Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Horrible how the corrupt idiot despicable gov moonbeam
revoked "personal exemptions and also religious exemptions"
they'll do that also when they force the fake mandatory jab
on all of us with some ruse of killer bird flu, ebola, etc. etc. 
that'll start the civil war they've been trying to bring on...
(forced inoculations of everyone)
Financial Crisis Forum / Re: Greece Financial Default Watch
« Last post by windyacres on Today at 06:54:58 pm »
Alex mentioned on his show today that the capitol
controls went from $66.00   a day to now $100 per month!
per the central banksters demand.
For a smidgeon of the daily cost to fight supposed ISIS
I have no doubt given the proper fully automatic rifles,
60 round magazines and cases of ammo, they'd all be
dead in no more than 2 days, finished, kaput  taken out
by patriots who volunteered to scourge the earth of sick
sadistic head lopping miscreants with no morals pushing
the agenda to keep the kabuki theater on "war on terrorism" funded.
EG, it's more like those snotty teenage brats are in an
18 wheeler semi-truck doing 120 MPH straight down a hill
and the brakes don't work, neither does the jake brake because
the idiots popped it into neutral and there's no engine compression
for that jake break to work LOL.

When it crashes, all of us here on the forum will have to think out
of the box on a lot of things when stores are closed, currencies are
worthless, etc. to get things done and procured without the conventional
ways we're all used to.   
Has anyone seen these?

1. How does the Israel lobby influence Congress?
YT: 1.1 Paul Findley - Should the executive outmaneuver Congress to save Palestine and Israel?
YT: 1.2 Janet McMahon - The Israel lobby network and Coordinated PACs that finance U.S. elections
YT: 1.3 Cynthia McKinney - In the Israel lobby's cross-hairs
YT: 1.4 Delinda Hanley - U.S. aid to Israel in numbers.

2. Does Israel and its lobby exercise too much influence on U.S. decisions to wage war in the Middle East?

YT: 2.1 Stephen Sniegoski - Neoconservatives and the Iraq War.
YT: 2.2 Karen Kwiatkowski - Inside the Pentagon's "Office of Special Plans."
YT: 2.3 Gareth Porter - The "manufactured crisis" and drive for U.S. / Israel military actions against Iran.
YT: 2.4 Brigadier General (ret) James J. David - How does U.S. military aid to Israel impact relations with other U.S. allies?

3. Does the "special relationship" transcend rule of law?

YT: 3.1 Grant F. Smith - A brief history of unprosecuted Israeli foreign agent, smuggling and espionage cases.
YT: 3.2 Ernie Gallo - The U.S.S Liberty: what really happened? What did not?
YT: 3.3 Mark Perry - Mossad poses as CIA? No-holds-barred national security reporting in the current environment.
YT: 3.4 M.E. "Spike" Bowman - The Jonathan Pollard Affair: what does it mean and what does it not mean?

4. History: How did the "special relationship" come to be?

YT: 4.1 Stephen Walt - The "special relationship" and what has changed since publication of "The Israel Lobby" book.
YT: 4.2 Geoffrey Wawro- Key findings from the book "Quicksand" and what happens to historians who revise history.
YT: 4.3 John Quigley - 1967, international law and cost of U.S. support for the occupation.
YT: 4.4 Alison Weir - Findings From the New Book "Against Our Better Judgment"

5. Has the lobby captured political parties and news media?

YT: 5.1 Jeff Blankfort - Are there Israel lobby gatekeepers and damage control squads on the Left?
YT: 5.2 Allan Brownfeld - The American Council for Judaism and battles over Zionism inside Jewish social welfare organizations.
YT: 5.3 Justin Raimondo - Has the Israel lobby captured the Right?
YT: 5.4 Scott McConnell - Did Neoconservatives take over GOP foreign policy?
YT: 5.5 Philip Weiss - What is changing in "permissible" mainstream public debate—and what is not?

6. Is Israel really a U.S. ally?

YT: 6.1 Paul Pillar - Are threats to Israel's security inflated to justify occupation and U.S. support?
YT: 6.2 Ray McGovern - Does Israel Act Like a U.S. Ally?
YT: 6.3 Philip Giraldi - Is Israel a U.S. Ally?
Richard Stallman at UofC
Uploaded on Feb 5, 2009

Richard Stallman lecturing about copyright at University of Calgary on 2009-02-03. Free/Libre formats & raw footage can be found at: , as per Stallman's request. (Transcode-SR1 contains wireless mic audio.)  Thanks to Sebastian Ochmann & Antonio Bonifati for their work transcribing this video!
Richard Stallman: We're heading for a total disaster
Published on Aug 19, 2012

The computer world is divided in two confronting camps with totally different philosophies. On the one side are companies that distribute programs under restrictive conditions. On the other are people who believe software must respect users' freedom.

So what's the balance between the two? Do computer owners really care about their freedom, or are they happy under the watchful eye of Big Brother? That's what we're asking one of the leaders of the free software movement, programmer-turned-philosopher, Richard Stallman.
Richard Stallman on Steve Jobs Death
On threats to freedom! Richard Stallman - in INT's ENLIGHTENMENT
Richard Stallman - "Freedom in your computer and in the net" (Speech 2014)
Video / Re: Why American men are avoiding marriage.
« Last post by TahoeBlue on Today at 05:19:37 pm »
The problem with America today is we have a culture of adults that refuse to grow up. 

I would say that many today cannot AFFORD to grow up ... Marriage indicates children and most people don't feel they are able to PAY for that without living in a trailer park. Back in the 60's-70's poor young adults went out and had children on "communes" in the woods. That was all they could afford and have kids too....

Anna Angel, 30, holds Trinitie Huey, 4, left, and Sunshine Huey, 3. Timothy Fresch, 25, holds his son, Domonic Fresch. In rear, from left, are Stormie Huey, 5, and Tiara Angel, 6.
Rare and Unseen Color Photographs of America’s Hippie Communes from the 1970s

From a few months ago, but highly relevant in terms of the encouraging signs it gives that the church, and the cultural right is holding firm and fighting back:

The Battle of Indiana and the Promise of Battles to Come
April 2015 | Volume 44, Number 4
David French, National Review

...To understand the future, let’s revisit and explain the four truths of the modern culture war.

First, the conflict is not between gay rights and religious liberty, but between the sexual revolution and Christianity. The fury of the gay rights movement was so palpable during the Indiana controversy that it’s easy to forget the Hobby Lobby RFRA case, a case that had nothing to do with gay rights. Abortion battles continue to rage, sometimes with an intensity that matches or exceeds the arguments over gay marriage. (The Wendy Davis filibuster in Texas captured the imagination of the Left just as much as the battles over gay wedding cakes.) And just over the horizon are new, widespread battles over the very definition of what it means to be male or female. Simply put, the sexual revolution questions everything about sexual morality and identity—demanding changes in every aspect of traditional sexual morality and, consequently, orthodox Christian theology.

The gay rights movement is inseparable from the sexual revolution, and the sexual revolution is inseparable from the gay rights movement. The principles of radical sexual autonomy, freedom from any form of moral judgment, and government support to ameliorate the consequences of sexual libertinism are present in the fights over abortion, gay rights, and now transgender issues. Those who surrender on one issue tend to surrender on others as well. With similar moral principles implicated, similar moral outcomes result.

Second, not a single major orthodox Christian denomination is reconsidering its stance on sexual revolution issues. While the media reports on the “progress” of the gay rights movement in mainline denominations—for example, the Presbyterian Church (USA) recently changed its definition of marriage to include same-sex unions—this movement is irrelevant to the much larger Evangelical and orthodox Catholic communities. None of the large orthodox Protestant denominations are changing their stance on human sexuality. Neither is the Catholic Church. Neither are the various branches of Orthodoxy. And these institutions collectively dwarf the liberal, mainline churches when it comes to churchgoing adherents.

Given this reality, the rapid advances of the gay rights movement and its allied sexual revolutionaries—coming as they do largely from liberal and less churchgoing segments of the population—will soon stagnate as they face the challenge of persuading tens of millions of Bible-believing Americans that there is nothing wrong with same-sex marriage. Given the absence of scriptural support for this position, the gay rights movement will face many of the same challenges as the abortion lobby, and will likely meet with a similar lack of success.

Browbeating Christians into submission is not a new tactic, and it is a tactic that has largely failed in the abortion arena—despite the existence of legal doctrines that are dramatically skewed against the pro-life movement. Yet the pro-life movement is as strong as it has ever been, and political outcomes are finally starting to reflect that strength, with jurisdiction after jurisdiction passing ever-stronger pro-life laws.

Third, the religious liberty movement is showing increasing, not decreasing cultural strength. While it is easy to grow discouraged in the face of events like Brendan Eich’s departure from Mozilla, the wave of threats directed at vendors like Memories Pizza, Republican politicians’ continued timidity on “culture war” issues, and the climate of intolerance that exists on campuses and in the mainstream media, the Left’s prominent failures are starting to outnumber its recent successes.

Consider the following:

-Cultural conservatives answered the Left’s attempted Chick-fil-A boycott with a “buycott” that swamped stores nationwide, even causing some to run out of food for customers eager to show their support for a beloved restaurant, owned by people who share their moral principles.

-Leftist pressure against Hobby Lobby failed. Customers were either supportive of the owners or indifferent to politics, and boycotts had no effect on Hobby Lobby’s bottom line or its willingness to fight. Not only did Hobby Lobby win its Supreme Court case, its owners are set to open a massive new Museum of the Bible near the National Mall.

-Efforts to drive Phil Robertson—of Duck Dynasty fame—off the air after controversial comments on sexual morality failed, giving cultural conservatives a victory in a medium (cable television) seen as almost uniformly hostile to orthodox Christianity. While Robertson has remained a polarizing figure (and often says things that make many of his supporters uncomfortable), there has been no serious repeat effort to remove him from the air.

-In Houston, leftist government officials were forced to backtrack within days after issuing subpoenas requiring area pastors to turn over the contents of their sermons and other communications. The public outcry was so swift and so great that the city capitulated even before a judge could rule on motions to quash.

-Even in Indiana, as Republican politicians quickly caved to corporate and media pressure, the grassroots response in support of Memories Pizza soon swamped the Left. A GoFundMe account set up to support the owners raised more than $800,000 in small donations in a matter of days (including over $200,000 in one day), putting the pizza restaurant in a far superior financial position than it had enjoyed before the controversy. The message was clear: Cultural conservatives are not, in fact, culturally isolated but rather have the support of millions of Americans who oppose leftist bullying.

While the Left has proven adept at using social media, so have cultural conservatives. And now when the Left overreaches, attempting to drive Christians out of work, there is often an opposite (and greater) reaction.

Fourth, conservative public intellectuals are holding firm in defense of life and religious freedom. Throughout the Battle of Indiana, there was striking unity among leading conservative thinkers. The consensus was clear even among those who support gay marriage: The Left had become illiberal and dangerous. A pluralistic nation must have room for cultural dissenters, and the desire to shame and blacklist individuals and destroy businesses had to be opposed, and opposed vigorously.

In fact, one was more likely to read about discomfort on the Left at some of the mob tactics than about discomfort among conservatives at the defense of religious liberty. This unanimity left Republican politicians relatively isolated, in the familiar position of abandoning their culturally conservative constituents to do the bidding of their corporate supporters.

Yet even this is likely to change. Most politicians are cultural followers, not cultural leaders, and if the base and the intellectual core of the conservative movement remain relatively united, Republican politicians will eventually bend. Once again, the abortion example is instructive. The pro-life movement has been gathering strength for more than a generation, but it is only in recent years that politicians have taken truly meaningful action. The pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute estimates that there were more pro-life bills passed in the last three years than in the previous decade.

* * *

The combination of high stakes—with the sexual revolution confronting Christianity itself—and the continued resolve of Christian churches, church members, and conservative public intellectuals, means that the Battle of Indiana is not only indecisive in the larger struggle, it will soon be forgotten as new battles inevitably erupt. These battles will stop only if Christians abandon their historic faith on a truly national scale or if the Left decides that it is content to “live and let live”—to work, attend school, and share the public square with people who express moral disagreement and who work actively to promote a cultural return to traditional morality.

For the time being, however, neither side looks ready to yield. So conservatives should be prepared for more—more battles over weddings, more campus intolerance, more boycotts, more buycotts, and more cultural anger and division.

To be sure, this is not the future that anyone desires, but for Christians, it is a far better future than one of isolation, censorship, and marginalization. In fact, for Christianity, this is nothing new. Cultural rejection is a scriptural promise and a longtime historical fact. As Christians in the Middle East and Africa face hideous violence, American Christians shouldn’t feel overwhelmed in the face of relatively minimal persecution. Christianity has survived lions. It is surviving beheadings. It can certainly withstand Twitter.

When it comes to the core of their faith, millions of Christians will echo, by word and deed, the words of Martin Luther: Here we stand. We can do no other.

 Posted on May 13, 2015 by David French  in Conservatism
Dr. Jim Willie / King Dollar’s reign of terror almost over

Jul 1, 2015 Paul Sandhu
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10