PrisonPlanet Forum
July 28, 2014, 10:25:09 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AE911 Truth vs JREF 9/11 Debunker  (Read 4707 times)
kevin82
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10



« on: September 24, 2009, 09:33:29 PM »

The head of AE911 truth (Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth) Richard Gage debates the debunking director of the JREF (James Randi Educational Foundation) website. Things didn't quite the debunkers way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKFiGfW6aGY
Logged
mr anderson
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,358



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2009, 11:31:25 PM »

Ya, debunker was owned.  Roll Eyes
Logged

WeAreChange Brisbane
I hold personal views, beliefs and opinions that do not necessarily reflect the beliefs and opinions of WeAreChange Brisbane as a whole.

Our Bitcoin address: 1Fzb4bp48oMr7CFzT3SbkTzKpMSvWW1X1t
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2009, 11:35:07 PM »

oh, dear, Jref'r totally defeated - good.  Richard dealt with Kevin VERY WELL.
Logged
VulpesVafrae
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329


el-CIA(duh!)


« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2009, 11:39:49 PM »

Lol he starts out saying "The largest building at the time, falling on it!" Yeah well look at http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm The gov't website, scroll down till you see the damage the falling 1 and 2 did. Riggghhht, so if thats the case why didn't Blgd. 3, 4, 5, 6 collapse? WTC 7 had the least ammount of debris then any of the other WTCs...
Logged

America is doubleplusgood today. It has always been doubleplusgood.
Futurist
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 313



WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2009, 05:38:21 AM »

I felt that Richard was perhaps a little too nice, this guy is dedicated to discrediting everything he says.

Check out his version of events at http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=150677.

As a practitioner of skepticism (only believing where the evidence points to eg. no UFO's, Bigfoot, psychic powers etc.) I still cannot believe how dedicated they are to the official story, I thought these guys would be scratching their chins and saying "on balance, the alternative story of 9/11 does have some merit". Although maybe the skeptics for 9/11 truth back away from the site leaving only the hardcore debunkers.

I only started getting into skepticism because they cover scientific topics, overall I think there's a lot bigger fish to fry than "snake oil" and pseudoscience.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!