If elections are cancelled, which term would you prefer-old focus group video

[EchelonMonitor]

Found this from a few years ago and since it is relevant to what is happening today, I decided to re-upload it.

The video of this focus group became public when it was ordered as part of the court trial relating to the man's heart attack.

What is interesting are the subjects discussed and terms tested:

Subject: something worse than 9/11, bio warfare, ebola, pathogen or virus released into the population, tainted water supply, nuclear bomb in Disneyland (?), quarantine certain cities


Terms tested:

united in the safety
united response to terror
united against the threat of terrorism
America defended from within

Something terrible happens in this country, we have to get America back on her feet, get America back to where it was.

Some people will interfere, some will try to hit us while we're still reeling from the attack.

Important that the media...

doesn't interfere.
doesn't criticize or harm the relief effort.
doesn't give up potential terrorist targets.

Would it be ok to make it illegal to publish stories...
that might be used by the terrorists?
against US policy?
that criticize actions of the US government or the president?

In the aftemath of an attack, it might be impossible to hold an election, so the president may have to fill positions of government by executive choice.

Terms tested:

The good faith appointment of interim leadership.
A new system for a new America.
(man collapses)

H1N1 National Emergency planned in 2004?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JfwKuCsRrw

[EchelonMonitor]

Too bad the guy collapsed before we heard the other terms, but if we start hearing

"The good faith appointment of interim leadership"

or

"A new system for a new America"

we'll know the America we all believe in is finished.