Charlie Sheen interviews Barack Obama for 20 minutes about 9/11

[Sub-X]

Yeah you guys were watching that real close weren't you... the article was put up and saved to the page in three stages, beginning at eight o'clock this morning... if you would take the time to read it, it is a huge article, takes 20 minutes or so to read... the photos were added as well as the disclaimer at the end of the process, this was about 8:30 to 8:45 AM...

Yep you guys are watching us real close aren't you... the whole thing was supposed to be up and ready to go by 9 AM as it was touted on the radio show all day yesterday... I think we made it don't you...

fascists

JTCoyoté

"The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not
as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law
and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.  
~John Adams

Hold on JT that is little unfair,this is the first anybody is hearing about being put up in 3 parts and Alex even played like the disclaimer was posted with the article,if people were watching real close its because thats what they have learned to do,so nobody can be blamed for feeling angry and a little like they were duped.

[Dig]

Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens)

Against the assault of laughter, nothing can stand.
- "The Chronicle of Young Satan," Mysterious Stranger Manuscripts

Humor must not professedly teach, and it must not professedly preach, but it must do both if it would live forever.
- Mark Twain in Eruption

The humorous story is told gravely; the teller does his best to conceal the fact that he even dimly suspects that there is anything funny about it.
- "How to Tell a Story"

Humor is mankind's greatest blessing.
- Mark Twain, a Biography

Laughter without a tinge of philosophy is but a sneeze of humor. Genuine humor is replete with wisdom.
- quoted in Mark Twain and I, Opie Read

Humor is the great thing, the saving thing after all. The minute it crops up, all our hardnesses yield, all our irritations, and resentments flit away, and a sunny spirit takes their place.
- "What Paul Bourget Thinks of Us"

Humor is the good natured side of a truth.
- quoted in Mark Twain and I, Opie Read

[JTCoyoté]

well if thats your explination, then i will accept it, but it still seems like the disclaimer could have easily been published right from the start.
However you did touch apon why it was so massively hyped as if it were second coming of jesus christ himself, only to turn out to be a fake interview with the president.
Its smells like a giant publicity stunt for which deception is used as its key delivery method, those are the tactics of the msm.

The second coming...? that's your spin on it... It wasn't hyped any higher than some of the other big-name guests Alex has had on in the past... the only difference now is the audience is bigger.

Besides it's not just for what began today... tomorrow the author of the article, Charlie Sheen will be on the air live with Alex... the whole week will be filled with surprises... so it's not over yet... you're going to have to earn my tax dollar over time this week big boy... (chuckle)...

--Oldyoti

"Assertions of "conspiracy theory" touted by "conspiracy debunking hounds"...
are designed to do nothing more than shout down, side track, or squelch honest
debate. Within topics of controversy, there may be "shenanigans", which only
honest and unfettered discussion can determine."
~Anonymous

[tritonman]

That would be your take on this JT.  Not mine or many others.

[JTCoyoté]

Hold on JT that is little unfair,this is the first anybody is hearing about being put up in 3 parts and Alex even played like the disclaimer was posted with the article,if people were watching real close its because thats what they have learned to do,so nobody can be blamed for feeling angry and a little like they were duped.

Read my post... for Christ's sake! It WAS posted with the article... but it took almost 45 minutes to post the MONSTER article...

Jesus Christ! either stop smoking the ganja... or stop drinking the fluoride... one of the two.

--Oldyoti

“In the beginning of a change the Patriot is a scarce man,
and brave, and hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds,
the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
~Mark Twain

[endof]

The second coming...? that's your spin on it... It wasn't hyped any higher than some of the other big-name guests Alex has had on in the past... the only difference now is the audience is bigger.

Besides it's not just for what began today... tomorrow the author of the article, Charlie Sheen will be on the air live with Alex... the whole week will be filled with surprises... so it's not over yet... you're going to have to earn my tax dollar over time this week big boy... (chuckle)...

Erm, yes it was very very hyped, alex even claimed he might go missing and certain people knew to 'put it out' (you know the HUGE news he was talking about?) if they didnt hear from him, pretty much claiming he might even be a target because of what he was getting ready to announce, ive never ever heard him hype like that before, theres been hype but not like that. Huge news he said, blah blah, for it to be all about some fake interview..

[unitedstrokesofamerica]

I see good points on both sides of this. I feel they should have put something at the top from the start saying that, this is the interview we wish that would happen. I think this is very dangerous to post something fake no matter how true the content is when the MSM is saying sites like infowars have no credibility.  On the other side you could say, Fortune favors the bold.   I will stick with Alex no matter the stunt.

[TruRevolution]

Wow, this is pathetic to mock a fake interview with Obama and then turn around and call it the real thing. Pathetic Alex, PATHETIC.  Instead of some little claim at the bottom telling us its fake, make a huge one at the top.  Or call it "What if? 20 Minutes with President Obama". 

I thought this was Infowars, not FOX.

[RoadRunner]

JTCoyote, please reply with your perspective on this viewpoint:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=133286.msg804114#msg804114

[JTCoyoté]

That would be your take on this JT.  Not mine or many others.

With a post like this, no one knows what your take is...

My take is what happened... You see, you can't post half of the Encyclopedia Britannica into WordPress all in one post, it must go up in stages... not my take... my knowledge...  knowledge you don't have.

--Oldyoti

"First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win."
~Gandhi

[tritonman]

Read my post... for Christ's sake! It was posted with the article... but it took almost 45 minutes to post the MONSTER article...

Jesus Christ! either stop smoking the ganja... or stop drinking the fluoride... one of the two.

--Oldyoti

“In the beginning of a change the Patriot is a scarce man,
and brave, and hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds,
the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
~Mark Twain

So do you now see the wisdom of posting a disclaimer at the top so as not to discredit the work from the outset?

[Dig]

Wow, this is pathetic to mock a fake interview with Obama and then turn around and call it the real thing. Pathetic Alex, PATHETIC.  Instead of some little claim at the bottom telling us its fake, make a huge one at the top.  Or call it "What if? 20 Minutes with President Obama". 

I thought this was Infowars, not FOX.

You do realize there is a powerful weapon within the constitution's first amendment that acknowledges, enforces, protects freedom to write satire? Ya think maybe the founding fathers had a reason for protecting this inalienable right?

[Sub-X]

As far as mainstream is concerned, why do you think the NWO had to put a G Beck on one of their propaganda outlets to fakely champion the same causes that WE THE NEW MAINSTREAM AUDIENCE AND ACTIVISTS have been doing, and growing exponentially doing so? We have so many gauges to know the pulse of the nation, and the polls are just one. Gun sales are another. Activism is another. Talking about activism, we have the MOST activists than the NWO's factions combined. HANDS DOWN. I'm not talking about the sheeple or non-activists who will bother to show up for a concert or a political rally for fun. If you know anything about the sociology of politics, the activists are usually the minority in the overall population, the by-standers are the majority. Well, we have the majority of the minority to our side. DEAL WITH IT.

Second, I said "most are liars." If that struck a chord with you, i'm sorry. Do some introinspection and come back later. Anyway, I started my lecture addressing two types of truthers: a) STUPID, who cannot understand what move is credible at one time and will not appear so at other times. b) ANGRY, I understand the feeling of many who used to be respected by friends for being the source of news as if from the heavens. I am in the same boat. BUT, friends, we are at crucial points in the infowar. There isn't much time left, this one move could mean a lot, IF WE DECIDE TO GET OVER THE DISAPPOINTMENT and use it to MAXIMIZE its effect. I wouldn't back such moves were it done at a time when we had to prove our credibility. What this move is intended for is not that, it's to use our acquired credibility, i.e. the MEDIA POWER OF AJ in 2009, to force the other side to cover our AGENDA. WE ARE THE AGENDA SETTERS NOW. They used to. Not ANYMORE. "ARRRRRGGGGG".

You made a sweeping statement about the peoples integrity that complained,(sorry most of them),and you know,so you know there are people spreading BS on the forum but don't do anything about it,you think letting them know you know will scare them,or was it just a generalization you didn't think you would get called out on

"WE ARE THE AGENDA SETTERS NOW" excellent, so top of the Agenda is to expose 9/11...oh wait it has been top of the agenda for the last 8 years,but we are the agenda setters,right ,so this by time next year we will be looking back and thinking how great it is that 9/11 was finally exposed,new investigation and all the people involved will be in and on their way to prison  

If we are the agenda setters,we wouldn't need fake interviews to get that across,so no we are not the mainstream and although we are in total agreement on how we want things to run,unlike yourself I know the reality, that we are not there yet. 

[JTCoyoté]

JTCoyote, please reply with your perspective on this viewpoint:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=133286.msg804114#msg804114

So sorry you feel as though I have singled you out... I haven't... ask your bunk buddies here...

This isn't about you, this is about the thread you started.

JTCoyoté

"God grants liberty only to those who love it,
and are always ready to guard and defend it."
~Daniel Webster

[JTCoyoté]

So do you now see the wisdom of posting a disclaimer at the top so as not to discredit the work from the outset?

[Dig]

You made a sweeping statement about the peoples integrity that complained,(sorry most of them),and you know,so you know there are people spreading BS on the forum but don't do anything about it,you think letting them know you know will scare them,or was it just a generalization you didn't think you would get called out on

"WE ARE THE AGENDA SETTERS NOW" excellent, so top of the Agenda is to expose 9/11...oh wait it has been top of the agenda for the last 8 years,but we are the agenda setters,right ,so this by time next year we will be looking back and thinking how great it is that 9/11 was finally exposed,new investigation and all the people involved will be in and on their way to prison  

If we are the agenda setters,we wouldn't need fake interviews to get that across,so no we are not the mainstream and although we are in total agreement on how we want things to run,unlike yourself I know the reality, that we are not there yet. 

dude, no offense and much love (Sub-X kicks ass) but the essence of his posts IMO are pretty cool.

[Dig]

So sorry you feel as though I have singled you out... I haven't... ask your bunk buddies here...

This isn't about you, this is about the thread you started.

JTCoyoté

"God grants liberty only to those who love it,
and are always ready to guard and defend it."
~Daniel Webster

RoadRunner started a thread?

[tattoo8118]

Whats the deal with the closed comments section on Infowars.com??

[Eckhart Tolle]

Barack Obama, Charlie Sheen, Van Jones, and the 9/11 Truther Movement

September 08, 2009 by
Mark Whittington 

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2153283/barack_obama_charlie_sheen_van_jones.html

    * Published Content: 1,692
    * Total Views: 2,136,023
    * Fans: 140


According to the Prison Planet blog, actor Charlie Sheen is demanding a meeting with President Barack Obama in order to demand that an investigation be opened over whether the Bush administration was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

This bit of news might be just another example of an overly egotistical actor thinking that his role as an aging lothario on Two and a Half Men buys him face time with the President of the United States. However, with the


Barack Obama, Charlie Sheen, Van Jones, and the 9/11 Truther Movement
 eighth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks coming up and the revelation that the now former White House Green Jobs Czar Van Jones was himself a 9/11 truther focuses attention on the new paranoid style of American politics. But this time the paranoids are not right wingers seeing commies under the bed. The paranoids are left wingers seeing Bush administration operatives under the rubble of 9/11.

Like many conspiracy theories, the 9/11 Truther movement stems from a combination of ignorance of science and history and a political agenda that has sent a group of people around the bend. People believe that the Bush administration engineered 9/11 because, as the slogan made famous by the TV show The X Files stated, they want to believe. They want to believe that George W. Bush was both nefarious enough and clever enough to slay three thousand human beings, make it look like a group of enraged Muslims did it, then use the event as an excuse to create an empire in the Middle East in order to grab all of the oil. Or it is something like that.

A now famous article in Popular Mechanics thoroughly debunked the 9/11 Truther conspiracy theory. However a casual attention to Occam's Razor should be sufficient to laugh off the idea that the US Government, which has done most things incompetently, pulled off the mother of all false flag operations.

[endof]

You made a sweeping statement about the peoples integrity that complained,(sorry most of them),and you know,so you know there are people spreading BS on the forum but don't do anything about it,you think letting them know you know will scare them,or was it just a generalization you didn't think you would get called out on

"WE ARE THE AGENDA SETTERS NOW" excellent, so top of the Agenda is to expose 9/11...oh wait it has been top of the agenda for the last 8 years,but we are the agenda setters,right ,so this by time next year we will be looking back and thinking how great it is that 9/11 was finally exposed,new investigation and all the people involved will be in and on their way to prison  

If we are the agenda setters,we wouldn't need fake interviews to get that across,so no we are not the mainstream and although we are in total agreement on how we want things to run,unlike yourself I know the reality, that we are not there yet. 

I think some people are forgetting just how freakin powerful the msm are, yes the internet has grown at an immense rate, but Televison im afriad is still the no1 stop for alot of people, you gotta face that, as long as you tell the truth, theres less they can use and you get stupid documentarys on national geographic.
Just as the tactics of truth are making headway agaisnt what is an incredibly powerfull brainwashing tool.

Whats going to happen if the MSM does pick this up, i dread to think.

This is the first one ive seen so far.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2153283/barack_obama_charlie_sheen_van_jones.html?cat=49

According to the Prison Planet blog, actor Charlie Sheen is demanding a meeting with President Barack Obama in order to demand that an investigation be opened over whether the Bush administration was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.

This bit of news might be just another example of an overly egotistical actor thinking that his role as an aging lothario on Two and a Half Men buys him face time with the President of the United States.

..

However, with the eighth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks coming up and the revelation that the now former White House Green Jobs Czar Van Jones was himself a 9/11 truther focuses attention on the new paranoid style of American politics. But this time the paranoids are not right wingers seeing commies under the bed. The paranoids are left wingers seeing Bush administration operatives under the rubble of 9/11.

Like many conspiracy theories, the 9/11 Truther movement stems from a combination of ignorance of science and history and a political agenda that has sent a group of people around the bend. People believe that the Bush administration engineered 9/11 because, as the slogan made famous by the TV show The X Files stated, they want to believe. They want to believe that George W. Bush was both nefarious enough and clever enough to slay three thousand human beings, make it look like a group of enraged Muslims did it, then use the event as an excuse to create an empire in the Middle East in order to grab all of the oil. Or it is something like that.

[Optimus]

Wow, this is pathetic to mock a fake interview with Obama and then turn around and call it the real thing. Pathetic Alex, PATHETIC.  Instead of some little claim at the bottom telling us its fake, make a huge one at the top.  Or call it "What if? 20 Minutes with President Obama". 

I thought this was Infowars, not FOX.

You do know what the concept of satire is, right?

Encyclopedia > Satire
http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Satire

Satire is strictly a literary genre, although it is found in the graphic and performing arts as well as the printed word. In satire, human or individual vices, follies, abuses, or shortcomings are held up to censure by means of ridicule, derision, burlesque, irony, or other methods, ideally with an intent to bring about improvement.[1] Although satire is usually meant to be funny, the purpose of satire is not primarily humor in itself so much as an attack on something of which the author strongly disapproves, using the weapon of wit.

A very common, almost defining feature of satire is its strong vein of irony or sarcasm, but parody, burlesque, exaggeration, juxtaposition, comparison, analogy, and double entendre are all frequently used in satirical speech and writing. The essential point, however, is that "in satire, irony is militant"[2]. This "militant irony" (or sarcasm) often professes to approve the very things the satirist actually wishes to attack.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Satire has been used for 1,000's of years to make statements as to what the author has on his or her mind. I wonder if the ancient Greeks and Romans did as much belly-aching about the satire of their time?

[RoadRunner]

So sorry you feel as though I have singled you out... I haven't... ask your bunk buddies here...

This isn't about you, this is about the thread you started.

JTCoyoté

"God grants liberty only to those who love it,
and are always ready to guard and defend it."
~Daniel Webster

JT, I think we both know that my feelings where not the main point I wanted you to address. This tactic of cheap tricks to avoid legitimate questions is getting really old. Perhaps you wish to call me a government co-intel agent again, but I would prefer that you just give your perspective on the main points addressed in the same hyperlink:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=133242.msg804114#msg804114

[Freeski]

A trickle will turn into a stream...

Charlie Sheen/Barack Obama fanfic, as written by… Charlie Sheen
http://www.inquisitr.com/36472/charlie-sheenbarack-obama-fanfic-as-written-by-charlie-sheen/

While nearly one out of three Americans question the 9/11 Commission Report and nearly one out of five think that the Bush Administration had a hand in the attacks, Charlie Sheen has taken questioning the official account of September 11th to a whole new level.

He’s written a fanfic about it. He doesn’t call it fanfic, but any of us who used to be addicted to Harry Potter fanfic know what fanfic is- we recognize it when we see it. Sheen has written a long- boy howdy, is it long- fantasy interview between himself and Barack Obama (abbreviated as PBO in the “interview”) in which much like an action movie star, he takes on America’s most charismatic man with the hard hitting questions. And being conceived and carried out totally in Sheen’s head, he pulls no punches.

As a native New Yorker who thinks the 9/11 Commission Report was an insult and that the previous administration is at least guilty of criminal negligence, I don’t begrudge Sheen his fervor on the subject. (And if I do, for a minute, all I have to bring up in my memory is landing in Newark on September 15th and watching the smoke billowing over half of my beloved home city in stunned silence.) However, Sheen’s mock interview is downright adorable in parts. I particularly liked the ending, although I think he’s being a bit of a Charlie-Sue:

(The Senior aide appears again beside the President whispering in his ear. He then quickly moves off).

PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized.  Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.

(the President rises from his chair , I do the same).

CS – Mr. President! One more second!

(The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).

CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -


(He pauses. We shake hands).

CS – Make sure your (sic) on the right side of history.

(The President breaks the handshake).

PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.

(I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)

[JTCoyoté]

So do you now see the wisdom of posting a disclaimer at the top so as not to discredit the work from the outset?

The wisdom is in posting of our detailed disclaimer... you might want to badger some of the purveyors of the reading material you enjoy... about posting a disclaimer at all on their lying BS...

The wisdom of this piece comes in the attention garnered... a page from the 1939 Orson Welles Mercury Theatre presentation of HG Wells' War of the Worlds... a disclaimer was always there, but only those who were really listening to the show heard it...

Only those people who took the time to read the article knew the disclaimer was there, in the spirit of the text, and then printed in detail all the way at the bottom...

--Oldyoti

"The government turns every contingency
into an excuse for enhancing power in itself."
~John Adams

[Shorty123]

Exactly, you cant 'out lie' the machine, its insane, the only thing we can use is the truth, i accpet now that it was a tactic, but a very very poor one imo.
To be honest, it would have been fine if he posted it with the disclaimer from the start and did not spend days hyping it like it was the second coming of christ

Why the hell wasnt it just posted as it was, with a disclaimer, no hype, nothing just a normal day and a letter.

endof exactly.

I thought the goal was to reach a level of "credibility." That way a solid foundation could be built upon that credibility. If one MSM org picks this up, I would be throughly surprised and will come back to eat some crow!

[RoadRunner]

A trickle will turn into a stream...

Charlie Sheen/Barack Obama fanfic, as written by… Charlie Sheen
http://www.inquisitr.com/36472/charlie-sheenbarack-obama-fanfic-as-written-by-charlie-sheen/

While nearly one out of three Americans question the 9/11 Commission Report and nearly one out of five think that the Bush Administration had a hand in the attacks, Charlie Sheen has taken questioning the official account of September 11th to a whole new level.
.................

edited quote

Well thats good news, hopefully it continues to be covered in such a mature fashion.

He’s written a fanfic about it.

Notice how they give it a good disclaimer, and no one is disappointed that the article is fictional. Where as Alex lied and gained no credibility by doing so.

[Scootle]

CS – Make sure your (sic) on the right side of history.

Lol!!! They are actually stooping low enough to point out a minor spelling/grammer error.

[Freeski]

It's now mentioned on the Charlie Sheen fan site. How about those fans that were with him through his coming out period (who will be reminded), or the brand spanking new fans who've never heard of a thing called the 9/11 Truth Movement?

http://www.charliesheen.net/#news

[deconstructmyhouse]

endof exactly.

I thought the goal was to reach a level of "credibility." That way a solid foundation could be built upon that credibility. If one MSM org picks this up, I would be throughly surprised and will come back to eat some crow!

IF HG WELLS HAD RUN A DISCLAIMER BEFORE THE BROADCAST OF WAR OF THE WORLDS
you never
never
never
would have heard about it.

The shock grabs you, then you pay attention to the story.
So,
you callin hg wells a poser and an idiot?

[Magnumpi]

Hopefully, Alex now knows why he shouldn't hype something, and just do it. Because most people are childish hacks. I mean really? If everyone else spent even 1/10th the energy on this issue in other forums/site/real-life, it's a huge success already. And think of all the attention Mr. Sheen will get for his upcoming cameo in Wallstreet 2!

[Sub-X]

Read my post... for Christ's sake! It WAS posted with the article... but it took almost 45 minutes to post the MONSTER article...

Jesus Christ! either stop smoking the ganja... or stop drinking the fluoride... one of the two.

--Oldyoti

“In the beginning of a change the Patriot is a scarce man,
and brave, and hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds,
the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot."
~Mark Twain

Sorry if my intelligence don't meet your high standards JT but I am in awe and grateful to be in the presents of such greatness,honored even and to have you try and insult me too,WoW I am so lucky.(See I can be a smartarse too)

So granted the article is huge and I can well believe it took that long to post it,but what you don't seem to realize is not everybody has that kinda of knowledge about websites etc. so what the ganja smoking,fluoride drinkers seen was an article published as reality and then the disclaimer was posted.

You know the reason why it took so long for the disclaimer,all anybody else seen was a story being sold as reality when in fact it was fiction now I mean if you can't at least see this then maybe you should come down off your intellectual pedestal and slum it with the rest of the dumbasses for awhile.

[deconstructmyhouse]

he War of the Worlds was an episode of the American radio drama anthology series Mercury Theatre on the Air. It was performed as a Halloween episode of the series on October 30, 1938 and aired over the Columbia Broadcasting System radio network. Directed and narrated by Orson Welles, the episode was an adaptation of H. G. Wells' novel The War of the Worlds.

The first two thirds of the 60-minute broadcast was presented as a series of simulated news bulletins, which suggested to many listeners that an actual Martian invasion was in progress. Compounding the issue was the fact that the Mercury Theatre on the Air was a 'sustaining show' (i.e., it ran without commercial breaks), thus adding to the dramatic effect. Although there were sensationalist accounts in the press about a supposed panic in response to the broadcast, the precise extent of listener response has been debated. In the days following the adaptation, however, there was widespread outrage. The program's news-bulletin format was decried as cruelly deceptive by some newspapers and public figures, leading to an outcry against the perpetrators of the broadcast, but the episode launched Orson Welles to fame.

Welles' adaptation was one of the Radio Project's first studies.

wikipedia

[RoadRunner]

IF HG WELLS HAD RUN A DISCLAIMER BEFORE THE BROADCAST OF WAR OF THE WORLDS
you never
never
never
would have heard about it.

The shock grabs you, then you pay attention to the story.
So,
you callin hg wells a poser and an idiot?

War of the worlds was fictitious trying to convince people its real.

9/11 Truth is supposedly true, but trying to convince people its not fictitious.

Your argument is flawed.

[chrisfromchi]

Great post agree 100%
And im not sure whats going on either.

I think i know whats going on but i'm waiting another hour so the detractors and those fans with hurt feelings vent a bit longer.

[deconstructmyhouse]

War of the worlds was fictitious trying to convince people its real.

9/11 Truth is supposedly true, but trying to convince people its not fictitious.

Your argument is flawed.

The point is to capture the attention of people by leading with a psy op
It's an age old strategem
the point is: no one's listening anymore
Time for big guns
this took balls

[Berminator]

I think i know whats going on but i'm waiting another hour so the detractors and those fans with hurt feelings vent a bit longer.

Thanks Chris, thoughtful.

[deconstructmyhouse]

you know, I didn't know whether it was brilliant or not ( I didn't really care, I was just happy 911 was possibly going to get revisited.)
But the dramatic, polar reactions on this forum have in and of themselves convinced me it was brilliant.
WHAT could AJ have done to revitalize this to this degree? Answer me that?
Even here...

Controversy is necessary to progress
always

[Freeski]

The point is to capture the attention of people by leading with a psy op
It's an age old strategem
the point is: no one's listening anymore
Time for big guns
this took balls

Agreed. PR stunts are always risky but if the primary objective is to just get your message on the table, you use whatever you have in your toolkit and try to turn negative blowback into opportunity.

[endof]

I think i know whats going on but i'm waiting another hour so the detractors and those fans with hurt feelings vent a bit longer.

No please do say, cos right now it seems more like major own goal.

[Berminator]

Plane crash for me.