Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II

Author Topic: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II  (Read 228178 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #40 on: February 10, 2010, 07:18:51 PM »
The Short-Lived California Birther Ticket

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7008


Dr. Orly Taitz, in an interview with “Russia Today,” speaks for the American Tea Party movement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk9NMApEWaw&feature=player_embedded


Keyes v Bowen – Motion to sustain Demurrer Granted – President Obama

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/keyes-v-obama-motion-to-sustain-demurrer-granted-president-obama/

Keyes v Bowen – Motion to sustain Demurrer Granted – Secretary of State

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/keyes-v-bowen-motion-to-sustain-demurrer-granted-secretary-of-state/



Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #41 on: February 10, 2010, 07:31:03 PM »
Candidate for Congress: 'If he claims he was born at Kapi'olani, I want him to show proof'

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124656

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #42 on: February 13, 2010, 06:39:14 AM »

Offline centexan

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 675
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #43 on: February 14, 2010, 08:10:14 PM »
This is cool.  Debra Medina, running to unseat Governor Rick Perry in the Texas Republican primary, said something controversial about 9/11 on the Glenn Beck program.  They've been villifying her for it.  Rather than back down though, she said this:

"The 9/11 Commission report, you know, great sections of that are redacted and they’re top secret. That makes us all wonder,’ well what’s happening back there?’ The same is true with the birth certificate thing. I think it’s healthy that people are asking questions."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0210/From_911_to_the_birth_certificate.html

Lol.  So cool.  No wonder the establishment is eager to get rid of her.  If she gets elected she'll have done a great service to the nation by flicking aside Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchison.  And next, maybe she'll stop doing business with Barry Sotero (aka Barrack Hussein Obama) until he shows his papers.  lol

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #44 on: February 15, 2010, 12:31:11 PM »
Attorney facing penalties wants birth docs for defense

http://americangrandjury.org/attorney-facing-penalties-wants-birth-docs-for-defense


Obama and Columbia College plead not guilty

http://americangrandjury.org/obama-and-columbia-college-plead-not-guilty


American Grand Jury joins forces with Dr. James David Manning

http://americangrandjury.org/history-in-the-making-american-grand-jury-joins-forces-with-dr-james-david-manning



Birthers’ Harassment Of Hawaii State Government?

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7285


Orly Taitz Readying For CA Bar Disciplinary Hearing, looks like she is in trouble

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7231

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #45 on: February 15, 2010, 05:04:54 PM »
Deal has called Obama’s Bluff

After nearly three months waiting for a response to his letter, U.S. Representative for Georgia, Nathan Deal, has yet to receive any reliable information from Barack Hussein Obama regarding Obama's citizenship status.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/11/deal-has-called-obamas-bluff/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p3O_6k8WT4&feature=player_embedded



Donofrio and Pidgeon – Appeal

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/donofrio-and-pidgeon-appeal/

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #46 on: February 18, 2010, 08:32:07 AM »
Orly Taitz in Danger of Disbarment?

Way back in spring of 2009, a lengthy document started circulating in the birther blogosphere, supposedly a formal complaint to the California Bar Association about the conduct of Laguna Niguel dentist/lawyer Orly Taitz.

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/02/16/ocweekly-orly-taitz-in-danger-of-disbarment/


Berg v Obama (Qui Tam) – Appellant Brief Filed

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/02/17/berg-v-obama-qui-tam-appellant-brief-filed/


Gino DiSimone, running as an Independent, assures Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. that, just as soon as he is Governor of Nevada, he is ready to take out Obama fast and hard.

Posted to her web site*:

Posted on | February 17, 2010 |

Gino DiSimone Says (#132):
February 16th, 2010 at 1:10 am

My name is Gino DiSimone and I am the leading Independent non-partisan candidate for Governor of Nevada. Immediately after I take the Governors seat, I will require the birth certificate and I will exercise all my executive powers to get this done! It will be the biggest issue you have ever seen. I have already laid the foundation to blow this wide open like never before and it will be from the executive powers of a Sovereign State Governor.

Please send my info around the USA. God be with us as we take this tyrant down, fast and hard. Your support is greatly appreciated.

Sincerely,
Gino DiSimone
Candidate, Governor of Nevada 2010, Independent non-partisan, GIN ! (Go Independent Nevada !

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7406



McCain’s Birther Opponent Issues Threat

Last month on Chris Matthews, Tea Party challenger J.D. Hayworth came out as a Birther pol. Now he is letting John McCain know just what kind of fight he can expect in the Arizona primary race.

J.D. Hayworth has a warning for John McCain: Bring up Jack Abramoff and I’ll rehash the Keating Five scandal.

The former six-term congressman isn’t yet officially in the race but already the Arizona GOP Senate primary shows signs of turning into a bare-knuckle brawl.

“If John McCain really wants to make this a campaign about ties to lobbyists we will very forcefully respond to his outrageous conduct and Bahamian vacations with convicted banker Charlie Keating,” said Jason Rose, a spokesman for Hayworth.

Perhaps Sarah Palin, who has endorsed McCain, will be sent out to fight it out, Teabagger to Teabagger, along the campaign trail. Wouldn’t that be fun.

And it’s on – McCain camp responds:

“Mr. Hayworth was the largest recipient of campaign contributions tied to the corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Senator McCain led the investigation that exposed Abramoff’s corruption.”

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7321



Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #47 on: February 19, 2010, 08:08:59 AM »
CIA Columbia Obama Cover Up Paster Manning talks about the latest

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WedxY61d60&feature=player_embedded


Orrin Hatch: “Satisfied” On Obama Eligibility

Taking a hard time from Tea Partyers at a Town Hall Meeting, Hatch said the Tea Party movement is tearing the Republican Party apart.

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7454



CPAC Hearing Birther Gospel?

Birther attorney Philip Berg is at the conservative conference. He doesn’t appear to be speaking, but he hopes to have listeners.

Berg concluded, “I will be attending the CPAC 2010 Convention in Washington, DC from Thursday, 2/18 to Saturday, 2/20 at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel. The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) will be helpful for me to spread the message that Obama is a fraud, a phony and Obama has put forth the biggest ‘HOAX’ in the history of our great nation.”

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7417



Okubo gives false UIPA response to The Post & Email


http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/18/okubo-gives-false-uipa-response-to-the-post-email/



Palin says questions about Obama's eligibility should not be part of the debate

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/18/palin-rejects-import-of-article-ii-section-1-clause-5-of-the-u-s-constitution/



Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #48 on: February 20, 2010, 09:17:41 AM »
Obama’s Incomplete Dossier; HI State Sen Intros “Vexatious Requests,” Birth Cert Bills

Hawaii State Senator Will Espero has introduced a bill to label some people “vexatious requestors” who can be denied responses from the DOH. This action was taken 2 weeks after I posted “Red Flags in Hawaii”

http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/

    a blog post documenting how Hawaii government officials have broken laws and rules in order to cover for Obama.

    The Honolulu Advertiser has an article about it. Apparently I can’t post anything from the HA because they won’t allow it, but it’s in an article online today. In it, Okubo claims that she gets about 50 requests/month for Obama’s BC.

    First off, I call BS on that number. I requested all the UIPA requests involving Obama for a 2-week period and there were 7 requests -- only 2 of which were for a BC, and both for a non-certified abbreviated birth certificate, which the Administrative Rules expressly authorize to be released to anybody who asks for it.

    Second, I believe this firmly places us in phase 3 of the saying, “First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”

From the HonoluluAdvertiser:

    “They’re spurred on by these ‘birther’ blogs who direct them to bombard the Health Department even though they have no legitimate right to the information,” [Health Department spokeswoman Janice] Okubo said.

    “They’ve been misled to believe that the state of Hawai’i gives out birth information to anyone who requests it, but really our law protects birth information. We’re entrusted with protecting people’s vital records. To open them up would mean opening them up to identity theft and other types of concerns.”

    State law allows birth certificates to be issued to family members, legal guard- ians, representatives of a person’s estate, or by court order or other legal purposes.

    Okubo said those who have been requesting Obama’s birth certificate don’t meet the legal standards.

Sorry, Ms. Okubo, but some of us already know that certain records are private. What has been requested are certain facts surrounding these documents — but more on this process in a moment.

The article continued:

    Rick Newbold, a defense contractor from North Carolina now working in Iraq, asked the Health Department and the White House for Obama’s birth records, in part, because Newbold believes it’s “hypocritical of the president to proclaim that his administration is transparent when it obviously is not,” he wrote in an e-mail to The Advertiser.

    “My interest in discovering and defending the truth about our chief executive is to maintain the integrity of the office of the president and to protect our republic from subversion, especially from foreign powers. America is in decline as a result of the globalist mindset and monied interests who seek to destroy America and integrate it into a global system of governance and taxation.”

    The continuing issue over Obama’s birthplace — and, therefore, his eligibility to serve as president of the United States — has led state Sen. Will Espero, D-20th, (’Ewa Beach, Waipahu) to introduce two bills this session on different sides of the issue.

    Senate Bill 2056 would open up Hawai’i birth records under strict conditions to people who currently have no legitimate right to see them. Senate Bill 2937 would allow state agencies to label people who persistently “abuse” the public information process as “vexatious requestors,” which would allow state officials to deny their requests for documents.

    Espero does not necessarily believe that everyone should see birth certificates that are now restricted, but said he wrote the bills to trigger legislative hearings to discuss the issue.

    “It’s all because of the noise about the president not being born here,” Espero said.

    “I believe he’s born here. Most of Hawai’i believes he’s born here and it’s not an issue here as it is with these Mainland birthers. It probably would not end all of the controversy because I believe the people that are these birthers have some other motives. Whatever you say or provide to these people, they will not be happy with anything.” …

    Attorney Jeff Portnoy, who represents The Advertiser, has made a career out of fighting for public access to government records and believes that county and state officials need to be more open about what they do.

    “On paper, the present state laws regarding access are very impressive, both philosophically and technically, in talking about that in a democracy, the public should have access to the workings of government,” Portnoy said. “Practically, the interpretation of those laws leaves a lot to be desired.”

    The reality, Portnoy said, is that “Hawai’i has a significant reputation as being a hostile place to obtain records and access and, frankly, a history of executive and legislative leaders who have been fairly hostile, either through their attorney general or corporation counsels or the bureaucracy itself.”

    Portnoy understands the desire among some people to see Obama’s birth records, but he does not put their requests in the same category as seeking openness to government dealings, such as details of public works projects or private meetings among officials to decide who will chair city councils, commissions and boards.

    “That’s the people’s business,” Portnoy said. “We’ve never brought an action to get somebody’s Social Security number and there are legitimate reasons to keep birth records private. Identity theft is a legitimate, serious issue.”

Then, Ms. Okubo stated the following:

    The majority of the people who e-mail or send letters to Okubo asking for Obama’s birth certificate do not challenge her response once she tells them they have no legal right to the information, she said.

    But about a dozen people continue to hammer Okubo with follow-up requests.

    “They want all of the organizational charts for our Office of Health Status Monitoring that handles vital records and for our health informations systems, our IT office,” Okubo said. “They request from me every single communication or every single document or request every record available related to President Obama’s vital records.”

    Okubo readily acknowledges that she hasn’t always been able to reply to a request within 10 working days as required under Hawai’i’s Uniform Information Practices Act, the state’s version of the federal Freedom of Information Act.

    But she adamantly disagrees with the “birthers’ ” interpretation of Hawai’i law.

    “They usually say that by not giving out his birth certificate we’re breaking the law,” Okubo said.

    “But we would be breaking the law by giving out a birth certificate to someone who does not have a right to it.”

    When Okubo told one writer they did not have a right to Obama’s birth certificate because they were not related to the president, the person wrote back saying they, indeed, had a common ancestor.

    “They said they have a tangible right to his birth certificate because they’re descended from Adam,” Okubo said, referring to the biblical figure. “We told them they need to provide some type of legal documentation.”

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2010/02/19/eligibility-obamas-incomplete-dossier-hi-state-sen-intros-vexatious-requests-birth-cert-bills/

Offline PEOA

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
  • When the truth is found to be lies
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #49 on: February 20, 2010, 09:19:56 AM »
keep the pressure on them..........good work..............
When the garden flowers baby are dead yes
and your mind is full of BREAD
your eyes, I say your eyes may look like his
but in your head baby I'm afraid you don't know where it is

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #50 on: February 20, 2010, 09:25:58 AM »
Obama’s Birth Certificate Was Amended in the Six Months Before He Announced Run for Presidency

 http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/amendment-while-deciding-to-run/


Obama supporters are starting to push back

Now that plans are being finalized for the trial in New York starting May 14th, Obama supporters are starting to get nervous. The fact that Manning can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Barack Obama never attended Columbia University, at least not in any capacity as a student, is not what the Obots want to hear.

Manning contends “no one, absolutely no one, remembers Obama from Columbia.”

Fox News did an interview with 400 Columbia ex-students and all they got were shrugs when asked about knowing Obama.

Small bits of information were circulated around the internet trying to build some kind of defense for Obama during the election period. You hear the stories about the “Pakistani” rommate and the piece from Phil Boerner who says he roomed with Obama at 104th Street. Then there is the 2-page article in the Sundial (student newspaper) that Obama supposedly wrote while at Columbia. Finally, you have the ex-professor Michael Barone who opines about grading one of Obama’s thesis papers at Columbia.

In reality, the sum total of these bits and pieces still come up way short of proving anything. Such information does not build a solid case demonstrating Obama ate, slept, worked and studied for 2 years at Columbia in order to receive the degree that was awarded him.

Dr. Manning tells you exactly why the internet stories being touted by the Obama supporters are nothing more than fabrications.

http://americangrandjury.org/obama-supporters-are-starting-to-push-back

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #51 on: February 22, 2010, 07:43:35 AM »
Organizers of a new march on Washington are offering Americans the opportunity to show President Obama their birth certificates and declare that unless he produces documentation of his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, he should quit.

The event is headed by Philip Berg, the first to bring court challenges to Obama’s eligibility under the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that presidents be a “natural born citizen.”

While a number of cases, including several of his own, remain pending, Berg told WND today the issue needs to be pressed.

“Since the courts are taking their time to get to the point of allowing ‘discovery,’ it is time to motivate the citizens of the United States for a ‘peaceful revolution’ to expose the ‘hoax’ of Obama, the biggest ‘hoax’ in the history of our country, in over 230 years,” he said.

Berg, who publicizes his cases through his ObamaCrimes.com website, said the planned “Birth Certificate March on Washington” will demand Obama resign.

A date and other logistical details of the march are to be announced within a few days, Berg told WND.

He’s also asking all citizens to e-mail, fax or mail a copy of their own birth certificates to him to present to Obama. The president should resign, he said, “because he has failed to produce his long form birth certificate to show he is ‘constitutionally eligible’ to be president.” (He said if people choose, they could black out private information.)

The copies can be e-mailed, fax to 610-834-7659 or mailed to: 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12, Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531.

“We will be preparing them to deliver to Obama demanding that he resign from the office of president as he has not proven that he is ‘constitutionally eligible’ to be president,” Berg said.

“I am proceeding for the 305 plus million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the 3.2 million men and women that have died and/or been maimed defending our Constitution,” Berg said.

http://americangrandjury.org/march-on-washington-to-tell-president-to-quit



Offline jeremystalked1

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,317
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #52 on: February 22, 2010, 07:58:33 AM »
There always has to be a scandal on the back burner, so that if the puppet gets out of control he can be destroyed deniably.

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #53 on: February 22, 2010, 02:09:10 PM »
HI Dept. of Health refuses to corroborate that Obama born in Hawaii

The Post & Email has received documentation establishing without a doubt that the Hawaii Department of Health categorically refuses to corroborate the July 28, 2009 statement of Dr. Chiyome L. Fukino that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a “natural-born American citizen.”

Since Fukino’s statement has become the fundamental claim to eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, the failure of her Department to corroborate it in any way establishes that claim as false, by common sense.  For honest folk, speaking sincerely, do not conceal corroborating evidence.  Nor is there a reason to hide Obama’s vital records unless they prove he is not eligible.

Since the public statement was made, numerous citizens have attempted to understand and verify the claim made by Dr. Fukino in her capacity as Director of the Department of Health for the state of Hawaii.  On each occasion the Department has officially refused to show any documentary evidence whatsoever to corroborate Fukino’s press release.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/19/hi-dept-of-health-refuses-to-corroborate-that-obama-born-in-hawaii/

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Orly Taitz Seeks UN Protection?
« Reply #54 on: February 22, 2010, 07:36:44 PM »
February 22, 2010
Attorney Appeals to UN for Protection from Persecution in United States

Geneva:

Today the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has confirmed that American attorney Dr. Orly Taitz has applied for urgent action under the mandate for human rights defenders.

Dr. Taitz, a well known Constitutional attorney, has been under increasing attack in the United States from groups and individuals opposed to her legal actions challenging the Constitutional qualifications of Barrack Hussein Obama to hold the office of President of the United States.

The California attorney has been the victim of death threats, vandalism, false complaints, and a suspected assassination attempt. Her reports to law enforcement and the judiciary have been ignored.

This office has been retained by Dr. Taitz to support her efforts for a UN investigation of her claims.

For more information contact:
Dr. Jonathan Levy Attorney
1629 K Street NW Suite 300
Washington DC 20006 USA

Make way for the Blue Helmets.


http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7625

http://www.scribd.com/doc/27277636/Immediate-Release-February-22-2010

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #55 on: February 23, 2010, 07:17:28 PM »
Canadian citizenship hurdle to be U.S. president? Michigan governor pooh-poohs concern over dual allegiances

The governor of Michigan has pooh-poohed concern over her allegiance to Canada – she was born there and has dual citizenship in the United States and Canada – and whether that would impact her candidacy if she chose to run for president.


Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm

"Come on," Jennifer Granholm said while being interviewed, along with Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, by Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday."

The discussion was about what's going on in Washington and how it impacts states. At the end of the interview, Wallace asked Granholm about her plans.

"Your two terms are up at the end of this year. Do you have any interest in moving here to Washington and working in the administration?" he asked.

"Are you offering me a job? No, I …" she said.

"Yes, because I'm a conduit for the Obama White House. Exactly," Wallace joked.

"No, I'm totally focused this year on creating every single job I can until the last moment," Granholm said. "December 31st at midnight is when I'll stop. So I have no idea what I'm going to do next, but I'm not going to run for president. I can tell you that."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=125858


HI Petition Launched in Spite of Introduced Bills

hat Hawaii State Senator Will Espero had introduced two bills in his State’s legislature designed to deal with questions regarding Mr. Obama’s vital documentation. I also referenced a HonoluluAdvertiser.com article wherein the Department of Health’s spokeswoman, Janice Okubo, seemed exasperated over having to deal with approximately a “dozen” persistent requests for departmental records.

Apparently her job is about to get even more interesting.

The Post & Email today announced that they have begun sending out petitions demanding full disclosure of Mr. Obama’s background documentation, including all “government documents pertaining to the preparation of the public statements made” by the Hawaiian Director of Public Health.

As writer Sharon Rondeau posted:

    On July 27, 2009, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, made an unprovoked public statement about Barack Hussein Obama’s birth and citizenship status. Since that time, neither she nor the Health Department has released any meaningful “index data” to substantiate the claim that Obama is a “natural born American citizen.”

    While birth certificates are protected by privacy laws in the state of Hawaii, the Uniform Information Practices Act, Section 92-F12, mandates that “(15) Information collected and maintained for the purpose of making information available to the general public” must be released upon request. Therefore, when Dr. Fukino voluntarily made her public statement regarding Obama’s status, her department became obligated to release the backup information used to prepare it. To date, Hawaiian officials have refused to provide any correlating evidence used to craft Dr. Fukino’s public statement.

    Obama himself has acknowledged that many have questioned his citizenship. However, on his first full day in office, he signed an Executive Order barring the release of his personal records. Never in American history has this been done by a sitting president.

According to the donation page for the petition, the site is intending to send a copy “to Hawaii Governor Linga Lingle (R), to the HI Lt. Gov.  James Aiona (R), to the HI Director of the Department of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino (R); and to each member of the HI State legislature: in all, more than 90 governmental officials.”

In part, the petition claims the following:

    Barack Obama, however, claims as his father, Barrack Obama, Sr., a man who was a Citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies in 1961. He makes this claim in his book, Dreams from My Father, and via the release of an electronic image of a Hawaii Certification of Live Birth. If such is the case, he cannot legitimately hold the U.S. Presidency.

    As I am sure you will readily admit, it is patently absurd for the United States of America and its citizens to rely upon electronic images of alleged government documents, while the general public is refused an opportunity to inspect such documents. Such a manner of acting violates all that America represents and everything which our Founding Fathers fought and died for in the American Revolution. We are a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people. Our government by nature must be open and transparent.

    The State of Hawai’i echoes this long tradition of freedom when in its Uniform Information Practices Act it states (92F-2):

        …the people are vested with the ultimate decision-making power. Government agencies exist to aid the people in the formation and conduct of public policy. Opening up the government processes to public scrutiny and participation is the only viable and reasonable method of protecting the public’s interest. Therefore the legislature declares that it is the policy of this State that the formation and conduct of public policy—the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies—shall be conducted as openly as possible. [emphases original]

there currently is no Hawaiian State law that bars any individual (or groups of individuals) from petitioning the State government for records, despite whatever statements that officials make in an attempt to quell such questions

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2010/02/22/eligibility-hi-petition-launched-in-spite-of-introduced-bills/



Court Grants Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief in Kerchner Appeal

This is great news because the case will now continue forward as scheduled. Obama’s and Congress’s opposition brief was initially due on February 22, 2010. The Department of Justice obtained a 14-day extension to file that brief, making the new due date March 8, 2010. After they file their opposition brief, I will then have 14 days within which to file a reply to that brief. All briefs will be posted at this blog and it is my hope that the public will read these briefs so as to stay fully informed on this issue that is critically important not only to my clients but also to our Constitutional Republic.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/court-grants-motion-for-leave-to-file.html



Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #56 on: February 23, 2010, 07:23:56 PM »
CPAC Panel Devolved Into Birther Forum

A panel called “Saving Freedom and Due Process from Oppressive Justice Department” devolved into a forum for the so-called “birther” movement on Saturday at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington.

Two panelists dropped out rather than appear alongside a leader in the “birther” movement, which believes that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States, according to a person with direct knowledge of the situation.

Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and Scott Bullock of the Institute for Justice both dropped out of the CPAC forum because of the presence of Gary Kreep, according to the knowledgeable person, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

“Unfortunately Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has had to decline today for a variety of different reasons, and because it is that season in Washington, D.C., Scott Bullock who is my good friend, has had a family emergency unfortunately he’s just had to rush back out, so I apologize for that as well,” said Andrew Langer of the Institute for Liberty, who was moderating the panel.

Kreep, director of the United States Justice Foundation, is behind a birther infomercial and has filed lawsuits demanding an original copy of Obama’s birth certificate. For viewers who donate $30, Kreep will send a fax in their name to the 50 state attorneys general and Attorney General Eric Holder that demands that Obama produce his “real” birth certificate.

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7613

Gary Kreep at CPAC Panel on Justice Department, introduces Phil Berg in the audience

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESwg_gcFzrA&feature=player_embedded

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/02/22/orly-appeals-to-un/



Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #57 on: February 24, 2010, 10:25:01 AM »
Arizona House panel approves bill requiring presidential candidates to show birth certificates

http://www.startribune.com/nation/85141947.html

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7657

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #58 on: February 26, 2010, 05:30:07 PM »
today is the day Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. is due to respond to complaints filed against her with the California Bar Association. The proceedings are confidential, however, and unless she posts something to her web site or rumors otherwise leak out, there will be no news on that front today.

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7820


Orly Taitz talks about her applying to the United Nations for "urgent action under the mandate for human rights defenders."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6M7o3ruNdU


Confirmation that Certificate Number Given by State Registrar’s Office

http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/02/23/confirmation-that-certificate-number-given-by-state-registrar%E2%80%99s-office/



Sun Shines On Meroni v. McHenry County Grand Jury

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7729


Is Orly Taitz Up To UN Standards?

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=7754



McCain’s Anti-Birfer Ad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28qf6QOfpC0&feature=player_embedded

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #59 on: February 27, 2010, 12:22:35 PM »
Did Orly Taitz File Her Bar Response Today?

The California State Bar doesn't comment on whether it's investigating an attorney for breach of professional ethics, but that doesn't mean they don't guffaw about it.

We just called bar investigator Robin Littlefield, whom Orly Taitz herself said is looking into complaints against the Laguna Niguel anti-Obama attorney. As soon as we said the words "Orange County," Littlefield started a slow, low laugh on the other end of the line.

She knew why we were calling.

That didn't mean she could talk about Taitz. In fact, she couldn't even confirm that she was investigating Taitz--even though Taitz herself has posted on her blog and filed court pleadings saying that Littlefield had contacted her.

"If she wants to tell on herself that's one thing," Littlefield said. "But we're not gonna tell on her."

Sounds like confirmation to us.

In Taitz's request for an emergency injunction filed as part of her Taitz v. Obama lawsuit in Washington, D.C., Taitz said she needed the courts to make Obama and various other bodies turn over a host of Obama's vital documents by Feb. 26--today--in order to file a timely response to the bar. Obama's birth certificate, see, will nullify all the instances where Taitz's actions allegedly violated professional standards.

There's no indication on Taitz's blog as to whether she filed that response today.

What, exactly, might the bar be investigating? Well, there's that order from federal Judge Clay Land of Georgia, slapping $20,000 of fines on Taitz. Land wrote in the order that his ruling was to be sent to the bar.

There are also complaints from independent attorneys who don't like the way Taitz has handled herself. We spent some time talking with one of those attorneys the other day, who asked not to be named, likely so that his social security number won't show up in one of Taitz's voluminous "dossiers" sent to law enforcement agencies across the country. But he said he has filed more than a dozen complaints with the state bar.

"I'm concerned with her being a lawyer, because I'm a lawyer," he said. "It's a self-policing profession, and she has brought our profession into disrepute. She is the worst lawyer I have ever seen... The worst lawyer in the history of the human race."

As for the kinds of rules she may have been breaking, here's one taste. California Business and Professions Code, §6106.1:

Advocating the overthrow of the Government of the United States or of this State by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means, constitutes a cause for disbarment or suspension.

http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/the-hilarious-haters/did-orly-taitz-the-worst-lawye/



Gino DiSimone Independent Candidate for Nevada Governor says Obama should be tried for treason if not natural born

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/27/meet-gino-disimone-independent-candidate-for-nevada-governor-4/



Okubo responds to public outcry for investigation

In response to the public outcry over my last report regarding Okubo’s apparently false response to my request for index data from the Hawaii Birth Index, Miss Janice Okubo has directed staff at the Hawaii Department of Health to release a pdf file containing what appears to be scans of a computer printout containing redacted pages from the Hawaii Birth Index for those sections, which would contain the surnames Payne, Dunham, Soetoro and Obama.

My initial UIPA request of January 22, 2010, sought the index data for all children on the Hawaii Birth Index whose parents’ surnames were either Obama, Payne, Soetoro or Dunham.  The Certificate of Hawaii Birth was issued from 1911 to 1972 for those who wished to have a document proving that they were born in Hawaii.  It was a way to apply for a document for those who were born a year before the request was made and who did not have a standard birth certificate, presumably because they were born at home, not in a hospital.  I had made my UIPA request to determine if Obama was born before Hawaii became a state, but a name on this Index does not exclusively prove that.  If you read the link on “Certificate of Hawaii Birth” you can see that it was granted to those who provided what the Department of Health considered sufficient proof of a a birth in Hawaii.  Thus it provided a vehicle to claim a Hawaii birth without actually being born in Hawaii, if only one succeeded in convincing the Department that you were.

In response to the evasive denials of my original UIPA request and the outright claim I had written what I did not write, Miss Janice Okubo admitted to me last week that microfiches of the Hawaii Birth Index did exist and that they did not contain the said surnames.  Following my disclosure of that to several friends, I was given a copy of a Treasury Department Document from 1949 showing that at least one individual with the surname Dunham was born in Hawaii during the period in which the Hawaii Birth Index was used.

As a consequence, I wrote Miss Okubo and asked for copies of the microfiche to prove the veracity of her claim and offered to pay for them.  I also suggested to readers of The Post & Email that they contact Mrs. Lingle, the governor of the State of Hawaii, asking for an outside review of the matter.

Today’s release of a pdf file appears to be the Department of Health’s way of responding to this public outcry, even though the documents do not prove anything, since they are not prima facie evidence of anything, other than that

1) the Department does not understand how to respond to a UIPA request:  I asked for microfiche copies, not pdfs of computer printouts,

2) does not understand how to respond to the Press:  obstructed my UIPA request for three weeks, made false claim, and never responded to my email to Miss Okubo asking her to look into this matter,

3) and does not understand how to respond properly to a public call for investigation with solidly confirmatory documents:  if the Department thinks these images are corroborating evidence, I would hate to think what kind of evidence they accept to issue a Certificate of Hawaii Birth!  If this is the standard of evidence in 2010, what was it in 1961?

Indeed, an impartial observer to this present affair, considering this manner of response of the Department to my UIPA request, now has even more evidence to regard the claim of Obama being born in Hawaii (based on having a Hawaii Birth Certificate) as even more dubious, as that Department evidently does not understand or use any professional sense of the term “prima facie evidence.”  This can only mean that any Certificate of Live Birth that they might issue is worthless as evidence without a concomitant disclosure of all supporting documentation filed to obtain it — which has been the contention of this e-Newspaper from the beginning.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/26/okubo-responds-to-public-outcry-for-investigation/



Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #60 on: February 27, 2010, 02:54:06 PM »
In his Pajamas Media piece “Please, No More ‘Half-as-Much’ Republicans,” J. Robert Smith states that swapping out John McCain for J.D. Hayworth in the upcoming GOP senatorial primary in Arizona is a “nice bargain from a conservative’s viewpoint.”

It would certainly be that, and an analysis of the voting records of these two men from the Grand Canyon State via vote ratings from the American Conservative Union (ACU), National Journal, and the Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) highlights just how good a bargain it would be.

Looking first at the ACU numbers, we see that Hayworth’s ACU lifetime rating of 98 is significantly higher than John McCain’s lifetime ACU average of 81. In fact, in John McCain’s 22 years in the Senate prior to last year, he was only able to equal or surpass Hayworth’s low-water mark of 88 (in ’03) three times (’94, ’95, and ‘96). What’s more, with the exception of 2003, Hayworth voted with the ACU position at least 96 percent of the time every year he was in Congress — a feat that John McCain has only achieved once.

With respect to National Journal’s ratings, Hayworth’s average score for the 12 years he served in the House was 22 points higher than John McCain’s average rating over this same period (National Journal ratings are only available for McCain for this 12 year period, as he did not vote enough in ’07 or ’08 to receive a rating and scores are not available prior to ’95). To put this in perspective, this gap is greater than the 21-point margin in 2008 between Senators Sam Brownback and Arlen Specter. Additionally, just as it was with the ACU data, Hayworth’s least conservative year fairs very well against McCain’s average year. In fact, Hayworth’s least conservative score (78) is higher than any score John McCain has received from National Journal since 1995.

As for the ADA ratings, they too show that Hayworth is clearly the most conservative choice to represent Arizonans alongside Jon Kyl in the U.S. Senate. According to ADA statistics, McCain and Hayworth have voted against the liberal ADA position 85 and 96 percent of the time, respectively, over the course of their congressional careers.

However, as clear as this data shows the difference between these two men to be, the ideological gap between them is actually even greater, as the above analysis does not take into account that there are really two John McCains — the McCain of the late 80s and most of the 90s, and the oft-yielding maverick Republican that we have known since.

From 1987 when John McCain first entered the Senate through 1997 his average ACU rating was a respectably conservative 88, but from 1998 through 2008 his average score fell to a less than stellar 73. To put this in perspective, only four current Republican senators have a lifetime rating that is less conservative than McCain’s average rating over this latter period (Snowe – ME, Collins – ME, Voinovich – OH, and Murkowski – AK). And the clear distinction between these two periods is such that McCain’s least conservative result prior to 1998 of 80 has only been surpassed once since (an 81 in 2000).

John McCain’s penchant for spending time on the other side of the aisle in the last decade is also evidenced by the voting statistics from National Journal and the ADA. The average ratings received by John McCain from these two groups were 10 and 12 points less conservative, respectively, for the period since 1998 than they were for the period prior. In fact, since 2000 only six current Republican senators have received a National Journal rating for any given year that is less conservative than the average score of 62 that McCain has received since 1998. What’s more, since 2001, McCain has, on average, ranked as the 9th least conservative Republican in the Senate according to National Journal’s ratings. Contrast this with Hayworth, who in his 12 years in Congress ranked, on average, as the 46th most conservative member of the House — putting him solidly amongst the top third of Republican representatives during this period.

So as you can see, Hayworth is right when he states that “Arizona Republicans will have a clear choice in the August 24 primary.” On the one hand, they can choose John McCain’s unique brand of hit-n-miss conservatism, and on the other they can choose someone who actually is — at least as Washington Republicans go — a true conservative.

But regardless of the outcome, one thing is for certain: Conservatives across the country will be crossing their fingers in August in hopes that Arizona Republicans will get it right, because we could definitely stand to have fewer “half-as-much Republicans.”

http://americangrandjury.org/mccain-vs-hayworth-no-contest-for-conservatives



Bill O'Reilly Interviews Senate Candidate J.D. Hayworth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIMgBZpKaH4

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #61 on: March 01, 2010, 07:43:25 PM »
Riddler: Riddle me this, Batman. When is a Birther NOT a Birther?

Batman: A cunning riddle, Riddler. I’d say the answer would be ‘When he doesn’t say or do anything that would indicate, to the average person, that he was one.’

Riddler: Then explain, bat-brain, how Joseph Farah, editor of World Net Daily, could be a Birther. After all, as he rightly pointed out, While I have written tens of thousands of words about the subject of Barack Obama’s eligibility and talked for dozens of hours on the public airwaves and given hundreds of interviews on this subject, never have I stated that Obama was not born in the United States.

Robin: Holy Word Salad, Batman! How do we cut through an explicit denial based on what he hasn’t said? Newsweek’s going to have to print that retraction, now!

Batman: Simple, Boy Wonder! We look at his actions, which, we are reminded time and again, speak much louder than words. And based on them, I would say that Newsweek has nothing to worry about for identifying him as… a… Birther.

Riddler: Oh boy, we’re in for a long-winded one, aren’t we? Go get some coffee, boys. We’re going to be a while.


‘Birther’ Conspiracy Roils GOP Campaigns

http://washingtonindependent.com/77867/birther-conspiracy-roils-gop-campaigns



To some Tea Party Leaders; this is a Constitutional issue not a crazy fringe conspiracy theory!

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/02/to-some-tea-party-leaders-this-is.html






Protean

  • Guest

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #63 on: March 03, 2010, 06:27:29 PM »
Orly’s Political Competition

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=8009


conspiracy to put Obama in the White House?

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/02/was-there-a-conspiracy-to-put-obama-in-the-white-house/


Per Chalice, Patriot’s Heart network and USJF are partnering to file a quo warranto in the District Court for the District of Columbia. Also, PHN is filing a new action on Wednesday in McHenry County with an application seeking a TRO — to restrain what, she does not say, but intimates that it is about the 2010 election. Chalice is looking for an attorney to represent PHN in McHenry County proceedings. Kreep has pledged that USJF will pay for the attorney.

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/sharon-ann-meroni-joins-kreep/



Obama Quo Warranto Update; Obama(DOJ) File Motion to Dismiss Quo Waranto Action...
 
Flashback: Judge Carter's Oct 29th Dismissal Order stated this; “The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district.” - Judge Carter - 10/29/09

The Defense(Obama) argued the very same position, in the motion to dismiss, in the Judge Carter case. They said Orly's case was in the wrong jurisdiction and needed to be filed in D.C..

Now, the Motion to Dismiss(Obama), just filed in D.C., in the Quo Warranto, the defense is arguing just the opposite, saying lack of jurisdiction. The defense then uses the lefts favorite tactics from the Alinsky playbook.

Via Free Republic; 'U.S. Attorneys' Office moves to dismiss Orly Taitz's Quo Warranto case' - U.S. Attorneys with the Department of Justice have moved to dismiss Orly Taitz's Quo Warranto case for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, the U.S. Attorneys' Office asserts that any judicial or bar sanctions against Dr. Taitz are the consequences of her own actions.

"Although, to Defendant's knowledge, this is Dr. Taitz’s first case in which she serves as Plaintiff, this is not her first bite at the apple, or even her second: she has unsuccessfully represented plaintiffs in at least three judicial districts seeking to raise similar claims. In each of these cases, the United States district courts have declined to find jurisdiction and have denied relief similar to the ultimate relief sought here.

Dr. Taitz's Complaint suffers from exactly the same defects that doomed many of her previous litigation efforts. Simply put, her allegations about the President's citizenship are not a concrete and particularized injury, as required to establish standing under the "case or controversy" requirement of Article III, and the harms that she has suffered from judicial and/or bar sanctions for her conduct in litigation are the consequences of her own actions and not in any way traceable to any legal claim cognizable against Defendant." ...source.

Taitz v. Obama, Civil Action No.: 10-0151 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-quo-warranto-update-obamadoj-file.html

Offline Guns Equal Freedom

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #64 on: March 03, 2010, 06:36:05 PM »
There always has to be a scandal on the back burner, so that if the puppet gets out of control.

I was thinking the samething.

If Obama gets out of control in in The White House.

I wouldn't doubt some liberal will bring back his birth certificate records to impeach Obama.

I think Obama wanting the American People to pay for all of America's Heathcare might do it.
A Peaceful Anarchy would be like Utopia, but a Minarchy is reality.

Offline oyashango

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,524
  • 43 Trillion and counting
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #65 on: March 03, 2010, 08:26:15 PM »
You Know, I must have fought with just about everyone on this forum trying to find some justification for Obama's birth certificate. With all the new evidence arising, I am beginning to change my mind about this issue.  It does seem odd that his records are sealed when they should be open to the American people for scrutiny.  I can no longer turn a blind eye to defend the indefensible.

Why won't he just open his records so that we can see just who he is and where he was really born? If he is innocent, this should not be a problem, even amongst his most harden critics. So, far he has lied about everything. No evidence of "hope" or productive "change".  He is spending this nation into an early grave.
If he is lying about these things, what else ( I am wondering now) is he hiding? ???

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #66 on: March 04, 2010, 06:52:50 PM »
Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury update: discussing Monroe County Tennessee, as well as other grand jury corruption in this country.


http://www.blogtalkradio.com/profile.aspx?userurl=us-grand-jury

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #67 on: March 05, 2010, 05:17:30 PM »
The Obama admin finally responded to the Arizona Eligibility Bill now working its way through the Arizona legislature.

Via, Rachel from ResistNet and rachelabombdotcom's YouTube Channel; Robert Gibbs insists that He was the one who had Obama/Soetoro Birth Certificate online. The problem is it isn't a Birth Certificate and his statement about what HI officials have determined is not true.

At some point another reporter off camera asks "why did you put it online?" The answer is pretty insulting to anyone who has been following this issue.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu7dcdhtKXI


http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-gang-respond-to-arizona-bill.html


Arizona lawmakers a joke to prez? Gibbs: Obama not paying attention to push for eligibility document

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126940

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #68 on: March 06, 2010, 06:40:03 PM »
Bommbshell: Hawaii Conspiracy Allegations on Email Records Request


Major late-breaking news has been posted this evening by Sharon Rondeau at The Post & Email. I have the links to this story and more over at News.TheRightSideOfLife.com. Basically, officials from the great State of Hawaii “inadvertently” shared some emails with a records requester, and it’s likely to blow back in the officials’ faces.

The email exchange was rather short, with the admission that a records request had to be handled by them. And then there was this little ditty:

    Hi, Janice,

    I checked online for a “Kathleen Gotto” and I came across this letter that I presume she wrote http://blogtalkradio.com/MenifeeValleyRadio/blog/2008/11/15/Letter-to-the-US-Supreme-from-Kathleen-Gotto-This-is-a-vital-issue-to-us-all who accused Obama of “…who almost got away with stealing the Presidency…” I doubt that any answer I might send her would satisfy her since she has the same agenda as Rob Lamb (who accused me of lying and that I should be fired). Although Rob Lamb did not mention Obama’s name, he can be found online as another person who has a hidden agenda. It is interesting that in all of Rob Lamb’s emails he did not mention Obama’s name even once.

    Aloha,

    Ken

It’s great to know that officials are conspiring against private individuals with respect to records requests, now, isn’t it, I ask obviously quite sarcastically?

Frankly, if you don’t think this is a conspiracy, I’ll direct you to what Ms. Rondeau pointed out in the annals of the great States’ own laws:

    …U.S. Code, Title 42, Chapter 21, Subchapter I of §1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights reads:

        (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges:

        If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire … for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; … ; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

The Post & Email claims to have the emails to back these allegations up. If they do and legal action is pursued, it could be another means to get to the truth behind this President and the apparent arrogance that some officials have in the way they treat concerned citizens.

I have a number of other eligibility and other links highlighted on the News site, but long-time readers of my blog will certainly note that this story proverbially takes the cake.

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2010/03/05/eligibility-bombshell-hawaii-conspiracy-allegations-on-email-records-request/


Hawaii Department of Health has conspired against the public for 5 months
DENIED UIPA RESPONSES AFTER DOING INTERNET BACKGROUND CHECKS ON THE POLITICAL VIEWS OF PERSONS MAKING UIPA REQUESTS

mong the documents which The Post & Email Legal Fund recently acquired with the financial assistance and support of the readers of this e-Newspaper, shocking evidence has been found which apparently indicts officials of the Hawaii Department of Health for conspiracy to deprive U.S. citizens of their constitutional right to due process.

The incriminating evidence was found in an inadvertent disclosure of emails between Ms. Janice S. Okubo, Communications Director for the Department, and Kenneth David, Supervisor of the Vital Statistics Office.

It appears that David took it upon himself to do background checks on those making UIPA requests and on that basis suggested to Okubo to deny responding to their lawful requests for the release of government documents, requests which they made on the basis of the grants of rights of access accorded them by the Hawaii Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA).

Following this email exchange, the Department of Health discriminated against citizens whom it perceived to have “a hidden agenda.” The term “hidden agenda” was coined by David to refer to citizens who questioned Obama’s legitimacy to hold the office of president: a clearly political view, on which basis they could not be lawfully denied access.
Kathleen Gotto makes a UIPA request

The criminal conspiracy seems to have come to the fore in regards to a UIPA request made by Kathleen Gotto. In the course of that request, she sought further explanatory information from the Vital Records Department, on October 3, 2009, by email:

    From: Kathleen Gotto
    Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 5:44PM
    To: OHSM, Vital Records
    Cc: Okubo, Janice S.
    Subject: Per Dr. Okubo
    Importance: High

    I asked Dr. Okubo the following question:

    “If amendments are made to a Hawaiian Cert of Birth and a late birth certificate is issued in lieu thereof, is it reasonable to assume it is called a Late Hawaiian Cert of Birth?” (Dr. Okubo replied) I do not understand your question. Please send this request with clarification to vr-info@doh.hawaii.gov

    I just want to know what an amended Hawaiian Cert of Birth is called after it is amended. Is it then called a “late birth c3, ertificate”, late Hawaiian Certificate of Birth or something else? The amending of Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian birth certificates appear to be different in your DOH Vital Records section.

    Also, perhaps you can provide me more clarification on the last question I asked Dr. Okubo:

    “From the amendment instructions above for a non-Hawaiian cert of birth, once it is marked up with the changes, does it stay in the file like that or will a new one be issued similar to the late HI BC?: (Dr. Okubo replied) As I understand, any changes to Hawaii vital records are noted on the record.

    Here’s my point: What Dr. Okubo stated is true for what (appears to be) non -Hawaiian BCs only. The Vital Records Amendment section appears to differentiate how amendments are done to both Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian birth certificates. The amended Hawaiian BC must be cancelled and a “late” birth certificate is issued in lieu thereof. However, that does not appear to be the procedure for non-Hawaiian BCs. They are to be amended on the face of the record, not replaced with a new BC apparently.

    Therefore, in addition to the question above asking what a “late” cert of birth is officially called after an amendment is this question: are Hawaiian birth certs amended differently from non-Hawaiian birth certs? It reads that way to me. It is clear that the amended Hawaiian BC is replaced with a “late”/new BC. What is not clear is whether the amended/marked-up non-Hawaiian BC stays in the file marked up or is it replaced with a new BC incorporating the changes?

    Thank you for clearing this up for me. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can provide any more clarification on my questions. They come right out of the Vital Records requirement. It’s just a bit confusing with Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian BC amendments.

    Sincerely,

    Kathleen Gotto

The Conspiracy is hatched by Ken David

After receiving Gotto’s request, Ken David of the Vital Records Department sent the following email to Janice Okubo:

    From: vr-info
    Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 6:18PM
    To: Okubo, Janice S.
    Cc: Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D.
    Subject: FW: Per Dr. Okubo
    Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009

    Hi Janice,

    Did you want me to respond to Kathleen’s email? I might not even try to clarify her questions. Instead, should I reply, I would probably appeal to the confidentiality of our records and the procedures we follow.

    Aloha,

    VR-Info (Ken David)

Okubo then replied to David:

    From: Janice Okubo
    To: ‘vr-info’
    Cc: ‘Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. 8:28PM’
    Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 8:28PM
    Subject: RE: Per Dr. Okubo

    Hi Ken,

    If you are able to respond succinctly then I would appreciate that. I don’t plan to respond to any further e-mails from this person. I was just required to provide a response to the UIPA request. Thanks.

    Janice

David then emailed Okubo, suggesting a conspiracy to deprive Gotto of a response, the incriminating evidence of which is contained in the following email:

Subject: FW: Per Dr. Okubo
From: vr-info
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 1:50 PM
To: Okubo, Janice S.
Cc: Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D.
Subject: Re: Per Dr. Okubo

Hi, Janice,

I checked online for a “Kathleen Gotto” and I came across this letter that I presume she wrote http://blogtalkradio.com/MenifeeValleyRadio/blog/2008/11/15/Letter-to-the-US-Supreme-from-Kathleen-Gotto-This-is-a-vital-issue-to-us-all who accused Obama of “…who almost got away with stealing the Presidency…” I doubt that any answer I might send her would satisfy her since she has the same agenda as Rob Lamb (who accused me of lying and that I should be fired). Although Rob Lamb did not mention Obama’s name, he can be found online as another person who has a hidden agenda. It is interesting that in all of Rob Lamb’s emails he did not mention Obama’s name even once.

Aloha,

Ken


Image of the actual copy of the Email exchanged between Ken David and Janice Okubo at the Hawaii Department of Health, Office of Vital Records: this copy was inadvertently released by HI DoH staff in regard to a different UIPA request.

That this exchange resulted in an abrupt shutting off of information to Gotto is confirmed by an analysis of her email correspondence, which was disclosed by Gotto to The Post & Email. In confirmation of this conclusion, Gotto made the following remark to the paper:

    The last correspondence I received from Janice Okubo was on 10/4 at 5:52PM. Ken David’s email to her about me was 10/5 at 1:50PM. On Oct 3, I had had correspondence with the Vital Records Office (where Mr. David appears to work), after Dr. Okubo had directed me there for any further info on “Changing an item on a Cert of Hawaiian Birth.”

    I suppose Dr. Okubo can say that since I appealed to OIP (because of not getting forthright info from her), she was out of the picture. But I could argue that I had to go to OIP on 10/21 at 9:24PM because it appears Mr. David had smeared me to her on 10/5 and thus gave her reason to stop corresponding.

    I don’t know what the legal ramifications of all this are, but it sure does look conspiratorial.

It looks like sufficient evidence for a charge of conspiracy to deprive Gotto of her civil liberties, even from a cursory consideration of the U.S. Code, Title 42, Chapter 21, Subchapter I of §1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights reads:

(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges:

If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire … for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; … ; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

The rights deprived are those granted in the UIPA for disclosure of government records.

On February 11, 2010, Janice Okubo, Communications Director for the Hawaii Department of Health, issued the following statement:

    The Department of Health is entrusted by the people of Hawai‘i to protect the vital records it maintains. The Department operates within the confines of the laws that govern state and federal agencies and will continue to do so. No amount of bullying or spreading rumors and false innuendos will persuade the department or its officials to break the trust of the people, operate outside of the law, or misuse the information it is entrusted to protect.

While it is admirable that Ms. Okubo’s department seeks to “protect” birth and other records, it is patently obvious that the Department does not follow its own state laws when it comes to releasing information. She stresses the importance of privacy, but fails to follow through when openness is in order.

If the Hawaii Department of Health did this with Kathleen Gotto, then against whom else did they discriminate?

It appears that Mr. Charlton was also targeted, because his UIPA request of Sept 27, 2009 was never answered until Dec. 28, 2009, well beyond the ten-day answer period mandated by the law. At that point, Health Department personnel denied having any internal records about the information sought. Only after repeated complaints to the OIP in November 2009 and a letter from that office to Okubo on December 8, demanding a reply, was any response received at all.

If you believe the above information is sufficient to demand a public investigation, you can contact the following officials, who would have jurisdiction to undertake such

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/05/hawaii-department-of-health-has-conspired-against-the-public-for-5-months/

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #69 on: March 09, 2010, 05:44:51 PM »
Taitz v. Obama: Orly Sues The Defense

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has now added US Department of Justice attorneys representing President Obama in her Quo Warranto case, Taitz v. Obama, to the list of defendants.

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/


Orly Taitz Falsely Accusing Damon Dunn

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=8211


Taitz seeks Obama’s records to defend herself in CA Bar complaint

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/taitz-seeks-obamas-records-to-defend-herself-in-ca-bar-complaint/




Obama and Congress File Their Opposition Brief to the Kerchner Appeal

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-and-congress-file-their.html

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #70 on: March 10, 2010, 07:12:13 PM »
HI Director of Department of Health Perjures Herself before HI Senate Committee

The Post & Email has received documentation which discounts the testimony which Dr. Fukino gave  to the Hawaii Senate Committee on Judiciary and Government Operations regarding SB2937.

In her testimony of February 23, 2010, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health stated, “For more than a year, the Department of Health has continued to receive approximately 50 e-mail inquiries a month seeking access to President Barack Obama’s birth certificate in spite of the fact that President Obama has posted a copy of the certificate on his former campaign website.”

But documents received by The Post & Email show that the actual number and time frame of the responses were much lower.

State Senator Will Espero proposed the amendment which would label repeat requesters “vexatious,” despite the fact that last summer, he told WorldNetDaily that he planned to “introduce legislation through which the state’s lawmakers would force the public disclosure of all President Obama’s birth documents held by the Hawaii Department of Health , including President Obama’s long-form original birth certificate.”

In August, Espero said, “My decision to file the legislation was primarily a result of the fuss over President Obama’s birth records and the lingering questions.” However, the bill which Espero has introduced to that end is SB2056, which would allow public access to birth certificates currently kept private by law, but only under very restrictive conditions.  Some of those conditions are a $50 fee for each birth certificate to be viewed, a 15-minute time limit, and  the Health Department assuming authority to redact any information that it deems “sensitive or confidential.”

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/09/hi-director-of-department-of-health-perjures-herself-before-hi-senate-committee/



Kathleen Gotto, who last fall had requested information from the Hawaii Department of Health under the state’s UIPA law, has filed a formal complaint with the Office of Information Practices Ombudsman, accusing Department of Health employees of investigating her background on the internet and subsequently ignoring her request.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/10/civil-rights-complaint-filed-with-state-of-hawaii-ombudsman/

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #71 on: March 11, 2010, 06:08:55 PM »
Orly Rejected By California Republican Assembly

At a nominating convention over the weekend, Taitz’s primary opponent for California Secretary of State, Damon Dunn, got the nod by more than 80% of the vote.

http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/the-hilarious-haters/birther-enemies-forced-to-work/

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #72 on: March 12, 2010, 12:53:44 AM »
Allen vs. Soetoro Update; All Records For Lolo Soetoro To Be Released, DHS Have No Records For Obama's Mama? Got Records!?

Kenneth Allen's remarks regarding his recent Allen v. DHS FOIA Joint Status Report

"Just thought I would update everyone on the conference meeting with the Department of Justice. Mr. Bowen from the DOJ and I talked about the existing FOIA case, he informed me that I would be receiving documents with regard to Stanley Ann's passport information and other records within a few weeks as soon a 3 weeks and as late as 6 weeks.

The search by the DHS turned up nothing on Stanley ANN? But the DOS has a lot of documents, as for Lolo Soetoro they will be releasing everything. I have reserved my rights to further discovery and a possible deposition of Maya Soetoro should they redact more than necessary. I've reserved all my rights because I'm at a disadvantage, not having enough information to make a correct decision. We will be setting a date certain in August for a briefing date, August was my idea because it gives me enough time to study the document and decided if more discovery is needed"


http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/03/allen-vs-soetoro-update-all-records-for.html



AGJ to Present 20 Federal Courts With Obama Treason Presentments..

http://prosecuteobama.org/?sid=springtour

Offline g1rlg0ne

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • Charly
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #73 on: March 12, 2010, 02:24:33 AM »
It's interesting to me that their names aren't capitalized on the status report.
Everyone else's names are... except Obama, Soetoro, etc.
TONY WEST is. So is SHAPIRO.
 ???

Protean

  • Guest
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #74 on: March 13, 2010, 12:17:34 PM »
Taitz v. Obama: Orly Sues The Defense

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. has now added US Department of Justice attorneys representing President Obama in her Quo Warranto case, Taitz v. Obama, to the list of defendants.

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/


Orly Taitz Falsely Accusing Damon Dunn

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=8211


Taitz seeks Obama’s records to defend herself in CA Bar complaint

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/02/14/taitz-seeks-obamas-records-to-defend-herself-in-ca-bar-complaint/





Obama and Congress File Their Opposition Brief to the Kerchner Appeal

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-and-congress-file-their.html


Orly Taitz, who I believe is an agent provocateur--who's mission is to discredit, trash and crash the Birther Movement, may have another function, namely to threaten to expose Obama's background, as a further incentive to Obama to keep to his controllers plans. I find it hard to believe Obama would do anything other than his owners want, but finding a reason for Taitz actually exposing Obama is a test in logic. Last year the blog: Lame Cherry, brought up this plan of Orly's to petition for Obama's records to defend herself in court--it's a checkmate strategy.

From Menace's above post:


Taitz’s entire Application for Preliminary Injunction through this link, in PDF format.
http://www.thepostemail.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Taitz-v-ObamaPrelimInjunction.pdf

Abbreviated list by author of article--

1) It only costs Obama $12 and a signed permission form to release an official copy of his original Birth Certificate, whereas, without such a document, I, Orly Taitz, risk losing my bar license, on the grounds that Land allegedly sanctioned me justly for defending Captain Connie Rhodes’ and my own reputation before his court.

2) It represents a conflict of interest, not only in my present case, but in the case of Obama’s future prosecution, if the U.S. Attorney General’s Office is allowed to represent him in my case; therefore, I request the AGs recusal.

3) Numerous individuals have been harassed, persecuted, and had their livelihood damaged by Obama supporters for demanding the verification of Obama’s birth-story/citizenship claims.

4) I have been publicly threatened with death and being murdered for exercising my free speech rights in this regard.

5) My car was sabotaged in such a way as to cause, with high probability, my death by incineration.

6) I must defend myself against Land’s $20,000 sanction, before the Appellate Court in Georgia.

7) I therefore respectfully request a certified copy of Obama’s long form Birth Certificate, medical records showing actual birth, and school records at Occidental, Columbia and Harvard, and that my case be heard before Feb. 26th, on an expedited schedule.

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #75 on: March 16, 2010, 09:45:11 AM »
Virginia Attorney General outlines birther legal challenge

Audio has surfaced of Virginia Attorney General outlining a legal strategy to challenge President Obama's citizenship.

In the recording, released by a liberal blog, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli describes how someone could gain the legal standing to mount a successful lawsuit.

"It will get tested in my view when someone--when [Obama] signs a law, and someone is convicted of violating it and one of their defenses will be it is not a law because someone qualified to be President didn’t sign it," Cuccinelli says.

Cuccinelli even says it's "possible" that he could challenge Obama's citizenship in court if Virginia were to sue the federal government.

The kicker comes when Cuccinelli says he thinks it's possible Obama may have been born in Kenya.

"Someone's going to have to come forward with nailed down testimotny that he was born in 'place b,' wherever that is. You know the speculation is Kenya. And that doesn't seem beyond the realm of possibility," he says.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/86739-virginia-attorney-general-outlines-birther-legal-challenge



Georgia Appeals Panel: Orly Has To Pay Up

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=8391

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/?p=8329


Orly demands Social Security Hearing and CC’s the rest of the world

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/orly-demands-social-security-hearing-and-ccs-the-rest-of-the-world/



Protean

  • Guest
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #76 on: March 16, 2010, 11:53:34 AM »

Orly demands Social Security Hearing and CC’s the rest of the world

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/orly-demands-social-security-hearing-and-ccs-the-rest-of-the-world/


Letter from above post:

03.15.10.

Attention Ms. Dawn S. Wiggins
Freedom of Information Officer
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Blvd
Baltimore, MD 21235-6401

Appeal of denial of disclosure of information under FOIA 5 USC §552(b)(6)

Demand for Administrative Hearing

Dear Ms. Wiggins

I am in receipt of your letter from 03.03.10., reference S9H: AD2135 and I respectfully appeal your denial of disclosure of information under FOIA 5 USC  552 (b)(6) and I demand an administrative hearing within 30 days for the following reasons:

   1. According to affidavits, provided by licensed investigators Mr. Neil Sankey and Ms. Susan Daniels (Exhibits A, B) Mr. Obama has used multiple social security numbers, which indicates social security fraud and identity theft. One does not have an expectation of privacy and right to privacy, when he uses identity of others. Moreover, such individual is subject to criminal prosecution for such crimes. If you, as a Social Security officer, upon receiving such information,  are refusing to act and prosecute, you become complicit and subject to criminal liability for aiding and abetting of felonies, subornation of felonies and under RICO.
   2. Social security number that Mr. Obama is using currently 042-68-4425, is a number, fraudulently obtained by Mr. Obama, as according to affidavits of Mr. Sankey, Ms. Daniels and former immigration officer, private investigator Mr. Sampson, this number was assigned between 1976-1977 in CT, while Mr. Obama resided at a time in HI. As a matter of fact, Mr. Obama never resided in CT.
   3. 042-68-4425 was originally assigned to an individual born in 1890, which makes him 120 years old. It appears this individual applied for the benefits when he was older and retired, and needed some Medicaire or Medicaid benefits. Mr. Obama is not 120 years old.
   4. Official Selective Service web site confirms Mr. Obama’s use of the SSN 042-68-4425
   5. Anyone bringing forward the matter of this fraud is subjected to retaliation. Investigator Sankey lost his privileges to use Lexis Nexis, which effectively took away his ability to obtain livelihood as a licensed investigator. Mr. Sampson lost his privileges to use Locator service, which effectively took away his ability to obtain livelihood. Major Stefan Frederick Cook was fired from his $120,000 position working for defense contractor, officer Ronald Dischler in Belleview Texas was threatened with investigation. Such behavior by Obama administration is indicative of a need to hide incriminating evidence.
   6. I am currently a Republican Party Candidate on the ballot running for the position of the Secretary of State of California. I personally, my husband and my three children were subjected to horrific intimidation, harassment, death threats, tampering with my car, cyber crimes, tampering with my pay-pal account, web site, defamation of character and other crimes.(see letter to Mr. Neal Kelley, Registrar of Voters of Orange County CA, Exhibit C). Persecutions were so horrific, that I had to seek protection from the UN, Civil Rights Defenders Commission in Geneva, Switzerland. [Edit: Hilarious...]

Wherefore, due to the above mentioned I demand disclosure of requested information, specifically original application for SSN 042-68-4425 and explanation of use of other multiple Social Security numbers by Mr. Obama. If you refuse to grant this appeal, I demand an  administrative hearing within 30 days.

Sincerely,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESq

Cc Royce C. Lamberth Chief Judge US District Court District of Columbia, re 10-cv-151-RCL Taitz v Obama
Cc John J Roberts, Chief Justice Supreme Court of the United States, Associate Justices of the Supreme Court, re 08A524  Lightfoot v Bowen
Cc 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, San Francisco, CA, re Barnett et al v Obama et al 09-c-82
Cc 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, Atlanta GA,  re Rhodes v Macdonald et al 09-15418, Cook et v Goodet al 09-14698
Cc Robert Mueller, Director of  FBI
Cc Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States
Cc Mark Sullivan, Director of Secret Service
Cc United Nations Commission for Civil Rights Defenders, Geneva, Switzerland

Offline menace

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,839
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #77 on: March 17, 2010, 09:47:50 PM »
Dr. James David Manning states in this video how crucial it is to be at the CIA Columbia Obama Treason.

http://americangrandjury.org/make-a-sacrifice-to-save-america


Proposed Hawaii “vexatious” bill defeated?


http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/03/17/proposed-hawaii-vexatious-bill-defeated/

Protean

  • Guest
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #78 on: March 17, 2010, 11:55:33 PM »
More about Menace's above post here:

Rev. Manning is on fire: Obama's recruitment by the CIA----Boom Shacka Lacka!

http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?page_id=6263

or

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WedxY61d60

Offline chris jones

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,463
Re: Obama Birth Certificate Updates - Part II
« Reply #79 on: March 18, 2010, 11:42:23 AM »

You folks have done a great deal of work on this issue, I am impressed and respect your determination.

First, I have no doubt whatsoever Obmama is illegal. I am with you folks on that 100%, my take is he is a product of the elites, has been trained, nurtured, and set in place with an agenda, a script in hand and a platoon of oversears to protect his background and to insure he can not be touched.
He is a elite con artist under deep cover, a sleeper so to say.
Problem, if Mr. Obama is nailed on this and ousted, who will replace him. Biden,  Hillary, McCain.
Different face and same agenda.
Don't misunderstand, you fight is worthwhile, I commend the efforts of all involved, those who have  stuck their neck out.
I hesitated before entering this subject because I  admire the determination of each involved in this just cause, I am not trying to put a damper on anyones efforts.
 - The power has manipulated this goverment for decades, battalions of these freaks have worked tirelessly 24 hours a day to insure their plan is not interfered with and to reach its conclusion, the takedown of this nation, the enslavement of the citizenry.
Bush began the abomination as was his part in the elites plan, he was an actor, an on stage sociopath playing his part. -Along came obama, the savior, his 580 promises to the citizenry, the change.
This regime is a barrell of worms, replace Oby and another maggot steps in.
Yes, I would love to see him ousted, the truth be know to the people as to his criminal, unconstitutional presidency. I too admit this act would cause the eyes to open of the masses and perhaps open a door to clean up other factions who were involved.
OK, I'm with you, but if in fact he was tossed, what  then?