Allegedly Flight 175- Looks to be a remote-controlled military drone. As you can see, a 'rocket pod' is mounted to the underside of the fuselage.
Is it a military 767 refueling tanker? An E-8C?
Remote-controlled military drone closes in on the South Tower.
Missile is fired from the rocket pod. It enters the building.
The combination of a military drone laden with fuel+a missile creates a massive explosion.
Bunker buster exits the other side of the building
========Fake Evidence Alert! 'Windows' photo..The debris was planted!=========
This photo, according to opponents of the pod theory, proved that a plane with windows hit the Towers, contrary to an eyewitness account indicating the plane had no windows, and did not look like it was from the area. But note three things:
*This piece of debris is unpainted, while a United Airlines 767's fuselage is painted deep gray in the part where the windows are.
*It is right by a stairway, a very easy place to plant a piece of debris
*It is undamaged, despite being through an intense explosion
=======They were under remote control========
Consider these points:
*Flight 11 flew over Indian Point nuclear plant. If the planes were piloted by terrorists who wanted to inflict massive casualties, surely they would have targeted the nuclear power station
*Both Flights 11 and 175 hit the buildings on the upper levels. Far more people would have died if the lower levels were hit.
*Flights 11 and 175 were both unusually unoccupied on 9/11
*Dov Zakheim, who was the writer of the PNAC document that called for a 'new Pearl Harbor' was the comptroller for the Pentagon, was not able to account for the infamous missing trillions, and was a professional neocon. With these connections to 9/11, it seems suspicious that he worked for System Planning Corporation, which is involved in remote control technology, and helped 'aid' both the Columbine and Virginia Tech investigations.
