Larry Siverstein and the Twin Towers

[deslock69]

O.K. friends, I have a couple of questions for you regarding some 911 events. If you are an educated man with lots of money, would you purchase a couple of skyscrapers that were full of asbestos? I mean, they were way over due to have it removed. Most of that type of stuff was done in the 80's right? Not a very good business decision if you asked me. My next question is: How were they able to get an insurance policy anyway? I have known people in that situation and they had to have the asbestos removed before they could sell. I need Silversteins insurance agent as my own. I mean , to get paid twice, that's a sweet deal. I'm not an insurance agent or anything. However the whole thing just smells badly.

[clint]

I've always found the Silverstein thing very odd. The strangest aspect is that the black op people involved in the attack informed a business man of their plans to down the towers. Why would they bother to include an already ultra wealthy man in the plot?

I thought these plots were run on a strictly need to know basis?

[bigron]

ALSO INCLUDE THE OTHER BUILDINGS SUCH AS  WTC 7 ETC

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE:  FOLLOW THE MONEY !!!!

SILVERSTEIN MADE A FORTUNE OUT OF THIS AND HE IS STILL REAPING....

OF COURSE HE WAS PART OF THE WWHOLE SCHEME.....HE MUST HAVE SHARED HIS PROFITS WITH THE DOERS???

[jbrid1138]

I've always found the Silverstein thing very odd. The strangest aspect is that the black op people involved in the attack informed a business man of their plans to down the towers. Why would they bother to include an already ultra wealthy man in the plot?

I thought these plots were run on a strictly need to know basis?

Because $$ corrupts!  Look at how 'ultra' wealthy the Bush family is.  Take a look at how 'ultra' wealthy the Cheney family is.  Take a look at how much $$ most of those folks in our own Congress have -- you think that's representative of the common man around here?  I don't.

They say that absolute power corrupts absolutely // I think the more $$ you have -- the more the greedy want to get their dirty hands upon.

My $.02 (that's about all I've got in fact).  I'll tell you this also -- although a lot can be laid at the foot of money as the root of evil -- it still takes more than just a greedy, corrupt SOB to do what some of these folks are guilty of doing.

[clint]

I still don't think he was important enough to know what was going on. I believe the the CIA or whoever was behind it would just have said f**k him.

[jbrid1138]

I still don't think he was important enough to know what was going on. I believe the the CIA or whoever was behind it would just have said f**k him.

You might be right, but there sure seems to be some things more than just a guy who leased a couple of buildings // the same ones that many of us THINK might very well have been blown up, as in controlled demolition:

/// Take a look at these things we know about Larry Silverstein ///:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.net/searchResults.jsp?searchtext=larry+silverstein&events=on&entities=on&articles=on&topics=on&timelines=on&projects=on&titles=on&descriptions=on&dosearch=on&search=Go
***extract***

--July 24, 2001: World Trade Center Ownership Changes Hands For the First Time 
Real estate development and investment firm Silverstein Properties and real estate investment trust Westfield America finalized a deal worth $3.2 billion to purchase a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center. The agreement covers the Twin Towers, World Trade Center Buildings 4 and 5 (two nine-story office buildings), and about 425,000 square feet of retail space

--Silverstein Properties already owned Building 7 of the WTC, which it built in 1987. This is the only time the WTC has ever changed hands since it was opened in 1973.

-- Larry Silverstein, the president of Silverstein Properties, only uses $14 million of his own money for the deal. His partners put up a further $111 million, and banks provide $563 million in loans.  The Port Authority had carried only $1.5 billion in insurance coverage on all its buildings, including the WTC, but Silverstein’s lenders insist on more, eventually demanding $3.55 billion in cover.

-- Larry Silverstein will claim the attacks on the World Trade Center constituted two separate events, thereby entitling him to a double payout totaling over $7 billion.  Eventually, after several years of legal wrangling, a total of $4.55 billion of insurance money was paid out for the destruction of the WTC.
(and this)
http://infowars.net/articles/may2007/150507Silverstein.htm
***extract***
His son, Roger, and his daughter, Lisa, were working for him in temporary offices on the 88th floor of the W.T.C. north tower. Regular meetings with tenants in the weeks immediately following their July 26, 2001, takeover of the building were held each morning at Windows on the World.

But  -- on Sept. 11, Roger and Lisa Silverstein were running late
***
Silverstein's determined quest to rake in every last penny possible from 9/11 and the fact that he has already secured billions from other insurers without a blink of an eye over the fact that he leased the property for 99 years just six weeks before the attacks and has since been caught in an admission that he ordered at least one of the buildings, WTC 7, "pulled" on 9/11.

(my comments) PERFECT TIMING NOT ONLY FOR HIS SON AND DAUGHTER, BUT ALSO FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY TO HAVE MADE SUCH A 'SWEET DEAL' JUST WEEKS BEFORE THE ATTACK -- A DEAL THAT WAS GOING TO LAST 'HIS FAMILY' FOR MANY YEARS AFTER HE'S DEAD AND GONE (99 YEARS) // QUITE A GOOD INVESTMENT FOR THEIR FUTURE FOR SURE.