Well, to all this I would like to say I remain to have an open mind regarding any and all of it. That does not mean I am in agreement with the subject, just open to the possibility. To make that possibility a reality where I would be convinced of the same, it would take better reference than saying '
particularily the melted steel' because obviously the residue of the massive amounts of cutter charges would also be quite capable of manufacturing the same // after all there should be no question that the same is used commonly to 'cut' steel // that's not a giant hacksaw at work there, it's the chemical reaction and the forces involved -- the by product of all that cutting is melted steel // this can be seen in its trapped form as it solidified afterwards while running down the cut beams. A tiny example, perhaps. But a multitude (magitude) of such cutting processes might very well produce a multitude of more of the melted residue (steel), maybe even forming into pools of the stuff.
Maybe (??) EW was used here, but also maybe (??) a simple explanation is that explosive cutting charges were at work. In my mind one seems to out weight the other. You are at liberty to guess which that is -- what proof exist otherwise? What links, what references?
Saying '
towers were turned into fine dust' // no challenge from me there, but again explosives can account for this also. Multiple explosives, doing far more damage than a fire cracker or two placed here and there. High-tech explosives turn lots of things into dust, the more there is at work, the more likely it seems that dust would be of even finer substance --
Take a look at this example:
(suggest you might want to consider turning the VOLUMN DOWN on your speakers for this -- )http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hma_Bh45bD8-- Even the nuclear physist, Dr. Steven E. Jones, suggest the use of multiple devices in the collapse of the WTC. See this --
"Why Indeed Did The WTC Buildings Collapse"http://www.physics911.net/stevenjones***extract***
And I present evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.(and this)
However, thermite, RDX and other commonly-used explosives can readily slice through steel (thus cutting the support columns simultaneously in an explosive demolition) and reach the required temperatures. (It is possible that some other chemical reactions were involved which might proceed at lesser temperatures.) This mystery needs to be explored — but is not mentioned in the “official” 9-11 Commission or NIST reports.
***************
Do you see what I mean? Personally keeping an open mind to this -- there seems to be others (far more tuned in than I am) that are also keeping an open mind // but leanings towards explosives, mostly.
Now if you please, and can provide supportive evidence as you suggest -- please do. Until then I remain open to anything being a possibility since the only ones that truly know the details of what happened as regards any of this is the guilty ones involved. For all others -- The puzzle remains scattered for us to try and sort and piece together.
My continuing thoughts.
