PrisonPlanet Forum
June 18, 2013, 11:13:34 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: damning photo  (Read 14554 times)
warren_pease
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61



« on: August 21, 2009, 10:51:37 AM »

If this photo is untouched, then Lucy, you have some splainin' to do...

http://www.bollyn.com/public/Pentagon_after_strike.jpg
Logged
warren_pease
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61



« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2009, 10:54:15 AM »

Logged
Berminator
Guest
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2009, 10:55:48 AM »

What's the mistery, cowboy?
Logged
luckee1
Guest
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2009, 10:57:55 AM »

I see upright lightpoles all around and no parts of plane.  What time was this photo taken on that day?

I see no people about, just vehicles.  What is going on here?
Logged
kushfiend
Guest
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2009, 11:00:02 AM »

I think this one is even more damning imo:

Notice the completely undamaged computer monitor...but wait I thought jet fuel caused 110 story steel skyscrapers to collapse into their own footprints?Huh  Tongue

Logged
DarkKnightNomeD
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 998



« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2009, 11:01:04 AM »

there is no plane wreckage

i believe it to be a missle
Logged
stella
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2009, 11:02:55 AM »

Has anyone ever done a to-scale comparison of that hole to the ones in the twin towers?  that might be interesting...
Logged
Berminator
Guest
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2009, 11:03:41 AM »


Had this at hand, another damning one.
Logged
luckee1
Guest
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2009, 11:05:07 AM »

I know for a fact that planes definitely went into the towers 1 and 2 in NY.  But it was nanothermite/mate that took them and wtc7 down.  But this photo of the pentagon and the subsequent one is really damning and says there is more to the story that a plane went in there.
Logged
Protean
Guest
« Reply #9 on: August 21, 2009, 11:11:00 AM »


On 911, April Gallop was in the area that was hit by the explosions in the Pentagon. She said when they brought her out to wait for the ambulance on the lawn (side where outside damage occurred) all she saw was green grass--no plane wreckage.

Excellent coverage on this topic here:

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/5422

"What Didn't Hit the Pentagon" with Dave von Kleist, April Gallop and Barbara Honegger. Dave von Kleist examines mainstream media coverage of the attack on the Pentagon; Pentagon survivor April Gallop describes her experiences on September 11th, 2001, her first day back at work as an administrative specialist with the U.S. Army at the Pentagon, after maternity leave; and Barbara Honegger, professional military affairs journalist, discusses her article, "The Pentagon Attack Papers".



Logged
warren_pease
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61



« Reply #10 on: August 21, 2009, 11:17:07 AM »

In Spoks Dad's Photo, the question becomes:

How did titanium, heavy guage aluminum, heavy guage rubber tires and landing gear all evaporate and a plastic monitor survive

and the inside of the building should be scorched to boot.

Not even David Copperfield could do this trick!
Logged
kushfiend
Guest
« Reply #11 on: August 21, 2009, 11:24:41 AM »

In Spoks Dad's Photo, the question becomes:

How did titanium, heavy guage aluminum, heavy guage rubber tires and landing gear all evaporate and a plastic monitor survive

and the inside of the building should be scorched to boot.

Not even David Copperfield could do this trick!

exactly.  Even though WTC 7 is the smoking gun of 9/11, I think the Pentagon "attack" is even more of a smoking gun type of evidence.

It is obvious to any 6 year old that a missile, not a plane, blew thru 3 reinforced rings of the pentagon, w/o damaging computer parts that were within a few feet of the bunker buster missile.

So, if a missile, and not a plane, was used on the Pentagon, it means that the U.S. govt, and not Osama, was behind the 9/11 attacks.

SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE A 6 YEAR OLD COULD COMPREHEND
Logged
Protean
Guest
« Reply #12 on: August 21, 2009, 11:34:33 AM »

exactly.  Even though WTC 7 is the smoking gun of 9/11, I think the Pentagon "attack" is even more of a smoking gun type of evidence.

It is obvious to any 6 year old that a missile, not a plane, blew thru 3 reinforced rings of the pentagon, w/o damaging computer parts that were within a few feet of the bunker buster missile.

So, if a missile, and not a plane, was used on the Pentagon, it means that the U.S. govt, and not Osama, was behind the 9/11 attacks.

SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE A 6 YEAR OLD COULD COMPREHEND

The radio link I posted above has April Gallop saying she thinks there were explosives planted inside the Pentagon area where she was.
The computers had all that info about the missing trillions of $ Donald Rumsfeld was trying to explain. Conveniently, it was blown up.
 Wink
Logged
kushfiend
Guest
« Reply #13 on: August 21, 2009, 11:44:39 AM »

The radio link I posted above has April Gallop saying she thinks there were explosives planted inside the Pentagon area where she was.
The computers had all that info about the missing trillions of $ Donald Rumsfeld was trying to explain. Conveniently, it was blown up.
 Wink

Exactly my friend.

Not to mention that building 7 housed all of the SEC's files on Enron and Worldcom, billion dollar ponzi scams that went completely unpunished.
Logged
Orgetorix
Guest
« Reply #14 on: August 21, 2009, 01:15:55 PM »

On 911, April Gallop was in the area that was hit by the explosions in the Pentagon. She said when they brought her out to wait for the ambulance on the lawn (side where outside damage occurred) all she saw was green grass--no plane wreckage.

Excellent coverage on this topic here:

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/5422

"What Didn't Hit the Pentagon" with Dave von Kleist, April Gallop and Barbara Honegger. Dave von Kleist examines mainstream media coverage of the attack on the Pentagon; Pentagon survivor April Gallop describes her experiences on September 11th, 2001, her first day back at work as an administrative specialist with the U.S. Army at the Pentagon, after maternity leave; and Barbara Honegger, professional military affairs journalist, discusses her article, "The Pentagon Attack Papers".





That audio link appears to be dead.

Now I'm just waiting for jimd3100 to come here and start calling us all batshit crazy no-planers, for even questioning the official story that a plane hit the Pentagon. I get so tired of the fanatics on either side. Sad
Logged
jimd3100
Global Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,292



« Reply #15 on: August 21, 2009, 03:15:26 PM »

That audio link appears to be dead.

Now I'm just waiting for jimd3100 to come here and start calling us all batshit crazy no-planers, for even questioning the official story that a plane hit the Pentagon. I get so tired of the fanatics on either side. Sad

I think the posts on this thread pretty much speak for themselves. Boy, do I feel silly. Maybe I should have looked into this thing as much as you folks criticizing me, then I'd know no plane hit but a missile instead, and everyone knows No plane does not = no Planer.  Roll Eyes  Yea, only a fanatic who can't face reality would still think a missile...woops I mean a plane hit the pentagon. I've wasted enough time on this thread already, enjoy your no plane party, good luck telling the masses of the invisible missile at the pentagon, you've got the perps on the run.
Logged
Protean
Guest
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2009, 03:23:54 PM »

That audio link appears to be dead.

Now I'm just waiting for jimd3100 to come here and start calling us all batshit crazy no-planers, for even questioning the official story that a plane hit the Pentagon. I get so tired of the fanatics on either side. Sad

KPFA Server in trouble again--

Here's another url to this file:
http://fv911truth.org/audio/Guns%20and%20Butter%20-%20April%20Gallop%20and%20Barbara%20Honneger%20-%20What%20Didn%27t%20Hit%20the%20Pentagon%2020080423.mp3

I don't think no-planers are bat shite crazy--peer pressure on this forum is debilitating for finding truth. You gotta look at ALL theories and consider ALL possibilities. The REAL truth is none of us know for sure what planes or no-planes were involved in 911--we only have theories--best not to get too attached any one theory in particular--keep looking, keep questioning--more light bulbs may go on, more people may come forward.

Listen to this MP3 of April Gallop--"She was there Charley" (too close for comfort you might say) AND, she saw no evidence of a plane crashing into the Pentagon.

Logged
nillumnoom5000
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45



« Reply #17 on: October 10, 2009, 05:49:16 PM »

Notice the completely undamaged computer monitor...but wait I thought jet fuel caused 110 story steel skyscrapers to collapse into their own footprints?Huh  Tongue

That is interesting, isn't it?
Logged
Letsbereal
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 27,359


Know Thyself


« Reply #18 on: October 10, 2009, 07:25:27 PM »

Go trough it and find some fine Pentagon pics

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v393/youricarma/NineOneOne/?albumview=slideshow
Logged

->>>|:-) THE CITY INDIANS (-:|<<<-
nillumnoom5000
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45



« Reply #19 on: October 10, 2009, 08:11:11 PM »

Go trough it and find some fine Pentagon pics

...and what exactly am I looking for?
Logged
Spark of Truth Inc.
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 382


Res ipsa loquitur. Let the good times roll.


« Reply #20 on: October 10, 2009, 08:48:54 PM »



hmmm...from the shape and size of the object, I'd guess it could be everything between a ripped off wing of a turboprop to a crashed reaper drone. In case that's a drone that fired missiles into the pentagon and crashes on a parachute down to be shipped elsewhere.

I don't know.
Logged

Walk tall, kick ass, love music and always remember you're coming from a long line of lovers, truth seekers and warriors.

- Hunter S. Thompson (RIP)
nillumnoom5000
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45



« Reply #21 on: October 10, 2009, 11:02:06 PM »

hmmm...from the shape and size of the object, I'd guess it could be everything between a ripped off wing of a turboprop to a crashed reaper drone. In case that's a drone that fired missiles into the pentagon and crashes on a parachute down to be shipped elsewhere.

I don't know.

Hmmm? Interesting!
Logged
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #22 on: November 08, 2009, 06:33:36 AM »

there is no plane wreckage

i believe it to be a missle

Tell ya what, I believe that a hijacked plane is what hit this building and 125 people were killed by terrorists that day!
Logged
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #23 on: November 08, 2009, 06:37:50 AM »

I think this one is even more damning imo:

Notice the completely undamaged computer monitor...but wait I thought jet fuel caused 110 story steel skyscrapers to collapse into their own footprints?Huh  Tongue



yeah look on the desk , a cofee mug( right side of monitor) is setting upright , plastic or styrofoam should have melted from the  heat .
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #24 on: November 08, 2009, 06:45:34 AM »

yeah look on the desk , a cofee mug( right side of monitor) is setting upright , plastic or styrofoam should have melted from the  heat .

Amazing!  I hope none of you guys plan on a career in Forensics!!!

It should have melted from the heat?  What else you got, Sherlock??
Logged
Nailer
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,445


« Reply #25 on: November 08, 2009, 06:53:07 AM »

Amazing!  I hope none of you guys plan on a career in Forensics!!!

It should have melted from the heat?  What else you got, Sherlock??

Well numbnutz I have common sense  and  when you have NO plane debris, seats, tires, luggage , bodies then there is something very wrong with the given story.   Jets have crashed into mountains  and there is debris scattered over a big area .

Let me guess you believe  everything the Government says is true.
Logged

I am a realist that is slightly conservative yet I have some republican demeanor that can turn democrat when I feel the urge to flip independant.
 
The truth shall set you free, if not a 45ACP round will do the trick.. HEHE
Kilgore Trout
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,633



« Reply #26 on: November 08, 2009, 06:56:38 AM »

I think we've all seen the official surveillance footage of the pentagon "attack". I didn't see a plane there , I see only a flash of light, and something that looks like a missile.

see for yourselves , no plane here..

video of pentagon hit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs
Logged

"I do not believe that there were, at the Council of Nicea,
three persons present who believed in the truth of what was set down.
If there were, it was on account of their ignorance."
J. M. Roberts, "Antiquity Unveiled", 1892
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #27 on: November 08, 2009, 07:11:17 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8
it's always amazed me how STRONG those wings are as they plough through SEVERAL uprooted light poles on the final AMAZINGly low altitude level'd off approach in front of the Pentagon.

Are you all dumb or blind? I can't seem to work out which it is...

The wings is where all the jet fuel is stored?
The wings flew through the light poles at 400MPH?
The wings weren't even slightly PUNCTURED along the way?

Me, I'm just surprised there weren't TWO TRAILS OF BURNING JETFUEL heading back from the Pentagon explosion through the collision-with-lightpoles path...

Maybe it's just me. I just don't see how a passenger jet can be so lucky to fly in absolutely FLAT at an altitude of about twenty meters, passing cars and not blowing anyone off the road or anything. And not a single engine scraping the Pentagon lawn. Something hit the Pentagon, a lot of people on that road concur. But a 757, in the manner of the official story? Hell, no...
Logged
37
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,213


"The President of what?"


« Reply #28 on: November 08, 2009, 07:23:32 AM »

Tell ya what, I believe that a hijacked plane is what hit this building and 125 people were killed by terrorists that day!

Tell ya what...if you want to refute the OP, then you should bring photographic evidence of your own.

Your hypothesis, while popular in the mainstream media, is completely unsupported.

Do you have a link, picture, document that proves that plane wreckage was recovered from the Pentagon?

Logged

"Whatever it is, I am against it."  -Groucho Marx

Channel 37
http://www.youtube.com/user/jmortimer37
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #29 on: November 08, 2009, 07:24:17 AM »

Well numbnutz I have common sense 

Is that what they're calling it these days?
Logged
Kilgore Trout
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,633



« Reply #30 on: November 08, 2009, 07:29:43 AM »

pollenate439 I read all of your posts, you are suspect. In fact it's easy to see the baiting speech in all of your posts.
Logged

"I do not believe that there were, at the Council of Nicea,
three persons present who believed in the truth of what was set down.
If there were, it was on account of their ignorance."
J. M. Roberts, "Antiquity Unveiled", 1892
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #31 on: November 08, 2009, 07:31:06 AM »

Tell ya what...if you want to refute the OP, then you should bring photographic evidence of your own.

Your hypothesis, while popular in the mainstream media, is completely unsupported.

Do you have a link, picture, document that proves that plane wreckage was recovered from the Pentagon?



http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/parts.html

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/compressor.html

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/yardparts.html

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/yarddebris.html

For those of you who have VERY IGNORANTLY stated that there were no human remains at the Pentagon, take a look at these pictures:

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/humanremains.html

You might also want to READ (something I know most of you Truthers DON'T do) this article:

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html

Anything else?

pollenate439
Logged
Mike Philbin
Guest
« Reply #32 on: November 08, 2009, 07:32:21 AM »

pollenate 439

what do you think of my non-sliced-through i.e. robust-wings-holding-tonnes-of-jet-fuel comment?

Smiley
Logged
Kilgore Trout
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,633



« Reply #33 on: November 08, 2009, 07:34:29 AM »

Or this video ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsWZHKIg3Cs
Logged

"I do not believe that there were, at the Council of Nicea,
three persons present who believed in the truth of what was set down.
If there were, it was on account of their ignorance."
J. M. Roberts, "Antiquity Unveiled", 1892
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #34 on: November 08, 2009, 07:35:01 AM »

pollenate 439

what do you think of my non-sliced-through i.e. robust-wings-holding-tonnes-of-jet-fuel comment?

Smiley

Mike,

What do you think of the previous photos I posted?
Logged
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #35 on: November 08, 2009, 07:37:34 AM »


WOW, that video really shows a lot!
Logged
Kilgore Trout
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,633



« Reply #36 on: November 08, 2009, 07:43:27 AM »

WOW, that video really shows a lot!

everything but a plane.
Logged

"I do not believe that there were, at the Council of Nicea,
three persons present who believed in the truth of what was set down.
If there were, it was on account of their ignorance."
J. M. Roberts, "Antiquity Unveiled", 1892
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #37 on: November 08, 2009, 07:45:03 AM »

pollenate 439

what do you think of my non-sliced-through i.e. robust-wings-holding-tonnes-of-jet-fuel comment?

Smiley

What am I supposed to think?
Logged
pollenate439
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


« Reply #38 on: November 08, 2009, 07:47:09 AM »

everything but a plane.

Although hundreds of people saw a plane...

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/PentWitnesses.xls

Anything else?
Logged
Kilgore Trout
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,633



« Reply #39 on: November 08, 2009, 07:53:41 AM »

Yeah , that link is what some sort of pdf? I don't download strange files , have you another format for this official information?

That video is the offical government release , why no plane visible?
Logged

"I do not believe that there were, at the Council of Nicea,
three persons present who believed in the truth of what was set down.
If there were, it was on account of their ignorance."
J. M. Roberts, "Antiquity Unveiled", 1892
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!