Richard Gage on Fox station discussing 9/11 - evidence for controlled demolition

[Irobot]

http://www.infowarstv.com/video/272/Richard-Gage-on-CA-Fox-station-discussing-911--evidence-for-controlled-demolition

[Irobot]

on the tube too now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW0SZCN6hdw

[ES]

Thanks. Gage is a dedicated patriot. a true hero.

[Irobot]

Question? Were their not more comments on this post? And if so, where did they go? If this was a duplicate post, I can not seem to find it.

[grapecrusher1]

He held himself up well.  Impressive.

[chrisfromchi]

That needs to go viral...that needs to go mega viral.

7:30 min Info-NUKE!

He names names and how the explosives could have been planted.

God Bless A/E 911, Richard Gage and Stephen Jones.

[Rock]

5 Stars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I wish all media acted so bravely and cordial!

[Rock]

Just watched it again and emailed to everyone.

Great find!

[npalmi]

very nice, stored on my harddrive

[NWOSCUM]

Richard Gage has juevos the size of bowling balls.  And he is articulate and educated!!

[A Who]

Richard Gage, another lame stream media actor we can truly trust, good job and good video. Seems fox is starting to wake up here a bit, first Freedom watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, and now their news anchors are questioning info given to them, and speaking the truth, great to see this, let's hope for more of it. 

[Chigs]

What I think he did well was to stay away from the "crazy consipirist" angle and stick with facts and reasonable ideas (that even the most brainwashed of sheeple could conisider as reasonable!) and even stick in a dig at the Bushes without saying it! 

[Rock]

Richard Gage, another lame stream media actor we can truly trust, good job and good video. Seems fox is starting to wake up here a bit, first Freedom watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, and now their news anchors are questioning info given to them, and speaking the truth, great to see this, let's hope for more of it. 

Once they use up the media whores they know they will be next.  They better speak truth while they can.  Very soon they will not be able.



Rock

[PainInDaBrain]

Once they use up the media whores they know they will be next.  They better speak truth while they can.  Very soon they will not be able.



Rock

True...

[Irobot]

anyone on reddit???

http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/8o1ac/richard_gage_on_ca_fox_station_discussing_911/

[KiwiClare]

It is posted in the 9/11 section too.  This was what I wrote about it when I posted it elsewhere:

This was the first interview Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, has had in the mainstream media, that was neither retracted nor spinned.

It was on on the 28th of May on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, California – only a local station,  but still a good sign.   As you will see, Gage was given the opportunity to lay out evidence, including regarding the nanothermite found in the WTC dust, and say that AE911Truth demands a new investigation into 9/11 to a receptive show host.

[Hawkwind]

you know they are going to start WW3 soon and its going to eclipse all these revelations weve been having recently.

[Irobot]

RG is a member of http://ae911truth.org

[KiwiClare]

RG is a member of http://ae911truth.org

They are doing very good work!

you know they are going to start WW3 soon and its going to eclipse all these revelations weve been having recently.

Everyone's better off for knowing who the real enemy is in my opinion, as they then can make informed decisions.

[Phil R.]

Very well done.  It's segments like these that get the truth out most effectively.

[Irobot]

http://snardfarker.ning.com/video/ae_911-truth-clovisfresno-kmph

[nofakenews]

female anchor:  He’s an architect experienced in steel structures.  Now Richard Gage is touring the country with a controversial message about September 11. 

male anchor:  Richard Gage is here to show us why he’s calling for a more thorough investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.  Thank you so much for joining us.

Gage:  You’re very welcome, it’s great to be here.

male anchor:  Well first of all give us a little bit more about your background.

Gage:  I’m an architect of twenty years, a member of the American Institute of Architects, and have been studying steel frame fire proof buildings for about that long. 

female anchor: We ask that for clarification because as we get into this we want people to make sure that you’re not just somebody with a wacky idea, you come with some science to you.  What is the official reason for the collapse of the World Trade Center towers?

Gage:  Well we’re told that the planes hit the buildings, and there was an explosion and a fire, and about a hour and a half later, in the case of the north tower, the buildings collapsed due to structural weakening, due to the fires.  The problem is that we don’t have large gradual deformations associated with collapses.  And fires in high rises have never brought down a steel frame high rise building at all, ever.  And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence in the twin towers and the third skyscraper to collapse that day, which most people don’t know anything about it.  We have the evidence of the ten key features of controlled demolition.  In the case of building seven, it collapses straight down into its own footprint, at free fall speed, in the first hundred feet.  It’s dropping, as you can see symmetrically, smoothly, at free fall speed, in the first hundred feet.  Two and a half seconds.  This is uncanny, there’s forty thousand tons of structural steel designed to resist this collapse. 

female anchor:  So, what, a forty-seven story building?

Gage:  Yeah, it’s called Building Seven, a football field away from the Twin Towers. 

female anchor:  Okay, so what we’re showing is left, what happened in fact, and right is  controlled, where you are using or the people who made this happen, used demolition, explosive devices.   

Gage:  Indeed, this a direct comparison.  You can see that indeed, almost freefall speed, freefall acceleration, through forty thousand tons of structural steel.  That is uncanny.  So we have 700 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation as a result of this evidence and the evidence in the World Trade Center that is very explosive. Almost every architect and engineer we’ve showed this information to, agrees with us that these are controlled demolitions.  If we can get them to look at the information, because obviously the implications of a controlled demolition are…dark for our country.  Because that means somebody besides Al Qaeda was involved.  Because these have to be easily, three of the most highly secure buildings, outside of the Pentagon. 

Male anchor:  Now if that was a controlled demolition, would there not be any evidence at the ground level of explosives within the debris that’s left?

Gage:  Indeed.  And what we find down there is pools of molten iron.  Several tons.

male anchor:  What is that doing there?

Gage:  Exactly, what is it doing there?   The first responders see it, the structural engineers see it, it’s documented by FEMA.  The melting of steel.  Normal office fires is what’s supposed to have brought these buildings down.  Along with jet plane impacts.  Jet fuel and office fires don’t produce molten iron or molten steel.  It doesn’t begin to melt until three thousand degrees.  But what we have is, the fires only produce maybe fourteen, sixteen hundred degrees.  So what produced all that molten iron?  Well, it has in it the chemical evidence of a special incendiary, which is thermite, a high tech incendiary used to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter.

female anchor:  You found that?

Gage:  Indeed, in all the dust throughout lower Manhattan, we have a four to six inch thick layer of this dust, and throughout it we have evidence of tiny spheres, billions of them, several tons of previously molten iron.  Well how does that happen?  If you have molten iron…the by-product of thermite is molten iron and it’s dispersed through out all this dust. 

male anchor:  You were allowed to go in and get samples and examine it?

Gage:  Oh, there’s plenty of dust.  A lot of people have this dust, and four of these samples have been sent to physicist Steven Jones, formerly of Brigham Young University. And they find in it, not only these spheres, which others have found too, USGS, RJ Lee, doing toxicology studies.  These spheres have iron, aluminum, fluorine, manganese, very unusual elements associated only with thermite. And there are small chips of unignited thermite as well.  This is very high-tech thermite, nano-thermite, it’s not found in a cave in Afghanistan, it’s produced in very sophisticated defense department contracting laboratories. 

female anchor:  Okay, well, we have an enemy here, we...the finger has been pointed to, this was the work of Al Qaeda, this was the work of Osama bin Laden, at least to get the planes all going into the buildings and into the field in Pennsylvania and into the Pentagon.  Is there no way that they then could still be the enemy that placed those in the buildings first, and then did the incendiary device via a plane second?

Gage:  Right.  Well, what you have to ask is who had access to the buildings?  Did Al Qaeda have access to these highly secure buildings?  Probably not.  Did they have access to sophisticated nano-thermite, where the particles are one thousand times smaller than a human hair?  Probably not.  Somebody else has to be investigated. That’s why we have 700 architects and engineers demanding a real investigation.  We don’t have the whole theory as to how this happened, who did it, why.  We just lay out the facts, like we did last night in the Veterans Memorial Auditorium, and we demand a real investigation, and they’ll find out who, why, how, et cetera. 

male anchor:  Now let me ask you, I’m person X, I want to place something in one of those buildings.  Where would I carry it, how big would it be?  Is it that visible that I would be spotted by security?  Or could I place it in one of my tooth fillings?

Gage:  We’re talking about several tons of nano-thermite and ordinary thermite.  One would have to have access through security.  So the security company involved for the World Trade Center should be thoroughly investigated.  And it turns out to be Securi-com, Stratesec, somebody should look to see who’s on the board of those companies. Some very interesting individuals turn out to be.  In addition, one would have to have the cover, of say, an elevator modernization, which was in fact going on nine months prior to 9/11, so that there were workers throughout the World Trade Center, that had access to the hoistway which is immediately adjacent to the core columns and beams in the building. 

female anchor:  You’re not trying to freak out the country, but you can’t help but feel a little freaked out by this. 

Gage:  Yeah, you’re getting it. 

female anchor:  Yeah.  And of course this is something we want to talk with you about a whole lot more, and we’re out of time.  But we do have a great deal of information on our website, kmph.com.  Thank you very much for your time today. 

Gage:  You're so welcome.

female anchor:  You’re opening  up a lot to think about.  We'll be right back.
http://www.sheilacasey.com/2009/05/transcript-of-richard-gage-explaining-controlled-demolition-on-kmph-in-fresno.html

Full transcript of the interview.

[clint]

He did a fantastic job and the newscasters didn't laugh once.

I wonder how Hannity would have reacted 

[KiwiClare]

expectevalue posted this in the 9/11 section:

Please, please email the station and thank them for covering this event! They are taking notice!

greatday@kmph.com

The producer of the show that Richard Gage was on in Fresno, spoke to Jason on the Infowars radio show recently, advising that he has had a phenomenal response to the airing of 9/11 truth!   

No wonder, many people can probably sense something is seriously wrong in society and are probably starving for the truth to be aired.

That was nice of him to phone up and let everyone know.  A good man.   Let's hope he phones in again as Jason had to cut him short unfortunately.

[Irobot]

Please, please email the station and thank them for covering this event! They are taking notice!

greatday@kmph.com

Thanks , will do !

Source: KMPH FOX News 26
Controversial Group Re–Examines 9/11 In Clovis

By Clint Olivier
FRESNO - More than a hundred people filled the Clovis Veterans Memorial Building to hear a call for an investigation into what happened to the buildings destroyed in the attacks of September 11th.

"We realize that this is very difficult information to take in," Architect Richard Gage said.

Gage spoke and presented evidence on why his group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth wants the U.S. Congress to look into how and why the Twin Towers and another building, known as WTC-7, fell.

Some video was provided to KMPH News by the group, which claims a membership of more than 600 architects and engineers.

"We're not conspiracy theorists, we are technical building professionals looking at the forensic evidence, so we provide the evidence, and we ask for a new investigation, and let's let the chips fall where they may," Gage said.

video
http://snardfarker.ning.com/video/ae_911-truth-clovisfresno-kmph

[gunDriller]

that's great !

what TV show is it on, KMBH, KNBH ?

[birgit]

that's great !

what TV show is it on, KMBH, KNBH ?

But they closed the report on a VERY NEGATIVE note


'the survivors do not want to hear about this again'
more friggin spin..trying to  discredit.

[marra]

Meanwhile the genocide continues on.  5,000 children died of starvation as I wrote this post.

[luckee1]

Yet, you wrote.

[KiwiClare]

KiwiClare wrote:

It is posted in the 9/11 section too. This was what I wrote about it when I posted it elsewhere:

This was the first interview Richard Gage, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, has had in the mainstream media, that was neither retracted nor spinned.

It was on on the 28th of May on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, California – only a local station,  but still a good sign.   As you will see, Gage was given the opportunity to lay out evidence, including regarding the nanothermite found in the WTC dust, and say that AE911Truth demands a new investigation into 9/11 to a receptive show host.

I have been advised by a person that works with ae911Truth that the show was on the 26th, not the 28th.       I asked her a few days ago what the date was and she didn't correct me when I advised I thought it was the 28th, so I'd left it at the 28th - one must never make assumptions like me!
She also advised: 
But the best is that we got some TV coverage by local Fox affiliate KMPH!  We were on 2 separate shows.  For the 10pm News they filmed part of the presentation and an interview – but failed to show any of the evidence that we presented with each.  And they brought in their local firefighter hero to cast aspersions upon us.   And for the morning show “Great Day” they did an in-studio live interview of us which lasted 7 minutes – where I was able to get a lot of evidence out there – including Building 7 on video! Check it out! 

[grapecrusher1]

I found that a critical thinker would(should) find the firefighter's comments "emotional testimony" as opposed to Gage's facts.  If a highly accredited architect was there to support the official story and shoot down Gage it would have been more damaging.

[KiwiClare]

I found that a critical thinker would(should) find the firefighter's comments "emotional testimony" as opposed to Gage's facts.  If a highly accredited architect was there to support the official story and shoot down Gage it would have been more damaging.

Yes, and if evidence like WTC 7 collapsing is presented, people can see the undeniable proof with their own eyes, which only reinforces Gage's presentation.

[grapecrusher1]

Yeah I was surprised to see WTC 7 being compared with a controlled demo on FOX.  This I thought was off limits for mainstream to show -- something is definitely awry.  It is bizarre how FOX seems the one coming around providing accurate info (Celente on today)  -- is it because it was so ridiculed and despised and by historic virtue this condition is to remain in the common psyche?

[KiwiClare]

Yeah I was surprised to see WTC 7 being compared with a controlled demo on FOX.  This I thought was off limits for mainstream to show -- something is definitely awry.  It is bizarre how FOX seems the one coming around providing accurate info (Celente on today)  -- is it because it was so ridiculed and despised and by historic virtue this condition is to remain in the common psyche?

The producer of the Fresno show phoned up a few days ago and spoke to Jason briefly. They were cut short owing to an ad break.   It is a shame we don't hear more from him about what is going on behind the scenes at Fox to enable hardcore truth to be aired.  I have suggested him as a guest on the show.

And while I'm here I should mention that that report from which came to me via someone who works for AE911Truth, was a report from Richard Gage himself.  It is pretty obvious it was, but it should be pointed out. This one:

But the best is that we got some TV coverage by local Fox affiliate KMPH!  We were on 2 separate shows.  For the 10pm News they filmed part of the presentation and an interview – but failed to show any of the evidence that we presented with each.  And they brought in their local firefighter hero to cast aspersions upon us.   And for the morning show “Great Day” they did an in-studio live interview of us which lasted 7 minutes – where I was able to get a lot of evidence out there – including Building 7 on video! Check it out!  We celebrated with beers and burgers at TGIF Fridays.

[7D7]

Richard Gage is the absolute best guy start people down the rabbit hole...

He purposely doesn't name names or plant ideas, he puts out irreputable scientific evidence and does it in a manner where everything he says is meant to make the viewer think and search for answers for themselves.

He had every opportunity to drop the name Marvin Bush...  but no, he wants people to look at it for themselves and refers to the board as "interesting people".

Whenever I have people watch a Alex Jones vid for the first time they normaly tell me that he sounds like some sort of nut case raving lunatic crazy person... and you know what, I can't argue, cause he does. But, nobody, argues with "Blueprint for terror"... Nobody. They allways turn to you afterwood and ask "So.. what then... ?" and start looking into it for themselves, where, they start to see the not so pretty conclutions they must draw.

[KiwiClare]

Richard Gage is the absolute best guy start people down the rabbit hole...

He purposely doesn't name names or plant ideas, he puts out irreputable scientific evidence and does it in a manner where everything he says is meant to make the viewer think and search for answers for themselves.

He had every opportunity to drop the name Marvin Bush...  but no, he wants people to look at it for themselves and refers to the board as "interesting people".

Whenever I have people watch a Alex Jones vid for the first time they normaly tell me that he sounds like some sort of nut case raving lunatic crazy person... and you know what, I can't argue, cause he does. But, nobody, argues with "Blueprint for terror"... Nobody. They allways turn to you afterwood and ask "So.. what then... ?" and start looking into it for themselves, where, they start to see the not so pretty conclutions they must draw.

Many of my friends really like Alex Jones and his work.  They make comments like: "I really like this guy"  and regard his films as important for people to see.  and people speak very highly of  '9/11 Blueprint for Truth' presented by Richard Gage, refer:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8182697765360042032

I've heard a few people who have seen a few 9/11 truth films, say they think  it is the best one they have seen.  He is at an advantage though, in that a lot of work has been done over the last few years, for example by David Ray Griffin, Alex Jones, Stephen Jones, Kevin Ryan and Neils Harrit, to name but a tiny few and that perhaps enables him to speak with an authority and confidence regarding the evidence of 9/11 that he would not have had otherwise. He certainly is an excellent speaker!

[Stan]

Just a heads up for UKers who have Sky. Blueprint For Truth will be on ControversialTV today and Wednesday.

And if you don't have Sky, go to the home of a friend who does and stick Blueprint For Truth on autoview while they make you a coffee. 

[KiwiClare]

Just a heads up for UKers who have Sky. Blueprint For Truth will be on ControversialTV today and Wednesday.

And if you don't have Sky, go to the home of a friend who does and stick Blueprint For Truth on autoview while they make you a coffee. 

Great!  That will save the 9/11 truthers a lot of leg work. 

------------------------------
On another note, further to previous post - I just need to clarify that I was advised that the Gage interview in Fresno was recorded on the 26th of May.      It understand it aired on the 28th.  I apologise for any confusion I have caused. 

[KiwiClare]

This is posted at AE911Truth 

Jun 2, 2009 
Richard Gage Interview on KMPH Fox 26 Hitting Big-Time Numbers on YouTube
http://www.ae911truth.org/info/60
Over 100,000 views in just a few days... 

[America2]

As much as I really hate to say it - too little, too late - they should have been discussing this THEN after it happened. Or at the very least, prior to the 2004 election.

As for the whole operation being a controlled demolition - didn't Groucho Marx once say, "You can either believe me, or your own two eyes". Pt being that anyone eye with a pair of eyes, ears, and a halfway decent brain SHOULD see the fraud that happened on that fateful day. The ENTIRE buildings blow up after a mere couple of planes hit them? Weren't there numerous explosions AFTER the planes hit?

Even though I was "asleep" then and all but accepted the Muslims being the guilty party - and my opinions stayed the same EVEN AFTER the Michael Moore film, something that played in my head over and over and over again was those planes somehow being able to GO THROUGH the buildings, when in reality, they BLEW UP once they HIT the buildings...even then, something just didn't feel right.

BTW - Michael Moore did NOT cover ANY of this in his film. The only thing he focused on was Bush's incompetence and laziness when it came to the intelligence reports warnings the prior summer.