Very interesting (and in-depth) response from 'Danny' on Prison Planet (his link goes to JAH Publishing):
I've just contacted 'Danny' as part of a blog entry I'm putting together about this 7/7 propaganda piece.
Here it is
July 1st, 2009 at 5:18 pm
There was an email exchange between Muad’Dib and the BBC people producing the Conspiracy Files program, prior to the “ambush” on the street. Terms were not agreed for Muad’Dib’s participation in the program. He wanted a guarantee that they would show 7/7 Ripple Effect on prime time, and then He would take part in their program. So that even if they did make a hit-piece (like they have done), the truth would already have been shown to the British people.
Then; in full knowledge that terms had not been agreed; they went and started filming Him to use the footage in their program, asking Him all sorts of insinuating and downright baffling questions. This is why He refused to speak a word to them and passed by them. They have no honour.
The makers of this BBC program are liars because they pretended to set out to genuinely appraise the alternative theories concerning 7/7. But that footage of Muad’Dib on the street was filmed a year ago, in Summer of 2008. Did you notice the “reporter” accusing Muad’Dib of lying about innocent people? ONE YEAR AGO?
So they never had ANY intention of being fair, right from the start. They didn’t bother telling you, the viewer, that the footage was a year old, in order to protect the illusion of their impartiality.
Another deception was them presenting the incident they themselves fabricated, as them “exposing” Muad’Dib as a white man from Sheffield. To the hundreds of thousands who knew Muad’Dib or had heard of Him before, this was not a surprise. He has NEVER denied being a white man from Sheffield! But we do not exist or are irrelevant to the British Bullshitting Corporation.
The revelation of who He is, is not new at all, and has been publicly available knowledge since TWENTY-THREE years ago, when Muad’Dib wrote the book “The Way home or face The Fire”. If a substantial number of people have only been exposed to this fact now, it has a lot to do with the very same BBC stonewalling Him for all those years until they could no longer pretend He does not exist.
They are now obviously afraid of the impact that 7/7 Ripple Effect is having, and judged that more damage would be incurred by ignoring it than by attempting to colour it the way they want people to see it. The latter being what they set out to do in their program. But; having seen it; I reckon they have shot themselves in the foot. The ripple effect is becoming a tidal wave and cannot be stopped either by them sticking their heads in the sand or by attacking it with weak ad-hominem arguments. All they have done is feed the wave, accelerate it.
Anyone else notice that Canary Wharf wasn’t mentioned even once? I wonder why.
Anyone notice that the interviewer did not ask Peter Power: “if it was only an office exercise with no bearing on what took place, then why did you say ‘we had to jump from slow-time thinking to quick-time doing’?”.
“We had to suddenly switch the exercise from fictional to real” - Peter Power.http://www.youtube.com/v/JKvkhe3rqtc
“We had to jump from slow-time thinking to quick-time doing” - Peter Power.http://www.youtube.com/v/sEbUQiYOGjU
Just an office exercise aye Peter??
And how about the laughable assertion that the four Muslim men dropped their ID’s away from the blast locations so that they would be found intact and everyone would know who did it? Talk about clutching at straws aye?
Let’s be clear - if they really were terrorists who wanted everyone to know they did it, then they would have specified their targets in the videos. They would also not have made the videos in 2004 because there would be a risk of the videos being found prior to the attack. They would have filmed themselves the night before the attack, or the very morning of the attack.
Leaving ID’s at the scene, when there would possibly be hundreds of other ID’s belonging to other people, would not provide a reasonable signature of who-dun-it. Not to mention that Mohammed Sidique Khan’s ID was found in three separate blast locations according to the official report. This makes no sense unless someone planted it, after the event, and this also was not addressed in the BBC hit-piece. You see, why would two terrorists who wanted everyone to be SURE who did it; according to the BBC; carry ID belonging to a third terrorist, when this would only cause a big question mark in people’s minds about whether or not this meant the evidence was planted by another party?
The Truth MAKES SENSE.
That’s how you know it’s the Truth.
This Conspiracy Files program helped to drive home what is said in 7/7 Ripple Effect about the BBC being a government propaganda organ and that it lies to the British people. For doing such a good job of that, I’m very grateful.