From Chocolaty http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=62764.msg324725#msg324725
Zeitgeist 2 propagandizing natural law!! 57:45
it seems to blame money instead of carnality in the case of someone who's selling you something or a doctor who tells a patient he needs certain things done, cynically wondering whether or not it's true or it's because of their greed. So the movie seems to assume greed, fleshy lusts etc.
it excuses the big corporations as victims of this. What nonsense, give me a break.
money isn't inherently bad any more than a gun or a knife is inherently bad, but a carnally lusting heart of a man seeking or possessing those things is what is bad. Which is why the hearts of men must be change and yeild to all goodness, to lust after that which is opposite and waring against all lusts of the flesh, the spirit! What we notice tells us something is wrong, though stealing might be selfishly seeming to be advantageous, something tells us it's bad, and we all know it. It's bad because it's not our possession, we haven't worked for it and therefor it's NOT JUST for us to take it. This spirit is after Justice, Peace, Love, Kindness, etc which war against our flesh which is ___
It's not money that causes a man to do wrong, but the love of money in that man's heart
1:01:00 they blame competitive money system (the SYSTEM!!!) for
- limited technology
- wealth gaps
- rich ruling elites
While it is the population's carnally lusting heart which is responsible for their corrupt rulers. A nation is ruled by the government it deserves
They then excuse walmart coming in because by the reason for their carnal lusts for greed which excuses them they move into a town and all the small businesses close and a "grey area emerges" (according to Zeitgeist). What exactly is walmart doing wrong zeitgeist asks, why should they care about small businesses they destroy.
Then they equate this "more subtly" to a person being fired from their job because a new technology comes out which can do it better and faster. How is that corruption?!
So the 3 examples Zeitgeist gives which it says are all corrupt, the more to the less subtle are as follows
- Dumping toxic waste
- Having a monopoly entreprise
- Downsizing the workforce
Then for this it says that the motive is the same: Profit (which it excuses). It excuses the carnal lusts and blames the systems. In summary it concludes that monateriism.
The motive it says is the same: Profit. They are all different degrees of the same "self-preserving mechanism" which always puts the well being of people second to monatery gain. (carnal lusts before spiritual ones).
So it renamed corruption which it gave a bad example for to self-preservating mechanism.
OH!!!! that's how they lead to pantheism!!! They're gonna say that we should put the resources (earth) before ourselves!
Democracy then it says isn't possible under a monerary based economy? WHAT?! They say if you have more money to advertise your position, the position you desire in government, that is in a democracy, it serves those in positions of differential advantage so it's always a dictatorship of the elitist, the financially wealthy.
so technology solves problems not politics zeitgeist says
So now we shouldn't write to our congressmen and representatives?
The monetary system is the reason why we don't have technology everywhere? It talks about the resources (Pantheism incoming I can feel it)
Funny that this is coming out when the economy is about to crash and the entire world will be affected. Maybe we shouldn't start another valid backed based currency?!
Maybe we should all have the resources divided upon every human being. (aka legitimizing theft) So that like in many places around the world now increasingly if you have "needs" and want to take someone else's proprety by 'virtue' of you having a need and needing to succour it you're justified and if the person who has it resists he can be put in jail.
so the 'competitive' monetary system is driven by "self-interest" to get those things which we all need (under carnal lusts which it assumes and excuses the consequences of for everyone) and therefor we should all split them among people.
Then they make it seem as if there was nobody honest out there.
Rather than everybody should realise that the cause for the world problems are the evil lusts of a carnal heart and therefor the solution is the good lusts of a spiritual heart they blame wars and poverty, on the profit system. They say it's impossible to have technological advancement to it's most productive and efficient states in a profit system rather than again blaming the correct culprit which is greed, not the money. The love of money is greed, this is the problem. And this comes from a carnally lusting heart.
It then says it's impossible for human beings to behave on truely ethical or decent ways under a monatery system, assuming everyone's carnally lusting heart therefor we should divide it among the people.
Greed (evil carnal lust) is no more natural than human clothing? ... wow, just wow.
Roxanne Meadows then from the VENUS project says that we want to eliminate the CAUSES of the problems. Eliminate the PROCESSES that produce greed and bigotry and prejudice and people taking advantage of one another and elitism! Eliminating the need for prisons and welfare. We've always had these problems because we've always lived within SCARCITY and BARTER and MONETARY SYSTEMS THAT PRODUCE SCARCITY.
So the CAUSES of the problems are the PROCESSES that produce all these evils. These PROCESSES zeitgeist has identified for us as being the money itself, not the carnally lusting heart.
Look up dictionary.com for Lucifer.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lucifer
"the planet Venus when appearing as the morning star."
"If we eradicate the conditions that generate what you call socially offensive behavior it does not exist."
Zeitgeist has falsely linked money to corruption and therefor AKA this means: no money = no socially offensive behavior.
Money is not the root of all evil. The love of money is the root of all evil.
And here we get into the pantheism, what they are REALLY pushing.
"War, poverty, corruption, hunger, misery, human suffering will not change in a monetary system - that is there will be very little significant change. It's going to take A REDESIGN OF OUR CULTURE, our values, and IT HAS TO BE RELATED TO THE "CARING"(yuck) CAPACITY OF THE EARTH. Not some human opinion, not some politician's notions of a way the world ought to be or some religious notions of the conduct of human affairs and that's what the VENUS project is all about.."
There you have it, pantheism. Not man is supreme over nature but nature is supreme over man.
They propose a sociaty (while doing this showing a huge eye shape, OH NO ITS JUST A COINCIDENCE... give me a break)
1) lawless (no cops, no laws)
As for lawlessness, "do as thou wilt" satanic doctrine.
2) with no "old superstition" (you remember how they attacked Christianity)
No Christianity, boy they really hate it.
3) no professions "that are no longer valid" such as stock brokers, bankers, advertisers (because money is the cause of problems, remember? sigh)
Now of course all those aren't "valid" because all the resources are going to be divided between people, but this assumes someone's going to divide them, I wonder if they're going to be fair and uncorrupt!? lol...
More pantheistic propaganda coming our way
"When we understand that it is technology divised by human ingenuity which frees humanity and increases our quality of life we then realise that THE MOST IMPORTANT FOCUS WE CAN HAVE IS ON THE INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT
OF THE EARTH'S RESOURCES
Money is the reason which keeps us from having these resources zeitgeist claims, so again the problems on money. Money creates scarcity Zeitgeist says. But it's the corruption which creates scarcity! Though if you remember Zeitgeist would have us link the two, corruption being excused by the fact of there simply being money.
Then this section turns into almost a bad ad for the VENUS project and their occult propaganda.
"The major difference between a resource based economy and a monetary system is that a resourced based economy is really concerned with people (what!?) and their well-being while the monetary system has become so distorted that the concerns of the people are really secondary if they're there at all"
Effectively again fallaciously assuming and excusing corruption linking it to the money itself rather than the love of money.
"If there's a problem in society and you can't earn money from solving that problem than it won't be done".
That is only true if you again assume pure carnal lusts for everyone. But what about the charity? If we love others we'll take care of them. Love thy neighbor as thy self, give to everyone who asks from you. These are spiritual injunctions from the bible which Zeitgeist vilifies and lies about so much. Every single lust which is spiritual takes care of others!
This effectively undermines the entire message of the movie and makes the case for being lead by the spiritual lusts rather than the carnal lusts, why doesn't Zeitgeist tell us about those?
Then Zeitgeist draws the same conclusion as it did earlier for technologies for free energy, because they link corruption to there being money (by this false link they also excuse the corruption) rather than the love of money which is the real cause of corruption. They assuming there's only carnal lusts they come to astounding conclusions all being held back because of "money".
Then they blame fascism in america on it's "dominant philosophy" (capitalism?) and religion (protestant Christianity). This is so utterly reversed and asinine. How does capitalism lead to fascism? Only their false links can lead them there. It can only be so because most of the population gets the government they deserve for having such carnal hearts and what for what they, murdering babies, supporting military invasions of other country, loving superficiality, pride etc etc. And protestant Christianity again is what leads on to spiritual lusts which is the real blatant solution to all these problems. The reason for the problems is carnal lusts in the hearts of men, and it's cure is it's antithesis, that which wars against the carnal lusts, spiritual lusts!
Then the anti-protestant Christianity message.
"You're brought up to believe that: "you shall earn your living by the sweat of your brow" That holds people back."
What the verse really says...
Gen 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread
, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art
, and unto dust shalt thou return
"freeing people" he continues "from drudgery, repetitive jobs which make them ignorant, you rob them."
There are machines available to do certain "manual labor". But working manual labor jobs per se, earning your living, how is that, getting robbed? Shouldn't people earn their living? Isn't it honest to earn your own living?
"The path is clear, but our monetary based structure (here we go again) which requires labor for income blocks this progress for humans need job in order to survive
. The bottom line is that this system must go or we will never be free and technology will constantly be paralyzed."
Yeah wouldn't want to work to earn your own bread eh buddy? This whole thing is based on their faulty links and assumptions they accepted earlier, and on it they would have us believe that "we will never be free" and "technology will constantly be paralyzed" as well as some human sufferings and crime, will remain until this whole system they propose is adopted.
"man made laws are attempts to deal with occuring problems and not knowing how to solve them they make a law."
Anarchy promoted. "Do as thou wilt" satanic doctrine again. Hey there are no problems we just don't know how do solve them yet so why have laws? If Zeitgeist 3 ever comes out I wonder how much more obvious they will get, the further down they go the closer to revealing how nonsensical and satanic what they are pushing is.
"The smarter people are, the richer the WORLD, because everybody become a CONTRIBUTOR"
"The smarter your kids are the better my life will be because they will be CONTRIBUTING more constructively TO THE ENVIRONMENT"
"Patriotism, weapons, armies, navies, all that is a sign that we're not civilized yet"
Patriotism is bad? Weapons (2nd amentmend)?
"War is inevitable when you produce scarcity"
"There is no state"
So patrotism is bad and there is no state. I guess we should all merge into a single world with no nation state then. NWO anyone?
LAST PART OF THE FILM, BAM NATURAL LAW. Just as I've been saying all this post along. Knew it was coming that's all they were describing. Look at my previous posts and search for natural law. This is the greek philosophy of Aristotle and it's what they all want us to subscribe to.
They say "it's time for a new social system which reflects the understandings we have today" While showing an eye structure again.
Then they attack religions with such nescient juvenile arguements.
This man from the VENUS project again with all the answers *sigh* has this to say: "the concept of 'god' is really a method of accounting for the nature of things. In the early days people didn't know enough about how things formed, how nature worked so they invented their own little stories and they made 'god' in their own image."
How fantastically ignorant and devoid of any substance. Thank you Mr whoever you are from the VENUS project for this boldly stated uneducated opinion. Then we see the occult come into it. "and they made 'god' in their own image". It is them who are making him in their own image! Christianity is the other way around.
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image
, in the image of God created he him
; male and female created he them.
So they inverse it as per usual, the opposite of Christianity, what they are really at war against.
They then attack the 'death and resurrection of Jesus Christ". "It is very difficult to take this account literally, for not only is there no primary sources denoting this supernatural event in secular history, awareness of pre-Christian saviors who also died and were resurrected immediately puts the story in mythological territory by association."
WOW!!! Okay where to start on this.
1) That there are no primary sources denoting the resurrection in "secular history"
2) That there are pre-Christian saviors who died and resurrected.
I'll start with number 2. This is blatantly false. They show Krishna and Horus which I recognize from the images so I'll deal with those [from kingdavid8]
Horus on being a savior: The only titles Horus is given are “Great God”, “Chief of the Powers”, “Master of Heaven”, and “Avenger of His Father”. None of the above titles are in any Egyptian mythology.
Horus on being resurrected: Horus was never crucified. There’s an unofficial story in which he dies and is cast in pieces into the water, then later fished out by a crocodile at Isis’ request. This unofficial story is the only one in which he dies at all.http://www.pantheon.org/articles/h/horus.htmlhttp://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/osiris.htm#horushttp://towerwebproductions.com/alt-lib/myth/eyeofhorus.htmhttp://members.aol.com/egyptart/hormyth.htmlhttp://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horushttp://www.tektonics.org/osy.html
Krishna on being a savior: He was never refered to as that.
Krishna on being resurrected: The closest parallel comes in some later versions in which Krishna's body turned into a log-like image which floated around the East coast of India, finally ending up in a temple in the town of Puri. But he neither rose from the dead or ascended to Heaven. http://www.webcom.com/~ara/http://www.pantheon.org/articles/k/krishna.htmlhttp://webonautics.com/mythology/mythology.htmlhttp://www.vets.com/encyclopaedia/ency1/D7.HTMhttp://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krishna
Now let me deal with number 1.
This is so ridiculous. If you saw Jesus after he died and was placed in a tomb for 3 days how in the world could you still remain secular in reporting this fact as a primary source? And had he was still in the tomb all the Jewish officials would have had to do is to point to his body and the early spreading of Christianity would have stopped right there. You have to remember that early Christianity was in Jerusalem!
Elaborating. We do not need to assume that the bible is inspired or even that the bible is reliable as a text, though we can get to those conclusions. Should we take the data that critical scholars allow - both skeptics and apologetics. Virtually all skeptics, it makes no difference if you're a believer or an unbeliever, they put 1 Corinthians, Paul's creed which is essentially 'I gave you - listerners from Corinth - the text, the story of the Gospel which I recieved'. He's writing this in 55 AD. The crucifixion was at 31.5 AD. Critics are willing to say that Paul probably got this material about 35 AD, but Peter and John and James had it before Paul did, and so we're right on top of the events. This material goes back to 31.5 AD and from this we get a very early account right on top of the events, we get eye witnesses, such as Paul who tells us that James, Peter and John agree. We have enthusiasm, their lives were transformed by their beliefs (the apostles) that they saw the risen Jesus so much so that they were willing to die for their beliefs, this doesn't speak of the validity of their claims, but of the sincerity of their beliefs, you don't die for something you don't believe in. Paul implies an empty tomb in 1 Corinthians 15:3 and following and so we have eye witnesses eye witnesses who were willing to die for their beliefs that Jesus appeared to them, with an empty tomb. This is but a very minimalistic [from habermas] case that can be made for the sake of not writing pages on this single point alone.
Here's a page which elaborates a bit morehttp://www.preventingtruthdecay.org/jesusresurrection.shtml
Here's an entire book on the subject.http://www.amazon.com/Case-Resurrection-Jesus-Gary-Habermas/dp/0825427886/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223183266&sr=8-1
In the absence of any plausible naturalistic explanation, Jesus resurrection is the most plausible explanation for the known data.
"What is truely sad however is that when we cease the idea that the stories from Christianity, Judaism, Islam are literal history and accept them for what they really are which are purely allegorical expressions derived from many faiths, we see that all religions share a common thread. And it is this unifying imperitive that needs to be recognized and appreciated."
More unscholarly boldness against Christianity and Judaism from Zeitgeist. Nevermind the entire branches of historiography, anthropology, it is to deny corroborating archaeology, palaeography, as well as umpteen popular ancient historian's and other's existence or writings (then you have a problem with those refering or quoting these historian's writings) and chronology, etc. To deny Jesus's existance is to is to deny vast historal evidence accepted by 99,9%+ of contemporary historical OT and NT apologetic and skeptical scholars. You might as well deny history until the time of cameras and videotapes. It's one of the most well attested fact of ancient history that Jesus Christ existed.
Then Zeitgeist bashes Christianity for the fruits of Catholicism, which is typical again and expected from them seeing as to how they've lied about it so far and tried to decieve the audience just as with their pantheistic no-money NWO propaganda.
Another quote from the VENUS project guy who has all the answers [... lol]
"The bible is subject to interpretation." he continues "You read it you say I think Jesus meant this, I think Job meant that, "oh no" he meant this. So you have the Lutheran, the Seventh Day Adventists (thanks for the plug), the catholic, and a church divided is no church at all."
There is only 1 correct interpretation of the bible. Some things may be harder to understand (like Paul at times) but the bible has to be consistant with itself. When taking the entire bible into consideration things become clearer (like topical studies, as well as the understanding of types and anti-types of Christ which must be consistant throughout the bible, looking at the original languages in which a verse and related verses are written, also in 1 co 2:14 we find that the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them
, because they are spiritually discerned. etc).
Also, it's quite clear if you know what's going on that the Catholic Church is trying to reconcile the protestant churches to themselves. Over many so far it has succeeded, but I know at least of 1 that will never give in, for it denounces the Catholic Church as the beast itself, which is biblical (daniel 2 & 8 ). It used to be during the reformation period that every single protestant denominations that I'm aware of denounced the Catholic Church as anti-Christ and as the beast itself. For some reason they do not do this anymore. Because just as they used to work by force in the world and now they do by stealth.
"This point on division, which is a trademark of all theistic religions brings us to our second failure of awareness." (let me guess, unity?) "the false assumption of separation through the rejection of the symbiotic relationship of life" Lol knew it.
More pantheistic garbage. Under natural law if we're all a group, no one should rise above the group mentality to denounce it, totally NWO.
"you have to take care of the whole community or you're going to have serious problems"
Now remember that this is to be done by FORCE which they won't tell you under an AUTHORITY in a system where NEED makes everything common. AKA you have nothing of your own and theft is legalized. Always keep that in mind.
"You gotta take care of the whole community or you're going to have serious problems, and now we have to see that the whole world is the community"
Unity message, pantheism, subserviancy to nature, anarchy, natural law, moneyless, no patriotism, no state, how disgusting is this movie really? Totally NWO.
"We must all take care of eachother" [...] "and it's not just a community of human beings, it's a community of plants and animals and elements and we really need to understand that, that's what's gonna bring us joy too and pleasure, that's what's missing in our lives right now. We can call it spirituality, the fact of the matter is joy comes from that bliss of connectedness" *Image shown of a pyramid with the sun*. I remember that if the hands are open it's a sign of veneration but can anyone remind me if having the thumbs and indexes joined is a sign of veneration? Zeitgeist continues with more pantheistic nature and sun worship "That's our 'god' spirit, that's that side of ourselves that really feels it, you can feel it deep inside you this amazing wonderful feeling and you know when you get it, you don't get it from money, you get it from connection."
Could this be any clearer? In occultism they will always lead you to the inside of yourself. This is something we must remember, because contrary to Christianity (as always) where it's about opening up to the spirit of God coming into our bodily vessels, they will bring out what's inside of us. This you will see them many time call 'god'. In effect increasing carnality.
Pantheistic comedians right after.
Love unites, but it's a spiritual unity, not a literal unity. When we love our neighbor and we love God we become united with them spiritually speaking (at least this is my understanding).
Joh 17:21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
Joh 17:22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
Joh 17:23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.
but the counterfit which is literal is about uniting with the literal omnipresence. Now many verses tell me God is omnipresent but fellow Christians if you disagree please let me know, don't take this as absolute from me now.
But I am beginning to think that the counterfeit is nearly always a literal counterfeit to the spiritual. And this literal interpretation of the spiritual seems to always be the OPTIMAL occult position. Therefor according to this since they would have us be exalted to believe that we're 'gods' as the serpent promised Eve in the garden they if indeed the bible says that God is omnipresent (which I am not so sure about but I think so) then we can understand why they want us to be literally everywhere, one with everything literally as it were.
"For love is extentionality, and seeing everything as you, and you as everything can have no conditionalities, for in fact we are all everything at once"
Uniting with the world, that's the utter opposite of what we're supposed to do. We're supposed to distance ourselves utterly and completely from the world, it has nothing to offer us.
Jas 1:27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
1Jn 2:15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
1Jn 2:16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
1Jn 2:17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.
Then evolution propaganda from expert (comedian) George Carlin, onto which is piled on occult assumptions. "If it's true that we're all from the center of a star" blah blah. "even a coke machine or a cigarette butt in the street in buffalo is made up of atoms that came from the star"
How do you feel being compared to a cigarette butt? Are you one with cigarette butts? How about one with cat vomit?
Carlin continues "we've been separated from the oneness" [...] "people have this yearning to be part of this original one again so they exploit that they call it 'god' they say he has rules and I think that's cruel"
So then no rules, do as thou wilt, satanic doctrine again. This is getting repetitive.
"Our lives, our past and our future are tied to the SUN, the MOON, and the STARS"
The moon now, ugh. Can this get any more paganistic?
"Our loyalties are to the species and to the planet."
Both of those are not true.
Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth
, and subdue it
: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth
They quote the last two quotes from Carl Sagan who promoted pantheism and natural law
"It's time to claim the unity, our outmoded social systems have broken apart and work together to create a sustainable global society where everyone is taken care of and everyone is truely free."
"Your personal beliefs whatever they may be are meaningless when it comes to the necessities of life"
Here we go. Another occult principal. My understanding of luciferianism is that it's a NEEDS based religion. Natural law appeals to needs as well, making them supreme. If I see you have 2 cars and I take feel I have need of one, under natural law I am justified to take your car because of my need, because goods are everyones nothing is truely yours alone. If you defend your proprety under this system the one who has a need can call the cops and have you put in jail for preventing someone to succour his needs. What's worse under natural law is that if one believes his friend may have a need he's justified in taking from you for his friend as well. It's the most disgusting system. Under this system if you go on vacation and come home and someone is living in your house you can not throw them out, they have needs...
"The most important issue at hand is the intelligent MANAGEMENT of the earth's resources."
Of course, who do you think's gonna manage the resources?
"Furthermore, ideaologies that SEPARATE humanity such as religion need strong reflexion in THE COMMUNITY in regard to its value, purpose and social relevancy."
2Co 6:17 Wherefore come out from among them
, and be ye separate
, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing
; and I will receive you,
"hopefully through time, religion will lose its materialism and basis in superstition and move into the useful field of philosophy"
So no to God's thoughts, yes to man's thoughts? If I remember correctly this is occult.
Mar 8:33 But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.
The word savourest is in other translation often translated as thinking or minding.
Also about philosophy
Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
"the fact is society today is backwards with politicians constantly talking about protection and security rather than creation, UNITY and progress"
"Instead of weapons of mass destruction, it is time to unleash something much more powerful" *Showing the sun*
"Our true DIVINITY is in our ability to create"
We're divine?! I thought God was divine. Oh that's right Zeitgeist believes we're 'god'. *yawn* luciferianism.
Does this remind anyone of anything?
Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die
Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods
, knowing good and evil.
"hence paralyzing any attempts at true GLOBAL sustainability" (talking about the monetary system)
Every single sentence is loaded with NWO garbage.
HAHAHA they're starting a movement, ohhh boy. I wonder how many millions will be decieved into thinking they are truely fighting the NWO when they're actually crying out for exactly what the NWO wants.
They want movement to be the world's largest movement the world has ever seen.
"we must mobilize and educate everyone about the inherent corruption of our current world system along with the only true sustainable solution, declaring all the natural resources on the planet as COMMON heritage to all people. While informing everyone as to the true state of technology while we can all be free if the world works together rather than fights."
Natural law, unity.
The rest of the movie is stating over and over again the same message so I won't write down every quote.
Since people get the government they deserve, certainly they will get it if they will it, and the powers that be cannot rule the people with evil unless the people themselves be evil. The change of the will of individuals towards evil, the desensitizing of evils is what permits these things to happen. A global movement asking for unity as such is the worse thing that could happen. It's like begging to be utterly dominated and to have nothing of your own and to think that you're 'god' and one with all of man and nature can only bring upon the earth more evils, because these things are exceedingly evil and occult and wrong.
"You are everything"
Another occult. Ask yourself why many of these occult teachers they are showing have been caught in disgusting and vile acts, it's because they profoundly darkened their hearts with these disgusting lies.
In the end, the scene where people are all stopping what they're doing and dropping their religions left and right for the occult luciferian teachings. The truth is that our goods are ours, not our neighbors, this is the 10th commandment.
Exo 20:17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is
We are not all one with the universe, with animals and plants and whatnot. Neither are we under them.
Now, in conclusion. This obvious new world order propaganda, and it's mixing truth with error as with the previous Zeitgeist. With that in mind, ask yourself WHY is it attacking Christianity so strongly and lying about it! This is important!