PrisonPlanet Forum
July 23, 2014, 08:19:07 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Coverage under Obamacare will require an implantable microchip?  (Read 1735 times)
Matt Hatter
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,521

« on: September 09, 2009, 09:25:43 AM »

Origional post is from  Roll Eyes

Interesting none the less.

Lets first say this, I am an Obama supporter 100%.

There's a pretty starling thing in the bill that 95% of Americans won't like.

The Obama Health care bill under Class II (Paragraph 1, Section B) specifically includes ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable." Then on page 1004 it describes what the term "data" means in paragraph 1, section B:

14 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to in15
formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
16 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
17 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
18 data from disparate data environments, electronic health
19 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
20 Secretary"

What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? Lets see...

Approved by the FDA, a class II implantable device is a "implantable radiofrequency
transponder system for patient identification and health information." The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as "claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary."

This sort of device would be implanted in the majority of people who opt to become covered by the public health care option. With the reform of the private insurance companies, who charge outrageous rates, many people will switch their coverage to a more affordable insurance plan. This means the number of people who choose the public option will increase. This also means the number of people chipped will be plentiful as well. The adults who choose to have a chip implanted are the lucky (yes, lucky) ones in this case. Children who are "born in the United States who at the time of birth is not otherwise covered under acceptable coverage" will be qualified and placed into the CHIP or Children's Health Insurance Program (what a convenient name). With a name like CHIP it would seem consistent to have the chip implanted into a child. Children conceived by parents who are already covered under the public option will more than likely be implanted with a chip by the consent of the parent. Eventually everyone will be implanted with a chip. And with the price and coverage of the public option being so competitive with the private companies, the private company may not survive.

So will everyone be covered by the public option eventually?Huh??

And does that mean everyone will be chipped?Huh?
Offline Offline

Posts: 234

« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2009, 10:15:57 AM »

That's what I understood, yeah, chips for everyone!
Offline Offline

Posts: 12,747

« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2009, 10:19:02 AM »

This was looked into here. See what you think!

Don't believe me. Look it up yourself!

The Great Deception - Forum/Library - My Research
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2009, 10:24:05 AM »

It's called "The National Medical Registry"...It seems to me, that if the NAZI healthcare bill passes, all participants will be implanted with a device so as to keep track of your "medical records".

9 Subtitle C—National Medical

10 Device Registry


12 (a) REGISTRY.—

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 519 of the Federal

14 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is

15 amended—

16 (A) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub17

section (h); and

18 (B) by inserting after subsection (f) the

19 following:

20 ‘‘National Medical Device Registry

21 ‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national med22

ical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the

23 ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and

24 outcomes data on each device that—

25 ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and

VerDate Nov 24 2008 01:43 Jul 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 01000 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3200.IH H3200 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS


•HR 3200 IH

1 ‘‘(B) is—2 ‘‘(i) a class III device; or

3 ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable,

4 life-supporting, or life-sustaining.

5 ‘‘(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall,

6 in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,

7 the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid

8 Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordi9

nator for Health Information Technology, and the Sec10

retary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods

11 for—

12 ‘‘(A) including in the registry, in a manner con13

sistent with subsection (f), appropriate information

14 to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by

15 type, model, and serial number or other unique iden16


Offline Offline

Posts: 4,130

« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2009, 12:08:38 PM »

And thus, the real reason for 'concern' over public health care.

And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take... OUR FREEDOM!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!