I dont know if anyone's caught this yet but the article, "Hacked Emails Show Climate Science Ridden with Rancor" from the WSJ has been pulled and replaced by a white wash.
I found out because I posted the link on facebook and quoted this powerful chunk of it as a comment:
"A partial review of the emails shows that in many cases, climate scientists revealed that their own research wasn't always conclusive. In others, they discussed ways to paper over differences among themselves in order to present a "unified" view on climate change. On at least one occasion, climate scientists were asked to "beef up" ... Read moreconclusions about climate change and extreme weather events because environmental officials in one country were planning a "big public splash."
The release of the documents has given ammunition to many skeptics of man-made global warming, who for years have argued that the scientific "consensus" was less robust than the official IPCC summaries indicated and that climate researchers systematically ostracized other scientists who presented findings that differed from orthodox views.
15 hours ago · Delete"
Then the next day I have 3 comments from ppl saying I'm making this up and that the article says nothing of the sort!
See here:
Homer Papadopoulos
you're quoting that? I can't find that in the article. all this seems to say is that some scientists snubbed some other ones. it doesn't even suggest that global warming's a scam.
So I visit the link again and low and behold, the article has been replaced by a much milder version.
See screen shots of before article....
Check out the article now.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html#articleTabs=articleSorry if this has already been mentioned. I didn't really see it anywhere.
