Glenn Beck Says 9/11 Truthers Destroying America - law suit

[Aerioch]

Wouldn't know, so I can't comment.

Really? Simply ask yourself what their position on Israel, and the "Special Friendship" they enjoy. 

Do they unquestioningly support both? If so you can check the "Zionist" box.
 

[Unintelligable Name]

Really? Simply ask yourself what their position on Israel, and the "Special Friendship" they enjoy. 

Do they unquestioningly support both? If so you can check the "Zionist" box.
 

I can't even really name any neo-cons... there's Bush Cheney Rumsfeld and that crew... but beyond that I really don't know.

Knowing what political position someone is doesn't interest me. To be quite frank I didn't even really understand what someone meant by "Right wing" or "Left wing" until about a year ago.

Never watched that type of television, never talked about it family or friends, so it never came up.

[Aerioch]

Sarah Palin?
Huckabee?
McCain?
Hannity?
Limbaugh?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

Take 5 minutes and read up on a few 

You must be attempting to dodge, or just don't wish to consider the point.

[Unintelligable Name]

No Sir. Unobservant, I'm not dodging anything I already explained why I have no clue.

Actually read my post instead of assuming you know what's what.

Sean Hannity I suppose is a neo-con from what I've heard, I've never sat through his show, only seen him used as an example for breaking down NLP.

Limbaugh I've never listened to.
Palin I've seen once on television.
McCain I have no clue what his policies are.
All I know about Huckabee is that he has some ties to Bilderberg... or something.

Do I have to say it again? Ok sure why not: I don't care what someone's political position is, and quite obviously don't follow political candidates -- nor do I vote.

[Unintelligable Name]

Here you go,

http://www.youtube.com/user/NeoConZionistThreat

Get on with your political bad self.

Still doesn't validate that guy's claims that Neocons = jews.

He was using it in this context:

"Von Brunn hated Jews and thought 9/11 was an inside job. Alex Jones hates neo-cons(Jews) and thinks 9/11 was an inside job. See? Von Brunn shot up the museum because of Jones."

His comment is gone now though.

[America2]

No Sir. Unobservant, I'm not dodging anything I already explained why I have no clue.

Actually read my post instead of assuming you know what's what.

Sean Hannity I suppose is a neo-con from what I've heard, I've never sat through his show, only seen him used as an example for breaking down NLP.

Limbaugh I've never listened to.
Palin I've seen once on television.
McCain I have no clue what his policies are.
All I know about Huckabee is that he has some ties to Bilderberg... or something.

Do I have to say it again? Ok sure why not: I don't care what someone's political position is, and quite obviously don't follow political candidates -- nor do I vote.

Hannity and Limbaugh - once a upon a time ago, they WERE sharp pro-American conservatives. However - once they tied the knot with Roger Ailles, it was all downhill from there as they sold their souls.

McCain - wasn't he involved in that DC Madam's escort service along with Cheney, Fred Thompson, and Guilliani? And then ended up getting off scott free with ONLY David Vitter taking the fall? Didn't he THROW the election to Obama in advance? Also - he's been a lifelong gun control advocate.

Palin - she probably never knew what was coming to her...being the "whipping boy". When she was offered the VP Repub candidate, she probably thought it was paradise...but the NWO seemed to make her think that, only to backstab her afterwards.

Huckabee - he smooched with false prophet Kenneth Coplan on that Satanic NWO TBN. 'Nuff said

[Unintelligable Name]

The paradigm doesn't do shit for me because I care about the specific issues at hand, not what side of the fence the person sits on so I can "guess" what they viewpoints will be because they sit in a certain camp.

If we were talking about something like Communism even that has a hundred different splinter groups, or Christianity. I'm sure there are a ton of camps within neo-conservatives as well, all with differing viewpoints.

Eitherway you can't know what you're dealing with just via labels. What purpose do the labels serve anyhow? 

Did I mention Glenn Beck is a scum bag today? Glenn Beck is a scumbag.

[Aerioch]

My point is that Neconservatives bend over backwards, and jump at the beckon call of Zionist Irsael Govt. / Policies

So yes

He tried to say that Neocons = Jews, very strange person.

It is very likely.

[Unintelligable Name]

My point is that Neconservatives bend over backwards, and jump at the beckon call of Zionist Irsael Govt. / Policies

Seems like everyone in office bends over backwards for Israel, regardless of political label.

But I'll say it again, this guy on Youtube was trying to say that because we dislike neo-con policies we must be against Jews, and hence Von Brunn = Alex Jones. 

[America2]

FWIW - I asked my dad what a neocon is to test what he knows about them. Here was his response, "They're pro-life, anti-gay rights conservatives who put social issues on the political forefront. The OLD conservatives put low taxes and smaller government in the forefront". And FWIW too - on Rapture Ready last year when I called out the neocons, I ended up raising alot of eyebrows b/c numerous posters ADMITTED they were neocons. Then when I pointed out what PAT BUCHANAN said about what neocons are, their response was, "Pat Buchanan only believes what he wants to believe".

Isn't it amazing how so many people are THIS asleep?

[Aerioch]

FWIW - I asked my dad what a neocon is to test what he knows about them. Here was his response, "They're pro-life, anti-gay rights conservatives who put social issues on the political forefront. The OLD conservatives put low taxes and smaller government in the forefront". And FWIW too - on Rapture Ready last year when I called out the neocons, I ended up raising alot of eyebrows b/c numerous posters ADMITTED they were neocons. Then when I pointed out what PAT BUCHANAN said about what neocons are, their response was, "Pat Buchanan only believes what he wants to believe".

Isn't it amazing how so many people are THIS asleep?

Enjoy the lies told by Bush in 2000 at the RNC Convention.. 

FLASHBACK: Bush's 2000 RNC Convention hypocrisy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slmr024JYaA

ROFL I'm not 100% sure but you might see Gov. Mike Huckabee infront of Dick Cheney @ 0:35/6:44

Just count the lies told in this condensed clip.


The Best Lie of them all... 11seconds.

Bush on nation building: 2000 presidential debates

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGDwvAbx_fg&feature=related

[Unintelligable Name]

Rofl....

If I were President I would institute memory courses for everyone.

[Aerioch]

The Real Conservative Movement began with Barry Goldwater ... read about him and his influence upon Ron Paul.  He is the closest thing to a real conservative.

Barry Morris Goldwater (January 1, 1909 – May 29, 1998)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Goldwater

[America2]

The Real Conservative Movement began with Barry Goldwater ... read about him and his influence upon Ron Paul.  He is the closest thing to a real conservative.

Barry Morris Goldwater (January 1, 1909 – May 29, 1998)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Goldwater

Even Pat Buchanan once said, in response to the neocons hijacking the GOP, that the party NEEDED to return to their Barry Goldwater-roots.

[Rainchild]

Dearie me that video gets more ridiculous at the end.

Listen to it and you'll know what I mean.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocIsSnmZgCY

Look at these two comments...

MDK236 (5 hours ago) Show Hide  0   Marked as spam Reply Krugman should blame Alex Jones for this if he wants to be remotely accurate
MDK236 (6 hours ago) Show Hide  0   Marked as spam Reply I have seen allot of anti-semisim on both sides of the spectrum, The 911 truth movement is full of anti-semites as I have found out. This Von Brunn sounds like a prime example. These guys call themselves "Paleoconservatives" more like Pseudoconservatives.

I wonder who he works for...

 

I almost feel pity for him, and then I remember what he said about 9/11 truth and I  think he deserves the criticism he gets.

[Unintelligable Name]

I almost feel pity for him, and then I remember what he said about 9/11 truth and I  think he deserves the criticism he gets.

Yeah pretty fascinating to see someone claim that Glenn Beck was connected to the shooter and Glenn goes on a rant about how intellectually retarded that is etc etc etc.

Doublethink at it's best.

[Freeski]

Wouldn't know, so I can't comment.

+1 for the honesty. I'm in the same boat there.

[Freeski]

FWIW - I asked my dad what a neocon is to test what he knows about them. Here was his response, "They're pro-life, anti-gay rights conservatives who put social issues on the political forefront. The OLD conservatives put low taxes and smaller government in the forefront". And FWIW too - on Rapture Ready last year when I called out the neocons, I ended up raising alot of eyebrows b/c numerous posters ADMITTED they were neocons. Then when I pointed out what PAT BUCHANAN said about what neocons are, their response was, "Pat Buchanan only believes what he wants to believe".

Isn't it amazing how so many people are THIS asleep?

It's unbelievable. The "sheeple" are not stupid. They are clearly under a spell.

[Freeski]

Rofl....

If I were President I would institute memory courses for everyone.

Tyrant! 

[Unintelligable Name]

Tyrant! 

Yeah maybe, but at least they would remember it.

[Freeski]

Yeah maybe, but at least they would remember it.

Lead by example. It's the only way you can have liberty. Persuasion over coersion and let the chips fall as they may.

[Unintelligable Name]

Lead by example. It's the only way you can have liberty. Persuasion over coersion and let the chips fall as they may.

One guy leading 300 million is insanity to begin with. The NWO is even crazier in their ambitions, they want 1 guy(Antichrist or some Maitreya person) to rule the entire planet.

But yeah common theme in my posts is that I think it's better to put forth a compelling argument, appealing to one's intellect and sense of morality than it is to just legislate against or for something.

Basically why I don't like Socialism... I think people should be free to give of their own free will on the basis of their own compassion and will to help others.

Was a joke anyway, I don't think a memory course will help anyone who is already not even paying attention 

[Freeski]

One guy leading 300 million is insanity to begin with. The NWO is even crazier in their ambitions, they want 1 guy(Antichrist or some Maitreya person) to rule the entire planet.

But yeah common theme in my posts is that I think it's better to put forth a compelling argument, appealing to one's intellect and sense of morality than it is to just legislate against or for something.

Basically why I don't like Socialism... I think people should be free to give of their own free will on the basis of their own compassion and will to help others.

Was a joke anyway, I don't think a memory course will help anyone who is already not even paying attention 

We'll get along just fine.

[pac522]

sociostudents reply seems to state (in my own words) that the media is held to a higher standard than John Q, is this correct?

I would think so. The media has the access to reach a large amount of people. They also have the obligation to report things responsibly, fairly and without bias. They are a essential part of the checks and balance system and should be exposing corruption not twisting illogical facts together in order to support their agenda. No one cares about opinion, just the facts. So essentially his "first amendment right" should be exercised to protect the public from governmental corruption.

Now, will someone wake me up.

[Elvis]

YEAH MAN THATS WHAT IM TALKIN ABOUT!!!!

[Irobot]

Suing for defamation of character doesn't threaten free speech. In fact defamation laws were what created free speech in the first place! The debate in the courts then was if you could criticize someone if what your saying is true and since the person was telling the truth the guy won and that began somewhat free speech in England. Defamation of character is basically when you lie about someone to damage their credibility or reputation. As long as Beck isn't lying there shouldn't be problem, but since he IS lying to damage the truth movement he can be sued for it because it's illegal! Defamation of character = Fraud

I see no harm in his statements. I understand his goals of demonizing this community, however, I still see it as free speech issue. I think the good Dr. Paul would see it this way as well. If he were to single out an individual that would be certainly different.

[Unintelligable Name]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tKuSMwMVsE

More crap from Glenn Beck as he spouts bull from his ivory tower.

[America2]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tKuSMwMVsE

More crap from Glenn Beck as he spouts bull from his ivory tower.

So if we get "attacked" by "Al Qaeda" again, what's going to happen to the "9/11 truth" movement? B/c Beck called these FEMA camps a lie, what will he say should happen to the "truthers" if "Al Qaeda" comes after us again?

[Ghost in the Machine]

sue him and the damn channel for spreading lies. everyone should sue, wonder how many truthers should  sign on the law suit...

[pac522]

Someone needs to call in to Beck's show and ask him if he knows if the CIA operating domestically is against that agency's charter. And then ask him if he's heard of operation mocking bird. And then ask him why every so called news channel is spouting the same propaganda, err news. And then ask him if he knows that a lie mixed with truth is much more dangerous than a lie by it's self and that's the very tactic Nazi Germany used.

Free speech does not exclude responsibility.

[codemonkey70]

Free speech does not exclude responsibility.

This needs to be repeated.  Seems a lot of our wonderful media types feel they bear no responsibility in spewing untruths or half truths. Then again, perhaps thats their intent.

[JBS]

And the morphing from  protesters => patriots => dissidents => low level terrorists => terrorists => insurgents => pogroms => concentration camps
continues...  It's Hitler all over again. All done nice and legal. Glenn Beck is actually helping to  destroy what used to be America.
In this case, free speech is being used as a weapon to destroy it.

[Mike Philbin]

is Glenn Beck still on the air?

[Freeski]

Glenn Beck is an annoying side effect (nice legacy dude).

[Dig]

And now all of the 9/12 data including pictures will be used as planned for the new homegrown terrorist database.  There is a whole section on how Glenn Beck has been controlled opposition from day 1.  This is how the NWO works.

Anyone who does not talk about the federal reserve, torture, privacy, and the possibility of false flag terrorism is a total f-ing tool.

Anyone who still focuses on GOP v. Dems are also suspect. It is sad that there are so few that do not fall into these categories.

BTW, here is all the months of posts on the controlled operative named Glenn Beck: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=382.0

[America2]

And now all of the 9/12 data including pictures will be used as planned for the new homegrown terrorist database.  There is a whole section on how Glenn Beck has been controlled opposition from day 1.  This is how the NWO works.

Anyone who does not talk about the federal reserve, torture, privacy, and the possibility of false flag terrorism is a total f-ing tool.

Anyone who still focuses on GOP v. Dems are also suspect. It is sad that there are so few that do not fall into these categories.

BTW, here is all the months of posts on the controlled operative named Glenn Beck: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?board=382.0

If anything, this was one BIG flaw in Oliver Stone's "JFK" - he fine-tuned everything from the CIA to the military industrial complex, etc...but he did NOT say ONE word about the bankers and federal reserve, the same people who control where the money flows/doesn't...which is why even though the film was a brilliant piece of work, just something felt MISSING, even though I had no idea the FR are crooks at the time.

[Mike Philbin]

was Oliver Stone's "W" any good?  I'm tempted to rent this out of the library.

[Unintelligable Name]

was Oliver Stone's "W" any good?  I'm tempted to rent this out of the library.

Apparently made him into a blundering idiot who just meant well & wanted America to be big and strong!

I didn't see it though, but I remember Alex talking about it.

[PainInDaBrain]

sorry just had to:

Glenn Beck pretended to be religious to get laid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzixgXR3cCg

[America2]

Apparently made him into a blundering idiot who just meant well & wanted America to be big and strong!

I didn't see it though, but I remember Alex talking about it.

Maybe that's why Stone didn't include the bankers/Federal Reserve angle in "JFK"? B/c his bosses in the Hollywood NWO-runned studios wouldn't let him?

As for Stone - his last brilliant film was 1995's "Nixon". Since then, either he got burned out, just completely lost it, or just sold himself out altogether. 1999's "Any Given Sunday" was a rotten borefest. Prior to 1995, even his "bad" films like "Salvador" and "The Doors" were actually pretty good. "Talk Radio" - which featured Eric Begosian as a talk radio host extremist(sound familiar?) - was one big underrated piece of work. And "Born on the Fourth of July" was by far Tom Cruise's best acting performance.