pursuant to this Agreement.
- Decide on a review of commitments and actions under the Convention to be started in 2014 and completed in 2015

32. The Parties commit to work together in international organizations, including international financial institutions, to further integrate climate aspects in their activities, including country reviews.


This Treaty should be retitled as The Treaty for the Sustainable Governance of Earth for the Benefit of the Elite

[ekimdrachir]

Anybody got any more info on these "Carbon Rings"

[Dig]

Alex Jones: Secret Copenhagen Treaty Documents Leaked
http://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-secret-copenhagen-treaty-documents-leaked/

Infowars
December 9, 2009

Alex Jones Breaks Down World Government Takeover

In Alex’s second special message about Climategate, the UN Climate Change Conference at Copenhagen and the Global Takeover, he analyzes the leaked documents in a draft of the treaty that expose the true intentions of the meeting– a World Government Takeover to shut down development in the Third World and dominate the planet through a carbon tax.

Part One



Alex also exposes President Obama’s cynical move to have the EPA declare CO2 to be a danger– in the face of logic and common sense. Through this designation, regulation could be implemented in the name of cutting emissions even if the Senate were to fail to ratify the Copenhagen treaty, which Obama is expected to sign.

Further, Alex points out that this scheme is just the implementation of a larger-scale plan to de-industrialize the already developed world and maintain control over the emerging spheres– from Maurice Strong to Paul Ehrlich & now-Science Czar John P. Holdren, top globalists have targeted human activity as a negative and implemented eugenics policies to breakdown mankind’s natural order.

Part Two

[Overcast]

I think it should henceforth be called "Hoaxenhagen"

[chris jones]

I'm blown away by the posting, you guys nailed it.

Its a curve ball, an out and out distraction. In the end who gets raped, skinned, and hung out to dry.

The Mossad moto haunts me, "By means of deception".

[Brocke]

Comments on the Danish Text...

Bunkers
13. An effective mitigation response includes reduction of emissions from international bunker fuels.
The Parties shall work through the International Maritime Organization and the International Civil Aviation Organization to take this issue forward and secure a timely implementation of actions needed, 

I'd never heard of Bunkers or Bunker Fuel.


Bunker fuel
Small molecules like those in propane gas, naptha, gasoline for cars, and jet fuel have relatively low boiling points, and they are removed at the start of the fractional distillation process. Heavier petroleum products like diesel and lubricating oil precipitate out more slowly, and bunker oil is literally the bottom of the barrel; the only thing more dense than bunker fuel is the residue which is mixed with tar for paving roads and sealing roofs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_oil#Bunker_fuel

Bunker Fuels
Bunker fuel is also known by other names: heavy oil, #6 oil, resid, Bunker C, blended fuel oil, furnace oil and other often locally used names.  No matter the origin of bunker fuel it has common properties where ever found: color, viscosity, contaminants, and operator problems.

Origin of Bunker Fuel
The origin of the bunker fuel being considered is crude oil.  When crude oil is subjected to refining, the lighter fractions (gasoline, kerosene, diesel, etc.) are removed by distillation.  The heaviest materials in crude petroleum are not distilled - the boiling points are too high to be conveniently recovered.  These materials (asphaltenes, waxes, very large molecules, etc.) carry through refining and become residual oil (or resid). During various operations in the refinery (principally heating at high temperatures), rearrangement of molecules may take place forming even larger molecular materials that have still higher boiling points.  These materials also become part of the resid.  Finally, any contaminants in the crude will not be distilled from the crude and will also be in the resid.  This includes any salts (chemical elements that are typically soluble in water), sediment (oil-wetted solids), and the heavy organic molecules from various sources.  Just as salt water leaves a residue of salt behind when it evaporates, so too does the refining process leave solids behind when the lighter materials are removed.  Before selling resid as bunker fuel, a refiner will very often dilute it to meet various sales specifications for trace metals, sulfur and/or viscosity.
http://www.liquidminerals.com/fuels.htm

[larsonstdoc]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/08/copenhagen-climate-summit-disarray-danish-text


The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.

The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.

The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.

The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".

A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:

• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;

• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";

• Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;

• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.

Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.

"It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.

Antonio Hill, climate policy adviser for Oxfam International, said: "This is only a draft but it highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurting. On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. It allows too many loopholes and does not suggest anything like the 40% cuts that science is saying is needed."

Hill continued: "It proposes a green fund to be run by a board but the big risk is that it will run by the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility [a partnership of 10 agencies including the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme] and not the UN. That would be a step backwards, and it tries to put constraints on developing countries when none were negotiated in earlier UN climate talks."

The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week. It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week.

Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders. However, it seeks to hold temperature rises to 2C and mentions the sum of $10bn a year to help poor countries adapt to climate change from 2012-15.

[Flynn]

F A I L

[Monkeypox]

What a bunch of liars are running this thing.

The developing countries need to just leave.