PrisonPlanet Forum
May 25, 2013, 05:21:39 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: you want answers? investigate Larry Silverstein  (Read 1252 times)
warren_pease
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61



« on: July 01, 2009, 10:20:58 AM »

Larry Silverstein benefited on an astronomical scale from the 9/11 fiasco. He tripped over his words on PBS. He later stated he was talking about "pulling the fireman" out of WTC7. Which makes absolutely no sense. Pull It = Get The Fireman Out.

I have no proof, however, I have heard that Larry Silverstein had asked for permission to demolish the towers prior to 9/11. Is this public record through the city or county records? Can the document be obtained. If nothing else, it would show Larry Silverstein had an interest in demolishing the towers prior to 9/11. I also understand, not verified, the reason he was denied demolition permits were due to asbestos content in WTC 1&2.

I think that if this chain could be established beyond reasonable doubt that this alone should be front page news.

Larry Silverstein is a private citizen but what did he do with all that payola? Who did he write big checks too? How many people can get that  kind of return on investment? Sign me up, puh-leeze. It just doesn't happen without a "little help".
Logged
loren
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2009, 01:19:05 PM »

Hey genius, Mr. Silverstein had no authority to tell anyone to demolish building 7.  The Fire Department gave him a call, informing him that the fire (which was burning all day) was still out of controll.  He quickly thought about all the events that had transpired, and told the N.Y.F.D. to "pull them out".
Logged

Gun packin' TV
netizen_x
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,733


When Spider webs unite, they can tie up a lion


WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2009, 01:30:15 PM »

Hey genius, Mr. Silverstein had no authority to tell anyone to demolish building 7.  The Fire Department gave him a call, informing him that the fire (which was burning all day) was still out of controll.  He quickly thought about all the events that had transpired, and told the N.Y.F.D. to "pull them out".

No, genius. He said 'Pull it'. Later, when questioned about this statement, he claimed that 'Pull it' meant 'pull them out'.

What planet are you from, Loren?
Logged

"Since corrupt people unite amongst themselves to constitute a force, then honest people must do the same" ~ Leo Tolstoy
vCFy7W3SFb
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,092



« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2009, 01:37:25 PM »

yeah but he said 'pull it' and then 'we watched the building fall' why would this be in the same sentence.
and btw - silverstein is a jew name and confirms that the jews did 9/11
Logged
jesqueal
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,071



« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2009, 01:51:42 PM »

yeah but he said 'pull it' and then 'we watched the building fall' why would this be in the same sentence.
and btw - silverstein is a jew name and confirms that the jews did 9/11
But its spelled with Roman letters, which proves that the Senate did 9/11.
And Larry is short for Lawrence (?) which is an English name which proves the Queen did 9/11.
What else...oh yeah, Silverstein owned a building, which confirms that home owners did 9/11
Logged

loren
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2009, 02:54:25 PM »

yeah but he said 'pull it' and then 'we watched the building fall' why would this be in the same sentence.
and btw - silverstein is a jew name and confirms that the jews did 9/11
STFU prick!!! Angry
But its spelled with Roman letters, which proves that the Senate did 9/11.
And Larry is short for Lawrence (?) which is an English name which proves the Queen did 9/11.
What else...oh yeah, Silverstein owned a building, which confirms that home owners did 9/11
;DThat's funny.
Wait a minute, maybee the comedians did 9/11, or maybee the networks did it so they could have something to report on.
Logged

Gun packin' TV
vCFy7W3SFb
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,092



« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2009, 03:04:31 PM »

STFU prick!!! Angry ;DThat's funny.
Wait a minute, maybee the comedians did 9/11, or maybee the networks did it so they could have something to report on.

you .
Logged
loren
Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2009, 03:20:18 PM »

you .
me what
Logged

Gun packin' TV
warren_pease
Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61



« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2009, 06:42:55 PM »

i hope the truth comes out in our lifetime. the elite must pay and Americans should demand answers. i don't claim to know what happened, but the truth damn sure is not in the 9/11 omission report. i think they should be forced to sell it in the fiction section of all bookstores worldwide. a minor victory. Obama doesn't want a new investigation. It would take stolen Pentagon footage or something of grand scale undisputed evidence. I wish someone could find the Flight 77 tape and post it all over the internets. I would laugh myself to sleep!
Logged
America2
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,213

Romans 10:9-10 King James Version


« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2009, 06:46:00 PM »

Building 7 wasn't even hit - but en yet, NOONE is allowed to ask questions about it in the media. Even Bill Maher kicked out and tasered 2 people from his audience that questioned this.

Sad
Logged
KiwiClare
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,747


Either you're with us or with the terrorists


WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 02, 2009, 04:53:54 AM »

warren_pease
Quote
Obama doesn't want a new investigation. It would take stolen Pentagon footage or something of grand scale undisputed evidence.

Take a look at all the evidence on this forum.  There is already undisputed evidence on a grand scale to show that 9/11 was an inside job. There is a metaphorical mountain of evidence. Think "unignited nanothermite" for starters and who that links to.

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf

http://visibility911.com/blog/?cat=303
Logged

To be persuasive, we must be believable,
To be believable, we must be credible,
To be credible, we must be truthful.
- Edward R. Murrow
America2
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,213

Romans 10:9-10 King James Version


« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2009, 02:00:06 PM »

The fact that Obama DOESN'T want an investigation says ALOT. Heck - even Bill Clinton once said, "Don't YOU DARE say 9/11 was an inside job!".

I mean remember when all the liberal anti-war crowd was SCREAMING for answers over what happened on 9/11? Why are they so *silent* now?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!