|
carlee
Guest
|
 |
« on: August 19, 2009, 06:45:19 AM » |
|
Does anyone have the file downloaded? For some reason I cannot down load that particular hr from the coast to coast site.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2009, 06:46:57 AM » |
|
did he talk about baby t-rex's?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Berminator
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2009, 07:00:49 AM » |
|
did he talk about baby t-rex's?
F T W Bwaahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
carlee
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2009, 07:14:25 AM » |
|
did he talk about baby t-rex's?
No he was talking about currency, He talked about Alex, He talked about releasing all of his files
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2009, 07:15:37 AM » |
|
No he was talking about currency, He talked about Alex, He talked about releasing all of his files
all of his files? does that include the baby t-rexs?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Berminator
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2009, 07:18:12 AM » |
|
No he was talking about currency, He talked about Alex, He talked about releasing all of his files
i'm sure Jordan don't mean anyone harm, anyways i'm a young earther myself, a baby t-rex would'nt surprise me, it would have a problem breathing as there was way more o2 when the dino's were here. Then came the flood...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thefreedomwriter
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2009, 10:25:36 AM » |
|
I listened to the interview and now I'm completely lost. Please correct me where I'm wrong. I thought people who believe that light is jesus also believe that lucifer is the light bringer. I'm not judging, I just got turned around last night.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bushido_aria
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2009, 10:44:34 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2009, 09:34:48 PM » |
|
What hour did he appear on??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bushido_aria
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2009, 11:19:25 PM » |
|
What hour did he appear on??
First, but he doesn't come on for like the first 20 minutes or so. And I agree that something is off. How can the Corner Stone also be the Cap Stone? *shakes head*
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2009, 04:27:10 AM » |
|
I listened to the interview and now I'm completely lost. Please correct me where I'm wrong. I thought people who believe that light is jesus also believe that lucifer is the light bringer. I'm not judging, I just got turned around last night.
Jordans a theosophist, he believes they are all part of the heiarchy. Ascended masters.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2009, 11:40:59 AM » |
|
all of his files? does that include the baby t-rexs?
Your mocking "criticism" of JM doesn't take into account you believe in a magic man who supposedly raised the dead, came back from the dead , 'communed' with angels and demons while casting magic healing spells. Pot? Kettle?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2009, 11:53:35 AM » |
|
Your mocking "criticism" of JM doesn't take into account you believe in a magic man who supposedly raised the dead, came back from the dead , 'communed' with angels and demons while casting magic healing spells. Pot? Kettle?
jordanius believes all of that too, he just believes it was his spirit guides of the heirarchy inside their flying saucers. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2009, 10:29:58 PM » |
|
Actually the NT is a metaphor, if you actually bothered to listen to what he says and that is pure conjecture what you have stated above.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: August 27, 2009, 04:14:20 AM » |
|
Actually the NT is a metaphor, if you actually bothered to listen to what he says and that is pure conjecture what you have stated above.
look, the guy takes directions from ufo/hierarchy people. thats a fact out of his own mouth.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2009, 10:00:14 PM » |
|
Wrong. If it was true anyhow, I ask again how is that any better then the crowd you follow, angels-aliens whatever you call your legendary creatures...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2009, 05:19:41 AM » |
|
Wrong. If it was true anyhow, I ask again how is that any better then the crowd you follow, angels-aliens whatever you call your legendary creatures...
Not wrong, not wrong at all. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5899469261241240032&ei=TAaZSoLALpPllQeg4bH-AQ&q=jordan+maxwell+ufo&hl=enThe whole first half hour is all Jordan in his own words, talking about his UFO experience's. I ask again how is that any better then the crowd you follow, angels-aliens whatever you call your legendary creatures. Whats the difference? The difference is that all UFO/Hierarchy communication comes from occultic means. IE, channeling, (as in Jordanus), automatic writing, walk-ins, ouija board type of things. Pretty much everything the Bible teaches against. Also Angels in the Bible that communicate with people look just like ordinary people and tell them just who they are and where they are from. Not so with UFO/Hierarchy entities. They have done nothing but lie about who they are and where they are from all through out history. BIG DIFFERENCE. Operation Trojan Horse, http://www.scribd.com/doc/18987109/John-Keel-Why-UfosOperation-Trojan-HorseThis book traces all the lies the UFO people tell. If they are really here to help us for one, why not just drop off a radio? And why constantly lie about who they are and where they are from? Passport to Magonia, http://www.scribd.com/doc/16741503/Passport-to-Magonia-on-UFOs-Folklore-and-Parallel-WorldsMore of the same. Why all the lies??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: August 31, 2009, 07:38:45 PM » |
|
Not wrong, not wrong at all. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5899469261241240032&ei=TAaZSoLALpPllQeg4bH-AQ&q=jordan+maxwell+ufo&hl=enThe whole first half hour is all Jordan in his own words, talking about his UFO experience's. Whats the difference? The difference is that all UFO/Hierarchy communication comes from occultic means. IE, channeling, (as in Jordanus), automatic writing, walk-ins, ouija board type of things. Pretty much everything the Bible teaches against. Also Angels in the Bible that communicate with people look just like ordinary people and tell them just who they are and where they are from. Not so with UFO/Hierarchy entities. They have done nothing but lie about who they are and where they are from all through out history. BIG DIFFERENCE. Operation Trojan Horse, http://www.scribd.com/doc/18987109/John-Keel-Why-UfosOperation-Trojan-HorseThis book traces all the lies the UFO people tell. If they are really here to help us for one, why not just drop off a radio? And why constantly lie about who they are and where they are from? Passport to Magonia, http://www.scribd.com/doc/16741503/Passport-to-Magonia-on-UFOs-Folklore-and-Parallel-WorldsMore of the same. Why all the lies?? There is nothing about serving a ufo hierarchy and I somehow knew the only information you had would be the same old blasted hit pieces that have posted many times over. Its not even close to proving your own twisted fantasy. You have no proof that aliens or even angels exist so how could you even prove by what means they are 'summoned'? Its just religious bias, ghosts, demons, aliens every group has a different name for the mysterious and paranormal. As for the bible reference, there are many who have said aliens walk among us(disguised as humans) and that sounds exactly like your fairy's or angels. There are many books documenting the lies of the bible as well but I doubt you've read much of them. Liars exist everywhere so I dont see again what your driving at other then case in point more of 'the pot calling the kettle black'.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2009, 07:55:44 PM » |
|
There is nothing about serving a ufo hierarchy and I somehow knew the only information you had would be the same old blasted hit pieces that have posted many times over. Its not even close to proving your own twisted fantasy.
You have no proof that aliens or even angels exist so how could you even prove by what means they are 'summoned'? Its just religious bias, ghosts, demons, aliens every group has a different name for the mysterious and paranormal.
As for the bible reference, there are many who have said aliens walk among us(disguised as humans) and that sounds exactly like your fairy's or angels.
There are many books documenting the lies of the bible as well but I doubt you've read much of them. Liars exist everywhere so I dont see again what your driving at other then case in point more of 'the pot calling the kettle black'.
same hit piece?? Thats him in his own words in an interview. Its really sad when people see the truth and still refuse to except it for what it is. Just keep the blinders on, thats not a gorilla in the room. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TheQ
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2009, 07:56:40 PM » |
|
Jordans a theosophist, he believes they are all part of the heiarchy. Ascended masters. what's your source?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: August 31, 2009, 07:58:03 PM » |
|
what's your source?
his own words.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TheQ
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: August 31, 2009, 08:08:59 PM » |
|
his own words.
Im sure you can do better than that..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Unintelligable Name
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: August 31, 2009, 08:25:10 PM » |
|
Im sure you can do better than that..
Kind of obvious when you look and listen to his material. I don't think Dok is saying "Jordan said that he was a Theosophist," but rather that from Maxwell's own words you can put the peices together that he follows Theosophy. He said Blavatsky is his favorite author for one... "My source" is the audio/video clips of him saying it, I honestly can't be bothered to dig it up. It's there if you look for it though, try 'Jordan Maxwell exposed' or something to that effect.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TheQ
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: August 31, 2009, 08:30:08 PM » |
|
Kind of obvious when you look and listen to his material. I don't think Dok is saying "Jordan said that he was a Theosophist," but rather that from Maxwell's own words you can put the peices together that he follows Theosophy. He said Blavatsky is his favorite author for one... "My source" is the audio/video clips of him saying it, I honestly can't be bothered to dig it up. It's there if you look for it though, try 'Jordan Maxwell exposed' or something to that effect.
Well, Blavatsky is also an historian so him praising her work doesnt mean he is a theosophist... If he also believes in historical accounts they believe in doesnt again necessarily means he fully embrace their religion... He is perhaps one, I'm just trying to find out what are the evidences showing that...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: August 31, 2009, 08:33:08 PM » |
|
ate=1251770144] Just keep the blinders on, thats not a gorilla in the room[/b]
I will say again. POT. KETTLE. End of story
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: August 31, 2009, 08:41:01 PM » |
|
Kind of obvious when you look and listen to his material. I don't think Dok is saying "Jordan said that he was a Theosophist," but rather that from Maxwell's own words you can put the peices together that he follows Theosophy. He said Blavatsky is his favorite author for one... "My source" is the audio/video clips of him saying it, I honestly can't be bothered to dig it up. It's there if you look for it though, try 'Jordan Maxwell exposed' or something to that effect.
One of Aj's favorite music artists is a pothead, does that make him one? What faulty irrational conclusions being drawn here, those of us who are well read actually do not shy from books just because the author does or is a part of something we disagree with. Does saying morals and dogma is a great book to study make you a freemason?  Another epic failure from the internet innuendo brigade.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Unintelligable Name
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: August 31, 2009, 09:15:54 PM » |
|
One of Aj's favorite music artists is a pothead, does that make him one? What faulty irrational conclusions being drawn here, those of us who are well read actually do not shy from books just because the author does or is a part of something we disagree with. Does saying morals and dogma is a great book to study make you a freemason?  Another epic failure from the internet innuendo brigade. I figure you might come along and try to say "That's the only proof? Haha!" Go ahead and maintain your reality, you don't have to argue with me in order to do that though -- contrary to your impulses. Music =/= Pot smoking. Philosophical books = Philosophies. Ask any Anti-Freemason if their favorite book is Morals and Dogma.. I mean come on... lol. But hey let's argue, why not... How about his Egyptian Pyramid ritual he was involved in with the tomb, etc? That's rather indicative of someone initiated into the mystery schools.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: September 01, 2009, 04:30:49 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: September 01, 2009, 04:32:02 AM » |
|
I will say again. POT. KETTLE. End of story

|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: September 01, 2009, 11:03:42 PM » |
|
I find your prattling likewise boring. Its the SOS 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: September 01, 2009, 11:08:02 PM » |
|
How about his Egyptian Pyramid ritual he was involved in with the tomb, etc? That's rather indicative of someone initiated into the mystery schools.
You've never been involved in any sort of ritual? How can you even objectively verify that the ritual is tied to the workings of an occult order or if that occult order has a nefarious agenda? and nevermind if the participants arent just doing it for kicks?(you cannot) You hate JM therefore no proof is necessary to condemn him and all you rely on are irrationally constructed fantastical leaps of logic and cointelpro videos from the likes of chris white.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Unintelligable Name
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: September 01, 2009, 11:23:26 PM » |
|
You've never been involved in any sort of ritual? How can you even objectively verify that the ritual is tied to the workings of an occult order or if that occult order has a nefarious agenda? and nevermind if the participants arent just doing it for kicks?(you cannot) Yeah I've been involved in a ritual, called Baptism, at the age of 1. He renamed himself Jordanius Maximus or 'Jordan Maxwell' from Blavastsky's books and you're here saying "Maybe he just likes the name, maybe he just finds it entertaining, maybe he just does the theosophical rituals by khemite priests in Egyptian pyramids for kicks." If it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, and waddles like a duck -- it's probably a duck. You hate JM therefore no proof is necessary to condemn him and all you rely on are irrationally constructed fantastical leaps of logic and cointelpro videos from the likes of chris white.
WTF? Are you really as intellectually dishonest to yourself as you come off as? Unsurprisingly I've yet again realized the pointlessness of arguing with you -- so I'll save my efforts that would have been spent digging through audio clips and video films to prove what Doktor wrote.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dok
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: September 02, 2009, 04:41:46 AM » |
|
I find your prattling likewise boring. Its the SOS  someone dosent like the truth, sorry about that. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: September 04, 2009, 10:44:38 PM » |
|
someone dosent like the truth, sorry about that.  At least I dont claim what I say is 'gospel' truth, you keep your authoritarian decelerations to yourself
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: September 04, 2009, 10:51:14 PM » |
|
Yeah I've been involved in a ritual, called Baptism, at the age of 1.
He renamed himself Jordanius Maximus or 'Jordan Maxwell' from Blavastsky's books and you're here saying "Maybe he just likes the name, maybe he just finds it entertaining, maybe he just does the theosophical rituals by khemite priests in Egyptian pyramids for kicks."
If it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, and waddles like a duck -- it's probably a duck.
WTF? Are you really as intellectually dishonest to yourself as you come off as?
Unsurprisingly I've yet again realized the pointlessness of arguing with you -- so I'll save my efforts that would have been spent digging through audio clips and video films to prove what Doktor wrote.
Newsflash bud, many of us own freemasonic/occultist books and if that qualifies for condemnation in your POV, it seems you are not nearly as sophisticated as you would wish.. I own "evil" books ranging from crowley to the bible and such..It is you who is intellectually dishonest in refusing to admit that no book or research is inherently evil but is open to study and taking to heart what is worthwhile and what is not( as I would assume JM does) You must have a very one dimensional mind to not be able to grasp these particulars which even some of todays teenagers can comprehend. Oh and you are lying as to his naming himself 'jordanus' that was a name provided him by a rabbi I believe during a correspondence which is documented on his website, please do not stoop to making lies out of thin air to prove your faulty COINTELPRO tripe 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Unintelligable Name
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: September 04, 2009, 10:59:44 PM » |
|
Oh and you are lying as to his naming himself 'jordanus' that was a name provided him by a rabbi I believe during a correspondence which is documented on his website, please do not stoop to making lies out of thin air to prove your faulty COINTELPRO tripe  Yup... pointless to even acknowledge that you exist. *goes back to ignoring you*First I'm a retard, then I'm an incoherent drug addict 'that can barely form a thought', now I'm COINTELPRO.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: September 04, 2009, 11:02:51 PM » |
|
Yup... pointless to even acknowledge that you exist.
*goes back to ignoring you*
Well were I caught with my pants down making up I would run for the hills too  (Anyone searching JM's website can verify the jordanus quote but CR offers nothing of substantiation for his own point) I think I wrote too much for him to read lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Unintelligable Name
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: September 04, 2009, 11:04:27 PM » |
|
Well were I caught with my pants down making up I would run for the hills too  (Anyone searching JM's website can verify the jordanus quote but CR offers nothing of substantiation for his own point) http://www.blavatsky.net/magazine/theosophy/ww/additional/ListOfCollatedArticles/TheNazareneSystem.html"THEOSOPHY, Vol. 49, No. 10, August, 1961 (Pages 462-465; Size: 12K) " "There are three Trinities in the Nazarene system as well as in the Hindu philosophy of the ante and early vedic period. The Nazarene diagram, except in a change of names, is identical with that of the Gnostics, who evidently borrowed their ideas from it. In the Nazarene Cosmogony, the personified imagery found in the names of their Powers and Genii is much the same as that to which any kabalistic student is accustomed. The Trinities are as follows: The Supreme Lord of Splendor and of Light, luminous and refulgent, before which no other existed -- is called Corona (the Crown). The second member of the first trinity is Lord Ferho, the unrevealed Life which existed in the former from eternity. Lord Ferho is "the Life which is no Life" -- the Supreme God. He is the Cause which produces the Light, or the Logos in abscondito. The third is Lord Jordan (Jordanus Maximus), the Water of Life. He is the one through whom alone we can be saved; and thus he answers to the Holy Ghost (the feminine principle) and to the Shekinah (veil), or spiritual garment of En-Soph. These three constitute the unrevealed Trinity. The second Trinity is the manifestation of the first, and is composed of the three LIVES. The first (LIFE) is the similitude of Lord Ferho through whom he has proceeded forth -- the King of Light, Lord Mano. He is Rex Lucis, "older than the architect of heaven and earth." The second LIFE is Ish Amon. This is the Pleroma, or the boundless circle within which lie all forms; the THOUGHT of the power divine. It is the "vase of election," containing the thought of Jordanus Maximus; thus the type, or its intelligible reflection, of the prototype of the "living Water," who is the "spiritual Jordan." The third LIFE which is produced from the other two, is Abatur (Ab, parent or father). Abatur is the "Ancient of Days," the father of the Demiurgos of the universe. He is the Creator who calls inert matter into life, through his vivifying spirit. He is the father who creates the first Adam (who creates in his turn the second). "Abatur opens a gate and walks to the dark water (chaos), and looking down into it, the darkness reflects the image of Himself ... and lo, a SON is formed -- the Logos or Demiurge (Fetahil), who is the builder of the material world thus called into existence." This third LIFE is the architect of the visible universe which he calls into existence by the power of his genii at the order of the "Greatest." " "(1) NOTE.--Collated from standard Theosophical sources. " Go fish.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Unintelligable Name
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: September 04, 2009, 11:07:03 PM » |
|
Unsurprisingly I've yet again realized the pointlessness of arguing with you -- so I'll save my efforts that would have been spent digging through audio clips and video films to prove what Doktor wrote. Have fun -- continue to call me COINTELPRO if you like. I await my next designation with 'baited breath'.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
clearmyst
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: September 04, 2009, 11:08:51 PM » |
|
You cannot disprove what jordan says about him being mailed the name by a rabbi, so I assume you see the massive leap in stretching your point here? Unless he admitted he took his name from that book you have no case
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|