PrisonPlanet Forum
May 22, 2013, 05:25:59 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: News agencies gagging gay factor in boy's rape  (Read 1320 times)
Raincheck
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,011



« on: July 02, 2009, 07:38:10 AM »

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102740

News coverage of a Duke University official accused of raping his adopted 5-year-old son and offering the child to someone else is apparently lacking what some say is a key piece of information: the fact the alleged perpetrator is a homosexual who lives with another "gay" man.

Frank Lombard, associate director of the Health Inequalities Program at the university's Center for Health Policy, was arrested last Wednesday in Raleigh, N.C., for attempting to induce someone to cross state lines to engage in sex with the child, who is black.

The arrest affidavit goes into graphic detail of Lombard's alleged actions, including alleged performance of oral sex with the child in front of a webcam, and sodomizing the boy with his finger and tongue. It also prominently cites the fact that Lombard is a homosexual living with another "gay" man.

In his online profile, Lombard reportedly describes himself as "perv dad for fun."

But days after the case broke, there have been few, if any, mentions in news stories that Lombard is part of a homosexual couple raising children.

In reports by the Associated Press, CNN and ABC News, for instance, the "gay" factor is never brought up.


A Lexis-Nexis news database search by WND using search terms "Frank Lombard" and "homosexual" or "gay" resulted in just four results, none of which were any major media.

Just today, Duke's campus newspaper, the Chronicle, finally mentioned the affidavit where it was stated, "he lived in Durham, North Carolina with his live-in homosexual partner."

An online comment in reaction to the ABC News story mentioned media hypocrisy with the high-profile case of Duke lacrosse players who were wrongly accused of a rape that never happened:

"The Duke lacrosse case was front page news everywhere, professors were signing statements of protest, another professor threatened to resign in protest when the students were readmitted to Duke when found innocent. Could it be the liberal media and professors are as afraid of the gay lobby as Obama is, since this could harm the gay adoption activists?"

Radio host Rush Limbaugh commented today on the apparent double standard, stating, "Did you hear there has been an actual rape at Duke University? An actual rape in Durham, North Carolina. It's not a phony one. Not a false charge. An actual rape. A guy sold his adopted 5-year-old son to a sex practitioner. A 5-year-old kid, yeah. There's a problem with this, too, because the guy is gay, a gay adoption.

"This is why you haven't heard about it. This does not fit the template. A false charge of rape at Duke when you had the poor, black, down-on-her-luck dancer and the rich, white, lacrosse players, oh, that fit the template. They were guilty before any evidence. This you haven't heard about because this doesn't fit the template here of what we're trying to accomplish."

The silence is reminiscent of the 1999 homosexual rape and murder of 13-year-old Jesse Dirkhising of Prairie Grove, Ark. Many news agencies across the nation ignored coverage.

Among those trying to shine the light on the homosexual aspect of the Lombard case is Mike Adams, a professor of criminology at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington.

"I tried to contact Frank Lombard over the weekend to probe his expertise regarding the health benefits of raping small children," wrote Adams. "So far, he's declined to comment."

Lombard faces a maximum of 20 years in prison if convicted.
Logged
TimeLady
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,309


« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2009, 07:09:21 PM »

... except it doesn't matter whether or not a gay guy did it or not. What happened happened, and it was obviously . . . not a good thing at all. Or are you as guilty as others when you say gays shouldn't be defined by their sexuality?
Logged

Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Raincheck
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,011



« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2009, 05:26:28 AM »

... except it doesn't matter whether or not a gay guy did it or not. What happened happened, and it was obviously . . . not a good thing at all. Or are you as guilty as others when you say gays shouldn't be defined by their sexuality?

You seem to be missing the point. It was bolded, so you should be able to see it second time around.
Logged
TimeLady
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,309


« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2009, 05:37:51 AM »

You seem to be missing the point. It was bolded, so you should be able to see it second time around.

yes, the part about his sexuality is bolded, I see

now, do you define a person by whether or not he or she is gay, or by the actions and contents of the person's character?
Logged

Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!