Very interesting articles about how money is used to break countries' will to resist NWO, as well as disclosure about 9/11 being preplanned.
http://www.michaeljournal.org/home.htmOfficial site of the “Michael” Journal
A journal of Catholic patriots
For the Social Credit monetary reform
Through the education of the population
And not through politicial parties
Welcome to the new on-line version of the “Michael” Journal, which exists since 1953 in its printed version, to promote Catholic principles and the Social Credit monetary reform, conceived by the Scottish engineer Clifford Hugh Douglas. You will find in the following links a mine of information on all that is related to this journal:
(What Pope John Paul II said about the Internet)
About us
You will find on this page details about the origin of this Canadian journal, about Social Credit and the necessity of such a monetary reform (including the famous article “The Money Myth Exploded”), about its founders, Louis Even and Gilberte Côté-Mercier, about the Pilgrims of St. Michael or White Berets — devout Catholics loyal to all the teachings of Pope John Paul II.
Articles
You will find in this page the articles published in previous issues of “Michael” classified by topics, for example, the articles of Louis Even and others on Social Credit and its various aspects (dividend, debt, compensated discount, taxes), social justice, the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church on the family, education, morals, sacraments, as well as articles on spirituality and Marian apparitions, etc.
Archives
In this page you will find most of the articles published in every back issue of “Michael”, but this time classified by year and issue. (To see the current issue, click on What's new.) Make sure to visit this page again soon, for issues of past years will be added regularly.
What's new
You will find in this page the latest free offprints available (4 or 8 pages taken from the regular 16-page “Michael” Journal), as well as the full text of Louis Even's book In This Age of Plenty (over 50 chapters), a masterpiece on Social Credit, as well as two other booklets, What do we mean by real Social Credit — Above political parties, and A sound and efficient financial system.
Subscription
Here is certainly the most important link, since this website is only a “foretaste” of the journal, which contains more articles that are not put on this site, and which remains the best way to be kept updated about the latest developments of the “Michael” Movement. Moreover, since it is not everyone who has access to the internet, you are strongly invited to also subscribe your friends to “Michael”, which is published 5 times a year, and available also in French, Spanish, and Polish.
Contact us
You will find in this page the usual information to contact us — our postal address, phone and fax numbers, e-mail address, either for our head office in Rougemont, Canada, or in other countries. You are also invited to attend our monthly metings in Rougemont or in other areas.
Gallery
You will find in this page the most recent cartoons published in “Michael” (including the one shown on the left), which represent very well the swindle of the present banking system. It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words, so these cartoons speak for themselves. You can reproduce them to make our message known around you.
© 2004 The Pilgrims of St. Michael. Reproduction of the contents of this site is permitted, provided you mention credits: our website address (
www.michaeljournal.org), as well as our phone number and postal address to subscribe: “Michael” Journal, 1101 Principale St., Rougemont, QC, Canada J0L 1M0), or the address in the U.S. or another country, if it applies.
_______________________________________________
But caveat emptor, this site does abide by the Roman Catholic Church's dogma that there is only one true god, and the Roman Catholic Church is the only place to disseminate the truth about god:
http://www.michaeljournal.org/conway.htmSome excerpts:
The assertion that one religion is as good as another is irrational. It is a first principle of reason that two contradictory statements cannot both be true. If one is true, the other is undoubtedly false. Either there are many gods or one God: either Jesus Christ is God, or He is not; Mohammed is either a prophet or an impostor; divorce is either allowed or prohibited by Christ; the Eucharist is the living Jesus Christ, or it is mere bread.
To declare all religions equally true, or that their differences are immaterial, is to deny objective truth altogether with the pragmatist — a denial which is the curse of our age. On this theory, a man ought to change his religion as he changes the cut of his clothes, according to his environment. He ought to be a Catholic in Italy, a Lutheran in Sweden, a Mohammedan in Turkey, a Buddhist in China, a Shintoist in Japan.
_______________________
Also he discloses the false prophets:
Beware of false prophets
It is certainly strange that many believers in the Bible are indifferentists, in spite of its clear, explicit condemnation of this theory. Jesus Christ commanded His Apostles to teach a definite Gospel, and condemned those who knowingly rejected it. “Preach the Gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not, shall be condemned” (Mark 16:15,16). He prophesied that many would gainsay His teaching, but He denounced them in unmeasured terms. “Beware of false prophets who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves” (Matt. 7:15).
Revelation, if it has any meaning, is a divine message which no one can reject without sin. We must receive it, as the Apostle says, “not as the word of men, but as it is indeed the Word of God” (1 Thess. 2:13). God, a God of Truth, could not possibly have revealed a plurality of religions, or a multitude of varying Christianities. He founded one Church, one Kingdom of God, one Sheepfold, under the perpetual and infallible guidance of Himself and the Holy Spirit.
Blessed Virgin Mary, You who have assisted the Apostles in the foundation of the Church, implore the gifts of the Holy Spirit for our Holy Mother the Church that is presently crucified in public by slanderers.
The history of Christianity in every age shows how alien to Christ is the dogma of indifferentism, which was first popularized by the English Deists and the French Rationalists of the seventeenth century. In the first three centuries, the Christian martyrs died by the thousands, rather than save their lives by a profession of indifferentism. Frequently, they were asked by friends and kinsfolk to sacrifice to the gods of pagan Rome, or at least to allow their names to be written down as having sacrificed. “What difference does it make?” asked their pagan friends. They answered in the words of Christ: “Every one, therefore, that shall confess Me before men, I will confess him before My Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 10:32,33). They were not indifferentists.
In sixteenth-century England, many a Catholic was offered money, preferment and life, if he would but acknowledge the royal supremacy of the Tudors in things spiritual, against the constant voice of Christendom from the beginning. But men like Blessed Thomas More, Bishop Fisher and Edmund Campion gladly died for the certain teaching of Christ. They were not indifferentists.
As a matter of fact, we find that the man who says first, “It does not make any difference what a man BELIEVES” is led logically to say, “It does not make any difference what a man DOES.” His morality is built upon the shifting sands of opinion fancy, human respect, and, therefore, will not stand the stress of sorrow, disgrace, difficulty, nor temptation. If religion be a mere matter of opinion, all certainty in morals becomes impossible, and men lapse into the old-time vices of paganism.
Sometimes the good lives of unbelievers are mentioned as proof positive that belief is an unimportant factor in the regulation of conduct. A man will argue, “A never puts his foot inside a church, nor does he accept any creed whatever; yet he is a man, kindly, charitable, pure and honest. On the other hand, B is a Catholic, accepting without question every dogma and law of his Church, and I know him to be a drunkard, an adulterer, a hypocrite, the most uncharitable and contemptible of men.” But this statement proves nothing at all, because the comparison is made between the open, well-known vices of a sinful, hypocritical believer, and the obvious good deeds of an amiable unbeliever. The whole character of the two men is often not adequately known, and consequently is not weighed in a true balance.
But even if we grant that a particular unbeliever is a fairly good man, his goodness is certainly not due to his unbelief. He lives in a Christian environment, he comes of Christian stock; he may perhaps have received a Christian education as a child. His life is parasitic. As Balfour writes in his Foundations of Belief, page 82: “Biologists tell us of parasites which live, and can only live in the bodies of animals more highly organized than they... So it is with those persons who claim to show by their example that naturalism is practically consistent with the maintenance of ethical ideals, with which naturalism has no natural affinity. Their spiritual life is parasitic; it is sheltered by convictions which belong not to them, but to the society of which they form a part; it is nourished by processes in which they take no share. And when these convictions decay, and these processes come to an end, the alien life which they have maintained can scarce be expected to outlast them.”
If a man be utterly indifferent to the truth of God, if he look upon the Ten Commandments as temporary laws evolved out of the consciousness of a certain Semitic race, if he questions the fact of God's existence, makes little of the fact of immortality, denies the fact of sin, and the freedom of the will, what basis can he have for the moral law? As a lawyer, he will not hesitate to bribe both jury and judge, if he can do so without detection; as a doctor, he will not shrink from child murder or a criminal operation; as a politician, he will steal what he can from the State's treasury, and be loyal to his friends, no matter what their competence or their morals; as a preacher of the Gospel of Christ, he will deny its every doctrine, and be at the beck and call of the rich and powerful among his hearers — a mere “seller of rhetoric,” as St. Augustine called him long ago.
The true Christian may, under stress of temptation, fall into the worst vices of the pagan, and give the lie to his high profession. But no matter how low he may fall, he falls FROM A STANDARD, and you may appeal to him for amendment. He has once climbed up the mount of God, and he knows that with God's help he can again reach the summit. But if a man feels confident that every lapse is due merely to the evil of environment, a taint in the blood, or the impelling force of a stronger will, he will not answer your appeal to higher things. He calls evil good, and good evil.
_________________________________
In my opinion this author fails to realize that false prophets may exist at the highest levels of the vatican and that Jesus was the ultimate anarchist completely against a controlled structure upon man, religious or otherwise. 
