HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams

Author Topic: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams  (Read 33011 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #40 on: September 13, 2009, 11:13:03 am »
I'm quite confused then  :)

Why is there a whole thread devoted to a bad call in a tennis match?  :-\

Because the House of Windsor and the House of Rothschild have pushed over 2,000 articles out to the world in every single language calling her "crazy" and demanding an "investigation" into her violent death threats that could be ruled criminal and land her in jail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also the Bilderberg controlled media is running 24/7 hit pieces saying that she is whacked crazy to support the insane idea of an "investigation".

The lynching is by the media.

If the media did not blanket the airwaves calling her crazy and investigating her for death threats, then it will be exposed. The state run media has the power to target anyone, anytime, and destroy them by demonization, innuendo, and playing on hostility. The judge made a f**ked up call, Serena called her on it, the other judges took another point away to steal the match from her. When that happened she was respectful to the opponent for a well fought game and left without incident.

Then the Bilderberg media, who is the most racist group of psychopaths the world has ever known, got hold of it...WHAMO!!!!!!!!!!!!
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Optimus

  • Globalist Destroyer
  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,982
  • The banksters are steaming piles of dog shit!
    • GlobalGulag.com
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #41 on: September 13, 2009, 11:13:38 am »

Sorry man, you have it backwards. The Royal Family is ceremonial, parliament has all the power. The only reason we still have a Royal Family is because it pulls in the punters who think its jolly nice to see the pomp and circumstance. If it wasn't for tourism they'd have been punted from the public purse decades ago. Land ownership? The US is built on the theft of land, so if we're going to start accusations about who owns what chunk of land and the history of that acquisition, you might want to start at home. Unless you're going to give your country back to the natives. The queen is a figure head, an avatar, even in the commonwealth. Don't mistake respect for governance.

As for the Netherlands, no idea how they do things but from what I can gather the Dutch are perfectly happy with their royals.

Really? The British queen has no power? She is only "cerimonial"?

Then riddle me this: If she is so powerless, then why did the Canadian Prime Minister need her permission to disolve the Canadian Parliament, which he asked for through the queen bitch's governor general who is "the queen's representative" in Canada?

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=73391.0
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people,
it's an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” – Patrick Henry

>>> Global Gulag Media & Forum <<<

Offline Sub-X

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,850
  • FEAR: False Evidence Appearing Real...
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #42 on: September 13, 2009, 11:14:55 am »
Yeah Sane,you are going to have to stop bashing the British Empire,what have they ever done to you ??? Your a big bully picking on that poor woman don't you know her house went on fire not so long ago,you are just heartless my friend.

You would never hear me saying about bad the royal family,the queen is just a figure head and a sweet old woman.  





“If you strike at,imprison,or kill us,out of our prisons or graves we will still evoke a spirit that will thwart you,and perhaps,raise a force that will destroy you! We defy you! Do your worst!”-James Connolly 1909


DARK HALF-END GAME

Offline OG

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #43 on: September 13, 2009, 11:19:10 am »
Oh really?

Parliaments have the power?

You are serious about this?

Look, the royals are so powerful that the queen of ENGLAND can dissolve all of parliament of CANADA with the stroke of her pen.

The Queen is so powerful she can over rule any and all decisions by the high court with a royal decree.

The queen is so powerful she can take a baby from any hospital in britain/canada/australia and eat it alive with crumpets while sipping tea and order that the mother's head by cut off so that she can take a steaming shit in her skull.

You tell me if parliament has that power.

Now I am not saying that she has done this, has any intention of doing this, or will do this.  But, the fact remains that she can do this and because she is supposedly ordained by god (whose god, we do not know), her actions cannot be judged by the inferior human beings. This is a fact, and has been for societies for 6,000 years. This country was founded on the concept that this form of societal structure is a travesty of humanity.

Read my signature, it was written by Thomas Jefferson in the last letter he ever wrote. Sums up the foundation of America.

You're right, but only technically, and only because at some point in history she did control parliament. That is no longer the case, and that statute of law is antiquated. The same goes for Australia, but in Australia's case they voted to keep the queen as the figurative head of state, it looks good for them. The queen has zero power over parliament here in the UK, and has not done for over 30 years (though no doubt she calls in favours). She has even less control now in foreign lands, which apart from having the queen as a figure head, have complete autonomy for the most part. Like I said, you're giving them too much credit, they are powerless. The sooner you realize that the sooner you'll realize that changing things for the better begins at home. If not then nothing will ever get done because you have zero control over England or the Netherlands.

As I said, buckpassing your problems onto someone/thing you have no control over only shows you have no real desire to correct things, because as long as you are playing the blame game you can avoid action by pleading helplessness. Stop blaming everyone else for your problems. If you think your government is bowing to the will of the British, fix your government, don't blame the British. It is not our fault you lot are incompetent.
War is Gods way of teaching Americans geography.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #44 on: September 13, 2009, 11:19:11 am »
COMMON SENSE

by

Thomas Paine


~~~~~~~~~~

OF MONARCHY AND HEREDITARY SUCCESSION

[...]



To the evil of monarchy we have added that of hereditary succession; and as the first is a degradation and lessening of ourselves, so the second, claimed as a matter of right, is an insult and an imposition on posterity. For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever, and though himself might deserve some decent degree of honors of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them. One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of hereditary right in kings, is, that nature disapproves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion.

Secondly, as no man at first could possess any other public honors than were bestowed upon him, so the givers of those honors could have no power to give away the right of posterity, and though they might say, "We choose you for our head," they could not, without manifest injustice to their children, say, "that your children and your children's children shall reign over ours for ever." Because such an unwise, unjust, unnatural compact might (perhaps) in the next succession put them under the government of a rogue or a fool. Most wise men, in their private sentiments, have ever treated hereditary right with contempt; yet it is one of those evils, which when once established is not easily removed; many submit from fear, others from superstition, and the more powerful part shares with the king the plunder of the rest.

This is supposing the present race of kings in the world to have had an honorable origin; whereas it is more than probable, that could we take off the dark covering of antiquity, and trace them to their first rise, that we should find the first of them nothing better than the principal ruffian of some restless gang, whose savage manners of preeminence in subtlety obtained him the title of chief among plunderers; and who by increasing in power, and extending his depredations, overawed the quiet and defenseless to purchase their safety by frequent contributions. Yet his electors could have no idea of giving hereditary right to his descendants, because such a perpetual exclusion of themselves was incompatible with the free and unrestrained principles they professed to live by. Wherefore, hereditary succession in the early ages of monarchy could not take place as a matter of claim, but as something casual or complemental; but as few or no records were extant in those days, and traditionary history stuffed with fables, it was very easy, after the lapse of a few generations, to trump up some superstitious tale, conveniently timed, Mahomet like, to cram hereditary right down the throats of the vulgar. Perhaps the disorders which threatened, or seemed to threaten on the decease of a leader and the choice of a new one (for elections among ruffians could not be very orderly) induced many at first to favor hereditary pretensions; by which means it happened, as it hath happened since, that what at first was submitted to as a convenience, was afterwards claimed as a right.

England, since the conquest, hath known some few good monarchs, but groaned beneath a much larger number of bad ones, yet no man in his senses can say that their claim under William the Conqueror is a very honorable one. A French bastard landing with an armed banditti, and establishing himself king of England against the consent of the natives, is in plain terms a very paltry rascally original. It certainly hath no divinity in it. However, it is needless to spend much time in exposing the folly of hereditary right, if there are any so weak as to believe it, let them promiscuously worship the ass and lion, and welcome. I shall neither copy their humility, nor disturb their devotion.

Yet I should be glad to ask how they suppose kings came at first? The question admits but of three answers, viz., either by lot, by election, or by usurpation. If the first king was taken by lot, it establishes a precedent for the next, which excludes hereditary succession. Saul was by lot, yet the succession was not hereditary, neither does it appear from that transaction there was any intention it ever should. If the first king of any country was by election, that likewise establishes a precedent for the next; for to say, that the right of all future generations is taken away, by the act of the first electors, in their choice not only of a king, but of a family of kings for ever, hath no parallel in or out of scripture but the doctrine of original sin, which supposes the free will of all men lost in Adam; and from such comparison, and it will admit of no other, hereditary succession can derive no glory. For as in Adam all sinned, and as in the first electors all men obeyed; as in the one all mankind were subjected to Satan, and in the other to Sovereignty; as our innocence was lost in the first, and our authority in the last; and as both disable us from reassuming some former state and privilege, it unanswerably follows that original sin and hereditary succession are parallels. Dishonorable rank! Inglorious connection! Yet the most subtle sophist cannot produce a juster simile.

As to usurpation, no man will be so hardy as to defend it; and that William the Conqueror was an usurper is a fact not to be contradicted. The plain truth is, that the antiquity of English monarchy will not bear looking into.

But it is not so much the absurdity as the evil of hereditary succession which concerns mankind. Did it ensure a race of good and wise men it would have the seal of divine authority, but as it opens a door to the foolish, the wicked; and the improper, it hath in it the nature of oppression. Men who look upon themselves born to reign, and others to obey, soon grow insolent; selected from the rest of mankind their minds are early poisoned by importance; and the world they act in differs so materially from the world at large, that they have but little opportunity of knowing its true interests, and when they succeed to the government are frequently the most ignorant and unfit of any throughout the dominions.

Another evil which attends hereditary succession is, that the throne is subject to be possessed by a minor at any age; all which time the regency, acting under the cover of a king, have every opportunity and inducement to betray their trust. The same national misfortune happens, when a king worn out with age and infirmity, enters the last stage of human weakness. In both these cases the public becomes a prey to every miscreant, who can tamper successfully with the follies either of age or infancy.

The most plausible plea, which hath ever been offered in favor of hereditary succession, is, that it preserves a nation from civil wars; and were this true, it would be weighty; whereas, it is the most barefaced falsity ever imposed upon mankind. The whole history of England disowns the fact. Thirty kings and two minors have reigned in that distracted kingdom since the conquest, in which time there have been (including the Revolution) no less than eight civil wars and nineteen rebellions. Wherefore instead of making for peace, it makes against it, and destroys the very foundation it seems to stand on.

The contest for monarchy and succession, between the houses of York and Lancaster, laid England in a scene of blood for many years. Twelve pitched battles, besides skirmishes and sieges, were fought between Henry and Edward. Twice was Henry prisoner to Edward, who in his turn was prisoner to Henry. And so uncertain is the fate of war and the temper of a nation, when nothing but personal matters are the ground of a quarrel, that Henry was taken in triumph from a prison to a palace, and Edward obliged to fly from a palace to a foreign land; yet, as sudden transitions of temper are seldom lasting, Henry in his turn was driven from the throne, and Edward recalled to succeed him. The parliament always following the strongest side.

This contest began in the reign of Henry the Sixth, and was not entirely extinguished till Henry the Seventh, in whom the families were united. Including a period of 67 years, viz., from 1422 to 1489.

In short, monarchy and succession have laid (not this or that kingdom only) but the world in blood and ashes. 'Tis a form of government which the word of God bears testimony against, and blood will attend it.

If we inquire into the business of a king, we shall find that (in some countries they have none) and after sauntering away their lives without pleasure to themselves or advantage to the nation, withdraw from the scene, and leave their successors to tread the same idle round. In absolute monarchies the whole weight of business civil and military, lies on the king; the children of Israel in their request for a king, urged this plea "that he may judge us, and go out before us and fight our battles." But in countries where he is neither a judge nor a general, as in England, a man would be puzzled to know what is his business.

The nearer any government approaches to a republic, the less business there is for a king. It is somewhat difficult to find a proper name for the government of England. Sir William Meredith calls it a republic; but in its present state it is unworthy of the name, because the corrupt influence of the crown, by having all the places in its disposal, hath so effectually swallowed up the power, and eaten out the virtue of the house of commons (the republican part in the constitution) that the government of England is nearly as monarchical as that of France or Spain. Men fall out with names without understanding them. For it is the republican and not the monarchical part of the constitution of England which Englishmen glory in, viz., the liberty of choosing a house of commons from out of their own body- and it is easy to see that when the republican virtue fails, slavery ensues. My is the constitution of England sickly, but because monarchy hath poisoned the republic, the crown hath engrossed the commons?

In England a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain! Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline mr anderson

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,358
    • WeAreChange Brisbane
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #45 on: September 13, 2009, 11:21:26 am »
Because the House of Windsor and the House of Rothschild have pushed over 2,000 articles out to the world in every single language calling her "crazy" and demanding an "investigation" into her violent death threats that could be ruled criminal and land her in jail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also the Bilderberg controlled media is running 24/7 hit pieces saying that she is whacked crazy to support the insane idea of an "investigation".

The lynching is by the media.

If the media did not blanket the airwaves calling her crazy and investigating her for death threats, then it will be exposed. The state run media has the power to target anyone, anytime, and destroy them by demonization, innuendo, and playing on hostility. The judge made a f**ked up call, Serena called her on it, the other judges took another point away to steal the match from her. When that happened she was respectful to the opponent for a well fought game and left without incident.

Then the Bilderberg media, who is the most racist group of psychopaths the world has ever known, got hold of it...WHAMO!!!!!!!!!!!!
...Ok

I don't really see a motive to demonise Serena Williams other than to provide a distraction & spectacle.

Still the way she blew up isn't in the spirit of the game despite it being a win / lose situation.
WeAreChange Brisbane
I hold personal views, beliefs and opinions that do not necessarily reflect the beliefs and opinions of WeAreChange Brisbane as a whole.

Our Bitcoin address: 1Fzb4bp48oMr7CFzT3SbkTzKpMSvWW1X1t

Offline TheCaliKid

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,574
  • What can we do about it, really?
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #46 on: September 13, 2009, 11:25:28 am »
You're right, but only technically, and only because at some point in history she did control parliament. That is no longer the case, and that statute of law is antiquated. The same goes for Australia, but in Australia's case they voted to keep the queen as the figurative head of state, it looks good for them. The queen has zero power over parliament here in the UK, and has not done for over 30 years (though no doubt she calls in favours). She has even less control now in foreign lands, which apart from having the queen as a figure head, have complete autonomy for the most part. Like I said, you're giving them too much credit, they are powerless. The sooner you realize that the sooner you'll realize that changing things for the better begins at home. If not then nothing will ever get done because you have zero control over England or the Netherlands.

As I said, buckpassing your problems onto someone/thing you have no control over only shows you have no real desire to correct things, because as long as you are playing the blame game you can avoid action by pleading helplessness. Stop blaming everyone else for your problems. If you think your government is bowing to the will of the British, fix your government, don't blame the British. It is not our fault you lot are incompetent.

You have been trained well.........to be a subject to the Crown - just like most of the rest of your countrymen. You just can't help it. Even though you are on this forum, supposedly because you desire freedom.

You should be in open rebellion to the Bitch Queen, in every way, shape, and form. What is wrong with you!?!?


Come on man, shake it off already!



Better to beg for forgiveness, than to ask for permission

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #47 on: September 13, 2009, 11:26:14 am »
You're right, but only technically, and only because at some point in history she did control parliament. That is no longer the case, and that statute of law is antiquated. The same goes for Australia, but in Australia's case they voted to keep the queen as the figurative head of state, it looks good for them. The queen has zero power over parliament here in the UK, and has not done for over 30 years (though no doubt she calls in favours). She has even less control now in foreign lands, which apart from having the queen as a figure head, have complete autonomy for the most part. Like I said, you're giving them too much credit, they are powerless. The sooner you realize that the sooner you'll realize that changing things for the better begins at home. If not then nothing will ever get done because you have zero control over England or the Netherlands.

As I said, buckpassing your problems onto someone/thing you have no control over only shows you have no real desire to correct things, because as long as you are playing the blame game you can avoid action by pleading helplessness. Stop blaming everyone else for your problems. If you think your government is bowing to the will of the British, fix your government, don't blame the British. It is not our fault you lot are incompetent.

You are agreeing that she has the power to (technically of course):

"...take a baby from any hospital in britain/canada/australia and eat it alive with crumpets while sipping tea and order that the mother's head by cut off so that she can take a steaming shit in her skull."

And you are saying that is not power over parliament?

Ok, let me rephrase it then...

"The Queen of the British Empire has the power to take a baby from wife of the Prime Minister's womb and eat it alive with crumpets while sipping tea and order that the Prime Minister's wife's head by cut off so that she can take a steaming shit in her skull. She can then order the Prime Minister to lick up the mess and then impale himself with a crucifix while singing 'God save our gracious Queen'. She can then order every member of parliament to do the exact same thing (given the wife is pregnant of course)."

Now, I am not sure what plane of reality you are in, but from the most basic form of logic, that seems to me like she might have a tinge of power over parliament in the UK.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #48 on: September 13, 2009, 11:27:25 am »
...Ok

I don't really see a motive to demonise Serena Williams other than to provide a distraction & spectacle.

Still the way she blew up isn't in the spirit of the game despite it being a win / lose situation.

take a look at the hundreds of youtube videos of white people blowing up at line judges, you will laugh your ass off. Then see if the Bilderbergers pushed out over 2,000 articles in less than 24 hours along with a blanketing TV/Radio slander campaign.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline lavosslayer

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 774
  • This is what happens after cats watch Obama...
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #49 on: September 13, 2009, 11:27:58 am »
You're right, but only technically, and only because at some point in history she did control parliament. That is no longer the case, and that statute of law is antiquated. The same goes for Australia, but in Australia's case they voted to keep the queen as the figurative head of state, it looks good for them. The queen has zero power over parliament here in the UK, and has not done for over 30 years (though no doubt she calls in favours). She has even less control now in foreign lands, which apart from having the queen as a figure head, have complete autonomy for the most part. Like I said, you're giving them too much credit, they are powerless. The sooner you realize that the sooner you'll realize that changing things for the better begins at home. If not then nothing will ever get done because you have zero control over England or the Netherlands.

As I said, buckpassing your problems onto someone/thing you have no control over only shows you have no real desire to correct things, because as long as you are playing the blame game you can avoid action by pleading helplessness. Stop blaming everyone else for your problems. If you think your government is bowing to the will of the British, fix your government, don't blame the British. It is not our fault you lot are incompetent.

All I have to say is WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PROOF OG?! Every time I see your posts your coming into the conversation guns blazing but have nothing to prove your points! no articles, documents or links to anything. Just your sarcastic, condescending demeanor and overstated opinion about what you think to be true. So by all means show us where these claims of yours are stated. Until then, all I see is trolling...
"Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither" -- Benjamin Franklin

Offline mr anderson

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,358
    • WeAreChange Brisbane
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #50 on: September 13, 2009, 11:31:11 am »
take a look at the hundreds of youtube videos of white people blowing up at line judges, you will laugh your ass off.
I don't see a difference in treatment..

Many players have been scorned by the media and it's irregardless of race. I can only see it as a media beat-up that's a good distraction. Bread & circuses....

WeAreChange Brisbane
I hold personal views, beliefs and opinions that do not necessarily reflect the beliefs and opinions of WeAreChange Brisbane as a whole.

Our Bitcoin address: 1Fzb4bp48oMr7CFzT3SbkTzKpMSvWW1X1t

Offline OG

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #51 on: September 13, 2009, 11:43:49 am »
You have been trained well.........to be a subject to the Crown - just like most of the rest of your countrymen. You just can't help it. Even though you are on this forum, supposedly because you desire freedom.

You should be in open rebellion to the Bitch Queen, in every way, shape, and form. What is wrong with you!?!?


Come on man, shake it off already!


See this is where we differ. You think that the british are "subjects" of the queen. That is not the case. I am not a subject of the queen and I am certainly not a royalist. I recognize them for what they are, leeches on the tax payer, nothing more. We have a constitutional monarchy, the parliament might "work for the queen", but that is only figuratively speaking. The queen has zero legal power to tell the British parliament what to do, even though the government acts "on behalf of the queen". Perhaps this is where the confusion arises and why people assume the queen runs the show when she does not. If Canada or Australia or even the United States want to kow tow and kiss the feet of the queen, then it says more about them than it does the British, who'd be more likely to throw spare change at her.

@ lavosslayer

Sorry what would you like me to prove? I can prove that most of you are all mouth and no trousers. Ok, for arguments sake lets say the Queen does tell the US what to do, what are you going to do about it? Nothing, thats what. You'll all just sit here making shit up like the Queen drinking out of a skull or some other completely sensationalist claptrap, whining and crying that everything is the fault of the British. I mean if you are correct and the US never had independance, then you've been getting owned for 300 years, your still getting owned and you'll be getting owned in another 300 years becuase none of you have the balls to do anything about it, well except whine. You want proof? Look around you champ.


And no Sane, the Queen cannot take a baby and eat it with crumpets.
War is Gods way of teaching Americans geography.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #52 on: September 13, 2009, 11:49:16 am »
I don't see a difference in treatment..

Many players have been scorned by the media and it's irregardless of race. I can only see it as a media beat-up that's a good distraction. Bread & circuses....

You do not see a difference? Do you watch TV?

Here are some of the comments by white people on CNN:

"I remember I got all up in someone's face when they stole my new Nelly album. Yeah, don't be dissin'"

WTF?

Wish I could have recorded it, definitely not word for word, but that is the deal.

And also I would like to know why the media is going absolutely ape shit on her when tomorrow marks the 6th anniversary of her sister's murder. The investigation and prosecution borders on James Earl Ray type insanity...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yetunde_Price
Yetunde Hawanya Tara Price (August 9, 1972 – September 14, 2003) was the elder half-sister and personal assistant to leading tennis players Venus Williams and Serena Williams. At the time of her death, she was 31 years old, the eldest of their mother, Oracene Price's five daughters and mother of three children, a registered nurse and owner of a beauty salon. Price came into the public eye when she was the victim of murder by shooting on September 14, 2003 in a poor section of Compton, an area of Los Angeles County, California, known for its history of gang violence. She was shot in the head while riding in an SUV driven by her boyfriend (who police reported was the intended victim) and died at Long Beach Memorial Medical Center.[1][2]

Compton rapper The Game's song "Dreams" is dedicated to her memory, as it states at the end of the track.

Southside Crips gang member Robert Edward Maxfield, 25, pleaded no contest to voluntary manslaughter on March 22, 2006, the day before his third trial in the killing was scheduled to start. The first two trials ended in a mistrial and a hung jury.[3] Prosecutors alleged during trial that Maxfield, surrounded by fellow gang members at a crack house, seized a firearm and took aim at the SUV when it approached. On April 6, 2006, Judge Steven Suzukawa sentenced Maxfield to 15 years in prison.[4]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Does any of that make sense to you? Two humg juries in such a supposedly open and shut case? Then he pleaded no contest? WHY? There were 2 hung juries. Was there more evidence? Read the prosecution's case again.

Damn it, I do not know how to explain this. If you arer black in America and you play tennis, golf, and other recreational activities of the empire...you got a big target on your back. believe that shit.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #53 on: September 13, 2009, 11:57:34 am »

See this is where we differ. You think that the british are "subjects" of the queen. That is not the case. I am not a subject of the queen and I am certainly not a royalist. I recognize them for what they are, leeches on the tax payer, nothing more. We have a constitutional monarchy, the parliament might "work for the queen", but that is only figuratively speaking. The queen has zero legal power to tell the British parliament what to do, even though the government acts "on behalf of the queen". Perhaps this is where the confusion arises and why people assume the queen runs the show when she does not. If Canada or Australia or even the United States want to kow tow and kiss the feet of the queen, then it says more about them than it does the British, who'd be more likely to throw spare change at her.

@ lavosslayer

Sorry what would you like me to prove? I can prove that most of you are all mouth and no trousers. Ok, for arguments sake lets say the Queen does tell the US what to do, what are you going to do about it? Nothing, thats what. You'll all just sit here making shit up like the Queen drinking out of a skull or some other completely sensationalist claptrap, whining and crying that everything is the fault of the British. I mean if you are correct and the US never had independance, then you've been getting owned for 300 years, your still getting owned and you'll be getting owned in another 300 years becuase none of you have the balls to do anything about it, well except whine. You want proof? Look around you champ.


And no Sane, the Queen cannot take a baby and eat it with crumpets.


She can't? Really? Please show me what has power in the entire british empire over a royal decree. Can the high court supersede a royal decree? Can an act of parliament? Do you have any clue whatsoever in how your government functions? I mean this is 2+2=4 stuff, WTF?

Anyway...


Please grab yourself a cold beverage and a big tub of popcorn.
I present you with the master of your domain.
The owner of your children, their minds, their blood, their DNA, and their determination.
Enjoy the show:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqFYRihMoVE&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjr-p9Fpktw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGLN1kREJ2Q&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBRP-o6Q85s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvglWKl6b1A&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgoDmw5R90Y&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HnePKE9AAE&feature=related
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Long to Reign over us, god save our gracious queen.
Please do not rape and torture my babies too much your royal High Ass!
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline lavosslayer

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 774
  • This is what happens after cats watch Obama...
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #54 on: September 13, 2009, 12:03:25 pm »

See this is where we differ. You think that the british are "subjects" of the queen. That is not the case. I am not a subject of the queen and I am certainly not a royalist. I recognize them for what they are, leeches on the tax payer, nothing more. We have a constitutional monarchy, the parliament might "work for the queen", but that is only figuratively speaking. The queen has zero legal power to tell the British parliament what to do, even though the government acts "on behalf of the queen". Perhaps this is where the confusion arises and why people assume the queen runs the show when she does not. If Canada or Australia or even the United States want to kow tow and kiss the feet of the queen, then it says more about them than it does the British, who'd be more likely to throw spare change at her.

@ lavosslayer

Sorry what would you like me to prove? I can prove that most of you are all mouth and no trousers. Ok, for arguments sake lets say the Queen does tell the US what to do, what are you going to do about it? Nothing, thats what. You'll all just sit here making shit up like the Queen drinking out of a skull or some other completely sensationalist claptrap, whining and crying that everything is the fault of the British. I mean if you are correct and the US never had independance, then you've been getting owned for 300 years, your still getting owned and you'll be getting owned in another 300 years becuase none of you have the balls to do anything about it, well except whine. You want proof? Look around you champ.


And no Sane, the Queen cannot take a baby and eat it with crumpets.

If the queen has no power anymore, then why are you rushing to defend her like a loyal servant in her court? Why fall on the sword for a royal that has nothing to offer? Why do you care so much about us attacking a monarch that by what your saying, is just an avatar? Obviously, she still holds sway enough over the people to get a response such as yours, even in her "powerlessness". So please, if you don't care about the queen and don't like parliament, then tell me what have you got to lose to let us say what we say and think how we think?
"Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither" -- Benjamin Franklin

Offline RickT

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,136
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #55 on: September 13, 2009, 12:12:27 pm »
um, somebody mentioned something about 'look what happened in Canada the other day'...

what happened here, related to the queen, that i missed?

as for serena, 11 grand slams and now the nwo is going to put the black girl in her place?  at the u.s. open?  i think the queen would have called in some favours to prevent this:

http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/index.html


good grief
"What a bunch of garbage, Liberal, Democratic, Conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" Alex

Offline OG

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #56 on: September 13, 2009, 12:19:17 pm »

She can't? Really? Please show me what has power in the entire british empire over a royal decree. Can the high court supersede a royal decree? Can an act of parliament? Do you have any clue whatsoever in how your government functions? I mean this is 2+2=4 stuff, WTF?

No, she can't. And the fact you even attempt to say she can is no different than me saying that just because you have the power to own a gun means you're a terrorist who only wants to kill people. Your tabloid tendencies are tiresome and pointless. Yes I know how my government functions, it is you who seems to like to take abstract and outdated crap that has absolutely no bearing in the real world and portray it as fact (just because it might have been true 600 years ago). The queen can technically tell the government what to do, but she has no leagal power to require them to follow her wishes. Simply put, you're full of shit. The government does what it wants, not what the queen wants it to do. If the queen attempted to enforce her rule, they entire royal family would be out on their ear. We simply do not care what they have to say.

Not sure what your video's of ceremonial pomp mean, apart from what I said, it brings in dollars and yen. I see no eating of babies. But then that never was true was it.

Keep pulling facts from your ass, keep blaming people on the other side of the world for your problems, keep being lazy. Perhaps you'll grow to like the prison you're building for yourself.



If the queen has no power anymore, then why are you rushing to defend her like a loyal servant in her court? Why fall on the sword for a royal that has nothing to offer? Why do you care so much about us attacking a monarch that by what your saying, is just an avatar? Obviously, she still holds sway enough over the people to get a response such as yours, even in her "powerlessness". So please, if you don't care about the queen and don't like parliament, then tell me what have you got to lose to let us say what we say and think how we think?

You misunderstand my intentions. I am not defending the queen, I could care less about her or her brood. I take offence to you people blaming everything on the British. If you have issue with your government, take it up with them, but don't drag me into your fight. The fact your country is a cesspit of ignorance has nothing to do with me. Fix your own shit, stop blaming everyone else for your incompetence.
War is Gods way of teaching Americans geography.

Offline Satyagraha

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,149
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #57 on: September 13, 2009, 12:32:01 pm »

You misunderstand my intentions. I am not defending the queen, I could care less about her or her brood. I take offence to you people blaming everything on the British. If you have issue with your government, take it up with them, but don't drag me into your fight. The fact your country is a cesspit of ignorance has nothing to do with me. Fix your own shit, stop blaming everyone else for your incompetence.

OG.. you are taking this as a personal affront; you're not being attacked.. your queen is. So why do you, on one hand, say, "I am not defending the queen, I could care less about her or her brood."... yet follow with, "don't drag me into your fight."

YOU? It's not you OG... it's the system that perpetuates the atrocities...
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself."

~ Thomas Paine, A Dissertation on the First Principles of Government, 1795

Offline Blowback

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,161
    • Info Salvo
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #58 on: September 13, 2009, 12:39:54 pm »
Who's blaming the UK for all America's problems?  Personally, I know any time that I have a problem, the first person to point the finger at is standing in the mirror.

I think the Queen has way more power than you giver her credit for OG, but time will reveal the absolute truth of that to everyone eventually.

One thing we need to do instead of bickering about the details is understand that we are all in the same boat regardless of what country you live in and start working toward making this world a better place wheather it is fighting the NWO or cleaning oil off baby seals or helping a stranger change a tire or whatever...

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #59 on: September 13, 2009, 12:45:00 pm »
No, she can't. And the fact you even attempt to say she can is no different than me saying that just because you have the power to own a gun means you're a terrorist who only wants to kill people. Your tabloid tendencies are tiresome and pointless. Yes I know how my government functions, it is you who seems to like to take abstract and outdated crap that has absolutely no bearing in the real world and portray it as fact (just because it might have been true 600 years ago).

The queen can technically tell the government what to do,
but she has no leagal power to require them to follow her wishes.
Simply put, you're full of shit.


The government does what it wants, not what the queen wants it to do. If the queen attempted to enforce her rule, they entire royal family would be out on their ear. We simply do not care what they have to say.

Not sure what your video's of ceremonial pomp mean, apart from what I said, it brings in dollars and yen. I see no eating of babies. But then that never was true was it.

Keep pulling facts from your ass, keep blaming people on the other side of the world for your problems, keep being lazy. Perhaps you'll grow to like the prison you're building for yourself.



You misunderstand my intentions. I am not defending the queen, I could care less about her or her brood. I take offence to you people blaming everything on the British. If you have issue with your government, take it up with them, but don't drag me into your fight. The fact your country is a cesspit of ignorance has nothing to do with me. Fix your own shit, stop blaming everyone else for your incompetence.

War = Peace
Slavery = Freedom
Ignorance = Strength

The Tavistock Doublespeak plans have worked out nicely on the Island.

"We should give up our freedom for liberty"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR_5_a2TdDE


On a general note, yeah I am pretty much full of shit, an asshole, and pull everything out of my ass. But I do not have the power to eat babies ;)
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline N.E.P.

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,064
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #60 on: September 13, 2009, 12:45:55 pm »
Quote
If the queen attempted to enforce her rule, they entire royal family would be out on their ear. We simply do not care what they have to say.
Yes you are right. Ordinary British people would be outraged if the Royal family tried to overtly assert their rule. However the Elite literally worship the Royal Family and your own Prime Minister has to get on his knees and pathetically grovel to the queen. A bit weird.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXOSE_8HLYs&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2Fvideosearch%3Fq%3Dqueen%2Belizabeth%2Btony%2Bblair%26www_google_domain%3Dwww.google.com%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26emb%3D0%26a&feature=player_embedded#t=43

Offline TheQ

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #61 on: September 13, 2009, 12:46:09 pm »
Because the House of Windsor and the House of Rothschild have pushed over 2,000 articles out to the world in every single language calling her "crazy" and demanding an "investigation" into her violent death threats that could be ruled criminal and land her in jail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Also the Bilderberg controlled media is running 24/7 hit pieces saying that she is whacked crazy to support the insane idea of an "investigation".

The lynching is by the media.

If the media did not blanket the airwaves calling her crazy and investigating her for death threats, then it will be exposed. The state run media has the power to target anyone, anytime, and destroy them by demonization, innuendo, and playing on hostility. The judge made a f**ked up call, Serena called her on it, the other judges took another point away to steal the match from her. When that happened she was respectful to the opponent for a well fought game and left without incident.

Then the Bilderberg media, who is the most racist group of psychopaths the world has ever known, got hold of it...WHAMO!!!!!!!!!!!!


this is surely satire  :P

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #62 on: September 13, 2009, 12:46:25 pm »
um, somebody mentioned something about 'look what happened in Canada the other day'...

what happened here, related to the queen, that i missed?

as for serena, 11 grand slams and now the nwo is going to put the black girl in her place?  at the u.s. open?  i think the queen would have called in some favours to prevent this:

http://www.wimbledon.org/en_GB/index.html


good grief


absolutely the bilderberg's love their stars. but when they dare challenge the authority...

SLAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline OG

  • Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #63 on: September 13, 2009, 12:47:34 pm »
OG.. you are taking this as a personal affront; you're not being attacked.. your queen is. So why do you, on one hand, say, "I am not defending the queen, I could care less about her or her brood."... yet follow with, "don't drag me into your fight."

YOU? It's not you OG... it's the system that perpetuates the atrocities...


Yes, in a way I do take it personally, but that is not different than an American jumping to the defence of the US when some one speaks ill of it. This atmoshpere of "lets blame the british" is unproductive, but then maybe it's supposed to be. Maybe you're supposed to just sit around moaning about things you cannot change rather than changing the things you have control over.


@blowback

I've known a few times in recent history when the government has done what it wanted despite the queen being vocal about their decision. It didn't stop them, and the queen didn't stop them, because she cannot. Not any more. I think people mistake what juice the queen has as actual legally mandated power, it's not, she has none. Not here and certainly not in the US. The people with the real power in the US are you lot, the American people, but as long as you keep thinking otherwise, well, you'll get nowhere.
War is Gods way of teaching Americans geography.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #64 on: September 13, 2009, 01:00:59 pm »

Yes, in a way I do take it personally, but that is not different than an American jumping to the defence of the US when some one speaks ill of it. This atmoshpere of "lets blame the british" is unproductive, but then maybe it's supposed to be. Maybe you're supposed to just sit around moaning about things you cannot change rather than changing the things you have control over.


@blowback

I've known a few times in recent history when the government has done what it wanted despite the queen being vocal about their decision. It didn't stop them, and the queen didn't stop them, because she cannot. Not any more. I think people mistake what juice the queen has as actual legally mandated power, it's not, she has none. Not here and certainly not in the US. The people with the real power in the US are you lot, the American people, but as long as you keep thinking otherwise, well, you'll get nowhere.

Holy shit, you are right. Even though I actually never did blame the british people because such an accusation is an affront to all of humanity, I will state for the record that the british people are the coolest partners in the fight against the NWO that a friend to liberty could ever have!

If not for the british people much of the exposure about the NWO would never have been possible. i deeply and thoroughly apologize if even without saying it, my express contempt for master/slave forms of government have led anyone to believe that i am against the british people.

i am sorry, sorry, sorry.

now back to the piece of f**king shit queen bitch and her nazi husband...

PRINCE PHILIP

HUSBAND OF QUEEN ELIZABETH II

RULER OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"It's a pleasure
to be in a country
that isn't ruled by its people."

-- Said to Paraguayan dictator Alfredo Stroessner.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PRINCE PHILIP'S NAZI LINKS


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/051208_prince_philip.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-379036/Prince-Philip-pictured-Nazi-funeral.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #65 on: September 13, 2009, 01:04:49 pm »
Critical Juncture
Chapter 5 -- TAVISTOCK
B31412 / Sun, 8 Mar 2009 07:02:40 / International
http://bodo.gnn.tv/blogs/31412/Chapter_5_TAVISTOCK
from Mind Control, World Control by Jim Keith (RIP)
(ISBN 0-932813-45-3)
Published by Adventures Unlimited Press 1997.
pp. 43-51

The Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, known by insiders as the “Freud
Hilton,” has been a major nexus for the worldwide psychological manipulation
that has taken place over the last 50 years. The Tavistock story—at least
the public version of it—begins immediately after World War II, when
members of British military intelligence created the Institute. In its own
literature Tavistock is described as an organization of “dynamic psychiatry”
which was intended to practice what they term ‘societry” on the planet as a
whole—and what I term world mind control.

British military intelligence itself, in the persons of many of its chief
players, has been aimed at a one-world government since its inception.
British Secret Service directors on an almost one-for-one basis have been
advocates of Fabian socialism. [1] It is alleged that Tavistock was set up
much earlier than its announced inception, over 20 years prior in 1921, by
Major John Rawlings Reese, on the orders of the Round Table’s Royal
Institute of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House). The RIIA,
along with the American Council on Foreign Relations, had been founded in
1919 during the Versailles Peace Conference, both being early New World
Order executive arms.

Reese was the man who dreamed of “building a society in which it is possible
for any member of any social group to be treated [psychiatrically], without
resort to legal means, and even if they do not desire such treatment.” At
the end of World War II, Reese called for the creation of “psychological
shock troops” who would fan out from the Tavistock Institute to engineer the
future direction of society. [2]

In 1932 Tavistock was put under the directorship of the German psychologist
Kurt Lewin. Lewin was a founder of the National Training Laboratories and
director of the Harvard psychological Clinic, and—an odd qualification for
a psychiatrist, I think—one of the key players in the original creation of
the OSS in America.

Lewin is credited with much of the original Tavistock into mass
brainwashing, applying the results of repeated trauma and torture in mind
control to society at large. If terror can be induced on a widespread basis
into a society. Lewin has stated, then society reverts to a tabula rasa a
blank slate, a situation where control can easily be instituted from an
exterior point.

Put it another way: By the creation of controlled chaos, the populace can be
brought to the point where it willingly submits to greater control. Lewin
maintained that society must be driven into a state equivalent to an “early
childhood situation. He termed this societal chaos “fluidity.”

Tavistock’s focus in the early days was on strategic warfare studies, in
particular of Germany, with emphasis on the reeducation of that errant New
World Order colony. During World War II many of the Institute’s members,
including its founder, Reese, ran the British Psychological Warfare
Directorate and subsidiary organizations based in the United States. After
World War II Tavistock can functionally be considered to have become a part
of Britain’s Psychological Warfare Bureau, now working on projects dealing
with the brainwashing of populations. [3] Tavistock is governed by what it
calls an invisible college, echoing antique occultist terminology and
reminding one that British intelligence was founded by Freemasons and
remains deeply Freemasonic to this day. The original use of the term
“invisible college,” prior to the announced creation of Tavistock, was
Reese’s reference to an informal association he had created of all the
psychiatrists then working in the British military.

For funding, the Tavistock Institute relies on large grants from anonymous
benefactors—with no doubt a substantial portion coming directly from the
Crown—along with grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford
Foundation, the Carnegie Institute, the World Health Organization, and the
British Home Office. Tavistock is also interlinked worldwide with a vast
network of other organizations and think tanks, including UNESCO, WHO, the
World Federation for Mental Health, and the Rand Corporation. Tavistock is
simply a front group for the psychological imp05ition of the New World Order
on the planet, and its main philosophic tool is the Hegelian dialectic
framed in the terms of Lewin.

The Rockefellers have always been prominent in deciding the course of
Tavistock. According to the official chronicler of the group,
“The Rockefeller Foundation, before making us a grant, would need to be
satisfied, not only by our policies.., but also with the persons to carry
them out.” [4] In a Tavistock-funded profile of the group, it is stated that the role of
the institute has been:
“(a) The invention of the command psychiatrist as a medical-social role
carrying out reconnaissance in a large structure and defined group, leading
to the ascertainment and recognition of critical problems in the sphere of
human relations and management.

“(b) The invention of social psychiatry as a policy science permitting
preventative technical intervention in large-scale problems. ..

“(c) The fashioning of a whole series of military institutions which
concretely and effectively implemented the policies advocated.

“(d) The invention of new types of therapeutic communities.
“(e) The invention of cultural psychiatry…

“Capability nurtured in the Tavistock for the psychiatrist to work with lay
personnel—in this case the military—in a collaborative partnership. In
other words, the strategy of command psychiatry and the developments to
which it led were psyche-dynamically conceived and based.”

Tavistock, born from the collaboration of the international monied elite,
military intelligence, and the materialistic psychiatric community, refers
to its self-admitted “military” orientation as Operation Phoenix—again, a
Freemasonic symbol that it shares with the infamous Vietnam War
assassination program. One is reminded of the Freemasonic legend “Ordo Ab
Chao,” Order Out of Chaos, which could just as easily describe the Tavistock
method of destroying a target subject, or a target population, prior to
reprogramming; the Tavistock modus operandi.

Throughout the Tavistock literature—either official or
Tavistock-inspired-they reiterate their “global vision” and make it clear
that the institute is intended to work its long-term “societry” on the world
regardless of the wishes of individuals who inhabit it.

One of the most successful of Tavistock-offshoot organizations is what was
originally known as the National Training Laboratories (NTL), and now the
NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Sciences, founded in 1947. Located in
Bethel, Maine, the mission of the NTL is to give Lewin-inspired “group
dynamics” sessions to American leaders. Again, during group sessions
“dissonance” or stress is introduced to destroy the individual’s previous
beliefs, and then a new, group-oriented personality is coaxed forth. This
is the primary technical method used by a myriad of Tavistock-influenced
“sensitivity” groups like Alanon and Esalen.

Since the 1950s, NTL has processed the majority of America’s corporate
leaders in its programs, while simultaneously running the same programs
for various segments of the government, including the Navy, the Department
of Education, and the State Department. None dare call it mind control. [5]

Eric Trist, the chairman of Tavistock’s governors, in 1963 described his and
Tavistock’s work on mass brainwashing, delineating in detail his theory of
“social turbulence,” based upon the theories of Hegel, although again, Trist
is far more quick to cite Lewin.

Trist postulated that the administering of a series of traumatizing shocks
upon a society would destabilize it, lowering the overall character of the
society’s reasoning. Trist suggested that by late 1963 the world had moved
into a condition of “permanent social turbulence” that would serve to usher
in a new condition of society, a new paradigm, and a new possibility for
remaking the face of the planet.

The nature of the permanent social turbulence that Trist foresaw is further
defined in a book published in 1975 by one of Trist’s associates, Fred
EmeIy. The book, Futures We Are In, likens the condition of current day
society to the violent punk welfare state of Anthony Burgess’ novel, A
Clockwork Orange, written in the 1960s.

Emery, in reflection of Trist, also trumpets Hegel. He describes the first
stage of the breakdown of society as being “superficiality,” in which
previous societal values are questioned and discarded. He uses as an example
of this the death of the Judeo-Christian paradigm.

The next inevitable state is “segmentation,” in which societal institutions
break down, resulting in a reversion to paranoid groups of individuals
hostile to each other.

The next stage in the breakdown of society would be the launching of a
fascist movement akin to the Nazis.

The final and most disrupted state of society is termed disassociation, in
which the individual becomes the entirety of society for himself, and is
isolated from other members of the group. The dominant culture of the
society becomes “fantasy and superstition.” According to Trist, the current
“wired society” where the main interaction of the individual is with
electronic media is only a metaphor for disassociation. Cyberpunks, New
Agers, and couch potatoes, take note. It is interesting to note that the
same progression can be seen in the microcosm with the induction of the
multiple personality, an oft-asserted goal of intelligence agency
brain-banging.

In May 1967 at Queen Elizabeth’s palatial estate in Deauville, France, a
conference was convened. It was intended to update participants on ongoing
projects of the Tavistock network. This was the “Conference on Transatlantic
Technological Imbalance and Collaboration,” sponsored by the Scientific and
Technological Committee of the North Atlantic Assembly and the Foreign
Policy Research Institute. Among the projects mentioned at the conference
were the collaboration of Emery and Trist on “social turbulence,” and the
SRI-Tavistock “Images of Man” project.

Participants in the conference included Tavistock’s Harland Cleveland;
Willis Barman of the Tavistock offshoot Stanford Research Institute; Dr.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, the future Carter national security advisor and the
Trilateral Commission’s founding executive director: and Fred Emery, who had
earlier delineated the stages of societal disintegration in his Futures We
Are In. Other participants were Dr. Aurelio Peccei, later to head the
zero-growth fixated Club of Rome, then chairman of the Economic Committee of
the Atlantic Institute, an important NATO think tank; and Sir Alexander King
and Sir Solly Zuckerman, advisors to the British crown.

Fleshing out the hologram of elitist New World Order planning is the
information that Brzezinski is believed by many in Western intelligence
organizations to be a KGB mole, recruited by British Round Tabler and
Rothschild-Warburg agent William Yandell Elliot. Henry Kissinger is also
linked to this group, reportedly after being recruited to a KGB homosexual
blackmail ring focused on the EICOM G-2 headquarters in Oberammergau,
Germany, at the end of the second world war. Kissinger was a member of the
U.S. Army 970th Counterintelligence Corps, involved in creating the Nazi
“rat lines” that enabled many prominent Nazis to escape prosecution at the
end of World War II.

Kissinger’s reported mentor was Fritz Kraemer of the Pentagon plans
division, who also groomed Alexander Haig. Kraemer’s secret life during
WWII, according to deceased conspiracy researcher Mae Brussel, was that of a
special lieutenant to Hitler. What does it matter whose side you are on, the
controllers might say? Both sides in the World War, or for that matter the
Cold War, only served to foster the synthesis of the New World Order. [6]

The principles that were agreed on at the Tavistock conference will sound
very familiar to those who have been following the reshaping of human
institutions and values by the New World Order. These include the belief
that man should not dominate nature, but instead become a part of it, with
no more rights and privileges than, say, the purple-assed baboon in the
wild. Governments are obsolete and will be replaced by other, more
encompassing institutions. Mankind is moving into a deindustrialized
post-technological society, an “information age,” the Age of Aquarius:
again, aborigines with laptop computers.

The primary impetus towards the evolution to the post-technological society
are the repeated shocks and chaos taking place, including such events as the
Kennedy assassination, the Vietnam War, and the assault on traditional
institutions and thinking by the psychedelic counterculture.

This philosophy was described exactly by Dr. William Sargent of the
Tavistock Institute in 1957 in his book Battle for the Mind—A Physiology of
Conversion and Brain-Washing. Again, the idea is that the micro reflects the
macro: the occultist dictum,
“As above, so below.

Sargent said, “Various types of beliefs can be implanted in many people
after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or
deliberately induced fear, anger, or excitement. Of the results caused by
such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgment and
heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes
classed under the heading of ‘herd instinct,’ and appear most spectacularly
in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common
danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility.”

Out of the Tavistock conference also came Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1968 book
The Technotronic Age, that posits an information society whose basis of
competition is replaced by “amusement focus” based on “spectator spectacles
(mass sports and TV) providing an opiate for increasingly purposeless
masses… New forms of social control may be needed to limit the
indiscriminate exercise by the individual of their new powers. The
possibility of extensive chemical mind control… will call for a social
definition of the common criteria of restraint as well as utilization. And
some think that Guy DeBord’s Society of the Spectacle isn’t literal.

In the Technotronic Age, the “nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s
organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force:
International banks and multinational corporations are acting and
planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the
nation-state.” Brzezinski also says of the “Technotronic Age” that, “At the
same time the capacity to assert social and political control over the
individual will vastly increase. It will soon be possible to assert almost
continuous control over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files,
containing even the most personal details about health and personal behavior
of every citizen in addition to the more customary data.

“These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.
Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information. Our
existing institutions will be supplanted by pre-crisis management
institutions, the task of which will be to identify in advance likely
social crises and to develop programs to cope with them.

“This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades toward a
Technotronic Era, a dictatorship leaving even less room for political
procedures as we know them. Finally, looking ahead to the end of the
century, the possibility of biochemical mind control and genetic tinkering
with man, including beings which will function like men and reason like them
as well, could give rise to some difficult questions.” A book written at the
same time by the conference chairman, Aurellio Peccei, was titled The Chasm
Ahead, and it too echoed the prevailing elitist themes: Peccei reiterated
that a one-world government was the only solution to the problems of the
world. Also required was that Russia and the U.S. would have to enter into
partnership in global planning and enforcement—a theme that has become
increasingly obvious in recent years with the Spetznaz setting up shop in
Peoria and Tulsa, and Clinton trying to lease the Long Beach Naval Yards to
the mainland Chinese. [7]

One of the footsoldiers of Tavistock—currently fallen from grace at least
in the eyes of the American people—is, believe it or not, Newt Gingrich.
The truth about Newt exists much in contradiction to his image as a staunch
upholder of Republican ideals and conservative family values. Gingrich is in
fact another Trojan horse whose mentor is the “futurist” Alvin Toffler.
Toffler’s book The Third Wave describes the current technocratic takeover
of the world, the acquisition of virtually all wealth by a tiny elite, and
the relegation of the vast majority of the populace to aThird World foraging
in the garbage heaps of the rich.

According to Gingrich, speaking to a crowd of yuppies at a congress on
“Democracy in Virtual America,” “In the mid-to-late-‘60s, I read Drucker’s
The Age of Discontinuities, Boulding’s The Meaning of the Twentieth Century,
Bell’s Beyond Post-Industrial Society—all of which were precursors to the
first popularizer of this notion, which was Future Shock, which was written
basically a quarter of a century ago. Now, those four books described
everything we’re living through for all practical purposes.., and nothing
has changed for a quarter of a century… I’ve worked with the Tofflers for
20 years in trying to figure out this interesting question. Since this is
all intellectually obvious, why can’t we break through?”

Toffler is a protege of Kenneth Boulding, who is one of Tavistock’s leading
lights in the United States, and according to his wife founded the
revolutionary Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Boulding and his wife
were responsible for much bridge building between the Fabian “societrists”
of Tavistock and the New Left in the 1960s.

Gingrich revealed his not-so-hidden roots when he mentioned the
“anticipatory democracy” project in his introduction to The Third Wave.
“A/D,” as it is termed, was a project fielded by Tavistock in the 1960s
intended to bring about a New Age shift toward anything but traditional
values, unless it is the Wellsian “Open Conspiracy” traditional values of
the elite controllers. Among the later projects that would be created by
participants in the “A/D” project would be the Malthusian Club of Rome and
the Carter administration’s Global 2000 plan.

Gingrich was ushered into the Tavistock orbit in 1965 when, as an
undergraduate at Emery University, a professor at Georgia Tech introduced
him to the work of Boulding and Toffler. After getting his Ph.D. at Tulane,
Gingrich took a teaching job at West Georgia State College, outside Atlanta,
the East Coast node of the “humanist psychology movement.” One of
Gingrich’s closest associates was the anything-but-Republican Jimmy Carter,
who put Newt in charge of an A/D pilot project called Goals for Georgia. It
was only later that Gingrich got his calling as a banner-waver for the New
Right. [8]

NOTES:

1. Dicks, Henry Victor, Fifty Years of the Tavistock Clinic.
(London. England: Routledge & K. Paul, 1970); Douglas and Thompson, ‘New
attempt to cover up the English side of the Bolshevik’s ‘Trust’. EIR, June
5, 1987: Wolfe, L., The Tavistock roots of the ‘Aquarian Conspiracy’, EIR,
January 12, 1996 2. Dicks; Zepp-LaRouche, Helga, The Hitler Book. (New
York: The Schiller Institute, 1984); Wolfe
3. Dr. John Coleman, Conspirator’s Hierarchy: The Story of the
Committee of 300. (America West Publishers, Carson City, Nevada, 1992):
ZeppLaRouche: Dicks 4. Dicks 5. Dicks; Woke
6. John Judge, “Nazis in the White House: The Reagan Administration &
the Fascist International, Overthrow, Fall 1985, and “Good Americans”.
Dharma Combat number 11
7. Coleman; Sutton and Wood, Trilaterals Over Washington.
(Scottsdale. Arizona: The August Corporation, 1978)
8. Anticipatory Democracy—People in the Politics of the Future.
Clement Bezold, ed. (New York: Random House, 1978): Steinberg, Jeffrey.
“Anticipatory democracy, EIR, January 12, 1996
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #66 on: September 13, 2009, 01:12:34 pm »

Yes, in a way I do take it personally, but that is not different than an American jumping to the defence of the US when some one speaks ill of it. This atmoshpere of "lets blame the british" is unproductive, but then maybe it's supposed to be. Maybe you're supposed to just sit around moaning about things you cannot change rather than changing the things you have control over.


@blowback

I've known a few times in recent history when the government has done what it wanted despite the queen being vocal about their decision. It didn't stop them, and the queen didn't stop them, because she cannot. Not any more. I think people mistake what juice the queen has as actual legally mandated power, it's not, she has none. Not here and certainly not in the US. The people with the real power in the US are you lot, the American people, but as long as you keep thinking otherwise, well, you'll get nowhere.

I have one question...

When did the royal families lose their power?

You are saying "not any more". I am assuming at one time it was true and now you are putting forth the proposition "no longer is this true" in other words "at some point in time, or slowly over time this power has eroded or was taken away".

If it would not be any trouble, I cannot find any evidence of this transition and suspect that the transition of power never occurred. Is there a way that you can lay those concerns to rest?
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Libertarian Perspective

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #67 on: September 13, 2009, 01:20:04 pm »
I think there is a misunderstanding here between British and American members of the board. Me being form the Uk I despise the Queen, I think she is the top of the power pyramid in the NWO if not one of the major players. Just because you do not see the queen's power that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. For example, Rothschild and Rockefeller are very good at disguising their wealth, creating dummy corporations and put boards of directors and even CEOs and everybody thinks that for example Bill gates owns Microsoft. Laughable!

At the same time, people have to realise that:
1) Many british can't stand the queen.
2) We can get guns if it comes to that.
3) We know what the deal is, are sick of Globalisation and the European Union.
“Good luck to him. I don’t blame him at all, but I just
wish he had not hit me so hard. I know he had to protect
his property, and I probably would have done the
same thing in his position. This has certainly stopped
me committing any more crime.” - British burglar elaborating robbery

sociostudent

  • Guest
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #68 on: September 13, 2009, 01:47:17 pm »
Ok, I'm just going to say one thing. The British Royals (along with the other Bilderbergers) seem to have a lot of fun trying to get the public in America to want this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War

Rather than having another one of these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War, which they need desperately, both economically and for the psychological well-being of the country.

And that's all I have to say about that.

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #69 on: September 13, 2009, 02:01:11 pm »

Yes, in a way I do take it personally, but that is not different than an American jumping to the defence of the US when some one speaks ill of it. This atmoshpere of "lets blame the british" is unproductive, but then maybe it's supposed to be. Maybe you're supposed to just sit around moaning about things you cannot change rather than changing the things you have control over.

By saying you support the house of windsor and the house of rothschild it becomes overtly obvious that you do not give a flying f**k about the people of britain. how can you tell me that you support the draconian and tyrannical police state set up by houses AND care about the people of Britain? How is that even possible? Stop working on behalf of the pharaoh to keep the slaves on both parts of the pond in intergenerational slavery...



“You know, whenever Pharaoh wanted to prolong the period of slavery
 in Egypt, he had a favorite, favorite formula for doing it. What was that?
He kept the slaves fighting amongst themselves.
But whenever the slaves get together, that's the beginning of
getting out of slavery.”

—Martin Luther King, Jr.


It is time for all of us to get together and stop buying into the ignorance of divisional hatred based on race/religion/nationality. That ignorance is the only thing allowing the Pharaohs, Kings, Elite Masters to continue ruling over us.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #70 on: September 13, 2009, 02:14:37 pm »
I think there is a misunderstanding here between British and American members of the board. Me being form the Uk I despise the Queen, I think she is the top of the power pyramid in the NWO if not one of the major players. Just because you do not see the queen's power that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. For example, Rothschild and Rockefeller are very good at disguising their wealth, creating dummy corporations and put boards of directors and even CEOs and everybody thinks that for example Bill gates owns Microsoft. Laughable!

At the same time, people have to realise that:
1) Many british can't stand the queen.
2) We can get guns if it comes to that.
3) We know what the deal is, are sick of Globalisation and the European Union.

that has always been my understanding of every member of this board.

it is a prison planet.

the NWO will not care if you are in UK/US/Zaire/Russia/Taiwan/Brazil

Pharaohs rule all in master/slave insanity.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Berminator

  • Guest
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #71 on: September 13, 2009, 02:20:22 pm »
I think there is a misunderstanding here between British and American members of the board. Me being form the Uk I despise the Queen, I think she is the top of the power pyramid in the NWO if not one of the major players. Just because you do not see the queen's power that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. For example, Rothschild and Rockefeller are very good at disguising their wealth, creating dummy corporations and put boards of directors and even CEOs and everybody thinks that for example Bill gates owns Microsoft. Laughable!

At the same time, people have to realise that:
1) Many british can't stand the queen.
2) We can get guns if it comes to that.
3) We know what the deal is, are sick of Globalisation and the European Union.


Being from Scotland i know that many Rangers supporters support Queeney, the others, the Celtic supporters, support the pope.
Many Many folks in England support Queeney, and we're an island, where the hell's the population gonna get blasters?

Offline RickT

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,136
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #72 on: September 13, 2009, 03:21:48 pm »

absolutely the bilderberg's love their stars. but when they dare challenge the authority...

SLAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Seriously Sane, I really think the NWO has bigger fish to fry.  Did the queen f over Michael Vick too?  Serena Williams means nothing to these people... Serena's little episode will be forgotten in no time.

Now,

what happened here in Canada?
"What a bunch of garbage, Liberal, Democratic, Conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" Alex

JTCoyoté

  • Guest
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #73 on: September 13, 2009, 03:35:13 pm »
I seriously don't get what the big deal is?

It was a bad call, a bad reaction to a tight match. Am I missing something here?

Mr. Anderson, and RickT,

The point that is being made here, is this; Serena in this final match was defeating this young lady from Belgium... And in the final set, the final call was erroneous, blatantly so... and Serena expressed displeasure with the poor call in a typically American fashion... namely explaining to the line judge that she, Williams, should just shove this tennis ball down the line judge's throat.

Within hours, literally hundreds of world press articles, running willy-nilly with this comment, touting Serena as everything from racist to attempting murder... Now who has the power to do that, especially when it's obvious that it was merely an "I'm pissed off," comment... and who are the reporters touting this? I wonder how many villas the royal houses of Europe have given away in the last 24 hours in order to get this accomplished...?

Think about it, even Rep. Joe Wilson who called the president a liar didn't get that kind of horrific charge leveled against him... Ask yourself, what is the national sport of Queens...? Queen Bea called Queen Liz, to levy some racism of her own at Serena's comment... "We mustn't allow our beautiful blonde athlete, to be defeated on the world stage, by that dark rabble from America." Can't you just hear it. "How dare that slave subject address a representative of the Queen in such a fashion." All Serena did was express in as few words as possible her extreme displeasure with the call... that is something slaves are not supposed to do, light or dark.

This understanding could be used by us as talking points with our buddies, who like to spend all their time at the bar watching sports... a method whereby we can awaken them to the New World Order... Let's please do take advantage of it, you will won't you...?

And to all of our friends in the United Kingdom, including Britain, and our friends in Europe as well... it must be understood that we know that even during our War for Independence against Britain, not everyone there was behind the king in his "maintenance and expansion campaign" during the last quarter of the 18th century... there were even a few extremely well-placed dissenters...

In England, politician and humorist Horace Walpole, a rebel sympathizer, upon receiving news of Bannister Tarlton's defeat at the hands of Daniel Morgan at Cowpens, made the following rye remark:

"America once more is not quite ready to be conquered, although
every now and again we fancy it is. Tarleton is defeated. Lord
Cornwallis is checked. And Arnold not sure of having betrayed
his friends too much purpose. ~Horace Walpole

Essentially what I'm saying is this, there is nothing that promotes division better, than a poor call in a sporting match that is being watched worldwide. And in this case the Royals have taken advantage...  We will now watch as the battle lines are drawn in every pub/bar/saloon/tennis club, in the world.

--Oldyoti

"What we meant, in going for those redcoats was this --
we had always governed ourselves, and always meant to...
they, didn't mean we should."

~ An old New England militia
captain, after the battles of
Lexington and Concord
April 19, 1775

Click on Duke

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #74 on: September 13, 2009, 03:41:11 pm »
Seriously Sane, I really think the NWO has bigger fish to fry.  Did the queen f over Michael Vick too?  Serena Williams means nothing to these people... Serena's little episode will be forgotten in no time.

Tennis means a lot to the royals. And Venus and Serena have been "allowed" to win because they are just that f-ing talented. But Venus was f-d over by a judge and she accurately pointed that out to the judge with some damn fine Patrick Henry type response. This questioning of authority is a no-no to the New World Order Pyramid structure, but IS AS AMERICAN AS APPLE PIE! The rulers of the New World Order want everyone in the world to know: You do not question authority when you have been "allowed" to receive favors from the elite.  Some thing happened with Van Jones and with Reverend Wright.

Michael Vick has major issues and was caught and incarcerated for those issues. I am positive that the entire debauchery did not just involve him and obviously we know who got caught and who did not. Of course Vick's issues are minuscule compared to Bush genociding over 1.5 million humans, so yeah the media went overboard. As far as exposing a bona fide racist talking about Michael Vick, here is the official 20 minute statement from the Ku Klux Klan.

Quote
Now,

what happened here in Canada?

one day the queen felt like f**king with the rights of a few million of her slaves so by royal decree, she dissolved the entire Canadian parliament which is her right because she has been ordained by god (whose god, we still do not know) and is above all the barbarians that work her land.


All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline RickT

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,136
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #75 on: September 13, 2009, 04:21:16 pm »
Tennis means a lot to the royals. And Venus and Serena have been "allowed" to win because they are just that f-ing talented. But Venus was f-d over by a judge and she accurately pointed that out to the judge with some damn fine Patrick Henry type response. This questioning of authority is a no-no to the New World Order Pyramid structure, but IS AS AMERICAN AS APPLE PIE! The rulers of the New World Order want everyone in the world to know: You do not question authority when you have been "allowed" to receive favors from the elite.  Some thing happened with Van Jones and with Reverend Wright.

Michael Vick has major issues and was caught and incarcerated for them. Of course they are minuscule compared to Bush genociding over 1.5 million humans, so yeah the media went nuts. As far as exposing a bona fide racist talking about Michael Vick, here is the official 20 minute statement from the Ku Klux Klan.

Okay Sane... right on

Quote
one day the queen felt like f**king with the rights of a few million of her slaves so by royal decree, she dissolved the entire Canadian parliament which is her right because she has been ordained by god (whose god, we still do not know) and is above all the barbarians that work her land.

Parliament isn't even sitting yet.  The MPs come back from summer break this week.  We'll likely have the Liberals and NDP bring down the minority government and we'll be into an election which will get the real  NWO's Canadian minion... Michael Ignatieff, elected as PM.  It makes my stomach churn.  I'll take the status quo any day.
"What a bunch of garbage, Liberal, Democratic, Conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" Alex

Offline RickT

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,136
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #76 on: September 13, 2009, 04:27:11 pm »
Oh boy. You need to do your research, son.



1. Who's the largest landowner on planet earth?

2. What happened in Canada the other day?


etc, etc, and so on and so forth.......


Th other day?  Dawnismygoddess, what happened here the other day?
"What a bunch of garbage, Liberal, Democratic, Conservative, Republican, it's all there to control you, two sides of the same coin! Two management teams, bidding for control of the CEO job of Slavery Incorporated!" Alex

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #77 on: September 13, 2009, 04:28:16 pm »

Th other day?  Dawnismygoddess, what happened here the other day?

I answered above:

one day the queen felt like f**king with the rights of a few million of her slaves so by royal decree, she dissolved the entire Canadian parliament which is her right because she has been ordained by god (whose god, we still do not know) and is above all the barbarians that work her land.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Dig

  • All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man.
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 63,099
    • Git Ureself Edumacated
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #78 on: September 13, 2009, 04:32:41 pm »
Also if it would not be too much trouble, could the queen find it in her heart to end the Tavistock behavioural modification program that conditions children to commit suicide?

Here is just one more in a long line of these "special projects on her majesty's secret service":


---------------------------------------------
Eight-year-old girl with learning difficulties found hanged in her bedroom
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/eightyearold-girl-found-hanged-in-her-bedroom-1786747.html
By Theo Usherwood, PA Sunday, 13 September 2009


An eight-year-old girl was found hanged in her bedroom, police said today. The girl was found at her home in Moor Street, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, at about 9.15am yesterday. Detective Superintendent Adrian Pearson, head of Nottinghamshire Police's public protection unit, said: "We are investigating the full circumstances of this death with our colleagues at children and young people's services. "Detectives have interviewed both the girl's parents, while a five-year-old boy who was also living at the address has been taken into local authority care. "The inquiry is at a very early stage, and it would be inappropriate for us to comment further at present." A post-mortem examination carried out at Leicester Royal Infirmary last night confirmed the cause of the girl's death as hanging.

Specialist police officers are working with social services at Nottinghamshire County Council to find out how the tragedy happened. Moor Street has now reopened following a full forensic examination of the scene, police added. Police said the girl's parents have not been arrested but were interviewed under caution. Sources refused to say whether the incident is being treated as suspicious or as a tragic accident. No one was in today at the rundown Edwardian terraced house in Moore Street, where the girl was found dead. There were two wheelie bins, one blue, one green, outside the front window of the house. The blinds were closed shut. There was also a wooden and glass cabinet standing outside the house. One woman, who did not want to be named, said: "I don't know the people myself but it's so sad what has happened."

A 21-year-old student, who lives near to the house, said the girl suffered from learning difficulties. He said: "The girl and her brother never came out of the house. You never saw them really. The family are very quiet apart from a German shepherd in the back garden. I've been here a long time but they never really spoke to us, although they were all right to say hello to. Yesterday there were quite a few police cars here and a couple of ambulances and the doctors." He said the family had lived in the house for about six or seven years.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately

Offline Sub-X

  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,850
  • FEAR: False Evidence Appearing Real...
Re: HOW RACIST ARE THE MEDIA? The Lynching of Serena Williams
« Reply #79 on: September 13, 2009, 04:38:27 pm »
I answered above:

one day the queen felt like f**king with the rights of a few million of her slaves so by royal decree, she dissolved the entire Canadian parliament which is her right because she has been ordained by god (whose god, we still do not know) and is above all the barbarians that work her land.


This God apparently.
“If you strike at,imprison,or kill us,out of our prisons or graves we will still evoke a spirit that will thwart you,and perhaps,raise a force that will destroy you! We defy you! Do your worst!”-James Connolly 1909


DARK HALF-END GAME