PrisonPlanet Forum
May 22, 2013, 02:46:57 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Forum Member Gullibility Test: Is Paul McCartney Dead?  (Read 80280 times)
Aussieteen
Guest
« Reply #80 on: January 11, 2010, 07:38:35 PM »

The beatles played along with a fun faux /conspiracy theory, think of all the goodness they have spread with all they're tunes, especially George. Tongue

yeah lol
Logged
Aussieteen
Guest
« Reply #81 on: January 11, 2010, 07:42:17 PM »

does anyone know how they picked the people who were on the cover of sgt pepper?...i'd be really interested..one of my ancestors is on there
Logged
Freedom Reigns
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


« Reply #82 on: January 11, 2010, 07:48:19 PM »

I went through the whole series and found it to be quite fascinating. I paused (or trying to pause) the points in the video where the filmmaker flashed documents and messages on the screen. I saw the references to appointments for an OTO meeting. It was all very cryptic. He showed a video clip where Linda McCartney was playing the stand-up bass and the word 'BILL' was pasted on it.

It seems as though this guy know a lot about the secrets behind the Beatles. I still don't know what to make of all it, though.
Logged

quote from Chesterfield Godfried: wha wha wha what "we talked a bunch of shit to this guy and he was so nice to everyone but we still kept talking a bunch of shit and now he's talking shit back..boo f**king hoo. And he won't ask Samson why we got banned... waaaa waaa waaa"
NinjaGaijin
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 550


MYSPACE/DJNINJAGAIJIN


WWW
« Reply #83 on: January 11, 2010, 11:52:37 PM »

They were the worlds first real SUPER BAND. They of course were going to be exploited however they could be. They really tried to fight it though.. why else you think Lennon is dead and Yoko goes free lol.
Logged

myspace.com/djninjagaijin / toxemiarecords.com / toxemiarecords.999.org
N.E.P.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,064



« Reply #84 on: January 13, 2010, 11:35:38 AM »

does anyone know how they picked the people who were on the cover of sgt pepper?...i'd be really interested..one of my ancestors is on there

The Beatles: " Sgt. Pepper's lonely heart club band"
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x403qy_the-beatles-sgt-peppers-lonely-hear_music

http://www.beatlesagain.com/btsgtppr.html

The Sgt. Pepper's Album



The cover of Sgt. Pepper's was designed by Peter Blake and put together by Peter Blake and Jann Haworth, who painstakingly combed through hundreds of photos for months before the photo shoot. The photo was taken by Michael Cooper at Chelsea Manor Photographic Studios on March 30, 1967.

Many of the people pictured in the cover were personal heroes of the Beatles or people they admired.



1. Sri Yukteswar (Indian Guru)
2. Aleister Crowley (black magician)
3. Mae West
4. Lenny Bruce
5. Stockhausen (modern German composer)
6. W.C. Fields
7. Carl Jung (psychologist)
8. Edgar Allen Poe
9. Fred Astaire
10. Merkin (American artist)
12. Huntz Hall (Bowery Boy)
13. Simon Rodia (creater of Watts Towers)
14. Bob Dylan
15. Aubrey Beardsly (Victorian artist)
16. Sir Robert Peel (Police pioneer)
17. Aldous Huxley (philosopher)
18. Dylan Thomas (Welsh poet)
19. Terry Southern (author)
20. Dion (American pop singer)
21. Tony Curtis
22. Wallace Berman (Los Angeles artist)
23. Tommy Handley (wartime comedian)
24. Marilyn Monroe
25. William Buroughs (author)
26. Mahavatar Babaji (Indian Guru)
27. Stan Laurel
28. Richard Lindner (New York artist)             29. Oliver Hardy
30. Karl Marx
31. H.G. Wells
32. Paramhansa Yogananda (Indian Guru)
33. Stuart Sutcliffe
35. Max Muller
37. Marlon Brando
38. Tom Mix (cowboy film star)
39. Oscar Wilde
40. Tyrone Power
41. Larry Bell (modern painter)
42. Dr. Livingstone
43. Johnny Weissmuller (Tarzan)
44. Stephen Crane (American writer)
45. Issy Bonn (comedian)
46. George Bernard Shaw
47. Albert Stubbins (Liverpool footballer)
49. Lahiri Mahasaya (Indian Guru)
50. Lewis Carol
51. Sonny Liston (boxer)
52 - 55. The Beatles (in wax)
57. Marlene Dietrich
58. Diana Dors
59. Shirley Temple
60. Bobby Breen (singing prodigy)
61. T.E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia)


Missing In Action

Several people who were intended to be included on the cover never made it, including Elvis, Hitler and Jesus.

In addition, two people who were included were later removed by photographic retouching.




In these pics from alternate shots of the cover photo, you can still see Leo Gorcey, who was removed because he requested a fee, next to his fellow Bowery Boy pal Huntz Hal, and Ghandi, who was removed because EMI felt his inclusion might offend record buyers in India.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Is Dead

Was Paul McCartney really the fourth member of the Beatles?
Paul Is Dead RSS Feed
 

http://www.paulisdeadhoax.com/index.php/sgt-peppers-lonely-hearts-club-band/

This album contains more clues than any other. I advise you to grab your LP or CD so you can check out the clues as I cover them.

Want to see the map of the people on the cover, check out the legend of Sgt. Pepper’s cover here.

FRONT COVER CLUES



    * The people are looking at what appears to be a freshly dug grave.
    * The yellow flowers (directly below the flowers that spell Beatles) are in the shape of a bass guitar. Paul was the bass player for The Beatles.
    * There are three sticks on the yellow flowers that represent the strings of the bass. There are only THREE sticks to represent the THREE remaining Beatles.
    * Also, notice that the yellow flowers spell out ‘PAUL?’; questioning Paul’s existence.
    * The doll on the right of the cover (in the white, black, and red stripes) has a small white car, with a blood red interior, on her lap. This is a model of the car that Paul died in.
    * Directly below the doll’s left foot is a white vase with yellow flowers in it. If you look closely it resembles a car plummeting over a cliff with flames coming out of the back end.
    * Below the ‘T’ in Beatles is a statue of the Hindu God Shiva ‘The Destroyer.’ Its hand points directly to Paul.

# Notice The Beatles standing behind the drum in the center of the photo. They are standing sideways except for Paul who is facing directly forward. John, Ringo, and George look *three dimensional* while Paul looks like one of the cardboard cutouts.
# Paul is the only one holding a black instrument. Black is associated with death. This may seem insignificant now, but it turns up a few more times.

    * This is the first occasion where we see an open palm above Paul McCartney’s head. There are many different theories as to what this signifies. It is generally taken to mean either that the person under the open palm will soon die or has recently passed away. As you will see, this turns up quite a few times.
    * Take a small mirror, or the bottom of a CD will work, and place it perpendicular to the center of the drum, so that you split ‘LONELY HEARTS’ in half. Now read the combined writing on the drum and the mirror. It says 1 ONE 1 X HE | DIE. ‘1 ONE 1′ equals three, another reference to three Beatles. The ‘X’ crosses out Paul because he is no longer alive. And the arrow between ‘He’ and ‘Die’ points directly to Paul. (pictured right)

GATEFOLD CLUES

    * The Fab Four are sitting facing the camera. On Paul’s left arm is a patch that says O. P. D. (Officially Pronounced Dead), much like D. O. A. (Dead on Arrival).
    * The photo was taken at such an angle, and with Paul’s sleeve folded, so that it appears to say O. P. D. when in reality it reads O. P. P. This stands for the ‘Ontario Provincial Police.’ (pictured right)
    * Another interpretation is that William Campbell was once a police officer in Canada. The lyrics to ‘She Came in Through the Bathroom Window’ explain this.

BACK COVER CLUES

    * For those of you who do not have the LP, it should be stated that the album had the the lyrics printed on the back cover, layered over a photograph of the Beatles. Those of you with the CD will find that picture on pages 12 and 13 of the CD booklet.
    * Paul is facing backwards, to signify that the man in the photograph is an imposter.
    * Paul, George, and John were all about the same height, but in this photo Paul appears higher than the other two. This represents that he is *rising up,* ascending if you will.
    * The words “Without You” are coming out the side of Paul’s head, from the song title “Within You, Without you.”
    * George’s thumb is pointing to the lyrics “Wednesday morning at 5 o’clock,” the time of Paul’s death.
    * George’s (in red) hand makes an L, John’s (in green) a V, and Ringo’s (in pink) an E. Paul (in blue) is the HOLE where the O would be in the word LOVE. (pictured below)



LYRIC CLUES

‘SGT. PEPPER’S LONELY HEARTS CLUB BAND’
“Let me introduce to you the one and only Billy Shears”
… As I mentioned earlier, Paul was supposedly replaced by William Campbell.     Billy is a nickname for William.
… Also, Billy Shears can be seen as a play on words. Billy Shears-> Billy’S hears-> Billy’s Here. As though they were introducing William (Billy) to the world.

‘SHE’S LEAVING HOME’
“Wednesday morning at five o’clock”
…The time when the car accident occurred.

‘LOVELY RITA’
“When I caught a glimpse of Rita”
… Paul was looking at Rita and not paying attention to the road.

‘GOOD MORNING, GOOD MORNING’
“Nothing to do to save his life” ” You are own you’re own, you are in the street”
… References to the car accident.
“People running around, it’s five o’clock”
… Another reference to the time of the accident.
“Watching the skirts, you start to flirt, now you’re in gear”
… Refers to Paul watching Rita. “In Gear” refers to driving.

‘A DAY IN THE LIFE’
“He blew his mind out in a car, he didn’t notice that the lights had changed”
… Describes, in more detail, the accident.



Logged
N.E.P.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,064



« Reply #85 on: January 13, 2010, 11:45:39 AM »

I went through the whole series and found it to be quite fascinating. I paused (or trying to pause) the points in the video where the filmmaker flashed documents and messages on the screen. I saw the references to appointments for an OTO meeting. It was all very cryptic. He showed a video clip where Linda McCartney was playing the stand-up bass and the word 'BILL' was pasted on it.

It seems as though this guy know a lot about the secrets behind the Beatles. I still don't know what to make of all it, though.

Good analysis. Yeah, I think the film maker is either:
1-The illegitimate daughter McCartney allegedly sired or someone that knows this story
2-one of the Beatles ghost song writers
3-a former Beatles manager or someone that worked closely with the Beatles.

I think the film maker is German. There are clues in the film. They write as if English is not there first language. Very German.They spell october "Oktober". I would have to go back and watch it for the third time but I don't know if I have the endurance for that. The illegitimate daughter is from Germany so that is my number one suspect.
Logged
N.E.P.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,064



« Reply #86 on: January 13, 2010, 11:51:26 AM »

Good analysis. Yeah, I think the film maker is either:
1-The illegitimate daughter McCartney allegedly sired or someone that knows this story
2-one of the Beatles ghost song writers
3-a former Beatles manager or someone that worked closely with the Beatles.

I think the film maker is German. There are clues in the film. They write as if English is not there first language. Very German.They spell october "Oktober". I would have to go back and watch it for the third time but I don't know if I have the endurance for that. The illegitimate daughter is from Germany so that is my number one suspect.

or......
4-Heather Mills or someone associated with her
5-A former soviet Bloc(Russian,East German, Polish, Czech) intelligence agent that knows the whole Beatles story because they were monitoring the situation without the knowledge of MI6.
Logged
JIMI
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180



« Reply #87 on: January 13, 2010, 06:14:50 PM »

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fcconcl.html#

Hmm, I'm not sure. Its possibly a different person, but for me not quite conclusive, as some of the photos of the supposed original Paul look like different people.
Logged
Aussieteen
Guest
« Reply #88 on: January 13, 2010, 06:18:29 PM »

The Beatles: " Sgt. Pepper's lonely heart club band"
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x403qy_the-beatles-sgt-peppers-lonely-hear_music

http://www.beatlesagain.com/btsgtppr.html

The Sgt. Pepper's Album



The cover of Sgt. Pepper's was designed by Peter Blake and put together by Peter Blake and Jann Haworth, who painstakingly combed through hundreds of photos for months before the photo shoot. The photo was taken by Michael Cooper at Chelsea Manor Photographic Studios on March 30, 1967.

Many of the people pictured in the cover were personal heroes of the Beatles or people they admired.



1. Sri Yukteswar (Indian Guru)
2. Aleister Crowley (black magician)
3. Mae West
4. Lenny Bruce
5. Stockhausen (modern German composer)
6. W.C. Fields
7. Carl Jung (psychologist)
8. Edgar Allen Poe
9. Fred Astaire
10. Merkin (American artist)
12. Huntz Hall (Bowery Boy)
13. Simon Rodia (creater of Watts Towers)
14. Bob Dylan
15. Aubrey Beardsly (Victorian artist)
16. Sir Robert Peel (Police pioneer)
17. Aldous Huxley (philosopher)
18. Dylan Thomas (Welsh poet)
19. Terry Southern (author)
20. Dion (American pop singer)
21. Tony Curtis
22. Wallace Berman (Los Angeles artist)
23. Tommy Handley (wartime comedian)
24. Marilyn Monroe
25. William Buroughs (author)
26. Mahavatar Babaji (Indian Guru)
27. Stan Laurel
28. Richard Lindner (New York artist)             29. Oliver Hardy
30. Karl Marx
31. H.G. Wells
32. Paramhansa Yogananda (Indian Guru)
33. Stuart Sutcliffe
35. Max Muller
37. Marlon Brando
38. Tom Mix (cowboy film star)
39. Oscar Wilde
40. Tyrone Power
41. Larry Bell (modern painter)
42. Dr. Livingstone
43. Johnny Weissmuller (Tarzan)
44. Stephen Crane (American writer)
45. Issy Bonn (comedian)
46. George Bernard Shaw
47. Albert Stubbins (Liverpool footballer)
49. Lahiri Mahasaya (Indian Guru)
50. Lewis Carol
51. Sonny Liston (boxer)
52 - 55. The Beatles (in wax)
57. Marlene Dietrich
58. Diana Dors
59. Shirley Temple
60. Bobby Breen (singing prodigy)
61. T.E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia)


Missing In Action

Several people who were intended to be included on the cover never made it, including Elvis, Hitler and Jesus.

In addition, two people who were included were later removed by photographic retouching.




In these pics from alternate shots of the cover photo, you can still see Leo Gorcey, who was removed because he requested a fee, next to his fellow Bowery Boy pal Huntz Hal, and Ghandi, who was removed because EMI felt his inclusion might offend record buyers in India.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Is Dead

Was Paul McCartney really the fourth member of the Beatles?
Paul Is Dead RSS Feed
 

http://www.paulisdeadhoax.com/index.php/sgt-peppers-lonely-hearts-club-band/

This album contains more clues than any other. I advise you to grab your LP or CD so you can check out the clues as I cover them.

Want to see the map of the people on the cover, check out the legend of Sgt. Pepper’s cover here.

FRONT COVER CLUES



    * The people are looking at what appears to be a freshly dug grave.
    * The yellow flowers (directly below the flowers that spell Beatles) are in the shape of a bass guitar. Paul was the bass player for The Beatles.
    * There are three sticks on the yellow flowers that represent the strings of the bass. There are only THREE sticks to represent the THREE remaining Beatles.
    * Also, notice that the yellow flowers spell out ‘PAUL?’; questioning Paul’s existence.
    * The doll on the right of the cover (in the white, black, and red stripes) has a small white car, with a blood red interior, on her lap. This is a model of the car that Paul died in.
    * Directly below the doll’s left foot is a white vase with yellow flowers in it. If you look closely it resembles a car plummeting over a cliff with flames coming out of the back end.
    * Below the ‘T’ in Beatles is a statue of the Hindu God Shiva ‘The Destroyer.’ Its hand points directly to Paul.

# Notice The Beatles standing behind the drum in the center of the photo. They are standing sideways except for Paul who is facing directly forward. John, Ringo, and George look *three dimensional* while Paul looks like one of the cardboard cutouts.
# Paul is the only one holding a black instrument. Black is associated with death. This may seem insignificant now, but it turns up a few more times.

    * This is the first occasion where we see an open palm above Paul McCartney’s head. There are many different theories as to what this signifies. It is generally taken to mean either that the person under the open palm will soon die or has recently passed away. As you will see, this turns up quite a few times.
    * Take a small mirror, or the bottom of a CD will work, and place it perpendicular to the center of the drum, so that you split ‘LONELY HEARTS’ in half. Now read the combined writing on the drum and the mirror. It says 1 ONE 1 X HE | DIE. ‘1 ONE 1′ equals three, another reference to three Beatles. The ‘X’ crosses out Paul because he is no longer alive. And the arrow between ‘He’ and ‘Die’ points directly to Paul. (pictured right)

GATEFOLD CLUES

    * The Fab Four are sitting facing the camera. On Paul’s left arm is a patch that says O. P. D. (Officially Pronounced Dead), much like D. O. A. (Dead on Arrival).
    * The photo was taken at such an angle, and with Paul’s sleeve folded, so that it appears to say O. P. D. when in reality it reads O. P. P. This stands for the ‘Ontario Provincial Police.’ (pictured right)
    * Another interpretation is that William Campbell was once a police officer in Canada. The lyrics to ‘She Came in Through the Bathroom Window’ explain this.

BACK COVER CLUES

    * For those of you who do not have the LP, it should be stated that the album had the the lyrics printed on the back cover, layered over a photograph of the Beatles. Those of you with the CD will find that picture on pages 12 and 13 of the CD booklet.
    * Paul is facing backwards, to signify that the man in the photograph is an imposter.
    * Paul, George, and John were all about the same height, but in this photo Paul appears higher than the other two. This represents that he is *rising up,* ascending if you will.
    * The words “Without You” are coming out the side of Paul’s head, from the song title “Within You, Without you.”
    * George’s thumb is pointing to the lyrics “Wednesday morning at 5 o’clock,” the time of Paul’s death.
    * George’s (in red) hand makes an L, John’s (in green) a V, and Ringo’s (in pink) an E. Paul (in blue) is the HOLE where the O would be in the word LOVE. (pictured below)



LYRIC CLUES

‘SGT. PEPPER’S LONELY HEARTS CLUB BAND’
“Let me introduce to you the one and only Billy Shears”
… As I mentioned earlier, Paul was supposedly replaced by William Campbell.     Billy is a nickname for William.
… Also, Billy Shears can be seen as a play on words. Billy Shears-> Billy’S hears-> Billy’s Here. As though they were introducing William (Billy) to the world.

‘SHE’S LEAVING HOME’
“Wednesday morning at five o’clock”
…The time when the car accident occurred.

‘LOVELY RITA’
“When I caught a glimpse of Rita”
… Paul was looking at Rita and not paying attention to the road.

‘GOOD MORNING, GOOD MORNING’
“Nothing to do to save his life” ” You are own you’re own, you are in the street”
… References to the car accident.
“People running around, it’s five o’clock”
… Another reference to the time of the accident.
“Watching the skirts, you start to flirt, now you’re in gear”
… Refers to Paul watching Rita. “In Gear” refers to driving.

‘A DAY IN THE LIFE’
“He blew his mind out in a car, he didn’t notice that the lights had changed”
… Describes, in more detail, the accident.





thank you
Logged
JIMI
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180



« Reply #89 on: January 13, 2010, 06:54:09 PM »

Its all possible, but not certain.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKytoJPTpFc&feature=related
Logged
Freedom Reigns
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


« Reply #90 on: January 13, 2010, 07:08:39 PM »

Good analysis. Yeah, I think the film maker is either:
1-The illegitimate daughter McCartney allegedly sired or someone that knows this story
2-one of the Beatles ghost song writers
3-a former Beatles manager or someone that worked closely with the Beatles.

I think the film maker is German. There are clues in the film. They write as if English is not there first language. Very German.They spell october "Oktober". I would have to go back and watch it for the third time but I don't know if I have the endurance for that. The illegitimate daughter is from Germany so that is my number one suspect.


Wow, I'm impressed that you went through all of them twice! Some of the videos were a bit overwhelming and downright scary, I'll admit.
Logged

quote from Chesterfield Godfried: wha wha wha what "we talked a bunch of shit to this guy and he was so nice to everyone but we still kept talking a bunch of shit and now he's talking shit back..boo f**king hoo. And he won't ask Samson why we got banned... waaaa waaa waaa"
JIMI
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180



« Reply #91 on: January 14, 2010, 02:08:01 AM »

Wow, I'm impressed that you went through all of them twice! Some of the videos were a bit overwhelming and downright scary, I'll admit.

Yes very eery, especially with all the symbolism. But some of the interpretation of the symbolism is a bit far fetched/stretched IMO.

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fcconcl.html#

Has some very good before & after photos, but some of the b4 photos look like a different person, yet some of the after photos look like the Paul we know of today. So maybe if all this is a scam, the scam artists are trying to get away with it by using before photos that arent even PM, to get away with it by adding confusion...
Logged
JIMI
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180



« Reply #92 on: January 14, 2010, 02:20:53 AM »

http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fcconcl.html#

PM's mother Mary died in 1956. His father Jim died in 1976. His brother Mike is still alive. If the real PM is dead, why would his brother & father keep quiet about the fake Paul?

I cant find any images of them togther mind.

But for me, their isnt a distinguishable enough distance generally, between the pre & post 1965 images for me to believe this.

Take a photo of anybosy on a different day, age, mood, weight, haircut, facial expression, angle, etc. & they may possibly look like a different person.

But on this website there is a noticable difference in some of the photos between pre & post 1967 Paul. And some of the post 1967 Paul photos, look noticable different to each other, due to the plastic surgery to try & make him look like the real Paul did.

But then how good were plastic surgery techniques in the 1960's?Perhaps they used secret military techniques that are 40 years ahead & more effective. Or perhaps it was done by the big grey aliens in underground cities, whose techniques are light years ahead....
Logged
JIMI
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180



« Reply #93 on: January 14, 2010, 05:36:54 AM »

http://www.stargods.org/Paul.html

Im not so sure any more  Huh Huh

It could be true.

It helps if there is a single solid conspiracy theory. But we have 2 possible Faux Paul McCartneys, Phil Akrill & Billy Shears.
2 possible causes of death in 2 months of the same autumn. Plane crash in France sept 1966. Car crash in Engand November 1966  Huh
Logged
JIMI
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180



« Reply #94 on: January 14, 2010, 06:16:22 AM »

Man this is all so freaky.

I look at all the Paul V's Faul photos & on 70% of them i have the gut feeling that it is 2 different people, but like is said in a really extensive abovertopsecret thread on this subject, i/we have a bias already, & people interpret a photo how they want to interpret it. Youd be better off asking a 12 year old who has no knowledge of paul mccartney, & no bias if the photos are of the same person.

All i can say is, some photos seem to show a recognisable difference in paul & faul (70%), while with 30% it seems like they could be the same person.

Overall, to me, the lookalike Faux Paul, is a pretty good lookalike! and he matches the real pre 1967 Paul, with around 70% accuracy overall, in my opinion.

When i have seen PM being interviewed etc in recent years, b4 i even heard about all this Faul stuff, with his manner, ego & his looks - hair dye, etc. there has always struck me as something slightly fake/imposterish about him. Could this be it!
The Jurys out, i cant quite decide....
Logged
Kinpa
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510



« Reply #95 on: January 14, 2010, 11:16:19 AM »

 the facial comparisons are what always got me, as well as vocal comparisons where the same word was pronounced differently...the early paul and post sgt. pepper's faul have COMPLETELY different skull sizes, angle of ears, and eyes, things that dont change...so how does that happen? and how is it that the fellow in the white album poster matches exactly the face from post '66 beatles pics? kind of funny IMO...
http://digilander.libero.it/jamespaul/fc1.html
Logged




" a positive attitude won't solve all of life's problems, but it will piss enough people off to make it worth the effort."
N.E.P.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,064



« Reply #96 on: January 14, 2010, 01:18:02 PM »

Logged
Piltdown Man
Guest
« Reply #97 on: January 14, 2010, 02:24:06 PM »

the clincher for me was this interview of Heather, Faul's ex..

http://plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-does-heather-mills-know.html
Logged
Freedom Reigns
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


« Reply #98 on: January 14, 2010, 02:54:01 PM »

I love how Faul got his wife to perform with him. Check out her vocal track on Hey Jude and tell me if she's qualified to be a background singer:

http://blogfiles.wfmu.org/KF/2006/03/linda_mccartney.mp3

 Grin
Logged

quote from Chesterfield Godfried: wha wha wha what "we talked a bunch of shit to this guy and he was so nice to everyone but we still kept talking a bunch of shit and now he's talking shit back..boo f**king hoo. And he won't ask Samson why we got banned... waaaa waaa waaa"
Kilgore Trout
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,633



« Reply #99 on: January 14, 2010, 02:57:46 PM »

A great topic it is , I linked a 20 minute video (Paul is DEAD) on page two or something in this thread , it is very succinct and worth checking out.
Logged

"I do not believe that there were, at the Council of Nicea,
three persons present who believed in the truth of what was set down.
If there were, it was on account of their ignorance."
J. M. Roberts, "Antiquity Unveiled", 1892
stella
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #100 on: January 14, 2010, 03:03:58 PM »

I don't buy it.  I admit, his face "degraded" over the years and he started looking weird, but that can happen with babyfaced people.  Just the fact that he continues to look different each decade shows that that's just how Paul ages.

Look at these two photos:


His jaw is more slack in the later photo but no plastic surgeon could make the eyes so similar.

Plus, I have an uncanny ability to be able to identify the singer of a song, even if I've never heard the song before.  And I always know when it's Paul, he sounds the same to me no matter what era the song is from.
Logged
Kinpa
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510



« Reply #101 on: January 14, 2010, 03:25:29 PM »

I don't buy it.  I admit, his face "degraded" over the years and he started looking weird, but that can happen with babyfaced people.  Just the fact that he continues to look different each decade shows that that's just how Paul ages.

Look at these two photos:


His jaw is more slack in the later photo but no plastic surgeon could make the eyes so similar.

Plus, I have an uncanny ability to be able to identify the singer of a song, even if I've never heard the song before.  And I always know when it's Paul, he sounds the same to me no matter what era the song is from.
you are wrong, those eyes are quite easy to make...and paul doesnt always sound the same at all...remember to compare PRE '66 pics and songs to POST '66 evidence...why did they pronounce words differently? a slack jaw does NOT elongate the entire skull by THAT much...compare the photos...
Logged




" a positive attitude won't solve all of life's problems, but it will piss enough people off to make it worth the effort."
Freedom Reigns
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


« Reply #102 on: January 14, 2010, 03:26:52 PM »

If you check out JIMI's YT link, there is a clip where Faul is caught play right-handed in India. That's pretty damning evidence to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKytoJPTpFc&feature=related

(part 3 of 7...click on part 1 to view the whole series)
Logged

quote from Chesterfield Godfried: wha wha wha what "we talked a bunch of shit to this guy and he was so nice to everyone but we still kept talking a bunch of shit and now he's talking shit back..boo f**king hoo. And he won't ask Samson why we got banned... waaaa waaa waaa"
stella
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #103 on: January 14, 2010, 03:51:13 PM »

you are wrong, those eyes are quite easy to make...and paul doesnt always sound the same at all...remember to compare PRE '66 pics and songs to POST '66 evidence...why did they pronounce words differently? a slack jaw does NOT elongate the entire skull by THAT much...compare the photos...

Yeah, I heard the comparison of "The Night Before" and "Blackbird" that's on this site: http://xdell.blogspot.com/2007/10/visual-cranberry-sauce.html

To me, Paul in "The Night Before" sounds just like Paul in "Golden Slumbers" Paul in "Blackbird" sounds just like Paul in "Yesterday" - it's two different singing styles, one loud and boisterous, one soft and understated, but the same guy.

Look at this video of him singing Yesterday: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms65JQTBCcQ

When in motion, you totally see the old guy we know today in that face. Same mannerisms, too.



Logged
Aussieteen
Guest
« Reply #104 on: January 14, 2010, 07:19:45 PM »

there is def something different about the face... Cry I just can't accept it!!
Logged
Freedom Reigns
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


« Reply #105 on: January 14, 2010, 07:37:06 PM »

there is def something different about the face... Cry I just can't accept it!!

Um, is it just me for do you have three different user accounts with the same picture?
Logged

quote from Chesterfield Godfried: wha wha wha what "we talked a bunch of shit to this guy and he was so nice to everyone but we still kept talking a bunch of shit and now he's talking shit back..boo f**king hoo. And he won't ask Samson why we got banned... waaaa waaa waaa"
Kinpa
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510



« Reply #106 on: January 14, 2010, 07:41:43 PM »

Yeah, I heard the comparison of "The Night Before" and "Blackbird" that's on this site: http://xdell.blogspot.com/2007/10/visual-cranberry-sauce.html

To me, Paul in "The Night Before" sounds just like Paul in "Golden Slumbers" Paul in "Blackbird" sounds just like Paul in "Yesterday" - it's two different singing styles, one loud and boisterous, one soft and understated, but the same guy.

Look at this video of him singing Yesterday: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms65JQTBCcQ

When in motion, you totally see the old guy we know today in that face. Same mannerisms, too.




voice and mannerisms are nothing to make a judgment upon, those are easily copied...the size of the skull, angle of the ears and eyes do NOT match...eyes and ears dont change from the day youre born till the day you die...and how exactly does a skull grow that much taller in less than one year?? a drooping jaw doesnt account for the differences that were evident in '67...compare any sgt pepper's facial pic with any earlier one...some VERY distinct differences in those two faces, and im sorry, but i refuse to accept your word on that you are able to distinguish the same voices...i am just as able to distinguish the differences myself...in the end it's hearsay, nothing more...
Logged




" a positive attitude won't solve all of life's problems, but it will piss enough people off to make it worth the effort."
stella
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #107 on: January 14, 2010, 08:05:55 PM »

voice and mannerisms are nothing to make a judgment upon, those are easily copied...the size of the skull, angle of the ears and eyes do NOT match...eyes and ears dont change from the day youre born till the day you die...and how exactly does a skull grow that much taller in less than one year?? a drooping jaw doesnt account for the differences that were evident in '67...compare any sgt pepper's facial pic with any earlier one...some VERY distinct differences in those two faces, and im sorry, but i refuse to accept your word on that you are able to distinguish the same voices...i am just as able to distinguish the differences myself...in the end it's hearsay, nothing more...

Well to me, it looks and sounds like the same guy, who happens to have a very expressive face, and is just aging.  But I guess we can't argue with each others' perceptions, now can we?  

But he would have had to have been a damn good impersonator to pretend to be one of the most public and widely recognized figures of the time, especially since all of the "paul is dead" rumors arose in real time and he was facing the public up against them.  It's not like this is some theory that came about 20 years later.

I will say this - there's definitely some weirdness that happened with the Beatles' before Sgt. Peppers came out. Drugs were definitely a part of it, but also exposure to... whatever and whoever they were exposed to. There is some part of their story we don't know, and, with John and now George gone, who both seemed to be the less "cooperative" ones in the group, maybe we never really will.
Logged
Kinpa
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510



« Reply #108 on: January 14, 2010, 08:27:19 PM »

Well to me, it looks and sounds like the same guy, who happens to have a very expressive face, and is just aging.  But I guess we can't argue with each others' perceptions, now can we?  

But he would have had to have been a damn good impersonator to pretend to be one of the most public and widely recognized figures of the time, especially since all of the "paul is dead" rumors arose in real time and he was facing the public up against them.  It's not like this is some theory that came about 20 years later.

I will say this - there's definitely some weirdness that happened with the Beatles' before Sgt. Peppers came out. Drugs were definitely a part of it, but also exposure to... whatever and whoever they were exposed to. There is some part of their story we don't know, and, with John and now George gone, who both seemed to be the less "cooperative" ones in the group, maybe we never really will.
i dont disagree...up until i saw face crossfades on the web, i thought it was all outright fakery, now im not so convinced of that...crossfades show differences that really just shouldne be there, and those differences only occur with the pre and post sgt pepper's pics...i dont think age can account for that because the change happened as of sgt pepper's, the man's skull suddenly got taller and thinner, his ear angle changed, and his eyes changed and that simply doesnt happen, and since it all occurred during his youth, it cant be blamed on old age...but you have to admit, the Beatles were quite a money maker...it might serve certain interests well to pull of such a fakery... no matter what the cost...so anything is indeed possible, what the truth actually is, i dont know...one website claims to have George harrison's bedside confession that Paul died and was replaced, but im not sure how anyone would be able to be certain that the confession actually came from George...i cant find an audio recording of it....

here's how the cross fading should look, a perfect match...this is sgt. pepper's and spys like us...


and here is a crossfade from 66 to 67, only a year apart from yesterday and today and sgt. pepper's...they do NOT match, and only a year's difference whereas the other DOES match after a 20 year difference...curious at the very least, and things like this leave me unable to reconcile the whole issue, i remain unconvinced either way...


Logged




" a positive attitude won't solve all of life's problems, but it will piss enough people off to make it worth the effort."
stella
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #109 on: January 14, 2010, 08:29:28 PM »

Ok last thing, just found this vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huNOsFQa_Ns&feature=fvw

pretty convincing that he was the same guy all along, and also depressing as you see him switch from young to old Sad
Logged
Viper
Guest
« Reply #110 on: January 14, 2010, 08:34:41 PM »

All this the walrus is dead stuff is quite satanic in my book, though i believe the other 3 wern't really into this side of things and were only feeding the poor man's demon concentrating on this stuff.
Logged
stella
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #111 on: January 14, 2010, 08:35:03 PM »

i dont disagree...up until i saw face crossfades on the web, i thought it was all outright fakery, now im not so convinced of that...crossfades show differences that really just shouldne be there, and those differences only occur with the pre and post sgt pepper's pics...i dont think age can account for that because the change happened as of sgt pepper's, the man's skull suddenly got taller and thinner, his ear angle changed, and his eyes changed and that simply doesnt happen, and since it all occurred during his youth, it cant be blamed on old age...but you have to admit, the Beatles were quite a money maker...it might serve certain interests well to pull of such a fakery... no matter what the cost...so anything is indeed possible, what the truth actually is, i dont know...one website claims to have George harrison's bedside confession that Paul died and was replaced, but im not sure how anyone would be able to be certain that the confession actually came from George...i cant find an audio recording of it....

here's how the cross fading should look, a perfect match...this is sgt. pepper's and spys like us...


and here is a crossfade from 66 to 67, only a year apart from yesterday and today and sgt. pepper's...they do NOT match, and only a year's difference whereas the other DOES match after a 20 year difference...curious at the very least, and things like this leave me unable to reconcile the whole issue, i remain unconvinced either way...




lol just posted the video with cross-fades at the same time!  That second one doesn't work for me - the "later" head is clearly at a larger scale - every facial feature is larger, the top of his head is higher, and the face goes further out on the left - only the right side is lined up. 

Ok, I've officially spent too much time on this now  Grin - its really interesting, but I think a diversion...
Logged
InfoArsenal
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 429


« Reply #112 on: January 14, 2010, 08:42:46 PM »

good job kingpa, but the second photo of paul sucks.

One thing you have to understand about photos is that by focal adjustment/angle you can make the head/body appear to be more squished/thin or wide so you need really good photos to compare.
Logged
Kinpa
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510



« Reply #113 on: January 14, 2010, 09:31:48 PM »

good job kingpa, but the second photo of paul sucks.

One thing you have to understand about photos is that by focal adjustment/angle you can make the head/body appear to be more squished/thin or wide so you need really good photos to compare.
i do understand that, howeverthe skull stops growing between the ages of 17-21, the ears and nose as well, so a skull just doesnt change THAT much...something is going on here, and not nearly all of it can be attributed to sucky photos...
 compare the nose and ears...these things dont change they way they apparently did in the pics...



all im saying is that these things make me wonder...if anything is crazy, it's the story that is claimed to be behind this conspiracy...here's the site and includes the so called George confession...if nothing else, they tell a really crazy story, and provide pic comparisons, supposed dr. reports, audio comparisons etc. etc....to each their own, but ill always wonder about this one, i can no longer simply accept that the Paul is dead idea is too crazy to be true...it's an interesting concept, with a few coincidences involved...a fun read at the very least...
http://digilander.libero.it/p_truth/index.html
Logged




" a positive attitude won't solve all of life's problems, but it will piss enough people off to make it worth the effort."
Aussieteen
Guest
« Reply #114 on: January 14, 2010, 10:44:36 PM »

Um, is it just me for do you have three different user accounts with the same picture?

3 accounts? list them please the only place I have used my picture is at the david icke forum (which I have quit) and a fashion site called polyvore? I also renamed my account on prisonplanet.
Logged
Freedom Reigns
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


« Reply #115 on: January 14, 2010, 10:47:02 PM »

3 accounts? list them please the only place I have used my picture is at the david icke forum (which I have quit) and a fashion site called polyvore? I also renamed my account on prisonplanet.

Due to the severe restrictions on this site, I can't search and I can't access the members list. I believe one of them was Aussieteen or something like that.
Logged

quote from Chesterfield Godfried: wha wha wha what "we talked a bunch of shit to this guy and he was so nice to everyone but we still kept talking a bunch of shit and now he's talking shit back..boo f**king hoo. And he won't ask Samson why we got banned... waaaa waaa waaa"
Aussieteen
Guest
« Reply #116 on: January 14, 2010, 10:52:59 PM »

Due to the severe restrictions on this site, I can't search and I can't access the members list. I believe one of them was Aussieteen or something like that.

yeh that was me
Logged
Piltdown Man
Guest
« Reply #117 on: January 15, 2010, 02:33:19 PM »

I love how Faul got his wife to perform with him. Check out her vocal track on Hey Jude and tell me if she's qualified to be a background singer:

http://blogfiles.wfmu.org/KF/2006/03/linda_mccartney.mp3

 Grin

painful
Logged
Kinpa
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510



« Reply #118 on: January 15, 2010, 05:34:08 PM »

painful
her fortune made it easier on him...too bad it didnt help any of us deal with her voice...
Logged




" a positive attitude won't solve all of life's problems, but it will piss enough people off to make it worth the effort."
N.E.P.
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,064



« Reply #119 on: January 16, 2010, 04:35:41 PM »

Evil Beatles?



http://stargods.org/EvilBeatles.html


The Beatles were occultists that attracted the wrong people around them. In an interview with Barbara Walters, Lennon assassin Mark David Chapman clearly demonstrated that he was a satanist. In other words he was an errand boy. He would then go on to shoot Beatle John Lennon to death.

"Alone in my apartment back in Honolulu, I would strip naked and put on Beatles records and pray to Satan to give me the strength. I prayed for demons to enter my body to give me the power to kill" (cited by Evangelist Richard Ciarrocca, Observations, Dec. 1990).

“In his book, The Ultimate Evil, investigator-author Maury Terry writes that between 1966 and 1967, the Satanic cult, the Process Church, "sought to recruit the Beatles.

The Beatles' album was dedicated to satanist Aleister Crowley. It was released 20 years, nearly to the day, after Crowley's death in 1947. The title song with the lyrics, "It was twenty years ago today..."

Crowley was born in 1875 and was called the "Great Beast." He was known to practice ritual child sacrifice regularly, in his role as Satan's high priest or "Magus." Crowley died in 1947 due to complications of his huge heroin addiction. Before dying, he succeeded in establishing Satanic covens in many U.S. cities including Hollywood. Anger, like Crowley, is a Magus, and appears to be the heir to Crowley. Anger was seventeen years old when Crowley died. In that same year, 1947, Anger was already producing and directing films which, even by today's standards, reek of pure evil.” - http://www.geocities.com/mmiddleton87/

A key link between the Beatles and the Process Church is Kenneth Anger, a follower of the "founding father" of modern Satanism. Anger, born in 1930, and a child Hollywood movie star, became a devoted disciple of Crowley.


Kenneth Anger

The movie Rosemary's baby was filmed in the Dakota were John Lennon was shot to death. It also appears that John Lennon knew the director personally. “The Director of Rosemary’s Baby was Roman Polanski. (At a party in California in 1973, Lennon ‘went berserk, hurling a chair out the window, smashing mirrors, heaving a TV against the wall, and screaming nonsense about film director Roman Polanski being to blame’ - Giuliano)

It’s also interesting to note that when the Beatles went to India to see the Yogi, John Lennon took along Mia Farrow star of the movie Rosemary’s Baby. It would appear that birds of the same coven flock together.

Did this nobody Director Roman Polanski make a pact with the Hollywood coven in order that he be given a very choice script that would make him a successful film director? So what is the price for fame in the underworld? It is the killing of your baby! This fact is even stressed in the movie Rosemary's Baby. In the movie, the coven demanded Rosemary's baby in return for her husband's success in Hollywood. It was an amazing coincidence that the film had a plot that would be similarly played out a year later - Polanski's pregnant actress/wife Sharon Tate would be murdered by Charles Manson's followers. Susan Atkins one of the killers stated that they wanted to remove the baby from Polanski's murdered wife Sharon Tate, but they ran out of time and had to flee the murder scene.

Was the death of Roman Polanski's baby a pre-payment for an Academy Award nomination for Polanski's for Best Adapted Screenplay. This movie became a critically-acclaimed and a commercially successful film. Director Roman Polanski was now on his way to the top of the heap of success.

Weeks before Lennon's death, on his latest album there was a song by Yoko Ono titled Kiss Kiss Kiss. When played backwards one can hear Yoko say, "I shot John Lennon." This is the same album that Lennon's killer John Chapman listened to over and over again! Was Chapman under mind control induced by the album? Mind control plays a very important role in satanism. It is no coincidence that Sirhan Sirhan who murdered Bobby Kennedy was very much involved with hypnosis and satanism. Just like Chapman and Jack Ruby (who assassinated John Kennedy), he claims to have no memory of what he did.

Now enter another mind control victim by the name of Charles Manson a satanic bill collector. His followers saw to it that Roman Polanski's wife was killed and would also attempt to cut out the baby. In the movie Rosemary’s Baby, it is stressed that there is power in babies blood. Could this be the reason why Sharon Tate’s baby was almost cut out of the womb by Susan Atkins Sadie Atkins not only wanted to remove the baby, but she also wanted to take out the eyes of the other murdered people, squash them against the walls, and cut off their fingers.She stated, "We were going to mutilate them, but we didn’t have a chance to."
Rosemary

    The main character in the movie and was to have her baby taken away had the nickname "Ro" short for Rosemary. I wonder what Roman Polanski's nick name was? Was it Ro? By the way, magicians wands are made from the wood of holly trees, thus we have Hollywood, and stars are the points of light that shine forth Lucifer's occultist wisdom.

    Now that we know Mark Chapman and Charles Manson were receiving messages from Beatle albums, but let’s take it even further. Remember the Beatles White Album that Charles Manson got his murderous orders from.

    On the album there is a song called Sexy Sadie. Well it turns out that this was the nickname of Susan Atkins. Now “Sadie Mae Glutz was the alias given to the Family member Susan Atkins by Manson even before the appearance of the White Album song 'Sexy Sadie!'" -http://www.phinnweb.com/livingroom/rosemary/

    It was Sadie's testimony in court that brought an end to the Manson family. Now read the lyrics below from the Beatles song Sexy Sadie.

Susan Atkins
"Sexy Sadie what have you done"

Sexy Sadie Beatles “White album” Year 1968

Sexy Sadie what have you done
You made a fool of everyone
You made a fool of everyone
Sexy Sadie ooh what have you done.

Sexy Sadie you broke the rules
You laid it down for all (the court) to see
You laid it down for all to see
Sexy Sadie oooh you broke the rules.

One sunny day the world was waiting for a lover
She came along to turn on everyone
Sexy Sadie the greatest (Manson killer)of them all.

(Susan Atkins was a sexual lover of the Manson family)

Sexy Sadie how did you know
The world was waiting just for you
The world was waiting just for you
Sexy Sadie oooh how did you know.

Sexy Sadie you'll get yours yet
However big you think you are
However big you think you are
Sexy Sadie oooh you'll get yours yet.

Susan Atkins often bragged and boasted.

We gave her everything we owned just to sit at her table
Just a smile would lighten everything
Sexy Sadie she's the latest and the greatest of them all.

She made a fool of everyone
Sexy Sadie.

However big you think you are
Sexy Sadie.
Brackets by author

Another nickname of Susan Atkins was Sadie Mae Glutz

Maggie Mae (Written by Lennon/McCartney/Harrison/Starkey)
Album “Let it be” Year 1970

Oh dirty Maggie Mae they have taken her away
And she never walk down Lime Street any more
Oh the judge he guilty found her
For robbing a homeward bounder
That dirty no good robbin' Maggie Mae
To the port of Liverpool
They returned me to
Two pounds ten a week, that was my pay.

Beatles “Let It Be” Album
May 8th 1970

Susan Atkins aka Sadie Mae Glutz

(Sexy) Sadie (Dirty Maggie Mae) Glutz (Manson's Slut?). Well "they have taken her away And she'll never walk down Lime (light) Street anymore Oh the judge he guilty found her..."

Speculation: Could the above lyrics also be a metaphor for black mail?

So why was Sharon Tate chosen to die. My feeling is that Roman Polanski made a pact with the Hollywood coven to exchange his child for his own success and fame. He was a unknown movie director until he was handed a script that would make him an instant success. So why give a major script to a basically unknown and un-established director? Why is because of his sacrificial offering of his child that would have to be made in the future. Charles Manson would be the grocery clerk coming for payment for a bill.

Charles Manson

Sadie had stated that Sharon Tate had been the last to die because, "She had to watch the others die." By all accounts, Tate died in excruciating fear and agony. Bugliosi gives Atkins’ account: she was holding Sharon Tate at the time and, “Tex came back and he looked at her and he said, ‘Kill her.” And I killed her... And I just stabbed her and she fell, and I stabbed her again. I don’t know how many times I stabbed her...” Sharon begged for the life of her baby, but Atkins told her, “Shut up. I don’t want to hear it.”

“Before he killed him, Charles “Tex” Watson told Voytek Frykowski: ‘I am the Devil and I am here to do the Devil’s business.’” Months later at the trial, Manson’s “disciples” were said to have been utterly under his power.

Sharon Tate's unborn baby, killed by the Manson family, was named Paul Richard Polanski. It was a male child.
Beatles often stayed at Tate residence (?)

In the famous 1970 Rolling Stone interview, Lennon suggested that he, George Harrison and Ringo Starr took their second LSD trip at Doris Day’s house in California while touring with the Beatles. He may have been referring, unwittingly, to 10050 Cielo Drive, Bel Air, Los Angeles, California, the house where Sharon Tate and four others were murdered. As previously stated, Doris Day’s son, Terry Melcher, had allowed Roman Polankski and his wife, Sharon Tate, to take over his unexpired lease about six months prior to the murders.57 Here is what Lennon said about his first and second experiences with LSD:
   

 
      
      
   A dentist in London…laid it [first LSD pills] on George, me and our wives [Cynthia Powell Lennon and Patty Boyd Harrison] without telling us at a dinner party at his house [in London]… And then, well, we just decided to take it again in California…We were on tour, in one of those houses, like Doris Day’s house or wherever it was we used to stay. And the three of us took it. Ringo, George and I. I think maybe Neil [Aspinall, a roadie]. And a couple of the Byrds…[David] Crosby and the other guy, who used to be the leader…[Roger] McGuinn. I think they came round, I’m not sure, on a few trips.58    
      

 
   Lennon’s memory of his second LSD trip was a bit fussy, but he mentioned some interesting people and places: Doris Day’s house, the Byrds. Earlier I mentioned that Terry Melcher produced the Byrds’ first two albums. As stated before, Melcher’s mother is Doris Day. Sharon Tate and her four companions were killed at a house in LA where Melcher had lived six months earlier. It might have been owned by Melcher’s mom, or maybe Lennon knew she was connected with the house somehow, so he referred to it as Doris Day’s house. Not only does Lennon unwittingly suggest that he and two other Beatles—George and Ringo—took their second acid trip in the house where Sharon Tate was murdered, he further intimates that the Beatles stayed at that house quite often while touring California. Here is the key statement again: "We were on tour, in one of those houses, like Doris Day’s house or wherever it was we used to stay." The words "wherever it was we used to stay" describe a place the Beatles stayed at frequently while on tour.

http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/contents.htm

John Lennon with his killer
Mark Chapman in background




John Hinkley who attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan "followed as exactly as he possibly could EVERY SINGLE MOVE that Mark David CHAPMAN had made, in the days before CHAPMAN murdered John Lennon.

Even MORE bizarre: at the time of their respective arrests following both shooting incidents, John Hinckley AND Mark David Chapman were each carrying on their person a paperback copy of the J.D. Salinger novel, ’CATCHER IN THE RYE.’ (AS did the MK-Ultra mind-controlled assassin Jerry played by Mel Gibson in the surprisingly revealing movie Conspiracy Theory.)

J.D. Salinger, certainly a gifted author, had SUBSTANTIAL and enduring ties to the U.S. intelligence community; in particular, the CIA. Was the book originally intended to be a mind-control programming tool? It's hard to say, but not inconceivable.

SO: Hinckley traced Chapman's footsteps, as it were, in an incredibly eerie AND incredibly REVEALING, scripted tableau; which culminated, as it did with Chapman, in mind-controlled Manchurian Candidate assassin Hinckley shooting his prey on the New York City streets.

Which indeed, brings up yet a FURTHER point. Hinckley FIRST CAME to New York WELL BEFORE his attempt to assassinate Reagan, in order to prepare himself for his assigned role by imitating Chapman's moves and actions of a few months before.

SO: HOW did Hinckley KNOW, several weeks BEFORE-hand, that Reagan was going to be at the place in New York City were Hinckley would shoot him, AND the DAY and TIME Reagan would be there??

SOMEBODY on the "INSIDE," who knew Reagan's schedule some time in advance, positioned Hinckley in New York well before the date of the attempted assassination of Reagan.

Somebody like George BUSH, Sr., maybe? Trying to get a jump on taking over as President? Or, maybe just sending ol' Ronnie a VERY strong, clear message about who the "boss" really was...
Written by NewsHawk

Beatle member George Harrison was the next to die and died from cancer. In the murky world of the occult there are many convenient deaths due to cancer. The occult bill collector had already come once in a previous failed attempt to kill Harrison with a knife. I find this rather curios when comparing real life to the Beatle movie called Help. In the movie Ringo is given a ring that makes him the target of a cult which wants to sacrifice him! They continually chase after him with a knife!

SANTA MONICA, December 30, 1999 -- Another Beatle victimized by violence.

Ex-Mop Top George Harrison was stabbed at his London-area home today by a knife-wielding intruder, reports say. Harrison, 56, was stabbed once in the chest before fending off the attacker. His wife, Olivia, suffered minor head injuries in the attack, but did not require hospitalization….The attack, which reportedly took place sometime around 3:30 a.m. London time, was said to have shocked residents of the quiet, upper-class community of Henley-On-Thames. Harrison's estate was thought to be particularly well guarded. It reportedly featured 24-hour security, patrol dogs and barbed wire fencing. British authorities said they were investigating burglary as a possible motive.

A 33-year-old man -- a resident of the Beatles' own Liverpool -- was arrested and booked on suspicion of attempted murder.

Harrison's stabbing comes 19 years after fellow ex-bandmate John Lennon was shot and killed outside his New York apartment by obsessed fan Mark David Chapman. Jim Bartoo, Hollywood.com

Occultists often use so called sacred numbers to bring them power. Sacrifices are often made on the bases of these numbers. Prime sacred numbers are 3, 6, 7, 9, 11. Sacred multiples are 19, 21, 33.

Note the year that Harrison’s attack took place. It was in 1999. Inverted with the one left out you have 666, the most sacred number of all. He was 56 years old. 5+6=11 which is a very sacred number representing the antichrist known as the 11th horn. Note too that he is stabbed by a man who just happens to be 33 years old. This too is a very sacred number since it is 3X11. He was also attacked around 3:30 am (33).

Another interesting event was that Prime Minister Chretien of Canada was attacked by a young man with knife too. The man somehow got through the intense home security and found his way in to into the Prime Ministers home late at night. This murder attempt failed.

Conclusion

My feeling is that that the Beatles were members of the same Hollywood occult as Roman Polanski. The Movie Rosemary’s Baby was a future template of what was going to happen to Polanski’s wife Sharon Tate. Also the songs recorded by the Beatles seem to indicate that they were mind control. I believe that songs like Helter Skelter, which Charles Manson felt he got his orders to kill from, were recorded by the Beatles for that express purpose.

As in the movie Rosemary’s Baby, I believe Sharon Tate was manipulated and set up by all the people around her, and those she loved and trusted including her own husband. She was the sacrifice to satan for all Polanski’s success. I for one was not fooled by Polanski's sparse tears during interviews.

Interesting to note that Mia Farrow who played Rosemary allegedly feared she would be the next victim of the murder spree. In her 1968 excursion to India with John Lennon of The Beatles, John wrote 'Dear Prudence' (also a song on White Album) for Mia Farrow's younger sister.

Mark Chapman was the name of Lennon's killer - Winifred Chapman was the maid who had first found the bodies at 10050 Cielo Drive.

Coincidences?

-Roman Polanski had done a prior movie called, Knife in the Water 1962

-George Harrison attacked by man with knife.

-All through the movie Help, Beatle Ringo Star is chased by religious fanatics that are armed with a knife.

-Susan Atkins was going to remove Sharon Tate's baby with a knife.

-Susan Atkins was a member Anton Szandor LaVey's Church of Satan.

-Nick names of Susan Atkins Sadie Mae Glutz, Sexy Sadie, Violet Sharon King, Donna Kay Powell.

-In the name (Charles) Manson, if you remove the "n" you are left with the word Mason.

-The Beatles White album was recorded between May 30th 1968 and October 13th 1968 and released Nov 22, 1968. November 22 was the fifth anniversary of the John F. Kennedy assassination.

-Actress friend of John Lennon Mia Farrow was the star of the movie Rosemary's Baby which was filmed in the the Dakota apartment block where John Lennon lived and was killed.

Theatrical Release: Rosemary’s Baby
June 12 1968
June's numeric value is 6 (the sixth month). Interesting to note too is the fact that 12 = 6+6. So 12 is six twice. You are then left with 666, (satan in the flesh).

"There is no comfort in the coven of the witch Some very clever doctor went and sterilized the bitch (Sharon Tate?) And the only man of energy, (Manson?) yes the *revolution’s pride (Manson's revolution?) He trained a hundred women (Manson's women?) just to kill an unborn child.(Sharon Tate's baby?) " —Leonard Cohen- “No Diamonds in the Mine” Brackets mine.

*Charles Manson believed in a revolution between blacks and whites which he called "Helter Skelter" after a Beatle song by the same name.

Sharon Tate
Date of birth 24 (=6) January 1943, Dallas, Texas, USA
Date of death: 9 August 1969

-Note the three 9s in this date. Inverted it becomes 666! The number of Rosemary's baby.

-One year prior to the death of Sharon Tate, the Beatles White album is released on November 22, 1968. On the album John Lennon sings a song about Susan Atkins being implicated in something that will not happen until one year later in the future.

-It would appear that John Lennon personally knew Susan Atkins a year before she murdered Sharon Tate. She murdered Sharon Tate because of orders from Charles Manson who in turn heard his orders from the Beatles White album. They were secret messages that only Manson could perceive. He seemed to be under mind control with the album acting as a vehicle.

-The Beatles were created and put together by Tavistock a mind control center in America.

An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population group in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent" of the BEATLES. The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a social experiment which would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which they were not even aware.

Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger words created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new targeted group, the youth of America.
http://www.illuminati-news.com/rock_and_mc.htm

It is obvious that Charles Manson was receiving "trigger words" from the White album. This is the same album that Mark Chapman listened to before he murdered John Lennon. Ironic is it not?

-Years later with President Ford in the White house, then Vice President Nelson Rockefeller was just a heartbeat away from becoming leader of the free world. With Rocky as Vice President, if anything should befall Ford at that time, he would instantly become President. Well, time to send in Manson's followers once again. One of Manson's followers Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme steps out in a failed assassination attempt against President Ford. (September 5, 1975) Two weeks later another woman Sara Jane Moore attempts another assassination with a handgun. (September 22, 1975)

-30 Dec 1999 Paranoid schizophrenic Michael Abram breaks into the home of George Harrison and stabs him several times in the chest. Voices in Abram's head told him that the former Beatles were witches.

In his book, The Ultimate Evil, investigator-author Maury Terry writes that between 1966 and 1967, the Satanic cult, the Process Church, "sought to recruit the Beatles.

A key link between the Beatles and the Process Church is Kenneth Anger, a follower of the "founding father" of modern Satanism, Aleister Crowley. Anger, born in 1930, and a child Hollywood movie star, became a devoted disciple of Aleister Crowley.

Crowley was born in 1875 and was called the "Great Beast 666." He was known to practice ritual child sacrifice regularly, in his role as Satan's high priest or "Magus." Crowley died in 1947 due to complications of his huge heroin addiction. Before dying, he succeeded in establishing Satanic covens in many U.S. cities including Hollywood. Kenneth Anger, like Crowley, is a Magus, and appears to be the heir to Crowley.

the Beatles' album was dedicated to Satanist Aleister Crowley. It was released 20 years, to the day, after Crowley's death in 1947, and its title song began with the lyrics, "It was twenty years ago today..." The album's cover featured a picture of Crowley.


John Lennon satanic salute

"They're COMPLETELY ANTI-CHRIST. I mean, I am anti-Christ as well, but they're so anti-Christ they shock me which isn't an easy thing." Derek Taylor, Press Officer for the Beatles

"I believed that he was Satan himself at times" George Martin, Beatles Producer

"Jesus, a garlic-eating, stinking little yellow, greasy fascist bastard catholic Spaniard." John Lennon, A Spaniard in the Works, p.14)

"Christianity will go, it will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that. I'm right and will be proved right. You just wait.. . .We're more powerfull than Jesus ever was.." Jesus was all right, but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It's them twisting it that ruins it for me." John Lennon


Knife scene in Rosemary's Baby


Lennon was shot to death outside the Dakota apartment block

The Dakota where John Lennon was sacrificed and
where the movie Rosemary's Baby was filmed


http://stargods.org/EvilBeatles.html
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!