|
7D7
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: June 03, 2009, 06:58:19 AM » |
|
BTW - Michael Moore did NOT cover ANY of this in his film. The only thing he focused on was Bush's incompetence and laziness when it came to the intelligence reports warnings the prior summer.
Not true - the really damning things for me, in Moores film, were all of the Bush/Saudi/Taliban connections that no one had ever spoken of before. Be honest, before Moores movie had you ever heard of Prince Bandar Bush? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Irobot
|
|
« Reply #41 on: June 03, 2009, 12:57:24 PM » |
|
This is posted at AE911Truth  Jun 2, 2009 Richard Gage Interview on KMPH Fox 26 Hitting Big-Time Numbers on YouTube http://www.ae911truth.org/info/60Over 100,000 views in just a few days... That is such good news, and we need it ! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
12160 "Destroying the NWO"Check out the blogs, videos, and discussions!!
http://12160.info/
RADIO HOST WANTED!!!
Trolls R People 2
|
|
|
|
gunDriller
|
|
« Reply #42 on: June 03, 2009, 02:18:53 PM » |
|
This is posted at AE911Truth Jun 2, 2009 Richard Gage Interview on KMPH Fox 26 Hitting Big-Time Numbers on YouTube http://www.ae911truth.org/info/60Over 100,000 views in just a few days... yep, very good news. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
America2
|
|
« Reply #43 on: June 03, 2009, 10:06:37 PM » |
|
Not true - the really damning things for me, in Moores film, were all of the Bush/Saudi/Taliban connections that no one had ever spoken of before. Be honest, before Moores movie had you ever heard of Prince Bandar Bush?
That's true - but still, Moore said nothing about evidence like multiple explosions, demolitions, etc...which all point it to being an inside job. He also was silent about neocons like Paul Wolfowitz. When all was said and done, even with the Bush/Saudi/Taliban connections, he painted Bush Jr as someone he was just merely lazy and incompetent, and that ultimately it was STILL the Muslim extremists, albeit them being largely Saudis instead, that were the culprits. As for the Bush/Saudi/Taliban connections - a couple of days after 9/11, wasn't the story about how the Bin Ladin family being flown out of the country in all of the papers? Doesn't the Saudi connection go beyond the Bush family? I agree that I had no idea of this prior to the movie, but when all was said and done, it left nothing more than your typical Left/Right paradigm debate. Even Republicans came out saying, "It STILL shows Clinton likely left an 8 year mess of fighting terrorism to Bush! You see?". |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chrsswtzr
|
|
« Reply #44 on: June 03, 2009, 10:15:35 PM » |
|
That's true - but still, Moore said nothing about evidence like multiple explosions, demolitions, etc...which all point it to being an inside job. He also was silent about neocons like Paul Wolfowitz. When all was said and done, even with the Bush/Saudi/Taliban connections, he painted Bush Jr as someone he was just merely lazy and incompetent, and that ultimately it was STILL the Muslim extremists, albeit them being largely Saudis instead, that were the culprits.
As for the Bush/Saudi/Taliban connections - a couple of days after 9/11, wasn't the story about how the Bin Ladin family being flown out of the country in all of the papers? Doesn't the Saudi connection go beyond the Bush family? I agree that I had no idea of this prior to the movie, but when all was said and done, it left nothing more than your typical Left/Right paradigm debate. Even Republicans came out saying, "It STILL shows Clinton likely left an 8 year mess of fighting terrorism to Bush! You see?".
Michael Moore didn't do any thinking for himself. He took some selective evidence that made major news if you looked for it and spun it in a 'safe' way not to implicate anyone in a dangerous fashion. The punchline for those who didn't see Moore's Fauxumentary: Bush was too stupid to contrive 9/11, his incompetence allowed it to happen though! Oh yeah, and he let the Bin Ladens leave the country, and he's friends with the Saudis (Maybe oil, maybe). The end. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
America2
|
|
« Reply #45 on: June 03, 2009, 10:21:26 PM » |
|
Michael Moore didn't do any thinking for himself. He took some selective evidence that made major news if you looked for it and spun it in a 'safe' way not to implicate anyone in a dangerous fashion.
The punchline for those who didn't see Moore's Fauxumentary: Bush was too stupid to contrive 9/11, his incompetence allowed it to happen though! Oh yeah, and he let the Bin Ladens leave the country, and he's friends with the Saudis (Maybe oil, maybe). The end.
Subsequently, the way the MSM went on endless debates over this film was laughable. For example, when I was watching Joe Scarborough one night, he EXPLODED at his liberal guest and said, "IT'S MY SHOW!", blah, blah, blah. When I reflect on it, I couldn't tell if he was really worried over whether 9/11 would be exposed as the fraud it was, or if he was just merely "acting". Oh - I believe Moore ended up debating Bill O'Reilly on his show during one of the conventions, if memory serves. It looked STAGED, to say the least. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
revolutionary_suicide
|
|
« Reply #46 on: June 03, 2009, 10:22:59 PM » |
|
here is a link to a thread discussing this Richard Gage video on an un-related hip hop forum i post at.. read the reactions.. shows you the mindset of a lot of people.. im 'Maccaholic' on there, and the other educate patriot (who posted the thread) is Iceberg Slim.. ha.. and check out 'Big Jake's' avatar.. give it a read: http://www.thecryptonline.com/board/showthread.php?tid=8162MAJOR PROPS to Richard Gage.. what a great example. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
for these are the times that try men's souls
|
|
|
|
chrsswtzr
|
|
« Reply #47 on: June 03, 2009, 10:47:47 PM » |
|
Subsequently, the way the MSM went on endless debates over this film was laughable. For example, when I was watching Joe Scarborough one night, he EXPLODED at his liberal guest and said, "IT'S MY SHOW!", blah, blah, blah. When I reflect on it, I couldn't tell if he was really worried over whether 9/11 would be exposed as the fraud it was, or if he was just merely "acting".
Oh - I believe Moore ended up debating Bill O'Reilly on his show during one of the conventions, if memory serves. It looked STAGED, to say the least.
Michael Moore is a just a shill for TPTB, so naturally all you will see him doing is acting in the public arena. Behind closed doors you may get a peek at the true Michael Moore, whatever that may be... who knows. It's pretty weird to think that all these politicians and public figures have a very different opinion and agenda than the one they really portray behind closed doors, isn't it? I think about that a lot actually, often wondering what rings true in so and so's heart... one day, one day... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
America2
|
|
« Reply #48 on: June 03, 2009, 10:55:16 PM » |
|
Michael Moore is a just a shill for TPTB, so naturally all you will see him doing is acting in the public arena. Behind closed doors you may get a peek at the true Michael Moore, whatever that may be... who knows. It's pretty weird to think that all these politicians and public figures have a very different opinion and agenda than the one they really portray behind closed doors, isn't it? I think about that a lot actually, often wondering what rings true in so and so's heart... one day, one day...
It started in the 1970's when the neolib's hijacked the Donkey party with their "grassroot" movements like women's lib(which, of course, gave birth to abortion rights). Then, of course, other "grassroot" movements like protecting the environment came out(which, of course, gave birth to this global warming hoax) Then a few years after Ronald Reagan left office, NWO scum Newt Gingrich, after the GOP landslide in 1994, introduced his "Contract to America" to supposedly continue the "Reagan Revolution"...which was an outright lie b/c all it did was allow the neocons to slowly but surely hijack the GOP.(i.e. Coincidence that Kristol, Cheney, and other neocons sent their PNAC agenda to Clinton in 1998?) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chrsswtzr
|
|
« Reply #49 on: June 03, 2009, 11:04:26 PM » |
|
It started in the 1970's when the neolib's hijacked the Donkey party with their "grassroot" movements like women's lib(which, of course, gave birth to abortion rights). Then, of course, other "grassroot" movements like protecting the environment came out(which, of course, gave birth to this global warming hoax) Then a few years after Ronald Reagan left office, NWO scum Newt Gingrich, after the GOP landslide in 1994, introduced his "Contract to America" to supposedly continue the "Reagan Revolution"...which was an outright lie b/c all it did was allow the neocons to slowly but surely hijack the GOP.(i.e. Coincidence that Kristol, Cheney, and other neocons sent their PNAC agenda to Clinton in 1998?)
The Rockefeller's funded the whole Women's Lib movement, to give way to having children raised by the state and put under mind control from an early age. Disperse the family unit, keep both parents working (or split up/divorce better yet), and keep them all in debt paying taxes with interests and penalties at a double dose now. It's speculative to think that Reagan may have started to think for himself, then had a hit on his life attempted, is well... speculative at best. The "save mother earth" movement as I like to call it (for irony and satire of course) definitely paved the way for the Al Gore's and Rothschild's of the current day, and the policies laid on the table for the Senate to debate on. Carbon taxes, anyone?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
America2
|
|
« Reply #50 on: June 03, 2009, 11:14:59 PM » |
|
The Rockefeller's funded the whole Women's Lib movement, to give way to having children raised by the state and put under mind control from an early age. Disperse the family unit, keep both parents working (or split up/divorce better yet), and keep them all in debt paying taxes with interests and penalties at a double dose now. It's speculative to think that Reagan may have started to think for himself, then had a hit on his life attempted, is well... speculative at best. The "save mother earth" movement as I like to call it (for irony and satire of course) definitely paved the way for the Al Gore's and Rothschild's of the current day, and the policies laid on the table for the Senate to debate on. Carbon taxes, anyone? Like I mentioned on another thread, my "Democrat" mom actually blames THE DEMOCRATS for this mess which forced these mothers into the work force, why? B/c she didn't like how the Democrats just kept feeding the poor with all this nonsense welfare, food stamps, etc to infinity. Ultimately, she thinks that it was b/c of this that caused money value to go down as government waste increased, which ultimately lead to tighter family budgets, which forced mothers into the work force. In her words, she also says, "Republicans have done alot better because they don't give lollypops to these poor peoples' mouths! They discipline and make people go out and work!". Of course, the REALITY of all this is that welfare, food stamps, et al are only a VERY small portion of the government expenditure budget. What alot of people DON'T realize is that we just have SO many items being taxes b/c we only have ENOUGH to pay the INTEREST of the debt the Federal Reserve gives us. Forget the 1040, there are like numerous other items that have no business being taxed...just so that illegal wars et al can get their fundings. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
chrsswtzr
|
|
« Reply #51 on: June 04, 2009, 01:32:41 AM » |
|
Like I mentioned on another thread, my "Democrat" mom actually blames THE DEMOCRATS for this mess which forced these mothers into the work force, why? B/c she didn't like how the Democrats just kept feeding the poor with all this nonsense welfare, food stamps, etc to infinity. Ultimately, she thinks that it was b/c of this that caused money value to go down as government waste increased, which ultimately lead to tighter family budgets, which forced mothers into the work force. In her words, she also says, "Republicans have done alot better because they don't give lollypops to these poor peoples' mouths! They discipline and make people go out and work!".
Of course, the REALITY of all this is that welfare, food stamps, et al are only a VERY small portion of the government expenditure budget. What alot of people DON'T realize is that we just have SO many items being taxes b/c we only have ENOUGH to pay the INTEREST of the debt the Federal Reserve gives us. Forget the 1040, there are like numerous other items that have no business being taxed...just so that illegal wars et al can get their fundings.
No shit. Screw welfare and democrat backed programs.... that's nothing compared to us being over in the Middle East right now and the banker bailouts!!!! It's like comparing an ant and a mountain next to eachother!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
KiwiClare
|
|
« Reply #52 on: June 04, 2009, 05:46:51 PM » |
|
That was a good interview Richard Gage had on the Infowars.com radio show today regarding the progress he is making getting the truth about 9/11 out in the public arena. He said he's "incredibly delighted" with the progress being made! He mentioned he is going to be on the nationally-syndicated show Coast to Coast AM on Tuesday night at 11pm, which Alex mentioned was the 2nd biggest show in the US. Richard Gage also mentioned that the numbers of architects and engineers for 911 Truth is growing and that they should have 1000 names on the petition he is taking to Congress in October. Architects and engineers, sign their petition if you haven't already. It is at http://www.ae911truth.org/You can sign as a supporter too. There are 3624 other supporters including A&E students who have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation, so you will by no means be alone.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
To be persuasive, we must be believable,
To be believable, we must be credible,
To be credible, we must be truthful.
- Edward R. Murrow
|
|
|
|
KiwiClare
|
|
« Reply #53 on: June 04, 2009, 06:09:43 PM » |
|
Further to the last post, I forgot to mention that the show Richard Gage will be on is on Coast to Coast AM on Tuesday night at 11pm, PACIFIC TIME.
Tell your friends to tune in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
To be persuasive, we must be believable,
To be believable, we must be credible,
To be credible, we must be truthful.
- Edward R. Murrow
|
|
|
|
