New Building 7 video shows CLEAR controlled demolition

[thought_criminal]

 Whoa!!!    I've been off it for awhile... This is HUGE.
 This IS new (to me at least) footage.

  It gives a whole new perspective. All the other vids show a perfectly symmetrical collapse (from the southeast)

  This vid show that as it falls the building tips northward at the very end.

  A: This absolutely demonstrates that damage from the north tower (WTC1) collapse's falling debris couldn't have caused the collapse of WTC7.
      Cut the two legs of a table that are facing you and it falls toward you.  The fact that it fell AWAY from the supposed debris damage
      means that it *WAS NOT* WTC1 falling debris damage.   Picture a tree being cut down. It falls toward the direction the initial cut was made.

  B: From recollection, the WTC7 diesel tanks were on the southern part of the building... the fact that it tips northward means that the diesel tanks are
     (once again) ruled out.

[iceman2]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7_pqXokZvQ&feature=channel

WHo has seen this one?

[RonPaulRocks]

Here is the video in the highest quality possible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ujWitEr-Ww&fmt=18

[Angry Patriot]

bump

[RonPaulRocks]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ujWitEr-Ww&fmt=18

This has the best view of the blast squibs.

[Scootle]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NrASZxGu_o&fmt=18

How does NISTs Thermal Exaggeration theory can account for these.

[GoingEtheric]

  WHY am I just seeing this? Where the hell did this come from? I want answers, lol.
Great, gotta read 4 pages-o-posts.

[iceman2]

I think I have found something very odd about all this and the twin towers and 911!

Not sure if anyone has noticed before now, if they have, so be it, but I reckon this is one of those strange coincidences.

If you watch the film Armageddon the 1998 film, with Bruce willis as the star. It shows quite early on in the film when the meteors first hit the twin towers. they strike in the exact same places or spots as the planes hit in the real version 3 years later! Call me crazy, but how odd is that?   

[Scootle]

I think I have found something very odd about all this and the twin towers and 911!

Not sure if anyone has noticed before now, if they have, so be it, but I reckon this is one of those strange coincidences.

If you watch the film Armageddon the 1998 film, with Bruce willis as the star. It shows quite early on in the film when the meteors first hit the twin towers. they strike in the exact same places or spots as the planes hit in the real version 3 years later! Call me crazy, but how odd is that?   

Watch the 9/11 Hidden in hollywood series on youtube... there's tonnes of things like that

[Letsbereal]

Not strange at all it is known that Hollywood is fed by Satanist CIA material.

Also The X-Files (Confirmed by Alex Jones) , Lonely Gunman (Episode one I believe) , Spongebob and more.

Did you check out those dollar bill folding?

PsyOps: New Series US Dollar Bills Tell 9/11 Plan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC71TjXb05w

[Waipio]

I'm guessing who ever had this video needed to wait 7 years for the smoke to clear before they felt comfortable with releasing it. Maybe some lower level worker stumbled across it and was able to smuggle it out or something. I doubt the NWO would flaunt this in our face or want us to see it. I'm just glad we have it at our disposal for persuading the sheep.

"I doubt the NWO would flaunt this in our face or want us to see it"

I  had the opposite impression. One reason is because the camera 'just happened' to swing around / focus on 7 a moment before it began imploding, as if to tell viewers  "See, we knew when to turn and watch"

[Waipio]

and this cladano :

I agree. The comment by the guy who shot the video "I'm an X-Firefighter so I knew if they left it burning it would come down". This guy is incredible !! Never before had fire dropped a steel framed building, but this guy KNEW this one was going to go. AS WELL, "there's no sound because I didn't want my friends and wife's voices on the internet" or do you really mean "I didn't want you hearing the demolition charges going off". THIS IS SUS.

[Waipio]

I acknowlage something if it is glaringly obvious. This, was far from obvious, glaring or otherwise. the "explosions" occure after the collaps begins. Period.

Re  #7 ...Who woulda thought that if you are pulling off a controlled demolition, and you dont want it to be quite so obvious that it is a controlled demo..... you might be clever enough to throw in some explosions that are are out of sync with  the timing  to a controlled demo...?

That way, you  establish grounds for future mental blocks and denials   in forums like this.

also;

The towers were a  very special controlled demo that  needed to:

*  provide special "Top Down"   sequence instead of usual obvious  detonations lower down.

*  again,  not appear so obvious as a Controlled  Demo