i think WTC7 is one of the Achilles Heels of the official story.
that and the crew of young Israeli men celebrating & high-fiving as they observed the proceedings from Bergen Park, New Jersey.
maybe they'll put that in future Mossad training manuals. "When executing false flag operations, do not celebrate the success of the operation in public, because we can not always count on the American media to be effective news censors for us."
i haven't ever heard the subject addressed on television, other than the report that WTC7 fell.
if 9-11 was not anticipated, the official explanation is, somehow the effect of the plane crashes knocked down WTC7.
OR, the decision was made to demolish the building, for safety reasons, and the workers wired it up in a space of a few hours, on 9-11.
so i guess the mainstream media just entirely avoids the subject ?
i guess one of the reasons i say WTC7 is the Achilles Heel of the operation is that it piqued the curiosity of Jim Hoffman, who documented his work at
http://911research.wtc7.net/it was his work that "put me over the top". before i met him, i felt that there were some mighty funny things going on & had read Ruppert's book, Crossing the Rubicon.
but Ruppert did not have access to physical evidence, so he ended up concentrating on investigating things like the war games. also, he was not an engineer, and he made the choice to disregard the physical evidence, to the extent that he came to advocate ignorring all evidence related to the collapse & possible definition of the buildings. i respect his work in the Rubicon; i completely disagree with his suggestion that it's best to ignore the subject of the collapse of the buildings.
anyway, i had to eventually admit, yes, absolutely, definitely, the buildings were demolished. the corroboration of the gut reaction reported by demolition engineers ("by Golly, that looks just like a demolition"), the reports of uniformed servicepeople & volunteers of explosions, the action of destroying the evidence by clearing away the debris pile and melting it down, instead of studying it, like you would with a normal crime scene ... it's not a happy realization to realize that your own government participated in the murder of 3000 of your own country-people.
and, like i said in another post, once we accept that the buildings were demolished, then that raises the question of "who did it ?"
anyway, if WTC7 hadn't gone down, i probably would not be asking these questions. and the perpetrators of 9-11 certainly could have guessed that demolishing 9-11 would raise questions that the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2 would not raise. yet they chose to go ahead and demolish WTC7.
either they were extremely arrogant, and felt they could get away with any crime they wanted, or a tactical & strategic decision was made - the benefit of demolishing WTC7 outweighs the risk to the official story that its collapse would bring.
so there must have been some mighty incriminating documents tucked away there.
once the decision was made to go ahead with 9-11, i can just imagine the perpetrators preparing in the months before it. "what do you say we move these classified documents to secure storage in WTC7".
it is possible to almost reverse engineer the crime.
i can't help but wonder what the plan is for when Cheney gets pre-senile, how will they keep him from talking ? i guess he won't be doing many interviews.
