|
Dig
|
 |
« on: August 01, 2009, 06:36:21 AM » |
|
Media Matters To Run Ads Attacking Lou Dobbs' Birther Obsession -- On CNN! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/31/media-matters-to-run-adds_n_249078.htmlHuffington Post Lila Shapiro 07-31-09 03:56 PM Read More: Birther Conspiracy, Birthers, Birthers Conspiracy, Cnn, Dobbs, Jon Klein, Lou Dobbs, Media Matters, Media News, Right Wing Conspiracy Theories, Southern Poverty Law Center, Splc, Media News It looks like CNN president John Klein's laissez faire attitude about Lou Dobbs "birther" obsession is about to be tested. Yesterday we noted that CNN host Lou Dobbs' "birther" obsession -- the right-wing theory Dobbs has been trumpeting that President Obama has no U.S. birth certificate, is an "undocumented" alien, and his presidency is "illegal" -- has been good for creating controversy and hot feelings but bad for CNN's ratings. In short, since Dobbs began talking Obama birth certificate conspiracy theories on his radio show, his audience on CNN has decreased by 15 percent. CNN's president John Klein has been largely defending Dobbs. After initially declaring the birthers story "dead" in an internal memo to Dobbs' staff, Klein switched tacks and went on to say that "Lous' his own show," and, in a panel discussion, Klein emphasized that what Dobbs said on his radio show was not his (Klein's) problem. "We have no control over what he says on his radio show." Klein said. "It's not a CNN radio program so he does what he does on the radio separate from what he does on our air." Now, media watchdog group Media Matters, who has been calling for Dobbs resignation has bought air time on CNN to run anti-Lou Dobbs ads-- on Lou's show! Greg Sargent spoke with Media Matters: A Media Matters spokesman tells me the group has bought a week of ad time on CNN, MSNBC and Fox News in D.C., New York, and Atlanta, beginning Tuesday. The catch: Media Matters has specifically purchased time to air the ad during Dobbs' show -- putting CNN in the position of either running the spot or nixing it and making this a bigger story Read the full transcript of the ad here: http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/media-matters-running-ads-attacking-lou-dobbs-birther-obsession-on-cnn/Media Matters Running Ads Attacking Lou Dobbs’ Birther Obsession — On CNN!
Okay, this is an intriguing new frontier in political media criticism. Media Matters, which has been attacking CNN for not reining in Lou Dobbs’ birther obsession, has now purchased air time to run a TV ad attacking “CNN’s Lou Dobbs problem” — during Dobbs’ show!
A Media Matters spokesman tells me the group has bought a week of ad time on CNN, MSNBC and Fox News in D.C., New York, and Atlanta, beginning Tuesday. The catch: Media Matters has specifically purchased time to air the ad during Dobbs’ show — putting CNN in the position of either running the spot or nixing it and making this a bigger story.
Here’s the script of the spot:
TITLE: CNN’s Dobbs Problem –- 30 Sec.
Chyron: CNN Has a Lou Dobbs Problem
Voice Over: CNN’s Lou Dobbs has been promoting the false, right-wing conspiracy that President Obama hasn’t produced a valid U.S. birth certificate.
Clips: A series of short clips of Dobbs saying “birth certificate”
Voice Over: CNN President Jon Klein said Dobbs’ obsession was “legitimate.”
Clips: Another series of short clips of Dobbs saying “birth certificate”
Voice Over: It’s time for “The Most Trusted Name in News” to live up to its slogan. Let CNN know there’s nothing “legitimate” about racially charged paranoia.
Chyron: Take action at mediamatters.org
CNN, obviously, hasn’t yet been informed of the ad’s content. It seems that Media Matters’ goal is to get CNN’s competitors to pick up on the story as news, to bait CNN into responding, and to foment internal tensions over Dobbs within the network. Media Matters has been closely documenting the Dobbs/birther story, and this is a real escalation. It’ll be interesting to see how CNN and Dobbs react.
***************************************
Update: A statement from Media Matters president Eric Burns earlier this afternoon gives more context:
“Between the reaction from other media figures and the crashing of Dobbs’ ratings, CNN is making a mockery of its claim to being ‘the most trusted name in news.’ CNN can’t continue to condone Dobbs’ birther coverage and expect to be taken seriously. Jon Klein owes viewers — and his network — more.” UPDATE: Dobbs has now responded to the ads on his radio show, calling them a "Swift Boat of the left" and "really extraordinary." He ends his rant suggesting he won't try to put a stop to the ad running: "So it'll be interesting to see what Media Matters runs. That sounds like a fascinating ad." Real Time Follow HuffPost on Twitter... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
|
Dig
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2009, 06:46:46 AM » |
|
Concerning the article at the plum line, look at this comment:------------------------------ Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers” | August 1st, 2009 at 12:17 am
The label of “birther” is fast becoming a noble badge of honor for millions of Americans who are not willing to let their Constitution die without a good ole patriot’s fight!
The leftist Obama propaganda press would love for you to believe that “birthers” are just a bunch of “crazy racists” that number in the hundreds, and that they have NO basis to demand proof of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama really is…
But the “birthers” actually number in the millions and the basis for their demands were set in stone by the men who wrote and ratified the US Constitution. If millions of American “birthers” are “right-wing nuts,” they are in good company with men like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Ben Franklin.
Obama has been running from his entire past all of his political life. His many minions in the press have been running interference every step of the way.
For the record, the following Obama records remain under lock and key, more than two years into public demands for Obama “transparency”… and Obama has spent a reported $1 Million in legal fees to keep them SEALED!
Obama’s official birth records -SEALED
His Occidental College records -SEALED
His Columbia College records -SEALED
His Harvard College records -SEALED
His College Thesis -SEALED
His Harvard Law Review articles -SEALED
His Indonesia Adoption records -SEALED
His Passport file -SEALED
His connection to countless foreign and domestic thugs -SEALED
Yet the American press, now to include Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly, insist that they somehow inherently know with absolute certainty, that Barack Hussein Obama was indeed born in Hawaii, a “natural born citizen,” not just “a citizen” or a “native citizen,” and that millions of Americans who think he should provide a minimum level of proof, are just “crazy” -”racists” or possibly even “potential domestic terrorists” as Obama’s Department of Homeland Security recently suggested.
Since ALL Obama records remain SEALED, what files did O’Reilly and others investigate in order to draw their absolute conclusion that Obama is legit and millions of Americans are nuts?
What’s all of the stink about?
US Law establishes that while there are several ways one can become a US citizen, there are actually only three different types of US Citizens with three very different sets of qualifications and citizen rights.
A US Citizen
A Native Born Citizen
A Natural Born Citizen
Today, we have to add one more category, the “illegal” US citizen. But that story is for another day.
A foreign born immigrant, who has successfully navigated the naturalization process, is a legal US citizen with all of the Constitutional rights afforded a US Citizen with the exception of one, the right to be President of the United States. As a matter of Constitutional case law, - 94 ”Whatever the term ‘’natural born’’ means, it no doubt does not include a person who is ‘’naturalized.’’
In this regard, the issue of Obama’s adoption by Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro is also of consequence, as Obama could only be a US citizen by way of “naturalization.” There is no record of Obama naturalizing as a U.S. citizen upon returning from Indonesia.
All of this is at the heart of the debate over where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. His family and friends say that he was born in Kenya. His political allies say that he was born in Hawaii, our fiftieth state. Obama has stated that he was born in Hawaii and he has presented as proof, THREE different Certifications of Live Birth (COLBs) [ NOT the same as a Certificate of Live Birth ] and he has named TWO different hospitals located in Hawaii, as his official place of birth.
But since he has refused to open up his official birth records in Hawaii, nobody knows for certain where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. Contrary to leftist attempts to spin, the mere fact that such a constitutional requirement exists implies that one must provide proof of compliance, if and when asked to do so.
NOTE: One can be a US citizen without being a “native citizen” or a “natural born citizen.” It must also be stated that Hawaii issued Certifications of Live Birth to foreign born non-citizens of the US as a regular practice.
If Barack Hussein Obama II was indeed born in Hawaii, and this can be verified by authenticating his official birth records alleged to exist in Hawaii, then he could be a “US Citizen” and maybe even a “Native Born Citizen” having been born on American soil. To date, no such evidence has been made available for purposes of authentication.
However, one can be both a “US citizen” and a “Native Born citizen” and still NOT be a “Natural Born Citizen.”
As an example, what are often referred to as “anchor babies” are both US citizens and Native Born citizens as a matter of federal law. But as a matter of the US Constitution, specifically Article II -Section I, they are NOT a “natural born citizen” as their parents were NOT citizens of the U.S.
NOTE: Barack Hussein Obama I, Obama’s legal birth father was NOT a US citizen. He was a British subject and a legal citizen of Kenya.
Under “natural law” at the foundation of the “natural born citizen” clause, a blood descendent will inherit by way of natural law, the fathers name and citizenship, no matter where they were born.
Until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, all Presidents since and including Martin Van Buren were born in the United States, a descendent of parents who were both US citizens.
Why the Founders were “Birthers”
It was the Founding Fathers who wrote and ratified, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”
They based this clause on the following; “Congress, in which a number of Framers sat, provided in the Naturalization act of 1790 that ‘’the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, . . . shall be considered as natural born citizens. . . .’’ 96 This phrasing followed the literal terms of British statutes, beginning in 1350, under which persons born abroad, whose parents were both British subjects, would enjoy the same rights of inheritance as those born in England; beginning with laws in 1709 and 1731, these statutes expressly provided that such persons were natural-born subjects of the crown.”
So, had both of Obama’s parents been US citizens, he would indeed be a “natural born citizen” of the US, even if he had been born in Kenya. By way of “natural law,” he inherited the name and citizenship of his father, in Kenya, not the US.
As his father was not a US citizen, but rather a citizen of Kenya, Obama inherited by birthright, natural law, his fathers name and citizenship. He is NOT a “natural born citizen” of the US, no matter where he was born.
The Founders exempted themselves from the “natural born citizen” clause because at the time of ratification, there were no “natural born citizens,” - US citizens born to two parents who were both US citizens.
But from President Martin Van Buren on, US born descendents of two US citizens did exist and up until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, those who became president passed the “natural born citizen” requirement in the Constitution.
Clearly, the Founders were very serious “birthers.” But why were they “birthers?” What were they so worried about?
Dual or Divided Loyalties
The president of the United States has unfettered access to ALL national security information. He is afforded powers unlike any other individual on earth. His finger rests on the Red button and his office is respected and revered around the globe. He is the international representative of every American citizen.
Such an office cannot be held by one with even the potential for dual or divided loyalties. The international pressure to act upon global interests instead of American interests is immense. Only one with completely undivided loyalties can be trusted. He MUST be a “natural born citizen” as the Constitution requires.
Above all else, the Founding Father’s feared a despotic central government that would one day turn its abusive power on its people. They went to great pains to design a Representative Republic limited in scope and power by constitutional text that would best secure the people against such an event, including Article II -Section I, intended to keep leaders with foreign loyalties from ever holding the broadest power on earth.
Then, they told us to alter or abolish any government that became a threat to Life, Liberty or the pursuit of Happiness.
They were “extremists…” They didn’t trust central power and they sure didn’t trust that power in the hands of someone with dual or divided loyalties.
Why the “Birther” Movement is EXPLODING!
Demonstrated by plummeting approval ratings only six months into office, the American people have seen enough of Obama’s “global” agenda, at odds with American interest, and what was once “hope” for “change” six months ago, has become fear, anger and discontent. Obama took office six months ago with a +28 point strong approval rating. Six months later, Obama finds himself at a -12 point approval rating, an unprecedented 40 point swing!
The Obama administration has named more unelected Czars in six months than pre-Soviet Russia named in its thousand year existence. They have forced industries into bankruptcy only to emerge the property of the federal government. They are ramming Marxist laws through a leftist congress so fast that members of congress don’t even have time to read them before they pass.
Members of congress are now afraid to hold town meetings for fear of being attacked by angry constituents who have had enough of watching DC elitists run roughshod over the other side of the aisle, the states and the American people. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090731/pl_politico/25646)
There are TWO reasons why the “birther” movement is EXPLODING instead of going away, despite daily attacks and name calling from the lamestream press.
The Constitution, including Article II -Section I either stands or it doesn’t.
The people are watching the utter hourly destruction of their nation in Washington DC and they need a peaceful way to end that destruction legally, before things become violent.
The flaw in the left’s plan to change the Unites States into a secular socialist One World Order is they have foolishly underestimated the desire for freedom and liberty in the hearts and minds of most Americans.
They have miscalculated… The 22.4% of the population who voted for Marxism in the last two election cycles thought that they won the right to shove Marxism down the throats of every American. They are horrifically mistaken…
By launching a heavy handed all-out assault on individual freedom and liberty from every possible front at breakneck speed, they have sent the nation into shock and dismay. Even many, who foolishly voted for the mystery messiah last November, are now jumping ship after watching him make a mockery of the US Constitution and the principles and values that made America the greatest free nation ever known to mankind.
The people need to right the ship and remove every anti-American fraud from the halls of the federal government before things get really ugly. Afraid to confront their constituents, law-makers are running for cover. When representatives stop listening to the people they work for, the people will stop talking and start acting!
If Obama is a “constitutional” president, he is going to have to prove it and fast. If not, he is going to have to leave the people’s White House, in handcuffs if need be! The issue will not go away. The Constitution stands or all bets are off!
Every member of his administration and his party who had knowledge of, participated in or provided cover for the greatest hoax every perpetrated on the American people, must step down with him.
The people will have to figure out what to do next, but one thing is certain, - this “silent coup” will not stand much longer. The walls are closing in and Obama & Co. are trapped in their own massive web of deceit.
People do NOT spend a million dollars to hide something
that there is no reason to hide.
The inescapable reality is this… - We have an unconstitutional resident of the White House and a whole lot of people working around the clock to keep him in office, for God only knows what purpose.
Although 22.4% of Americans don’t seem to care about that, millions of American “birthers” do, as did the Founding Fathers.
Sooner or later, Obama is going to have to prove that he is legitimate. The longer it takes for him to come forward and do so, the more dangerous the situation will become, as citizens grow increasingly angry over the utter destruction of their country.
The truth exists in Obama’s official birth, adoption, college and passport records. Nobody hides the truth unless the truth will expose a lie…
Even Obama’s political allies had better start calling for the truth and fast, or they will sink with him! The Founders had it right and on that basis alone, so do the “birthers.”
We’re keeping a list of all who have chosen badly…---------------------------------
Then look at the comments below it:--- You can't make this stuff up | August 1st, 2009 at 12:50 am
Uh someone needs to report ‘Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers”’ to the FBI and Secret Service. You my friend are a sicko.
Shelley Gardner | August 1st, 2009 at 12:54 am
Birther poster: The only label “birther” bestows on any one is “unstable”. What hogwash! And as for your threat that you are keeping a list of all who have chosen badly, be aware that this threat is a prosecutable crime under the terrorism laws enacted under the same Constitution that you so badly misinterpret. And if you are keeping a list, make sure you spell my name right - so many ill educated luddites have a tendency to mangle it. Education is the sunshine that can disinfect a seriously musty mind. Have a nice day!
Pumalicious! | August 1st, 2009 at 12:59 am
Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers”:
You need to explain why so many Republicans and cons are willing to trample on the rights of the sovereign state of Hawaii, whose records have already demonstrated that Barack Hussein Obama is indeed a natural born citizen of the United States of America.
The COLB issued by the sovereign state of Hawaii is legally admissible evidence in any United States court. Why are you people so willing to overturn their sovereignty in order to prove a highly unlikely point?
Birthing in Porcelain | August 1st, 2009 at 01:03 am
Hey “Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers’”….
I printed out your comment from this forum, took a healthy dump in my lovely toilet, and then I wiped my soiled backside with your ridiculously paranoid rambling…Thank you for making it so lengthy, as my backside was quite soiled indeed. God bless us all and keep us safe from bunker nuts like you, enjoy the AM radio down there! Cheers!
Michael Nathan | August 1st, 2009 at 01:28 am
Hey birther, you are a seriously deranged and delusional and dangerous fanatic. Put my name on your list, too. The reality is, the GOP is down to about 20% of the population, and about 1/2 of that is made up of conspiracists, racists, misogynists, gun nuts and homophobes. You cannot abide the fact that a black man is president, so you will do whatever you can to feed your paranoia and sick fantasy world…--------------------------------
How much more obvious does it get?
---------------------------------------
Then it looks like reality started setting in--- Most readers of this blog know that I personally believe Obama was born in Hawaii and can prove it any time he sees fit. I have always believed that the BC issue was a smokescreen to control awareness of the fact that Obama was a British/Kenyan citizen at the time of his birth through his father who was never a US citizen.
This fact alone – as the Supreme Court made reference to in the Minor case (see below) – raises doubts as to whether a native born US citizen with a dual foreign nationality at the time of his birth can be President. The BC birther conspiracy theory has clearly and effectively shielded from view the true issue – which is a legal question, not a conspiracy theory.
But with our Government trying to sanitize Obama’s eligibility today in Congress by attempting to pass H. RES. 593 , I’ve come up with a new mantra for the BC birthers:
WHERE DO WE PLACE THE PLAQUE?
H. Res 593 states:
Whereas the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii;
If they’re going to make that assertion so boldly and codify it in a Congressional Resolution then the American people, especially Hawaiian citizens, deserve to know exactly where in Hawaii Obama was born. Right?
This will be a source of State pride and also revenue for the municipality which can claim the exact spot where Obama was born.
H. Res 593 is intended to celebrate Hawaii’s entering the union. It makes great pomp out of its factual assertion that the 44th President of the US was born in Hawaii. So let’s not stop there. If the Congressional record will state Obama was born in Hawaii, it should also tell us where exactly in Hawaii he was born.
Honolulu is a city. But his birthplace is a spot, a certain address. That’s what we need. Because otherwise we can’t memorialize the spot. So here comes your mantra:
WHERE DO WE PLACE THE PLAQUE?
It doesn’t seem fair to the citizens of the municipality where Obama was born to deprive them of a plaque stating “this is where the 44th President was born.”
Most birth-sites of Presidents are given special distinction – some are protected and maintained by the National Park Service as National Historic Sites. For example, the place of birth for Teddy Roosevelt is a National Historic Site.
Why should Hawaii get the raw end of the stick?
Considering his historical run as the first African American President, doesn’t the place of Obama’s birth deserve to be declared a National Historic Site?
Of course, if Obama states unequivocally where he was born then historians will be able to thoroughly research that claim. And that’s all good because I’m sure Obama wants this cleared up. So let them make the Congressional resolution – just demand that the exact spot in Hawaii is made clear.
Was it a hospital? Was it in a house? If so, which house?
Is Congress really going to pass a resolution saying Obama was born in Hawaii without knowing where exactly in Hawaii he was born?
So listen up BC birthers, this is your new mantra:
WHERE DO WE PLACE THE PLAQUE COMMEMORATING OBAMA’S BIRTH?
It’s a respectful question. It’s not mean spirited. It doesn’t involve a conspiracy theory. And it will generate revenue and tourism for the people in the town where Obama was born. It will also provide something concrete for those concerned about his eligibility to properly research. Seems like a win win for everybody.
Just ask Obama to have a little love for the municipality where he was born by confirming once and for all his exact birthspot? What’s wrong with a little love, Pres?
muxamed | August 1st, 2009 at 03:20 am
Breaking ranks with other liberal talk hosts, Sirius Satellite Radio’s Lynn Samuels believes Obama is ‘lying’ about his true place of birth, which may have been outside of the United States and would mean he is ineligible to be President
muxamed | August 1st, 2009 at 03:21 am
Dear President Obama:
You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.
You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.
You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.
You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.
You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.
You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don’t understand it at its core.
You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others.
Lou Pritchett
You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.
You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America’ crowd and deliver this message abroad.
You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.
You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.
You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.
You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.
You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics against certain banks and corporations.
You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.
You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.
You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.
You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.
You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O’Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.
You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.
Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.
Lou Pritchett
bush | August 1st, 2009 at 03:28 am
on January 9, 2009 The ignorance of some people on this subject is one thing; the rudeness is quite another.
It’s clear from some of the comments that:
1) If you’re against Obama, you MUST be racist,
2) If Obama actually HAD a certified birth certificate, he would have already ended this craziness,
3) If Obama was a U.S. citizen in 1981, he would have had a U.S. passport when he went into Pakistan…but instead, he had an Indonesian one.
4) The majority of citizens prefer to keep their heads in the sand rather than to confront the possibility that they have been “had” by Barry
5) If Obama had been born in Hawaii, his Kenyan grandmother (and the Kenyan hospital that has his real birth certificate showing the name of the physician who delivered him) would have had to have been magically transported to Hawaii.
6) Hawaii state officials have said they examined Obama’s birth certificate and it is authentic–they didn’t say if it said, “U.S”. or “Kenya” Note how carefully they have worded their press releases.
7) The person who referred to “Mars” is dead on.
Obama has such a devoted following, that there is no limit to the lies, fraud, and cover-up people would be willing to do for him.
9) There will be a day of reckoning for Barry, the DNC, and those who helped to perpetrate this hoax on the American people.
Max | August 1st, 2009 at 07:09 am
After the birther issue , whats the next distraction ? the white house vegetable garden ?
mike | August 1st, 2009 at 07:27 am
Dobbs is an old,out of touch closet racist white guy time has left behind. Time for him to go to the station where his type live and spew their final rants-Fox news.
John Borling | August 1st, 2009 at 07:29 am
The’birth matter’ will not go away until the President tells Hawaii to present the original for independent validation. What is there to hide?
There is the another issue of ‘did he register for the draft’—-failure to have done so makes him, by law, ineligble to hold federal office.
John Carter | August 1st, 2009 at 07:33 am
Anyone with any common sense knows that Media Matters is just another slobbering love prostitute as NBC, CBS, ABC and PBS are as well.Every major magazine and newspaper are behind him as well (that’s why they are all going “belly up”) including the rag the N.Y. Times. Even CNN is in love and has slobbered all over Obama as well as MSNBC which is IN BED with him. It’s refreshing to see 1 reporter stand up and question thishorrid and pathetic journalism. Well done Lou….Finally someone grew a pair…
Bob | August 1st, 2009 at 07:45 am
“Most readers of this blog know that I personally believe Obama was born in Hawaii and can prove it any time he sees fit. ”
Then why doesn’t he?
That’s the question people are asking.Regardless of your position on this issue, what is so difficult about just opening the records and ending the discussion once and for all?
The very people that attack those that want to know probably don’t want to know the truth or very afraid of what they’ll learn.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Look at similar patterns in other blogs, there are hundreds of unanswered questions and the only defense is:
"You are a fringe group."
"You are stupid."
"You are crazy."
How is this not the same as every other CFR cover up?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately
|
|
|
