Hillary Clinton wants to target the 9/11 Truth Movement

[Dig]

HILLARY CLINTON'S MOTIF

Hillary is determined to get to the White House, that is why she has already broken so many laws and paid off so many people.  She realizes that the confrontations on her husband create a huge tear in her armour.  In addition, Bush's Nazi ties are always interested in increased reasons to move Citizens into Chertoff FEMA/Concentration camps.  Also Ron Paul is looking more likely to be the Republican candidate as he is on target to break all other candidate's funding and has won every fair poll that exists.  Here are some of the reasons that Hillary is deciding to kill people rather than just answer questions:  the answers implicate her, the answers implicate her husband.

C.H.A.N.G.E. confronts Bill Clinton

7 min - Oct 25, 2007 -    (4 ratings)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8jVjfTM9Kw

She already has demonstrated the similar personality of a serial killer or repeat offender:

The Death of Vince Foster - What Really Happened? (1995)

1 hr 12 min - Aug 9, 2006 -    (16 ratings)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4113276458031151696

Allan J. Favish U.S. Supreme Court Press Conference on Vincent Foster's Cover Up by Hillary Clinton

25 min - May 28, 2007 -    (3 ratings)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7009252526060541658
________________________

WACO: The Rules of Engagement (1/2)

1 hr 9 min - Apr 19, 2006 -    (117 rating)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4298137966377572665

WACO: The Rules of Engagement (2/2)

1 hr 6 min - Apr 20, 2006 -    (92 ratings)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1755692679103175934

WACO: The Big Lie

31 min - Apr 19, 2006 -    (97 ratings)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5369116450757675658

Waco - A New Revelation (1999) (Part 1 of 2)

54 min - Apr 20, 2006 -    (62 ratings)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5510108493532885562

Waco - A New Revelation (1999) (Part 2 of 2)

58 min - Apr 20, 2006 -    (66 ratings)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2962656895645965329

[Dig]

COPS STAGE VIOLENCE
A PLAY BY PLAY ANALYSIS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv042Ywecl4

[Dig]

CHANGE confronts Bill Clintion AGAIN!
http://wearechange.org
Bill Clinton Speech Interrupted By WeAreCHANGE

Comment: Clinton is right - 9/11 wasn't an inside job, and Bill never had sex with that woman.

Former President Bill Clinton predicted Tuesday that his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, is likely to have a more difficult time winning the Democratic presidential nomination than she would the general election. "I wouldn't be surprised if the primary is tougher than the general," the former president said at a Minneapolis fundraiser for his wife's campaign, arguing that she's more immune to attacks from Republicans because "they don't have anything new to say about her." Because of the current political climate, Clinton said Democrats are in prime position to reclaim the presidency. "I think we can run anybody and win if we run a smart campaign," Clinton said. That gives Democrats the opportunity to pick the most qualified candidate for the job, he said, making the pitch that Hillary Clinton is that candidate. Clinton's 50-minute speech, which started about an hour behind schedule, was derailed briefly by several hecklers in the audience who shouted that the 2001 terrorist attacks were a fraud. Rather than ignoring them, Clinton seemed to relish a direct confrontation. "A fraud? No, it wasn't a fraud," Clinton said, as the crowd cheered him on. "I'll be glad to talk to you if you shut up and let me talk." When another heckler shouted that the attacks were an "inside job," Clinton took even greater umbrage. "An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside job," Clinton said. "You guys have got to be careful, you're going to give Minnesota a bad reputation."

[Dig]

Bill Clinton Trades Blows With 9/11 Truthers-Former president again targeted by non-violent protesters        
http://infowars.net/articles/october2007/251007Clinton_heckled.htm
Steve Watson Infowars.net Thursday, Oct 25, 2007

For the second time in as many months a public appearance by former president Bill Clinton has been interrupted by 9/11 truth activists.  According to a AP report, Clinton, appearing at the State Theater in downtown Minneapolis as part of a Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, was interrupted by a group of protesters campaigning for a new investigation into the 9/11 attacks.

The AP reported:
Clinton's 50-minute speech, which started about an hour behind schedule, was derailed briefly by several hecklers in the audience who shouted that the 2001 terrorist attacks were a fraud. Rather than ignoring them, Clinton seemed to relish a direct confrontation. "A fraud? No, it wasn't a fraud," Clinton said, as the crowd cheered him on. "I'll be glad to talk to you if you shut up and let me talk." When another heckler shouted that the attacks were an "inside job," Clinton took even greater umbrage. "An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside job," Clinton said. "You guys have got to be careful, you're going to give Minnesota a bad reputation."

The confrontation follows an incident last month during which members of the protest group We Are Change concealed a small PA system at a Clinton book signing. In addition to declaring 9/11 to be an inside job, the activists proceeded to tell the audience in attendance that Bill Clinton has attended meetings of the secretive elite policy making Bilderberg group and that he actively works with internationalist lobbying group The Council on Foreign Relations.

[Constitutional Patriot]

LOL.  Look how defensive Ol' Billy Boy got when confronted with the truth.  Usually people get defensive when they have something to hide!

The truth hurts, doesn't it BILL.

[Dig]

Bill "the shill" Clinton: "An inside job? How dare you! How dare you!"

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c68_1193347304&p=1



http://wcco.com/topstories/local_story_296230151.html

[Dig]

Former president campaigns for his wife in Minneapolis
http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=268082

Former President Bill Clinton predicted Tuesday that his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, is likely to have a more difficult time winning the Democratic presidential nomination than she would the general election. "I wouldn't be surprised if the primary is tougher than the general," the former president said at a Minneapolis fundraiser for his wife's campaign, arguing that she's more immune to attacks from Republicans because "they don't have anything new to say about her." Because of the current political climate, Clinton said Democrats are in prime position to reclaim the presidency. "I think we can run anybody and win if we run a smart campaign," Clinton said. That gives Democrats the opportunity to pick the most qualified candidate for the job, he said, making the pitch that Hillary Clinton is that candidate. Bill Clinton's evening appearance at the State Theater in downtown Minneapolis followed a day of activity in Minnesota. Earlier in the day, he helped dedicate a new center for healthy living at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, then headlined two Minneapolis fundraisers. Tickets to the first fundraiser went for $1,000 or $2,300, while those for the second event at the State Theater ranged from $25 to $100. The Clinton campaign wouldn't divulge how much was raised, but said they sold all 2,000 tickets for the State Theater event. Recent polls have shown Hillary Clinton with a healthy lead over her opponents in the Democratic primary. Bill Clinton didn't elaborate on why she's likely to face a tougher fight in the primary, but he noted the strength of the entire Democratic lineup and said Democrats were lucky to have a range of good candidates to choose from. But in arguing for his wife's candidacy, the former president called her "the most qualified non-incumbent candidate for president" that he's seen in his 40 years as a voter.

Clinton, rattling off as he often does dizzying sets of facts and figures, laid out the challenges likely to be faced by the next president. His rundown had a distinctly global emphasis, as he returned numerous times to the argument that Hillary Clinton is most qualified to undo damage to the U.S. reputation in the world he said has been caused by the Bush administration. "This is not an experimental deal," Clinton said. "We're not going to get a honeymoon here. She went to 83 countries when I was president." Clinton's 50-minute speech, which started about an hour behind schedule, was derailed briefly by several hecklers in the audience who shouted that the 2001 terrorist attacks were a fraud. Rather than ignoring them, Clinton seemed to relish a direct confrontation. "A fraud? No, it wasn't a fraud," Clinton said, as the crowd cheered him on. "I'll be glad to talk to you if you shut up and let me talk." When another heckler shouted that the attacks were an "inside job," Clinton took even greater umbrage. "An inside job? How dare you. How dare you. It was not an inside job," Clinton said. "You guys have got to be careful, you're going to give Minnesota a bad reputation."

[Dig]

[Dig]

[Dig]

The Masonic Brotherhood: President Bill Clinton bows to former President George H. W. Bush
www.informationliberation.com/?id=10946

Former President Bill Clinton bows to former President George H. W. Bush after he receives a honorary degree during the Tulane University Commencement in New Orleans on Saturday May 13, 2006. Former President Clinton also received a degree. Clinton said Hurricane Katrina and the enormous response it provoked should teach the graduates at least one thing. "It is a positive manifestation of the most important fact of your lives — the interdependence of human beings on this planet," Clinton said. "And if you look at the negative aspects of Katrina, the lives lost, the property washed away, dreams broken, it is also evidence of our interdependence."

[Dig]

[Constitutional Patriot]

Did he kiss the ring?  Geez...they're so brash nowadays that they're not even trying to hide it anymore.  They've got 90% of the population brainwashed into complete ignorance of the signs that are right in front of their eyes everyday.

[Dig]

Campaign call reveals Clinton debate concern
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/campaign-call-reveals-clinton-debate-concern-2007-11-01.html
By Sam Youngman  November 01, 2007

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) top advisers, doing damage control after the candidate’s debate performance Tuesday, told supporters on a conference call Wednesday that the campaign needed more money to fight back. Mark Penn, Clinton’s senior strategist and pollster, and Jonathan Mantz, the campaign’s finance director, told the supporters on the call, which The Hill listened to in its entirety, that they expect attacks from Clinton’s rivals to continue, and she will need the financial resources to deflect their attacks.
 
Clinton came under withering assault in the Philadelphia debate, and some supporters on the call agreed with analysts that she stumbled. “I wouldn’t say she lost her cool,” one caller said. “But I would say she lost her footing.” The caller addded that Clinton’s response to questions about records from her time in the White House that have been sealed by the National Archives “made me roll my eyes.” The criticisms followed Penn’s assertion that Clinton was “unflappable.” He also said criticisms from Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) and former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) would backfire and that hewas already “detecting some backlash,” particularly among female voters. Those female voters are saying, “Sen. Clinton needs our support now more than ever if we’re going to see this six-on-one to try to bring her down,” Penn told those on the campaign call.

He, Mantz and several supporters hinted repeatedly on the call that Clinton was unfairly targeted by Tim Russert, debate moderator and host of NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Russert made it appear that President Clinton had done something new or unusual,” Penn said, before adding that it “is, in fact, an extremely confusing situation … I think there will be further clarification.” “I hope so,” a female caller responded. “To me, it was the most uncomfortable part of the debate.” Penn turned again to Russert. “The other candidates were asked questions like, ‘Is there life in outer space?’ ” The object of the call, and a follow-up breakfast Thursday morning with campaign chairman and former chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Terry McAuliffe, was apparently to stop whatever bleeding the senator might have sustained during a debate in which Clinton wore a bull’s-eye on her back throughout the evening. Penn and Mantz said “a new phase” in the campaign had begun with about 65 days to go before the Iowa caucuses. They expect Obama and Edwards to go “negative on TV, and we’re going to need the resources to fight that front.”

While one supporter voiced his concern that the Clinton campaign is not devoting enough money and staff to Iowa, lagging behind Obama, most supporters who commented on the call expressed their displeasure with what they saw as the moderators’ focus on Clinton. One caller from Oklahoma City said that “the questions … were designed to incite a brawl,” and that Russert’s and Brian Williams’s moderating was “an abdication of journalistic responsibility.” Another said Russert “should be shot,” before quickly adding that she shouldn’t say that on a conference call.  Penn and Mantz said they were hearing a lot of the same sentiment from other supporters, but they do not plan to engage the media or the debate’s moderators. “We’re not challenging the media on that, but the sentiment you’ve expressed is obviously one I’ve heard,” Penn said. Penn added that he conducted polling before and after the debate — a focus group, perhaps — that saw Clinton as the winner. Sen. Joseph Biden (Del.) “had a good night” and John Edwards “did better,” Penn said, though he added Edwards’s numbers have been going down. “Obama did not have a particularly good night,” Penn said.

Those results diverge sharply from the assessment of most analysts who watched the debate, and thought Clinton did poorly. Her campaign appeared to be in full damage-control mode Wednesday. It received a big boost at midday when Clinton received the coveted endorsement of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). Gerald McEntee, AFSCME’s president, mentioned the debate during his endorsement speech, and took Penn’s and Mantz’s view of the results. “Some of you may have seen last night’s debate,” McEntee said. “Six guys against Hillary, and I’d call that a fair fight. This is a strong woman.” Obama and Edwards continued their assault throughout the day, trying to capitalize on the first chink in Clinton’s armor that they have seen in months.

In a memo from the Obama campaign, spokesman Bill Burton said Clinton “offered more of the same Washington political calculation and evasion that won’t bring the change America needs.”  “The ‘politics of hope’ doesn’t mean hoping you don’t have to answer tough questions,” Burton wrote. Burton wrote that Clinton dodged questions on Social Security, Iran and the National Archives issue. And on one of the more talked-about moments from the end of the debate, Clinton’s position on a move by New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer (D) to grant driver’s licenses to illegal aliens, Burton said, “Twelve hours after the debate ended, the American people are still waiting for an answer on Sen. Clinton’s position … She didn’t answer the question in the debate and her campaign couldn’t answer it afterwards.” In Wednesday’s conference call, Penn said Clinton “clarified that she does support governors like Gov. Spitzer” who are faced with the issue because of the federal government’s failure to offer comprehensive immigration reform.  The Edwards campaign, apparently referring to the AFSCME endorsement, said Clinton was “trying to change the subject after losing a debate.” Clinton drew fire throughout the day from the Republican National Committee, which sent around a compilation of negative press releases from state Republican parties in Texas, Florida, Georgia and California. Two conservative bloggers filed a complaint with the FEC charging that Clinton had engaged in questionable, and possibly illegal, fundraising practices. The Clinton campaign released a video Wednesday, entitled “The Politics of Pile On,” showing clips of the senator’s rivals going after her by name during the debate. The senator did not appear ready to surrender Wednesday, though. When accepting the AFSCME endorsement, Clinton handed McEntee a pair of boxing gloves. “When it comes to fighting for America’s working families, I’ll go 10 rounds with anybody,” she said.

[Dig]

I wrote an article about this on our website on Sept 10th. Alex Jones is calling it right on the money and his sources are gravely correct. This article is right from the Council on Foreign Relations website. With the media being CFR members, they are doing exactly what their bosses want. It seems as if and when they stage the next event, they could blame it on 9/11 Truth Movement for aiding the terrorist. After all, talking about the constitution is considered subversion and being an enemy combatant under the Patriot Acts. Notice the highlighted comments made by Kaplan? Footnote: Eben Kaplan is the assistant editor of CFR.org, where he writes primarily about terrorism and homeland security.

This just shows we're winning the infowar!

Source: http://www.cfr.org/publication/13307/preventing_the_next_attack.html

By Eben Kaplan

For years, terrorism experts have cautioned that the next terrorist attack in the United States could be carried out by a homegrown cell, inspired by radical propaganda but with no formal ties to any terrorist organization. On May 8 these warnings gained some gravity when the U.S. Department of Justice announced the arrests of six men in New Jersey who were allegedly plotting an armed assault (Newsweek.com) on the Fort Dix Army base. Four of the accused conspirators came from the former Yugoslavia, one from Turkey, and one from Jordan; none had any known ties to other terrorist groups. Their capture capped a fifteen-month FBI investigation.

Stories like this have become increasingly familiar. The New York Police Department received high praise after a yearlong undercover operation (New York) resulted in the arrest and conviction of two men plotting to bomb the Herald Square subway station in 2004. Defendants in that case claimed entrapment, as did Hamid Hayat, a Pakistani-American teenager from Lodi, California, who in 2006 was convicted in federal court of providing support to terrorists. He maintains an undercover FBI agent openly pressured him to explore radical ideologies (LAT).

As with previous cases, family members of the six men arrested in New Jersey claim their innocence (WashPost). In earlier instances, local Muslim communities felt unfairly targeted by law enforcement, a sentiment which, as this Backgrounder explains, could help radicalize some American Muslims while leading others to mistrust the police.

All this speaks to the difficulties faced by law enforcement officials charged with combating homegrown terrorism. Jihadi propaganda, easily accessed on the Internet, has led to a rise in self-starting terrorist cells across the globe. Some experts say the United States needs a domestic intelligence agency similar to Britain’s MI5, a proposal considered in this Online Debate. But MI5 has had its own troubles; a recent Economist report details how a massive investigation into a group of men plotting bomb attacks in Britain failed to discover that two of the group’s affiliates were plotting the July 2005 attack on London’s mass transit system.

Some experts suggest the best defense against homegrown terrorism is effective community policing (PDF)—beat cops who know a community well enough to sense when something is amiss. Since 2002, New York City has built one of the world’s premiere counterterrorism police units. Local police have also made effective use of recent changes to domestic surveillance law. Though the Bush administration took criticism for its warrantless wiretaps, legitimate electronic surveillance proved useful in the recent New Jersey arrests.

Intelligence sharing can also help detect homegrown cells. Most states have developed intelligence “fusion centers” to cull information from various state and federal agencies. The FBI has established one hundred Joint Terrorism Task Forces to help coordinate efforts between local and federal authorities. The National Journal takes an in-depth look at how such cooperation (PDF) has played out in Los Angeles.