Charlie Sheen interviews Barack Obama for 20 minutes about 9/11

[rio]

It's Working!

The Alex Jones Show: Charlie Sheen Requests Meeting With Obama Over 9/11 Cover-Up
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS252554+08-Sep-2009+PRN20090908
Tue Sep 8, 2009 7:36pm EDT

The Alex Jones Show: Charlie Sheen Requests Meeting With Obama Over 9/11
Cover-Up
Actor demands investigation be reopened after majority of 9/11 Commission
members say government lied about official story.

Hmm...

[El Scampio]

"fake interview with Obama? President Obama? Charlie Sheen? Where is this interview? What does he say? Shit, 9/11? I have questions about 9/11. WHERE IS THE INTERVIEW FOR THE LOVE OF GOD GET ME THE INTERVIEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Yup and this again exposes the psychopaths and genocidal maniacs just as it always has in the past. Read a true story about this from one of this forum's members and how the New Zealand government was forced to issue an apology for being psychopathic, delusional, paranoid, control freaks...
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=55664.0


oooooh, scary....just like Jonathon Swift followers (thanks for pointing out this similarity )

Failing to attempt new ways to expose the truth utilizing god's gift of independent thinking dishonours humanity. You really think that people using constitutionally protected inalienable rights dishonours the families? Hmm, I find that rather odd. Do you have any evidence, proof, logic, rationality, sourced information to back up this outlandish accusation used by Bill Clinton?  "HOW DARE YOU!"

Really? Then they definitely will fail. People can smell hit pieces without any depth a mile away.

If you still worship the MSM, you may want to hang out at a different forum.

You mean like how they questioned the method for getting us into the genocides in the middle east?  The MSM exposes every day how they are G7 Banker controlled propaganda and mind control matrices. Their attempt to discredit these undeniable glaring unanswered questions will assist in waking millions more up to the matrix around them.

Sane, all I done was portray how the MSM goons will likely portray this. You know and everyone else here knows that is how it will go down on some of the MSM shows.

So why feel the need to try and pick it all apart?

I even asked you 1 simple question:

1. Will the MSM cover this in a good light and even mention the content?

Look at how you replied:
If you still worship the MSM, you may want to hang out at a different forum.

So instead of answering you attack me instead. How the hell does that help?

Do you think that everyone that feels this could of been done in a better way should go and hang out on a different forum?

[endof]

http://gawker.com/5354916/charlie-sheens-fantasy-911-truther-grilling-of-the-president

charlie-sheens-fantasy-911-truther-grilling-of-the-president

right yeah, great. working sure..

[level1online]

One question:
Why isn't this thread listed in this section?
Off Topic / Faux Controversies / Whining Threads / UFO's

[adissenter2]

I firmly believe that if all these frustrated posters did this they would be alleviated:

1. Print up a bunch of your favorite informative articles or burn a stack of your favorite truth dvds.

2. Go out and hand them out to people and talk to them person to person.

Get out into the streets like Luke and all the the other activists rather than sitting behind a computer wasting your time and our time.  I am personally sick of trying to read a thread and get nothing but a bunch of gibberish that distracts from the goal.  I feel for the mods today.  If you are not prepared to  hit the streets and actually debate someone then do some hard core research in preparation then get out there.  We are attempting to make people aware.  We are trying to stop the next false flag that will eventually come and with that the after affects, this time a probable internet patriot and once that goes into effect there is no going back.  People have to see this coming otherwise they are going blindly follow the blind to destruction.

Go out and do some face to face,  you will surprised at how empowering it is.  Even if the majority flips you off or calls you a nut, there is a chance that you will run into one honest person that actually cares and may take what you are giving away for free seriously.  Again, most are clueless to what is going on and I am sure most of you if not all were like me in the past, that being clueless.  I received a VHS tape of 911/Road to Tyranny and that serious started me down the road of recovery.  Keep the ball rolling and do your part.  Quit the nitpicking and questioning the tactic behind the latest stunt and Go forth!

[psy0ps]

The fact that millions of people crashed the websites should tell you something. AJ knows what he's doing. He got the hype built and now its out it needs to go viral.
Instead of the MSM plastering Brittney, Anna Nicole, Natalie Hallaway, Octo Mom, Michael Jackson bullshit, THIS needs to be plastered for a week or two on the "news".
All the fake pundits need to have CS on as  guest and he can explain to the dumbed down masses that 9/11 = inside job.

[Dig]

Sane, all I done was portray how the MSM goons will likely portray this. You know and everyone else here knows that is how it will go down on some of the MSM shows.

So why feel the need to try and pick it all apart?

I even asked you 1 simple question:

1. Will the MSM cover this in a good light and even mention the content?

Look at how you replied:
If you still worship the MSM, you may want to hang out at a different forum.

So instead of answering you attack me instead. How the hell does that help?

Do you think that everyone that feels this could of been done in a better way should go and hang out on a different forum?

Do you know how I found out about 9/11 truth?

Let me tell you...

I was watching Bill O'Reilly and he was talking about the 9/11 widows. He demonized them in a similar manner that you are prophetically describing the future attacks by the MSM on AJ and CS.  Well this was odd because he did not even have them on the show. So I got confused because my understanding is that the media refused to pursue having victims of 9/11 on the air out of respect for their privacy. My understanding was that the victims' families were still deep in morning or just did not want to use deaths of loved ones to garnish sympathy, fame, etc. My understanding is that the 9/11 victims DID NOT WANT TO TALK!

Bill O'Reilly told me about 9/11 victims who were begging to talk and he was demonizing them and refusing them airtime.

Well ya know what I did?

I found out for myself what these women wanted to say.

Even with Van Jones...

The American people are STARVING for information on 9/11 that does not comply with the completely insane and overly obvious government coverup of 9/11 truth. The American people are pursuing this information as if it was 100 church commissions multiplied by 100 pentagon papers.

[codemonkey70]

I still respect you but disagree. IMO satire and humor do not disrespect the victims of the horrors caused by psychopathic elite scumbags. It is another way of exposing the truth to those still under the spell of trauma based mind control. It has been used for thousands of years to expose the pharaohs of their respective time periods.

But to those being knowledgeable in the mechanics of trauma based mind control, do you think that this would have been their first choice of tactic in breaking the first brick?
Im not disagreeing just to be contrary, Im very disturbed by what I feel is a low level stab at a beast.... a very impotent stab.

I very well may be thinking about this wrong.. but it would make sense for those trying to reach as many as possible( or certain specific segments of the population) to pay attention to how some of us perceive these things that are being done.

[El Scampio]

Do you know how I found out about 9/11 truth?

Let me tell you...

I was watching Bill O'Reilly and he was talking about the 9/11 widows. He demonized them in a similar manner that you are prophetically describing the future attacks by the MSM on AJ and CS.  Well this was odd because he did not even have them on the show. So I got confused because my understanding is that the media refused to pursue having victims of 9/11 on the air out of respect for their privacy. My understanding was that the victims' families were still deep in morning or just did not want to use deaths of loved ones to garnish sympathy, fame, etc. My understanding is that the 9/11 victims DID NOT WANT TO TALK!

Bill O'Reilly told me about 9/11 victims who were begging to talk and he was demonizing them and refusing them airtime.

Well ya know what I did?

I found out for myself what these women wanted to say.

Even with Van Jones...

The American people are STARVING for information on 9/11 that does not comply with the completely insane and overly obvious government coverup of 9/11 truth. The American people are pursuing this information as if it was 100 church commissions multiplied by 100 pentagon papers.

Nice story and reassuring that people do see through the BS even if it is a small % unfortunately.

Anyway

I even asked you 1 simple question:

1. Will the MSM cover this in a good light and even mention the content?

[JTCoyoté]

Ron Paul site

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/106041

I am steaming right now. Alex Jones just hoodwinked all of us, again.

Nobody with any journalistic integrity would put a dislaimer at the bottom of an article saying it was all made up. I actually had hope for a few minutes there, now I am just angry.

Alex Jones is the Used Car Salesman of Liberty Merchandise
output

take a look at the title on ats

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread499423/pg1
Charlie Sheen "interviews" President Obama [Alex Jones HOAX!]

For the first 90+ minutes of availability, the InfoWars.com website was presenting this article as an actual interview by Charlie Sheen with President Obama. Some time after the interview first appeared, the comments, "What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet," were added to the article on InfoWars.com.

You have been hoaxed by Alex Jones.

Here is the link to the originally posted interview, before the additional comment indicating the interview was fiction:
Original Charlie Sheen "Twenty Minutes With The President" Story - With No Disclaimer

Thanks to ATS member getreadyalready for capturing the unedited original page.

talking about the points are they? or are they talking about the hoax?

No what Alex did-- was a Hoax. This deals with a very Serious Issue and its an issue where lots of family members are trying to be serious about. We don't need this sh*t from Alex.

Looks a lot like the Daily Paul, and ATS have their own share of "go along to get along" trolls... the don't upset the "mainstream media" applecart variety...

I'm sure the moderation staffs over on these boards will have made the proper adjustments by this time tomorrow afternoon... once the reality, and the sanity, of today's article finally sinks in.

JTCoyoté

"All government without the consent of the
governed is the very definition of slavery."
~Jonathan Swift

[Monkeypox]

we wouldn't be still talking about it.
you know that's true.
the forums wouldn't be ablaze with righteous anger right now...

short story:
The 911 perpetrators blew the lid off of civilized behavior and decency: killing their own people to take their rights away from them and wage endless war in their name.  I mean, really: and then the cover up and years of lies.

And you are pissed about this?

Why would you want the forums to be ablaze with righteous anger?  Do you think that's a positive thing?

The forums would be ablaze with everyone discussing how brilliant it was if the fake "interview" had been left out.

[codemonkey70]

Why would you want the forums to be ablaze with righteous anger?  Do you think that's a positive thing?

The forums would be ablaze with everyone discussing how brilliant it was if the fake "interview" had been left out.

Absolutely. My grumpy ass would have been smiling as well. 

[JTCoyoté]

Why would you want the forums to be ablaze with righteous anger?  Do you think that's a positive thing?

The forums would be ablaze with everyone discussing how brilliant it was if the fake "interview" had been left out.

Yes it is a positive thing...  the use of the word fake is beginning to irritate me though... I ask you again, did you read it?

Yeah... you would have really loved just another fact piece...  there would have been only two individuals discussing it though... and I can guarantee you wouldn't of been one of them.

JTCoyoté

"The highest level of prosperity occurs when
there is a free-market economy and
a minimum of government regulations."
~Adam Smith, "The Wealth of Nations"

[Mr Grinch]

This will blow minds all over the world!

The tactics are WORKING...
http://news.google.com/news/search?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=charlie+sheen

[Dig]

Nice story and reassuring that people do see through the BS even if it is a small % unfortunately.

Anyway

I even asked you 1 simple question:

1. Will the MSM cover this in a good light and even mention the content?

Oh, I apologize, let me rephrase my answer to your question...

Do you know how I found out about 9/11 truth?

Let me tell you...

I was watching Bill O'Reilly and he was talking about the 9/11 widows. He demonized them in a similar manner that you are prophetically describing the future attacks by the MSM on AJ and CS.  Well this was odd because he did not even have them on the show. So I got confused because my understanding is that the media refused to pursue having victims of 9/11 on the air out of respect for their privacy. My understanding was that the victims' families were still deep in morning or just did not want to use deaths of loved ones to garnish sympathy, fame, etc. My understanding is that the 9/11 victims DID NOT WANT TO TALK!

Bill O'Reilly told me about 9/11 victims who were begging to talk and he was demonizing them and refusing them airtime.

Well ya know what I did?

I found out for myself what these women wanted to say.

Even with Van Jones...

The American people are STARVING for information on 9/11 that does not comply with the completely insane and overly obvious government coverup of 9/11 truth. The American people are pursuing this information as if it was 100 church commissions multiplied by 100 pentagon papers.

I hope that helps.

[DCUBED]

http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2009/09/08/charlie-sheens-911-conspiracy-interview-with-obama

Charlie Sheen's 9/11 Conspiracy Interview with Obama

Everyone knows that 9/11 was a Jew-run conspiracy covered up by the government, except Barack Obama. For some reason our president doesn't agree with this FACT, so enter hooker/coke/sitcom star Charlie Sheen, who has penned a (unintentionally hilarious) fictitious interview with our president where he sets the record straight on 9/11 once and for all. Feel free to read that last sentence again, since nothing about this makes any sense. Basically, Sheen's "interview" is like the "Penthouse Forum" of 9/11 fan fiction.

Here's just a little taste of an article that very well might make your head explode.

    (the President rises from his chair , I do the same).

    CS — Mr. President! One more second!

    (The President starts towards the door — I follow him quickly step for step).

    CS — Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -

    (He pauses. We shake hands).

    CS — Make sure your on the right side of history.

    (The President breaks the handshake).

Woah. Mr. President, you just got served by the dude from Two and a Half Men.

[Dig]

I'm getting really sick of lazy journalism.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2153283/barack_obama_charlie_sheen_van_jones.html

According to the Prison Planet blog, actor Charlie Sheen is demanding a meeting with President Barack Obama in order to demand that an investigation be opened over whether the Bush administration was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

This bit of news might be just another example of an overly egotistical actor thinking that his role as an aging lothario on Two and a Half Men buys him face time with the President of the United States. However, with the eighth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks coming up and the revelation that the now former White House Green Jobs Czar Van Jones was himself a 9/11 truther focuses attention on the new paranoid style of American politics. But this time the paranoids are not right wingers seeing commies under the bed. The paranoids are left wingers seeing Bush administration operatives under the rubble of 9/11.

Like many conspiracy theories, the 9/11 Truther movement stems from a combination of ignorance of science and history and a political agenda that has sent a group of people around the bend. People believe that the Bush administration engineered 9/11 because, as the slogan made famous by the TV show The X Files stated, they want to believe. They want to believe that George W. Bush was both nefarious enough and clever enough to slay three thousand human beings, make it look like a group of enraged Muslims did it, then use the event as an excuse to create an empire in the Middle East in order to grab all of the oil. Or it is something like that.

A now famous article in Popular Mechanics thoroughly debunked the 9/11 Truther conspiracy theory. However a casual attention to Occam's Razor should be sufficient to laugh off the idea that the US Government, which has done most things incompetently, pulled off the mother of all false flag operations.

But reason and logic are really not things that need enter into a conspiracy theory like 9/11 Trutherism. People who embrace 9/11 Trutherism do so because they find the current world situation intolerable. The United States is engaged in a long war with Islamofascist terrorism and will be for the foreseeable future. Even Barack Obama, not the most bellicose President when it comes to actual enemies of the United States, has resigned himself to continuing most of the policies of George W. Bush.

Having found the current situation intolerable, 9/11 Truthers reject the idea that it was inevitable, brought on by the tides of history and the mistakes of previous administrations, but rather some cabal did it to us. The sad part, though, as Jonah Goldberg points out, 9/11 Trutherism is becoming mainstream among the Left. Considering what else the Left believes, that should not be too surprising.

Sources: Charlie Sheen Requests Meeting With Obama Over 9/11 Cover-Up, Alex Jones, Prison Planet, September 8th, 2009

Van Jones a 9/11 'Truther', Mark R. Whittington, Associated Content, September 4th, 2009

Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report, Popular Mechanics, March, 2005

How Sad, Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online, September 8th, 2009

Look at the comments, the truth is rising.

[ekimdrachir]

http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2009/09/08/charlie-sheens-911-conspiracy-interview-with-obama

Charlie Sheen's 9/11 Conspiracy Interview with Obama

Everyone knows that 9/11 was a Jew-run conspiracy covered up by the government, except Barack Obama. For some reason our president doesn't agree with this FACT, so enter hooker/coke/sitcom star Charlie Sheen, who has penned a (unintentionally hilarious) fictitious interview with our president where he sets the record straight on 9/11 once and for all. Feel free to read that last sentence again, since nothing about this makes any sense. Basically, Sheen's "interview" is like the "Penthouse Forum" of 9/11 fan fiction.

Here's just a little taste of an article that very well might make your head explode.

    (the President rises from his chair , I do the same).

    CS — Mr. President! One more second!

    (The President starts towards the door — I follow him quickly step for step).

    CS — Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -

    (He pauses. We shake hands).

    CS — Make sure your on the right side of history.

    (The President breaks the handshake).

Woah. Mr. President, you just got served by the dude from Two and a Half Men.

/smacks forehead

[Modzilla_Kicker]

TO ALL THOSE WEEPING AND WHINING AND MOARNING AND GROANING:

http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS252554+08-Sep-2009+PRN20090908

Reuters did NOT, I say did NOT twist and manipulate Sheen's artistic presentation of the 9-11 controversy, as some of the whiners told us they all would.. NOW, let us end the mourning over the supposed demise of TRUTHERS' credibility after Sheen's exploit.

[thnkfstpal]

HEY DUMBSHITS, GET YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES.

IT'S WORKING ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS252554+08-Sep-2009+PRN20090908

YOU NAYSAYING SONS OF BITCHES better GTFO and STFU.

AS USUAL, ALEX IS GENIUS!!!!

YOU f**kIN DUMBSHITS

except you monkey, I still love you

[Dig]

I think some people are forgetting just how freakin powerful the msm are, yes the internet has grown at an immense rate, but Televison im afriad is still the no1 stop for alot of people, you gotta face that, as long as you tell the truth, theres less they can use and you get stupid documentarys on national geographic.
Just as the tactics of truth are making headway agaisnt what is an incredibly powerfull brainwashing tool.

Whats going to happen if the MSM does pick this up, i dread to think.

This is the first one ive seen so far.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2153283/barack_obama_charlie_sheen_van_jones.html?cat=49

LOOK AT THE COMMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT IS WORKING BIG TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BWAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAA

[notagain]

It's a press release written by Alex Jones Show.

[DCUBED]

Oh, I apologize, let me rephrase my answer to your question...

Do you know how I found out about 9/11 truth?

Let me tell you...

I was watching Bill O'Reilly

That's funny, cause Bill O woke me up too.  Back in 06 a few days before the 5 year anniversary he had some guy on about controlled demolition and Bill would barely let him talk. So I went online to find out if what he was saying was true and found Loose Change. And went down the rabbit hole from there.

[Monkeypox]

Yes it is a positive thing...  the use of the word fake is beginning to irritate me though... I ask you again, did you read it?

Yeah... you would have really loved just another fact piece...  there would have been only two individuals discussing it though... and I can guarantee you wouldn't of been one of them.

JTCoyoté

"The highest level of prosperity occurs when
there is a free-market economy and
a minimum of government regulations."
~Adam Smith, "The Wealth of Nations"

It is 100% absolutely a fake interview - no matter how you try to spin it.  Frankly, I don't give a rat's ass if you're "irritated" by the truth or not.  

Yes, I read it several times.  If I read it a few more, will the "interview" suddenly become real?

My issue is the use of the faux interview. If you look at all of the people making negative comments, that's also what they have an issue with.

Why are you so incapable of admitting even the possibility that a mistake was made in presenting the information in this fashion?

[thnkfstpal]

LOOK AT THE COMMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT IS WORKING BIG TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BWAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAA

UMMM, how do you look at the comments on Reuters?
DOH!

[notagain]

That Reuters piece is a paid press release, so don't get excited! Anyone can pay for a press release.  It's the same exact one on Market Watch. Even if you search Charlie Sheen on Reuters, there's not one mention of  Charlie Sheen 20 minutes w/ president.

[Monkeypox]

LOOK AT THE COMMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT IS WORKING BIG TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BWAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAA

Uh, the comments are pretty negative.  As is the article.

[chrisfromchi]

its been 12 hours and you guys still have your panties in a bunch...sigh.

[Dig]

http://blogtown.portlandmercury.com/BlogtownPDX/archives/2009/09/08/charlie-sheens-911-conspiracy-interview-with-obama

Charlie Sheen's 9/11 Conspiracy Interview with Obama

Everyone knows that 9/11 was a Jew-run conspiracy covered up by the government, except Barack Obama. For some reason our president doesn't agree with this FACT, so enter hooker/coke/sitcom star Charlie Sheen, who has penned a (unintentionally hilarious) fictitious interview with our president where he sets the record straight on 9/11 once and for all. Feel free to read that last sentence again, since nothing about this makes any sense. Basically, Sheen's "interview" is like the "Penthouse Forum" of 9/11 fan fiction.

Here's just a little taste of an article that very well might make your head explode.

    (the President rises from his chair , I do the same).

    CS — Mr. President! One more second!

    (The President starts towards the door — I follow him quickly step for step).

    CS — Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -

    (He pauses. We shake hands).

    CS — Make sure your on the right side of history.

    (The President breaks the handshake).

Woah. Mr. President, you just got served by the dude from Two and a Half Men.

LOOK AT THE COMMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Berminator]

Rivero has mentioned it:


FLASHBACK - 9/11 - The "Pod People" And The Plane That Crashed Into the Pentagon


Relinked in light of the ersatz Charlie Sheen interview with Obama, in which the "no plane" theory gets yet another airing.

[codemonkey70]

Yes it is a positive thing...  the use of the word fake is beginning to irritate me though... I ask you again, did you read it?

Yeah... you would have really loved just another fact piece...  there would have been only two individuals discussing it though... and I can guarantee you wouldn't of been one of them.

JTCoyoté

"The highest level of prosperity occurs when
there is a free-market economy and
a minimum of government regulations."
~Adam Smith, "The Wealth of Nations"

Not speaking for anyone else.. but as for myself I agree that another "fact piece" wouldnt have brought much convo obviously. I simply do not like how this was done. Just my view I suppose... or perhaps I do not understand what Mr Jones is trying to accomplish. Id have been able in good faith support Mr Sheen petitioning PBO to discuss 9/11 with him openly as in an interview.Use money bomb money to purchase a spot with Mr Sheen demanding an audience with PBO on prime time. Something just as provocative, but not using what could even remotely come back to do any damage to the truth movement in general.  I cant seem to wrap my head around using such tactics... and exactly who Mr Jones was trying to reach by using these tactics.


JT ... I have always valued your ideas and opinions. I have copied and pasted and pointed others to your own words more times than I can count. Please really understand what Im saying here : In the circle of people who my family and I are familiar with .. this tactic was a complete disaster. There MUST be some follow up, some completion of reaching out to certain segments of the population that are completely turned away by this particular thing that was done. Not a retraction, that would admit deception. But something.

[Dig]

Uh, the comments are pretty negative.  As is the article.

journalism 101
(Guest)
Add a Comment
when all else fails, namecall... Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:52 PM
Thomas
(Guest)
Great to see that 95% of all readers here firmly disagree with this third rate journalist; the public knows that 9/11 was an "inside job" designed to "shock and awe" the American people into Add a Comment
supporting the invasion of Iraq,Afghanistan, Central Asia and soon Iran. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:52 PM
Van Jones is a racist kook
(Guest)
Did Van Jones sign the 9-11 truther petition? Yes. Did Van Jones attack white people? Yes. Did Van Jones hold rallies for a cop killer? Yes. So for those of you claiming it was 'vile smear' this Add a Comment
came from his own words and actions. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:35 PM
Van Jones is a racist kook
(Guest)
35 percent of people on the Left believe that 9-11 was an inside job. That either Bush knew ahead of time or that we were behind the attack ourselves. That is insane. Insane as the racist Van Jones. Van Jones also is on record of attacking law enforcement and police. So who put Van Jones in a Add a Comment
position of a job with a 30 billions budget? Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:43 PM
Richard Cranium
(Guest)
No, This is not completely biased garbage. Whether you believe that 911 was allowed by the government, carried out by terrorists inspired by Osama Bin Laden who in turn was paid by the CIA to do so, or the official government story, one thing remains true. There are a LOT of people who believe each of one of three of these stories. Not one group is a minority and to write garbage like the above is to marginalize yourself to Bill O'Reilly standard of commentary. This guy should do Add a Comment
something REAL. Like journalism. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:06 PM
Julia Bodeeb
Osama bin Laden's father was a building contractor....Osama grew up around that and he somehow plotted to bring the bldgs down. To me it does look like part of the cause was a Add a Comment
controlled demolition but who knows. Bush was too busy vacationing to plan the attacks! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:56 PM
Richie
(Guest)
Written by Mark Whittington Mark R. Whittington is a fictional writer residing in Houston, Texas. I Add a Comment
fixed it for you. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:51 PM
The 1st Casualty of War
(Guest)
Research. You need to do research before you can write an article Mark. Your scribble is pathetically inaccurate, hell, I could write a better hit piece. Trouble is, I have a conscience as well Add a Comment
as a brain. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:37 PM
nader paul kucinich gravel
(Guest)
Truther or liar? Anderson Baldwin Carter Choate Clemente Gonzalez Gravel Kaptur Kucinich Add a Comment
McKinney Nader Paul Perot Sheehan Ventura Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:00 PM
Dan
(Guest)
What a kind gentle man you are Mr. Whittington. I appreciate your objective journalistic integrity. I appreciate how you must feel to be one of the boys, to be like everyone else, to be ordinary and Add a Comment
dull. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:27 PM

Steve
(Guest)
This guy tries to say that 9/11 was not an inside job, however he fails at debunking anything with facts. because he is just making up horseshit. Someone is paying him under the table, or he just Add a Comment
believes everything he sees in print. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:52 PM
Chris
(Guest)
HAHA!!! What a joke Mr. Whittington! I think it is you who can't accept truth. Where is your reason and logic you nut case? Just because Popular Mechanics says so you believe it? Actually take Add a Comment
some time, look at the facts, then apologize for being so rude. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:10 PM
some guy from 15.000 miles away
(Guest)
By the way, I read the other comments that was posted before me just now. And they made me Add a Comment
smile. All I can say is godspeed to the American people. Your efforts will overcome tyranny. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:46 PM
some guy from 15.000 miles away
(Guest)
The writer of this article is a disgrace to his profession. Like most of the so called journalists, anchormen we have today. They are basically slaves to their editors and bosses and have no self opinions. They are no different from the media whores that attacked Jim Garrison with all kind of Add a Comment
stuff. They are raping the future of their children. It's pathetic. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:50 PM
Confused
(Guest)
When did Prison Planet become a blog? Seriously, Popular Mechanics is yellow journalism. It's a fraud; a shill; a stinking pile of BS. Anyone who read the PM conspiracy can see that from the get Add a Comment
go. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:10 PM
Crazy Cool
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Sorry, I'm the dumb ass. Heh! Your a good writer, I am just not a good reader. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:18 PM
Guest
(Guest)
The author of this article is basically calling anyone who thinks or questions 9/11 being an inside job an idiot. I guess I'm an idiot because its obvious to me that a bunch of men in a cave did not commit this crime. The author is obviously biased. What would you think about an independant Add a Comment
investigation into 9/11. I do not see any harm in that. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:50 PM
Crazy Cool
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Umm..It's Alex Jones, not Van Jones. Check your facts Mr. Professional Journalist. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:29 PM
dc
(Guest)
Once you said "Islamofascist" I knew you were Bush leftovers. Answer these then... CS '" Number 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of '˜09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11. CS '" Number 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. "I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could Add a Comment
actually get out of the building, so w Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:12 PM
Another GMT guest...
(Guest)
Tell me Mr. Whittington, did you actually have to take any formal education to write the inane, unfounded claptrap garbage you just have? And may I ask if you changed your name by deed poll to "Mark" to remove yourself from being confused with an adventurous fictional character with a Add a Comment
name that would suit you more? Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:24 PM

PersianPaladin
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Read that: - http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2009/09/08.html Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:23 PM
GiveItARestWhittington
(Guest)
This type of casual dismissal of truthers as crazy kooks doesn't work anymore Whittington. Anybody who has seen the collapse of WTC7 and followed the facts down into the rabbit hole that is 9/11 knows that 9/11 was a false flag attack. You're going to have to do a lot harder than the usual character assassination and ad hominem attacks. Popular Mechanics was a joke and never debunked anything. Get on the right side of history, Whittington. Fulfill your obligation as a journalist and hold yourself to a higher standard. Discuss the points that Sheen raises rather than his Add a Comment
character. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:33 PM
You're a retard...
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Everyone knows 9/11 is a government cover-up. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:13 PM
benf
(Guest)
In the Catholic abuse problem all of polite mainstream society stuck their heads in the sand for about a thousand years out of total cowardice while all the while impugning the character of the victims. And yet the truth was SOOOO obvious and yet no one had the guts to step up. This hit piece on Sheen is totally reminiscent of the smug dismissive gutlessness of the minions who protected the church pervs by marginalizing those who would speak the obvious truth. And the perverts who would be sent to "investigate" the perverts would invariably site Occam's Razor to "prove" the victims were little liars compared to the appreciable holiness and respectability of the priests. Add a Comment
Pathetic how whole societies can be cowed. Same here. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:41 PM
Greenwich Mean Time
(Guest)
And these people aren't lunatics on the fringes of society; they are politicians, senior military personnel, university professors, investigative journalists, engineers, pilots - and many, many more. It's been said many times but it far more patriotic to ask the questions than to blindingly Add a Comment
accept the unacceptable. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:56 PM
Greenwich Mean Time
(Guest)
gain from asking these questions is dumbfoundingly ignorant. And Popular Mechanics - the 'now famous' piece because it really is the only piece that 'debunks' from a scientific perspective. Compared to the books, articles, journals - masses of information - dedebunking on the other side. And it's worth bearing in mind that the article was written by Benjamin Chertoff, the cousin of Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security at the time. And it is owned by the Hearst Group of which personal friends of the previous presidential administration are on the board. When I think about what their motive might be for writing such an article - I don't have any difficulty in finding it. Compare this with the motives of the people who have jeopardised their careers and been labelled as unpatriotic lunatics for being brave enough to ask the questions that need to be asked, and I know which one sits more easily. And these people aren't lunatics on the Add a Comment
fringes Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:11 PM
Greenwich Mean Time
(Guest)
I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I've previously worked for a political party in the heart of government and understand how the public attribute politicians and the political process with more credit than it deserves when it comes to long-term, overreaching strategy. People would be surprised at how much of the process, like in many organisations, is really just reactionary, short-term firefighting. Many conspiracy theorists become laughable in the face of this. But this article - written in 2009 (and I had to double check) - is drenched in ignorance. It wreaks of someone having watched 'Loose Change' in 2005, though it was ridiculous and still places anybody with legitimate questions that have yet still to be answered, into one large group of unhinged, paranoid conspiracy theorists. To be unable to differentiate between people who believe CNN faked footage that we saw on TV - crazy by anyone's standards - with people who are intelligent, articulate and have Add a Comment
nothing to gain from a Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:04 PM
Someone with half a brain rather than a simpleton
(Guest)
Mark - you don't deserve the name "Mark". That was one pathetic piece of uninformed, ignorant, unthoughtful, unquestioning garbage. The detail and facts of the Sheen "letter" you have ignored but then what do we expect from scum like you my friend. Too busy doing your masters' bidding Add a Comment
ensuring your career doesn't bomb! You're a pathetic excuse for a human being. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:42 PM
Grand Poo
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Suppressed: Will do captain. And while you're at it, look up the word "facetious". Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:27 PM
Emerson
(Guest)
What a rubbish piece of journalism %282%29.%0D%0A%0D%0A%22Like many conspiracy theories%2C the 9%2F11 Truther movement stems from a combination of ignorance of science and history and a political agenda that%22%0D%0A%0D%0ADid you actually read the CharlieAdd a Comment
%27s piece %3F%3F%3F%0D%0A%0D%0AThat is backed by science%21 Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:05 PM
Comments 21 - 30 of 57<< Prev

BadNews
(Guest)
Why do you not try to debunk any of the facts that Sheen said? You just insult with nothing to back it Add a Comment
up unlike Sheen. It's a weird world when I learn more from an actor than the news. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:00 PM
SuppressedReality
(Guest)
"It's so much funner to watch football and ignore thems." It's dumbed down, brainwashed morons like you who make me sick You don't deserve to live in a free country. The most patriotic thing you can do is question and challenge your government. Do your own research and look at the facts presented. Then start researching the Federal Reserve, a private bank by the way. Quoting from memory but think goes something like this..When governments fear their people there is freedom. Add a Comment
When people fear their government there is tyranny. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:00 PM
Hahaha
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Mark, all of your comments are negative, you can't fool us anymore, we know you're a coward!!! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:42 PM
benf
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Intellectually dishonest drivel. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:11 PM
orion700
(Guest)
The Popular Mechanics article was built on straw men and has been debunked. As an engineer and commercial rated pilot who has done the research, I will tell you that 9/11 was and inside job. I Add a Comment
don't care how evil the cia trained terrorists are, they cannot violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:30 PM
LOL
(Guest)
The writer of this article hopes you don't read "20 minutes with the President". He did not debunk ANY POINTS CHARLIE SHEEN MADE IN THE LETTER, instead he attacked his character and tries to make people who question the official story look like nutjobs. Please read the letter, ask the writer why he did not even debunk one statement such as 6 out of 10 9/11 commission members Add a Comment
question the official story?? Don't be a sucker Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:30 PM
WAKE UP
(Guest)
You have convinced me Emerson. Hey, do me a favor, Visit www.ae911truth.com They have a petition signed by 800 different scientists and engineers who think the 9/11 story was Bull. Google WTC7 and watch it with your eyes open. WTC7 was one of the most well built skyscraper in the US. Yet it falls like a controlled demolition in a nice little pile. You can not have the same cause for building collapse for all 3 buildings on that day. WTC7 did not get hit by a plane. FIRE COULD NOT Add a Comment
MAKE THE BUILDING FALL THE AY IT DID> DONT BE DUMB. GOOGLE WTC7 AND WAKE UP Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:59 PM
CheckUrFacts
(Guest)
%22The magazine pushing the government%27s 9%2F11 propaganda%2C Popular Mechanics %28PM%29%2C is published by the Hearst family. Its March cover story%2C Debunking 9%2F11 Lies%2C has been exposed by credible researchers to contain numerous distortions and flawed conclusions. American Free Press revealed that Benjamin Chertoff%2C the 25-year-old senior researcher who authored the 9%2F11 article%2C is related to Michael Chertoff%2C the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security %28DHS%29. The PM article illustrates how a propaganda method%2C used by dictatorships%2C is now being employed by the U.S. Add a Comment
government%3A controlling mainstream media outlets to promote its version of 9%2F11.%22 Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:12 PM
Whittington=Hack
(Guest)
Whittington it's pretty clear that you haven't researched both sides of the argument. Citing 'Popular Mechanics', a publication owned by Hearst, as an impartial authority on 9/11 is more foolish than relying on the 9/11 Commission's report of the facts. Why not check out Sheen's sources and see how the pieces add up to you. I think you will find his argument is more reasonable than the official Add a Comment
story. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:54 PM
Emerson
(Guest)
What a rubbish piece of journalism (2). "Like many conspiracy theories, the 9/11 Truther movement stems from a combination of ignorance of science and history and a political agenda that" Did you Add a Comment
actually read the Charlie's piece That is backed by science! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:53 PM

WAKE UP
(Guest)
WOW, that was objectional journalism. If you would have taken the time to, I dont know, actually look at the information that Mr. Sheen in presenting for at leat 30 minutes, you would have discovered that he is actually bringing FACTs to the table. Not conspiracy. What does Charlie Sheen have to gain from doing this? Do you think he stays up at night wanting to be dragged through the mud by the ignorant media? He has millions and millions of dollars. Not too much to gain here. Do your damn job and research your topic a little before you write a silly hit peice that makes you looks very uneduated. Send this atricle to the college that you graduated from, I think Add a Comment
you may be eiligle for a full 100% tuition refund. RESEARCH BEFORE YOU ACT LIKE A WRITER!!! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:40 PM
Drew
(Guest)
The WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Research the evidence. Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light. -George Washington http://Add a Comment
www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1T8OgvYS-o&feature=player_embedded Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:42 PM
Ben
(Guest)
How does it feel to be an absolute piece of TRASH?! You have no FACTUAL evidence to put forth, so you make unfounded accusations of ignorance. YOU, my friend, are the ignorant one. And you will burn in the deepest circle of Hell with everyone else who apathetically stood idly by and TALKED NONSENSE to further your piddly selfish agendas while the people who control you SCREW US ALL OVER. You will regret your insolence in the end as the big dick known as the New Add a Comment
World Order continuously f**kS YOU UP YOUR ASS. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:09 PM
Kevin
(Guest)
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot. - Notebook, 1904 Add a Comment
(Mark Twain) Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:57 PM
Ben in Texas
(Guest)
Your article completely avoids any of the topics in Charlie's letter. You are taking the same road every other member of the controlled mainstream media has tried to take. These issues are going nowhere. Writing sneering op-ed responses to these inquiries exposes you as lazy and not worth attention. People died and the majority of the victims' families and 6 of the 10 911 commissioners stated that they had major issues with the 9-11 report. Put your journalism on that. We're gaining momentum and your BS dismissals won't slow this. Be on the right side of history. Check your Add a Comment
traffic too. You'll get more hits covering the truth and writing smears. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:38 PM
Rancidmeet
(Guest)
Add a Comment
That was really an ill informed and irresponsible piece. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:28 PM
Dale Gribble
(Guest)
I feel sorry for you if you don't know by now that there are serious problems with the official story of Add a Comment
9/11. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:07 PM
Inquisition
(Guest)
Sorry your on the wrong side of history when 6 out of 10 9/11 commission members disagree with Add a Comment
you maybe you should be asking yourself some serious questions. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:17 PM
dm
(Guest)
Why do you believe 9/11 truth is associated with the left? Please back that statement up because it's not true. Alex Jones who you mentioned (among many other truthers) for example is a far right-Add a Comment
winger. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:56 PM
Grand Poo
(Guest)
You're right! Charlie needs to stick to being a simple egotistical actor. "Overly egotistical" is super fringe-like. The real conspiracy is in how this aging lothario continues to get so much work and is one of the highest paid actors. By the way, does Popular Mechanics still sell those cool homemade hovercraft kits? That's so cool that they did all that hard work to uncover the truth so all those experts that don't work for their publication can relax and read other articles on car planes and such. I'm so glad I read your article. I was beginning to think I might listen to the people crying out Add a Comment
for answers. It's so much funner to watch football and ignore thems. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:16 PM
Comments 41 - 50 of 57<< P

Alf
(Guest)
In his request for an interview%2C Sheen points out that 6 of 10 commissioners publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9%2F11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack%2C and you like to label this a demand Add a Comment
from a nutjob%3F Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:12 PM
DontBeScared
(Guest)
Mark Whittington is scared. Move aside brother, the American people are waking up and will protect you, even thought you were a coward. And you are right, some cabal did not do this to us, rather it Add a Comment
WAS the tides of history and the mistakes of previous and current treasonous administrations. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:54 PM
Jon
(Guest)
Ignorance of history and science? For one, Cover-ups and conspiracies have happened repeatedly throughout history and second, the rubble (evidence) was removed and tampered with way earlier Add a Comment
than science needed for it to be investigated properly. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:13 PM
steveo
(Guest)
Add a Comment
hahaha - popular mechanics - how can you quote that garbage?? Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:09 PM
dave
(Guest)
I second that motion. irresponsible journalism to not investigate the allegations fully. shame on you Add a Comment
Mark. W. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:17 PM
benf
(Guest)
Add a Comment
smug shabbily written dreck. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:52 PM
Nick
(Guest)
Perhaps you should speak with Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth: http://www.ae911truth.org/ Add a Comment
Who am I more apt to believe: unreliable government or actual architects/engineers? Add a Comment
Posted on 09/08/2009 at 2:09:17 PM

[chris jones]

Excuse me for a minute... (chuckle, chuckle, CHUCKLE!!!)... STROKE OF GENIUS... AND... HEE - HEE - HEE... STROKE OF GENIUS... (sigh)...

There...I feel much better now!

--Oldyoti

"One of the main purposes for the control and power of the
Establishment media is to keep the masses deceived and
ignorant about their rights and oppressions of their rights."
~Charles Weisman

JT.

Agreed.

Here is a man dedicated to driven, driven by conscience, and overwhelming concern for the course this regime and others have taken.

Our nations salvation is on the line. CS did not step over the line , he stepped on it.

This will cause some people to become aggravated, as if this man and his backers are throwing a curve ball, are they?? NO, they called it for what it is, so what if its labeled a letter at the ending, a hopefull start to open eyes is my take.

This will casue people to look, some will chastize this, however I beleive many will cheer it. The odds are with us.

The mighty and righteous regime and their flat out lies, this was not comparible and we know it, Whats the flack all about here.

Human nature, is that it, everyone thought this actually took place and disregrded the content. PLEASE.

I have a feeling the majority who read this wish it had transpired??

This man has guts and honour, he gives a twit about the people and this nation isn't that obvious, or have we raised our noses so high they are scrapping our forehead.

This pizzed of people, good, I hope those same ones read what is said, how many would have seen this content if not written in this way.

[Dig]

Not speaking for anyone else.. but as for myself I agree that another "fact piece" wouldnt have brought much convo obviously. I simply do not like how this was done. Just my view I suppose... or perhaps I do not understand what Mr Jones is trying to accomplish. Id have been able in good faith support Mr Sheen petitioning PBO to discuss 9/11 with him openly as in an interview.Use money bomb money to purchase a spot with Mr Sheen demanding an audience with PBO on prime time. Something just as provocative, but not using what could even remotely come back to do any damage to the truth movement in general.  I cant seem to wrap my head around using such tactics... and exactly who Mr Jones was trying to reach by using these tactics.


JT ... I have always valued your ideas and opinions. I have copied and pasted and pointed others to your own words more times than I can count. Please really understand what Im saying here : In the circle of people who my family and I are familiar with .. this tactic was a complete disaster. There MUST be some follow up, some completion of reaching out to certain segments of the population that are completely turned away by this particular thing that was done. Not a retraction, that would admit deception. But something.

I agree, something should be done.

Can anyone research the history of satire, humor, and irony to expose the crimes of the elites?

[Monkeypox]

journalism 101
(Guest)
Add a Comment
when all else fails, namecall... Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:52 PM
Thomas
(Guest)
Great to see that 95% of all readers here firmly disagree with this third rate journalist; the public knows that 9/11 was an "inside job" designed to "shock and awe" the American people into Add a Comment
supporting the invasion of Iraq,Afghanistan, Central Asia and soon Iran. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:52 PM
Van Jones is a racist kook
(Guest)
Did Van Jones sign the 9-11 truther petition? Yes. Did Van Jones attack white people? Yes. Did Van Jones hold rallies for a cop killer? Yes. So for those of you claiming it was 'vile smear' this Add a Comment
came from his own words and actions. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:35 PM
Van Jones is a racist kook
(Guest)
35 percent of people on the Left believe that 9-11 was an inside job. That either Bush knew ahead of time or that we were behind the attack ourselves. That is insane. Insane as the racist Van Jones. Van Jones also is on record of attacking law enforcement and police. So who put Van Jones in a Add a Comment
position of a job with a 30 billions budget? Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:43 PM
Richard Cranium
(Guest)
No, This is not completely biased garbage. Whether you believe that 911 was allowed by the government, carried out by terrorists inspired by Osama Bin Laden who in turn was paid by the CIA to do so, or the official government story, one thing remains true. There are a LOT of people who believe each of one of three of these stories. Not one group is a minority and to write garbage like the above is to marginalize yourself to Bill O'Reilly standard of commentary. This guy should do Add a Comment
something REAL. Like journalism. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:06 PM
Julia Bodeeb
Osama bin Laden's father was a building contractor....Osama grew up around that and he somehow plotted to bring the bldgs down. To me it does look like part of the cause was a Add a Comment
controlled demolition but who knows. Bush was too busy vacationing to plan the attacks! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:56 PM
Richie
(Guest)
Written by Mark Whittington Mark R. Whittington is a fictional writer residing in Houston, Texas. I Add a Comment
fixed it for you. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:51 PM
The 1st Casualty of War
(Guest)
Research. You need to do research before you can write an article Mark. Your scribble is pathetically inaccurate, hell, I could write a better hit piece. Trouble is, I have a conscience as well Add a Comment
as a brain. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 7:09:37 PM
nader paul kucinich gravel
(Guest)
Truther or liar? Anderson Baldwin Carter Choate Clemente Gonzalez Gravel Kaptur Kucinich Add a Comment
McKinney Nader Paul Perot Sheehan Ventura Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:00 PM
Dan
(Guest)
What a kind gentle man you are Mr. Whittington. I appreciate your objective journalistic integrity. I appreciate how you must feel to be one of the boys, to be like everyone else, to be ordinary and Add a Comment
dull. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:27 PM

Steve
(Guest)
This guy tries to say that 9/11 was not an inside job, however he fails at debunking anything with facts. because he is just making up horseshit. Someone is paying him under the table, or he just Add a Comment
believes everything he sees in print. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:52 PM
Chris
(Guest)
HAHA!!! What a joke Mr. Whittington! I think it is you who can't accept truth. Where is your reason and logic you nut case? Just because Popular Mechanics says so you believe it? Actually take Add a Comment
some time, look at the facts, then apologize for being so rude. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 6:09:10 PM
some guy from 15.000 miles away
(Guest)
By the way, I read the other comments that was posted before me just now. And they made me Add a Comment
smile. All I can say is godspeed to the American people. Your efforts will overcome tyranny. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:46 PM
some guy from 15.000 miles away
(Guest)
The writer of this article is a disgrace to his profession. Like most of the so called journalists, anchormen we have today. They are basically slaves to their editors and bosses and have no self opinions. They are no different from the media whores that attacked Jim Garrison with all kind of Add a Comment
stuff. They are raping the future of their children. It's pathetic. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:50 PM
Confused
(Guest)
When did Prison Planet become a blog? Seriously, Popular Mechanics is yellow journalism. It's a fraud; a shill; a stinking pile of BS. Anyone who read the PM conspiracy can see that from the get Add a Comment
go. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:10 PM
Crazy Cool
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Sorry, I'm the dumb ass. Heh! Your a good writer, I am just not a good reader. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:18 PM
Guest
(Guest)
The author of this article is basically calling anyone who thinks or questions 9/11 being an inside job an idiot. I guess I'm an idiot because its obvious to me that a bunch of men in a cave did not commit this crime. The author is obviously biased. What would you think about an independant Add a Comment
investigation into 9/11. I do not see any harm in that. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:50 PM
Crazy Cool
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Umm..It's Alex Jones, not Van Jones. Check your facts Mr. Professional Journalist. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 5:09:29 PM
dc
(Guest)
Once you said "Islamofascist" I knew you were Bush leftovers. Answer these then... CS '" Number 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of '˜09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11. CS '" Number 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. "I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could Add a Comment
actually get out of the building, so w Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:12 PM
Another GMT guest...
(Guest)
Tell me Mr. Whittington, did you actually have to take any formal education to write the inane, unfounded claptrap garbage you just have? And may I ask if you changed your name by deed poll to "Mark" to remove yourself from being confused with an adventurous fictional character with a Add a Comment
name that would suit you more? Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:24 PM

PersianPaladin
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Read that: - http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2009/09/08.html Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:23 PM
GiveItARestWhittington
(Guest)
This type of casual dismissal of truthers as crazy kooks doesn't work anymore Whittington. Anybody who has seen the collapse of WTC7 and followed the facts down into the rabbit hole that is 9/11 knows that 9/11 was a false flag attack. You're going to have to do a lot harder than the usual character assassination and ad hominem attacks. Popular Mechanics was a joke and never debunked anything. Get on the right side of history, Whittington. Fulfill your obligation as a journalist and hold yourself to a higher standard. Discuss the points that Sheen raises rather than his Add a Comment
character. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:33 PM
You're a retard...
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Everyone knows 9/11 is a government cover-up. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:13 PM
benf
(Guest)
In the Catholic abuse problem all of polite mainstream society stuck their heads in the sand for about a thousand years out of total cowardice while all the while impugning the character of the victims. And yet the truth was SOOOO obvious and yet no one had the guts to step up. This hit piece on Sheen is totally reminiscent of the smug dismissive gutlessness of the minions who protected the church pervs by marginalizing those who would speak the obvious truth. And the perverts who would be sent to "investigate" the perverts would invariably site Occam's Razor to "prove" the victims were little liars compared to the appreciable holiness and respectability of the priests. Add a Comment
Pathetic how whole societies can be cowed. Same here. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:41 PM
Greenwich Mean Time
(Guest)
And these people aren't lunatics on the fringes of society; they are politicians, senior military personnel, university professors, investigative journalists, engineers, pilots - and many, many more. It's been said many times but it far more patriotic to ask the questions than to blindingly Add a Comment
accept the unacceptable. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:56 PM
Greenwich Mean Time
(Guest)
gain from asking these questions is dumbfoundingly ignorant. And Popular Mechanics - the 'now famous' piece because it really is the only piece that 'debunks' from a scientific perspective. Compared to the books, articles, journals - masses of information - dedebunking on the other side. And it's worth bearing in mind that the article was written by Benjamin Chertoff, the cousin of Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security at the time. And it is owned by the Hearst Group of which personal friends of the previous presidential administration are on the board. When I think about what their motive might be for writing such an article - I don't have any difficulty in finding it. Compare this with the motives of the people who have jeopardised their careers and been labelled as unpatriotic lunatics for being brave enough to ask the questions that need to be asked, and I know which one sits more easily. And these people aren't lunatics on the Add a Comment
fringes Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:11 PM
Greenwich Mean Time
(Guest)
I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I've previously worked for a political party in the heart of government and understand how the public attribute politicians and the political process with more credit than it deserves when it comes to long-term, overreaching strategy. People would be surprised at how much of the process, like in many organisations, is really just reactionary, short-term firefighting. Many conspiracy theorists become laughable in the face of this. But this article - written in 2009 (and I had to double check) - is drenched in ignorance. It wreaks of someone having watched 'Loose Change' in 2005, though it was ridiculous and still places anybody with legitimate questions that have yet still to be answered, into one large group of unhinged, paranoid conspiracy theorists. To be unable to differentiate between people who believe CNN faked footage that we saw on TV - crazy by anyone's standards - with people who are intelligent, articulate and have Add a Comment
nothing to gain from a Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:04 PM
Someone with half a brain rather than a simpleton
(Guest)
Mark - you don't deserve the name "Mark". That was one pathetic piece of uninformed, ignorant, unthoughtful, unquestioning garbage. The detail and facts of the Sheen "letter" you have ignored but then what do we expect from scum like you my friend. Too busy doing your masters' bidding Add a Comment
ensuring your career doesn't bomb! You're a pathetic excuse for a human being. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:42 PM
Grand Poo
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Suppressed: Will do captain. And while you're at it, look up the word "facetious". Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:27 PM
Emerson
(Guest)
What a rubbish piece of journalism %282%29.%0D%0A%0D%0A%22Like many conspiracy theories%2C the 9%2F11 Truther movement stems from a combination of ignorance of science and history and a political agenda that%22%0D%0A%0D%0ADid you actually read the CharlieAdd a Comment
%27s piece %3F%3F%3F%0D%0A%0D%0AThat is backed by science%21 Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:05 PM
Comments 21 - 30 of 57<< Prev

BadNews
(Guest)
Why do you not try to debunk any of the facts that Sheen said? You just insult with nothing to back it Add a Comment
up unlike Sheen. It's a weird world when I learn more from an actor than the news. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:00 PM
SuppressedReality
(Guest)
"It's so much funner to watch football and ignore thems." It's dumbed down, brainwashed morons like you who make me sick You don't deserve to live in a free country. The most patriotic thing you can do is question and challenge your government. Do your own research and look at the facts presented. Then start researching the Federal Reserve, a private bank by the way. Quoting from memory but think goes something like this..When governments fear their people there is freedom. Add a Comment
When people fear their government there is tyranny. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:00 PM
Hahaha
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Mark, all of your comments are negative, you can't fool us anymore, we know you're a coward!!! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:42 PM
benf
(Guest)
Add a Comment
Intellectually dishonest drivel. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:11 PM
orion700
(Guest)
The Popular Mechanics article was built on straw men and has been debunked. As an engineer and commercial rated pilot who has done the research, I will tell you that 9/11 was and inside job. I Add a Comment
don't care how evil the cia trained terrorists are, they cannot violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:30 PM
LOL
(Guest)
The writer of this article hopes you don't read "20 minutes with the President". He did not debunk ANY POINTS CHARLIE SHEEN MADE IN THE LETTER, instead he attacked his character and tries to make people who question the official story look like nutjobs. Please read the letter, ask the writer why he did not even debunk one statement such as 6 out of 10 9/11 commission members Add a Comment
question the official story?? Don't be a sucker Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:30 PM
WAKE UP
(Guest)
You have convinced me Emerson. Hey, do me a favor, Visit www.ae911truth.com They have a petition signed by 800 different scientists and engineers who think the 9/11 story was Bull. Google WTC7 and watch it with your eyes open. WTC7 was one of the most well built skyscraper in the US. Yet it falls like a controlled demolition in a nice little pile. You can not have the same cause for building collapse for all 3 buildings on that day. WTC7 did not get hit by a plane. FIRE COULD NOT Add a Comment
MAKE THE BUILDING FALL THE AY IT DID> DONT BE DUMB. GOOGLE WTC7 AND WAKE UP Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:59 PM
CheckUrFacts
(Guest)
%22The magazine pushing the government%27s 9%2F11 propaganda%2C Popular Mechanics %28PM%29%2C is published by the Hearst family. Its March cover story%2C Debunking 9%2F11 Lies%2C has been exposed by credible researchers to contain numerous distortions and flawed conclusions. American Free Press revealed that Benjamin Chertoff%2C the 25-year-old senior researcher who authored the 9%2F11 article%2C is related to Michael Chertoff%2C the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security %28DHS%29. The PM article illustrates how a propaganda method%2C used by dictatorships%2C is now being employed by the U.S. Add a Comment
government%3A controlling mainstream media outlets to promote its version of 9%2F11.%22 Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 4:09:12 PM
Whittington=Hack
(Guest)
Whittington it's pretty clear that you haven't researched both sides of the argument. Citing 'Popular Mechanics', a publication owned by Hearst, as an impartial authority on 9/11 is more foolish than relying on the 9/11 Commission's report of the facts. Why not check out Sheen's sources and see how the pieces add up to you. I think you will find his argument is more reasonable than the official Add a Comment
story. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:54 PM
Emerson
(Guest)
What a rubbish piece of journalism (2). "Like many conspiracy theories, the 9/11 Truther movement stems from a combination of ignorance of science and history and a political agenda that" Did you Add a Comment
actually read the Charlie's piece That is backed by science! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:53 PM

WAKE UP
(Guest)
WOW, that was objectional journalism. If you would have taken the time to, I dont know, actually look at the information that Mr. Sheen in presenting for at leat 30 minutes, you would have discovered that he is actually bringing FACTs to the table. Not conspiracy. What does Charlie Sheen have to gain from doing this? Do you think he stays up at night wanting to be dragged through the mud by the ignorant media? He has millions and millions of dollars. Not too much to gain here. Do your damn job and research your topic a little before you write a silly hit peice that makes you looks very uneduated. Send this atricle to the college that you graduated from, I think Add a Comment
you may be eiligle for a full 100% tuition refund. RESEARCH BEFORE YOU ACT LIKE A WRITER!!! Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:40 PM
Drew
(Guest)
The WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Research the evidence. Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light. -George Washington http://Add a Comment
www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1T8OgvYS-o&feature=player_embedded Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:42 PM
Ben
(Guest)
How does it feel to be an absolute piece of TRASH?! You have no FACTUAL evidence to put forth, so you make unfounded accusations of ignorance. YOU, my friend, are the ignorant one. And you will burn in the deepest circle of Hell with everyone else who apathetically stood idly by and TALKED NONSENSE to further your piddly selfish agendas while the people who control you SCREW US ALL OVER. You will regret your insolence in the end as the big dick known as the New Add a Comment
World Order continuously f**kS YOU UP YOUR ASS. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:09 PM
Kevin
(Guest)
In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot. - Notebook, 1904 Add a Comment
(Mark Twain) Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:57 PM
Ben in Texas
(Guest)
Your article completely avoids any of the topics in Charlie's letter. You are taking the same road every other member of the controlled mainstream media has tried to take. These issues are going nowhere. Writing sneering op-ed responses to these inquiries exposes you as lazy and not worth attention. People died and the majority of the victims' families and 6 of the 10 911 commissioners stated that they had major issues with the 9-11 report. Put your journalism on that. We're gaining momentum and your BS dismissals won't slow this. Be on the right side of history. Check your Add a Comment
traffic too. You'll get more hits covering the truth and writing smears. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:38 PM
Rancidmeet
(Guest)
Add a Comment
That was really an ill informed and irresponsible piece. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:28 PM
Dale Gribble
(Guest)
I feel sorry for you if you don't know by now that there are serious problems with the official story of Add a Comment
9/11. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:07 PM
Inquisition
(Guest)
Sorry your on the wrong side of history when 6 out of 10 9/11 commission members disagree with Add a Comment
you maybe you should be asking yourself some serious questions. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:17 PM
dm
(Guest)
Why do you believe 9/11 truth is associated with the left? Please back that statement up because it's not true. Alex Jones who you mentioned (among many other truthers) for example is a far right-Add a Comment
winger. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:56 PM
Grand Poo
(Guest)
You're right! Charlie needs to stick to being a simple egotistical actor. "Overly egotistical" is super fringe-like. The real conspiracy is in how this aging lothario continues to get so much work and is one of the highest paid actors. By the way, does Popular Mechanics still sell those cool homemade hovercraft kits? That's so cool that they did all that hard work to uncover the truth so all those experts that don't work for their publication can relax and read other articles on car planes and such. I'm so glad I read your article. I was beginning to think I might listen to the people crying out Add a Comment
for answers. It's so much funner to watch football and ignore thems. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:16 PM
Comments 41 - 50 of 57<< P

Alf
(Guest)
In his request for an interview%2C Sheen points out that 6 of 10 commissioners publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9%2F11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack%2C and you like to label this a demand Add a Comment
from a nutjob%3F Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:12 PM
DontBeScared
(Guest)
Mark Whittington is scared. Move aside brother, the American people are waking up and will protect you, even thought you were a coward. And you are right, some cabal did not do this to us, rather it Add a Comment
WAS the tides of history and the mistakes of previous and current treasonous administrations. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:54 PM
Jon
(Guest)
Ignorance of history and science? For one, Cover-ups and conspiracies have happened repeatedly throughout history and second, the rubble (evidence) was removed and tampered with way earlier Add a Comment
than science needed for it to be investigated properly. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:13 PM
steveo
(Guest)
Add a Comment
hahaha - popular mechanics - how can you quote that garbage?? Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:09 PM
dave
(Guest)
I second that motion. irresponsible journalism to not investigate the allegations fully. shame on you Add a Comment
Mark. W. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:17 PM
benf
(Guest)
Add a Comment
smug shabbily written dreck. Add a Comment

Posted on 09/08/2009 at 3:09:52 PM
Nick
(Guest)
Perhaps you should speak with Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth: http://www.ae911truth.org/ Add a Comment
Who am I more apt to believe: unreliable government or actual architects/engineers? Add a Comment
Posted on 09/08/2009 at 2:09:17 PM

Did you actually READ the comments?

[hal 9000]

I like how the intrepid "journalist" at The Portland Mercury makes a joke out of Sheen looking at a blank computer screen, and threw in the old "9/11 truthers think the Jews did it" nonsense. As for Sheen looking at a blank computer screen, I have a news flash to that Portland Mercury "journalist" - Sheen is not looking at a blank computer screen. The picture was taken at an angle to the screen and the small print on the web page he was reading did not show up in the photo due to being washed out by the brightness of the background on the page."

Honestly, it is underhanded tactics like these that ultimately discredit the mainstream news media. They can only get away with fooling people with these kinds of tricks for so long. I hope this story hits the mainstream news shows big in the coming days. Maybe it's not quite as bad as I initially thought. The more they attack and vilify us, the more people take the time to look into the facts and find out they've been lied to. I hope this grows into a news media wildfire in the next few days. Bring it on.

[endof]

http://www.examiner.com/x-9341-Manhattan-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m9d8-Alex-Jones-publishes-fake-interview-of-President-Obama-with-Charlie-Sheen

Alex Jones publishes fake interview of President Obama with Charlie Sheen

Alex Jones, the controversial talk radio host and operator of conspiracy websites like Infowars.com and Prisonplanet.com, sparked outrage today by publishing an entirely fabricated Q&A interview between President Barack Obama and Two and a Half Men actor Charlie Sheen. For his part, Sheen appears to be a willing participant in this ploy.

Branded as the most explosive information of his career, Jones posted a transcript of the fake conversation on his websites this morning, deliberately misrepresenting it as a 20-minute interview between Obama and Sheen. He later modified the content – after it was presented to the public as being real – to include a disclaimer on the very bottom of the article, which states that this is merely an open letter from Sheen to Obama, and that no such conversation has taken place. One website, AboveTopSecret.com, has since published a cached edition of the original report, which clearly demonstrates how it was initially positioned to viewers.

..

Even with the abovementioned revisions, this report continues to provide misleading information, as it attributes wholly falsified quotes to our President. In addition, its opening summary deceptively positions the conversation as being real; anyone that fails to read the entire document would never know the difference. That said, even though I often disagree with Obama politically – I believe, wholeheartedly – that these actions are completely malicious.

[Berminator]

http://www.examiner.com/x-9341-Manhattan-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m9d8-Alex-Jones-publishes-fake-interview-of-President-Obama-with-Charlie-Sheen

Alex Jones publishes fake interview of President Obama with Charlie Sheen

Look out, here comes JT,
Oh shit, Help!

Ha Ha!

[Optimus]

That Reuters piece is a paid press release, so don't get excited! Anyone can pay for a press release.  It's the same exact one on Market Watch. Even if you search Charlie Sheen on Reuters, there's not one mention of  Charlie Sheen 20 minutes w/ president.

Yes we know that and they are starting to show up all over the place. It's a brilliant move to get the word out. Just think, this is only the first salvo and it's already becoming a masterpiece. It's like poetry in motion!

[Monkeypox]

Look out, here comes JT,
Oh shit, Help!

Ha Ha!

Uh oh, they said "fake interview".  JT is gonna be "irritated".